Effect of Oxygen Extraction (Brush-Sign) on Baseline Core Infarct Depends on Collaterals (HIR)

SWI brush sign of cerebral parenchymal veins in central nervous system diseases

Brush sign (BS) was first reported as prominent hypointensity of deep medullary veins and subependymal veins on T2*-weighted images at 3 T MRI in patients with acute stroke in the territory of the middle cerebral artery. Subsequently, BS in central nervous system (CNS) diseases such as moyamoya disease, cerebral venous thrombosis, and Sturge-Weber syndrome was also described on susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI), and the clinical implications of BS were discussed. The purpose of this review is to demonstrate BS on SWI in various CNS diseases and its mechanisms in the above-mentioned diseases. We also explain the clinical implications of this finding in each disease.

A Novel Nomogram for Predicting Malignant Cerebral Edema After Endovascular Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Malignant cerebral edema (MCE) is a common and feared complication after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). This study aimed to establish a nomogram to predict MCE in anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke (LVOS) patients receiving EVT in order to guide the postoperative medical care in the acute phase.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, 381 patients with anterior circulation LVOS receiving EVT were screened from 636 hospitalized patients with LVOS at 2 stroke medical centers. Clinical baseline data and imaging data were collected within 2-5 days of admission to the hospital. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on whether MCE occurred after EVT. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the independent risk factors for MCE and to establish a nomogram.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients out of 381 (17.32%) developed MCE. The independent risk factors for MCE included admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≥16 (odds ratio [OR] 1.851; 95% CI 1.029-3.329; P = 0.038), ASPECT score (OR 0.621; 95% CI 0.519-0.744; P < 0.001), right hemisphere (OR 1.636; 95% CI 0.941-2.843; P = 0.079), collateral circulation (OR 0.155; 95% CI 0.074-0.324; P < 0.001), recanalization (OR 0.223; 95% CI 0.109-0.457; P < 0.001), hematocrit (OR, 0.937; 95% CI: 0.892-0.985; P =0.010), and glucose (OR 1.118; 95% CI 1.023-1.223; P = 0.036), which were adopted as parameters of the nomogram. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the area under the curve of the nomogram in predicting MCE was 0.901(95% CI 0.848-0.940; P < 0.001). The Hosmer-Lemeshow test results were not significant (P = 0.685), demonstrating a good calibration of the nomogram.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel nomogram composed of admission NIHSS, ASPECT scores, right hemisphere, collateral circulation, recanalization, hematocrit, and serum glucose provide a potential predictor for MCE in patients with AIS after EVT.

Collateral Blood Flow and Ischemic Core Growth

Treatment of a large vessel occlusion in the acute ischemic stroke setting focuses on vessel recanalization, and endovascular thrombectomy results in favorable outcomes in appropriate candidates. Expeditious treatment is imperative, but patients often present to institutions that do not have neurointerventional surgeons and need to be transferred to a comprehensive stroke center. These treatment delays are common, and it is important to identify factors that mitigate the progression of the ischemic core in order to maximize the preservation of salvageable brain tissue. Collateral blood flow is the strongest factor known to influence ischemic core growth, which includes the input arterial vessels, tissue-level vessels, and venous outflow. Collateral blood flow at these different levels may be imaged by specific imaging techniques that may also predict ischemic core growth during treatment delays and help identify patients who would benefit from transfer and endovascular therapy, as well as identify those patients in whom transfer may be futile. Here we review collateral blood flow and its relationship to ischemic core growth in stroke patients.

Brush sign and collateral supply as potential markers of large infarct growth after successful thrombectomy

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the relationships between brush sign and cerebral collateral status on infarct growth after successful thrombectomy.

METHODS

HIBISCUS-STROKE cohort includes acute ischemic stroke patients treated with thrombectomy after MRI triage and undergoing a day-6 MRI including FLAIR images to quantify final infarct volume (FIV). Successful reperfusion was defined as a modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score  ≥ 2B. Infarct growth was calculated by subtracting FIV from baseline ischemic core after co-registration and considered large (LIG) when  > 11.6 mL. Brush sign was assessed on T2*-weighted-imaging and collaterals were assessed using the hypoperfusion intensity ratio, which is the volume of Time-To-Tmax (Tmax)  ≥ 10 s divided by the volume of Tmax  ≥  6 s. Good collaterals were defined by a hypoperfusion intensity ratio  < 0.4.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-nine patients were included, of whom 45 (34.9%) had a brush sign and 63 (48.8%) good collaterals. Brush sign was associated with greater infarct growth (p = 0.01) and larger FIV (p = 0.02). Good collaterals were associated with a smaller baseline ischemic core (p < 0.001), larger penumbra (p = 0.04), and smaller FIV (p < 0.001). Collateral status was not significantly associated with brush sign (p = 0.20) or with infarct growth (p = 0.67). Twenty-eight (22.5%) patients experienced LIG. Univariate regressions indicated that brush sign (odds ratio (OR) = 4.8; 95% confidence interval (CI): [1.9;13.3]; p = 0.004) and hemorrhagic transformation (OR = 1.7; 95%CI: [1.2;2.6]; p = 0.04) were predictive of LIG. In multivariate regression, only the brush sign remained predictive of LIG (OR = 5.2; 95%CI: [1.8-16.6], p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Brush sign is a predictor of LIG after successful thrombectomy and cerebral collateral status is not.

KEY POINTS

• Few predictors of ischemic growth are known in ischemic stroke patients achieving successful mechanical thrombectomy. • Our results suggest that the brush sign-a surrogate marker of severe hypoperfusion-is independently associated with large ischemic growth (> 11.6 mL) after successful thrombectomy whereas cerebral collateral status does not.

Hypoperfusion Intensity Ratio Predicts Infarct Growth After Successful Thrombectomy for Distal Medium Vessel Occlusion

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This study evaluated whether quantitative measurement of collaterals by the hypoperfusion intensity ratio (HIR) on baseline computed tomography perfusion (CTP) correlated with infarct growth and clinical outcome after successful endovascular recanalization of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by primary distal medium vessel occlusions (DMVO).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive AIS patients who underwent an initial CTP and were successfully recanalized by thrombectomy (modified thrombolysis In cerebral infarction 2b or 3) for DMVO. We evaluated the association of baseline HIR with infarct growth and clinical outcome.

RESULTS

Between January 2018 and January 2021, 40 patients with an AIS caused by a DMVO were successfully recanalized by MT (65%, 26/40 female, median age 72 years, range 65-83 years). Baseline HIR was strongly correlated with infarct growth after successful recanalization (r = 0.501, p = 0.001). An HIR<0.3 was the optimal threshold for good collaterals using ROC analysis. Patients with HIR ≥ 0.3 had higher infarct growth compared to HIR < 0.3 (23.8 mL, IQR: 9.1-45.1 vs. 7.2 mL, interquartile range (IQR): 4.2-11.7, relative risk 7.9, p = 0.024 in multivariate analysis); their clinical outcome was poorer in univariate analysis (75%, 21/28 patients with a 3 months modified Rankin scale of 0-2 vs. 33%,4/12, p < 0.017, odds ratio (OR) 6.0, 1.37-26.20) but it did not remain significant in multivariate analysis (p = 0.107).

CONCLUSION

Good collaterals on initial CTP assessed by an HIR < 0.3 are associated with less infarct growth after successful recanalization of AIS caused by a DMVO.

Does the Brush-Sign Reflect Collateral Status and DWI-ASPECTS in Large Vessel Occlusion?

Introduction

The relevance of the brush-sign remained poorly documented in large vessel occlusion (LVO). We aimed to assess the relationship between the brush-sign and collateral status and its potential impact on baseline diffusion-weighted imaging–Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (DWI-ASPECTS) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients eligible to mechanical thrombectomy (MT).

Methods

Consecutive patients admitted in the Lyon Stroke Center with anterior circulation AIS due to intracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) and/or M1 or M2 segment of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion eligible for MT were included. The brush-sign was assessed on T2-gradient-echo MRI. Collateral status was assessed on digital subtraction angiography according to the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology/Society of Interventional Radiology (ASITN/SIR) score.

Results

In this study, 504 patients were included, among which 171 (33.9%) patients had a brush-sign. Patients with a brush-sign more frequently had a poor collateral status [72 (42.1%) vs. 103 (30.9%); p = 0.017]. In univariable analysis, a DWI-ASPECTS < 7 was associated with a brush sign. Following multivariable analysis, the brush-sign no longer affected DWI-ASPECTS < 7 while the latter remained associated with younger age [odds ratio (OR) 0.97, 95% CI.96–0.99], male sex (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.08–2.99), a higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.1–1.21), a poor collateral status (OR 9.35, 95% CI 5.59-16.02), MCA segment (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.25–5.38), and intracranial ICA (OR 3.01, 95% CI 1.16–8) occlusion.

Conclusions and Relevance

The brush-sign may be a marker of poor collateral status but did not independently predict a lower DWI-ASPECTS.

Clinical Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT04620642.

Susceptibility-diffusion mismatch correlated with leptomeningeal collateralization in large vessel occlusion stroke

Objective

To investigate the relationship between asymmetric prominent hypointense vessels (prominent vessel sign, PVS) on susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) and leptomeningeal collateralization in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion.

Methods

We retrospectively enrolled patients with M1 segment occlusion of the middle cerebral artery who underwent emergency magnetic resonance imaging and digital subtraction angiography within 24 hours from stroke onset. The extent of PVS on SWI was assessed using the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS). Leptomeningeal collateralization on digital subtraction angiography images was assessed using the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology/Society of Interventional Radiology (ASITN/SIR) scale. Spearman’s rank correlation test was performed to explore the correlation of ASITN/SIR scores with SWI-ASPECTS and SWI-diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) mismatch scores.

Results

Thirty-five patients were enrolled. There was no significant correlation between SWI-ASPECTS and ASITN/SIR scores. However, SWI-DWI mismatch scores were positively correlated with ASITN/SIR scores.

Conclusion

The range of PVS on SWI did not closely reflect the collateral status, while the range of SWI-DWI mismatch was significantly correlated with the leptomeningeal collateralization. In patients with acute anterior circulation stroke due to large vessel occlusion, larger SWI-DWI mismatch was associated with better leptomeningeal collaterals.