|
1
|
Lazzerini F, Bruschini L, Fiacchini G, Canzi P, Berrettini S, Forli F. The Role of Bone-Anchored Hearing Devices and Remote Microphones in Children with Congenital Unilateral Hearing Loss. Brain Sci 2023; 13:1379. [PMID: 37891748 PMCID: PMC10605185 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13101379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 09/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Congenital unilateral hearing loss (UHL) represents a contemporary audiologic challenge. Children with UHL can struggle with understanding speech in noise, localizing sounds, developing language, and maintaining academic performance, leading to low self-esteem, anxiety, and decreased social support. Two specific conditions related to UHL in children are single-sided deafness (SSD) and unilateral auris atresia (UAA). This was a retrospective observational study on a group of children with UHL. The Simplified Italian Matrix Sentence Test was used for the assessment of speech reception threshold (SRT) in different conditions: speech and noise from the front (S0N0), speech at 45° from the side of the better ear and noise at 45° from the opposite side (SbNw), and vice versa (SwNb). Each test was conducted unaided, with a bone-anchored hearing device (BAHD), and with a remote microphone (RM) system. The use of a BAHD and RM led to an improvement in SRT in S0N0 and SwNb conditions. The SSD subgroup demonstrated significant benefits with both devices in SwNb, and the UAA subgroup from the use of BAHD in S0N0. In conclusion, the study underscores the potential benefits of both devices in enhancing speech perception for UHL children, providing insights into effective intervention strategies for these challenging cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Lazzerini
- Otolaryngology, Audiology and Phoniatrics Unit, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (L.B.); (G.F.); (S.B.)
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Luca Bruschini
- Otolaryngology, Audiology and Phoniatrics Unit, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (L.B.); (G.F.); (S.B.)
- Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Giacomo Fiacchini
- Otolaryngology, Audiology and Phoniatrics Unit, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (L.B.); (G.F.); (S.B.)
- Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Pietro Canzi
- Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Paediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy;
| | - Stefano Berrettini
- Otolaryngology, Audiology and Phoniatrics Unit, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (L.B.); (G.F.); (S.B.)
- Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
- Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Francesca Forli
- Otolaryngology, Audiology and Phoniatrics Unit, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (L.B.); (G.F.); (S.B.)
- Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Early surgical and audiologic outcomes of active, transcutaneous, osseointegrated bone-conduction hearing device (Osia 2® system) placement. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2022; 156:111114. [PMID: 35314374 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2022.111114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Revised: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the outcomes of pediatric Osia 2® System placements. METHODS We performed a retrospective chart review of primary and revision Osia 2® System surgical cases at two tertiary academic children's hospitals. Operative details and post-operative surgical and audiologic outcomes were recorded. RESULTS 18 cases were performed on 14 children (mean age: 11.5 years, range 7-16) and included 9 primary surgeries and 9 revisions from BAHA Attract®, Connect® and Sophono® implants. Surgical planning for revision surgeries was complex due to prior incisions, implants, and bony contour. Post-operative aided audiograms revealed pure tone average (0.5-4 kHz) of 26.2 ± 2.5 dB HL (mean ± SD), with no high frequency roll-off (8 kHz aided threshold: 23.8 ± 7.5 dB HL). Two minor post-operative complications were identified. CONCLUSION Bone-conduction hearing devices (BCHDs) are used to improve access to sound for children with conductive hearing loss, single-sided deafness, and aural atresia. Traditional passive, percutaneous abutment-based and transcutaneous magnet-based surgical BCHDs can be limited by skin complications and high-frequency acoustic attenuation. Recent availability of active, transcutaneous osseointegrated BCHD systems presents potential for improvement on both of these traditional limitations. Initial experience with the Osia 2® System demonstrates overall successful, uncomplicated placement with excellent audiologic outcomes. Revision cases require careful surgical planning. Further follow-up and comparative studies with other BCHDs are necessary to fully evaluate the effectiveness of the Osia 2® System.
Collapse
|