Acute Stroke With Large Vessel Occlusion and Minor Clinical Deficits: Prognostic Factors and Therapeutic Implications

[Multicenter Study on the Frequency of Large Vessel Occlusion in Patients with Minor Stroke]

INTRODUCTION

The management of minor ischemic stroke presents significant challenges due to variability in the application of neuroimaging protocols and endovascular treatment (EVT). The lack of consensus on the need for computed tomography angiography (CTA) in these cases highlights the importance of investigating the prevalence and clinical implications of large vessel occlusion (LVO) in this population.

METHODOLOGY

Analysis of the multicenter CODICT registry in patients with minor ischemic stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≤5) treated at tertiary stroke alert (SA) centers in the Valencian Community between July 1, 2020 and November 30, 2023. The frequency of LVO, defined as occlusions in the internal carotid artery, vertebral artery, basilar artery, and critical segments of the middle (M1, M2), anterior (A1, A2), and posterior (P1, P2) cerebral arteries, was evaluated using CTA.

RESULTS

A total of 5473 SA activations were identified during the study period. A total of 833 patients suffered a minor ischemic stroke. LVO was observed in 17.5% (n = 146) of minor strokes on CTA. EVT was performed in 48.6% (n = 71) of patients with minor stroke and LVO. The most frequently occluded vessels were the middle cerebral artery (MCA) in its M1 and M2 segments, both in 35.6% (n = 52) of cases. However, the vessels most frequently treated with EVT were in the M1, in 29.5% (n = 43) of cases, followed by the M2, in 10.9% (n = 16) of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the importance of performing CTA in all patients who meet SA activation criteria, regardless of clinical severity. The presence of LVO changed the clinical management in almost half of the patients with minor stroke and LVO.

Predictive value of CT imaging features on the risk of hemorrhagic transformation after mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke with large vessel obstruction

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the predictive value of computer tomography (CT) imaging features for the risk of hemorrhagic transformation (HT) after mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke with large vessel obstruction (AIS-LVO).

METHODS

A total of 135 patients with AIS-LVO diagnosed and treated in our hospital from August 2021 to May 2023 were selected as the research subjects. Their clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. Mechanical thrombectomy was performed in all patients. The patients were divided into the HT group (n = 27) and the non-HT group (n = 108) according to whether HT occurred within 24 h after thrombectomy. CT examination was performed after mechanical thrombectomy in the two groups, and the changes in CT imaging indexes in the two groups were observed. Logistic regression was used to analyze the influencing factors and a prediction model was constructed based on the influencing factors. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was established to analyze the predictive value. Additionally, ROC curve was used to analyze the diagnostic value of serum CT imaging features.

RESULTS

Compared with the non-HT group, the proportion of atrial fibrillation history in the HT group was significantly increased, and the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score and galectin-3 (Gal-3) level were significantly increased before thrombectomy (P < 0.01). Compared with the non-HT group, the proportion of exudation of contrast medium and Hyperdense Middle Cerebral Artery Sign (HMCAS) in the HT group was significantly increased, time to peak (TTP) was significantly prolonged, and cerebral blood flow (CBF) was significantly decreased (P < 0.001). The history of atrial fibrillation, NIHSS score before thrombectomy, Gal-3, contrast agent exudation, HMCAS, TTP and CBF were the influencing factors of postoperative HT after mechanical thrombectomy in AIS-LVO (P < 0.05). Based on the results of multivariate logistic regression analysis, a prediction model was established as follows: Logit (P) = -3.520 + 1.529 × history of atrial fibrillation + 0.968 × NIHSS score before thrombectomy + 0.806 × Gal-3 + 1.134 × contrast agent exudation + 2.146 × HMCAS + 0.684 × TTP-0.725 × CBF. The area under the curve (AUC) of the logistic prediction model for predicting HT after AIS-LVOLVO mechanical thrombectomy was 0.873 (95% CI 0.817-0.929) with a sensitivity of 78.75% and a specificity of 83.33%, indicating that the prediction model had good prediction efficiency. The AUC of TTP and CBF alone in predicting HT after mechanical thrombectomy in AIS-LVO patients was 0.728 and 0.736, respectively. The AUC of combined detection was 0.783, and the combined detection had a high diagnostic value for HT after mechanical thrombectomy in AIS-LVO patients.

CONCLUSION

The combined detection of TTP and CBF of CT imaging features had certain diagnostic value for HT in AIS-LVO patients after mechanical thrombectomy. The logistic prediction model based on these influencing factors had a high diagnostic value for HT after mechanical thrombectomy.

Comparing the efficacy and safety of bridging therapy vs. monotherapy in patients with minor stroke: a meta-analysis

The two main therapeutic approaches for stroke treatment are endovascular thrombectomy, which involves mechanically removing the thrombus, and bridging therapy, which uses intravenous thrombolytics (IVT) prior to endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). This study aimed to compare monotherapy (EVT or IVT alone) with bridging therapy (IVT+EVT) in terms of efficacy and safety outcomes in patients with minor ischemic stroke. After a thorough screening, eight studies were included for qualitative synthesis and meta-analysis, comprising a total of 3,117 patients across the treatment arms. The main outcomes of interest were the efficacy of treatment modality, the rate of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), and mortality. In terms of functional outcomes measured by the Modified Rankin Score (mRs) 0-1, no significant difference was observed when comparing IVT monotherapy with bridging therapy (IVT+EVT), with an odds ratio of 0.79 (P = 0.41). However, IVT was associated with a decreased risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) compared to bridging therapy (OR = 0.51; P = 0.02), while EVT was associated with an increased risk of sICH compared to bridging therapy (OR = 8.33; P = 0.01). Mortality rates were comparable between IVT alone compared to bridging therapy and EVT alone compared to bridging therapy (P = 0.14). Although both treatment modalities share similar efficacy, there was a trend in favoring bridging therapy for mortality rates, but it was not statistically significant. Future randomized controlled trials and updated systematic reviews are needed within five to ten years to increase sample sizes and potentially identify statistically significant differences in mortality and other outcomes.

Is Thrombectomy Effective for Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke Patients with Mild Symptoms? Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis

BACKGROUND

Endovascular treatment (EVT) is an established method for managing large vessel occlusion (LVO), but its efficacy in patients with mild stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score < 6) remains debated. Given the clinical problem of early neurological deterioration in approximately 10% of mild stroke patients, understanding the role of EVT in managing these patients is crucial. Our objective was to perform a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis (TSA) focusing on mild stroke patients with LVO to determine whether EVT offers better outcomes than best medical therapy alone.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases up to 12 December 2023 identified 14 retrospective and prospective cohort studies, including a total of 4436 patients with NIHSS scores less than 6 and presenting with LVO. Studies were categorized into crossover and non-crossover groups to prevent overestimation of the treatment effect. In the crossover group, patients initially treated with BMT were moved to EVT upon clinical deterioration. In the non-crossover group, patients remained in their initially assigned treatment. Meta-analysis and data extraction followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The primary outcome was achieving an excellent functional outcome, defined as a modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 0-1 at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included good (mRS 0-2) and favorable (mRS 0-3) functional outcomes. Safety outcomes were symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) and mortality at 3 months.

RESULTS

In the crossover group, EVT did not significantly improve excellent functional outcomes, and TSA results were inconclusive. Conversely, in the non-crossover group, EVT significantly improved the excellent functional outcome rates at 3 months (65.0% vs. 53.7%; OR 1.62; 95% CI 1.13 to 2.32), supported by TSA. EVT increased the risk of sICH in both crossover and non-crossover groups, while mortality rates did not significantly differ between EVT and BMT groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our research indicates that thrombectomy may not significantly help mild stroke patients in recovering functional status and could increase the risk of sICH. The disparity in results between crossover and non-crossover studies highlights the critical need for the prompt identification of patients at risk of early neurological deterioration to minimize negative outcomes. Additional randomized controlled trials are essential to optimize the application of EVT in this patient population.

Effect of short- versus long-term serum glucose levels on early ischemic water homeostasis and functional outcome in patients with large vessel occlusion stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In ischemic stroke, the impact of short- versus long-term blood glucose level (BGL) on early lesion pathophysiology and functional outcome has not been assessed. The purpose of this study was to directly compare the effect of long-term blood glucose (glycated hemoglobin [HbA1c]) versus serum BGL on early edema formation and functional outcome.

METHODS

Anterior circulation ischemic stroke patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy after multimodal computed tomography (CT) on admission were analyzed. Endpoints were early ischemic cerebral edema, measured by quantitative net water uptake (NWU) on initial CT and functional independence at Day 90.

RESULTS

A total of 345 patients were included. Patients with functional independence had significantly lower baseline NWU (3.1% vs. 8.3%; p < 0.001) and lower BGL (113 vs. 123 mg/dL; p < 0.001) than those without functional independence, while HbA1c levels did not differ significantly (5.7% vs. 5.8%; p = 0.15). A significant association was found for NWU and BGL (ß = 0.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.006-0.03; p = 0.002), but not for HbA1c and NWU (ß = -0.16, 95% CI -0.53-0.21; p = 0.39). Mediation analysis showed that 67% of the effect of BGL on functional outcome was mediated by early edema formation.

CONCLUSION

Aggravated early edema and worse functional outcome was associated with elevated short-term serum BGL, but not with HbA1c levels. Hence, the link between short-term BGL and early edema development might be used as a target for adjuvant therapy in patients with ischemic stroke.

The Pitfalls of NIHSS: Time for a New Clinical Acute Stroke Severity Scoring System in the Emergency?

Stroke is the second leading cause of death and a major cause of disability worldwide. Stroke severity scales serve as reliable means to track a patient's neurological deficit, predict outcome, and guide treatment decisions in clinical practice. The National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) was introduced over 30 years ago, marking a significant milestone in the field of stroke. Over the years, there have been notable advancements in acute stroke care. Despite several modifications made to NIHSS, none has yet succeeded in effectively capturing all the complex effects of a stroke. This review focuses on the pitfalls of NIHSS and emphasizes the need for a quick and comprehensive clinical and upgraded version of the stroke severity rating scale.

Assessing the Efficacy of Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients with an NIHSS < 6 Presenting with Proximal Middle Cerebral Artery Vessel Occlusion as Compared to Best Medical Management

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Minor acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients-defined by an NIHSS score < 6-presenting with proximal middle cerebral artery large vessel occlusions (MCA-LVO) is a subgroup for which treatment is still debated. Although these patients present with minor symptoms initially, studies have shown that several patients afflicted with MCA-LVO in this subgroup experience cognitive and functional decline. Although mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is the standard of care for patients with an NIHSS score of 6 or higher, treatment in the minor stroke subgroup is still being explored. The purpose of this preliminary study is to report our center's experience in evaluating the potential benefit of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in minor stroke patients when compared to medical management (MM).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study with two comprehensive stroke centers within our hospital enterprise of consecutive patients presenting with minor AIS secondary to MCA-LVO (defined as M1 or proximal M2 segments of MCA). We subsequently evaluated patients who received MT versus those who received MM.

RESULTS

Between January 2017 and July 2021, we identified 46 AIS patients (11 treated with MT and 35 treated with MM) who presented with an NIHSS score < 6 secondary to MCA-LVO (47.8% 22/46 female, mean age 62.3 years, range 49-75 years). MT was associated with a significantly lower mRS at 90 days (median: 1.0 [IQR 0.0-2.0] versus 3.0 [IQR 1.0-4.0], p = <0.001), a favorable NIHSS shift (-4.0 [IQR -10.0--2.0] versus 0.0 [IQR -2.0-1.0], p = 0.002), favorable NIHSS shift dichotomization (5/11, 45.5% versus 3/35, 8.6%, p = 0.003) and favorable mRS dichotomization (7/11, 63.6% versus 14/35, 40.0%, p = 0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

In our center's preliminary experience, for AIS patients presenting with an NIHSS score < 6 secondary to MCA-LVO, MT may be associated with improved clinical outcomes when compared to MM only.

Minor stroke in large vessel occlusion: A matched analysis of patients from the German Stroke Registry-Endovascular Treatment (GSR-ET) and patients from the Safe Implementation of Treatments in Stroke-International Stroke Thrombolysis Register (SITS-ISTR)

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Reperfusion treatment in patients presenting with large vessel occlusion (LVO) and minor neurological deficits is still a matter of debate. We aimed to compare minor stroke patients treated with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) and intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) or IVT alone.

METHODS

Patients enrolled in the German Stroke Registry-Endovascular Treatment (GSR-ET) and the Safe Implementation of Treatments in Stroke-International Stroke Thrombolysis Registry (SITS-ISTR) between June 2015 and December 2019 were analyzed. Minor stroke was defined as National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≤5, and LVO as occlusion of the internal carotid, carotid-T, middle cerebral, basilar, vertebral or posterior cerebral arteries. GSR-ET and SITS-ISTR IVT-treated patients were matched in a 1:1 ratio using propensity-score (PS) matching. The primary outcome was good functional outcome at 3 months (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2).

RESULTS

A total of 272 GSR-ET patients treated with EVT and IVT (age 68.6 ± 14.0 years, 43.4% female, NIHSS score 4 [interquartile range 2-5]) were compared to 272 IVT-treated SITS-ISTR patients (age 69.4 ± 13.7, 43.4% female, NIHSS score 4 [2-5]). Good functional outcome was seen in 77.0% versus 82.9% (p = 0.119), mortality in 5.9% versus 7.9% (p = 0.413), and intracranial hemorrhage in 8.8% versus 12.5% (p = 0.308) of patients in the GSR-ET versus the SITS-ISTR IVT group, respectively. In a second PS-matched analysis, 624 GSR-ET patients (IVT rate 56.7%) and 624 SITS-ISTR patients (IVT rate 100%), good outcome was more often observed in the SITS-ISTR patients (68.2% vs. 80.9%; p < 0.001), and IVT independently predicted good outcome (odds ratio 2.16, 95% confidence interval 1.43-3.28).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests similar effectiveness of IVT alone compared to EVT with or without IVT in minor stroke patients. There is an urgent need for randomized controlled trials on this topic.