A multicenter retrospective controlled study of the Pipeline™ and Tubridge™ Flow Diverter devices for intracranial wide-necked aneurysms

Comparison of pipeline embolization device and tubridge flow diverter for posterior circulation aneurysms: A multicentre propensity score matched study

Rationale and objectives

The off-label use of flow diverters (FDs) has broadened to include treating aneurysms in posterior circulation (PC). A novel flow diverter, the Tubridge flow diverter (TFD), has been created in China specifically for treating PC aneurysms. However, studies comparing between pipeline embolization device (PED) and TFD are rare. Thus, our study aimed to explore the effectiveness of PED and TFD in the treatment of PC aneurysms using a propensity score matched cohort design.

Methods

Retrospective data collection was conducted on patients who underwent treatment with either PED or TFD over the period from 2015 through 2020. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to calibrate for patient age; history of ischemic stroke; aneurysm size; morphology; location and neck; number of FDs; parent vessel diameter; and the employment of assisted coiling and balloon techniques. Data on previously ruptured aneurysms was not included in the analysis. A comparison was conducted between the two devices to assess perioperative complications, aneurysm occlusion rates, and functional outcomes.

Results

A total of 252 PC aneurysms were treated in 248 patients. Clinical and imaging follow-ups were lost in 26 and 47 patients, respectively. Major perioperative complications occurred in 7.5% of the cases, with favorable clinical outcomes in 91.0% and complete occlusion in 79.1%. Eighty-two (32.5%) aneurysms were treated with TFD, while 170 (67.5%) aneurysms were treated with PED. PSM was used to account for these significant variations, producing 82 matched pairs of unruptured aneurysms treated with PED or TFD. In terms of functional and angiographic outcomes, no significant differences were found between PED and TFD (functional outcome, p = 0.594 and angiographic outcome, p = 0.415). However, more perioperative major complications were found in patients treated with TFD (p = 0.005) compared with those receiving PED.

Conclusion

The comparative study of PED and TFD in the treatment of PC aneurysms resulted in positive clinical results and sustained occlusion rates, with acceptable perioperative complications. However, higher quality studies are needed to enhance our understanding of the use of FDs for treating of PC aneurysms.

Endovascular treatment of multiple intracranial aneurysms

Multiple intracranial aneurysms are difficult to treat. In order to investigate the effect and safety of endovascular treatment for multiple intracranial aneurysms, 54 consecutive patients with 116 multiple intracranial aneurysms treated with endovascular embolization were retrospectively enrolled. Angiography was performed immediately after embolization and at each follow-up. All clinical data were analyzed. Of the 116 aneurysms, 56 (48.3%) were embolized with coiling alone, 19 (16.4%) with stent-assisted coiling, 31 (26.7%) with stenting alone, and 10 (8.6%) with flow diverters plus coiling. After embolization, 31 (27.6%) aneurysms with stenting alone had no apparent change in size, and in the remaining 84 aneurysms, complete occlusion was achieved in 50 aneurysms (59.5%), near-complete occlusion in 26 (31.0%), and incomplete occlusion in 8 (9.5%). Thrombus formation at the aneurysm neck occurred in 3 patients (5.6%), coil protrusion in 2 (3.7%), and intraprocedural rupture in 1 (1.9%), resulting in a total complication rate of 11.1%. Follow-up angiography was performed in 44 (81.5%) patients 6 to 90 months (mean 49) later. Among 50 completely occluded aneurysms, 38 (76%) aneurysms remained completely occluded, and 4 (8%) aneurysms recurred. Among 26 aneurysms with initial near-complete occlusion, 12 (46.2%) aneurysms with neck remnant had progressive thrombosis to complete occlusion, 2 (7.7%) had no change compared with immediate occlusion, and 5 (19.2%) regrew. In conclusion, endovascular embolization with intracranial stenting and coiling is safe and effective and may play an increasingly important role in the management of multiple intracranial aneurysms.

Pipeline versus Tubridge in the treatment of unruptured posterior circulation aneurysms

BACKGROUND

To compare the safety and efficacy of pipeline embolization device (PED) and Tubridge flow diverter (TFD) for unruptured posterior circulation aneurysms.

METHODS

Posterior aneurysm patients treated with PED or TFD between January, 2019, and December, 2021, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients' demographics, aneurysm characteristics, treatment details, complications, and follow-up information were collected. The procedural-related complications and angiographic and clinical outcome were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 107 patients were involved; PED was applied for 55 patients and TFD for 52 patients. A total of 9 (8.4%) procedural-related complications occurred, including 4 (7.3%) in PED group and 5 (9.6%) in TFD group. During a mean of 10.3-month angiographic follow-up for 81 patients, complete occlusion was achieved in 35 (85.4%) patients in PED group and 30 (75.0%) in TFD group. The occlusion rate of PED group is slightly higher than that of TFD group. A mean of 25.0-month clinical follow-up for 107 patients showed that favorable clinical outcome was achieved in 53 (96.4%) patients in PED group and 50 (96.2%) patients in TFD group, respectively. No statistical difference was found in terms of procedural-related complications (p = 0.737), occlusion rate (p = 0.241), and favorable clinical outcome (0.954) between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study found no difference in complication, occlusion, and clinical outcome between PED and TFD for unruptured PCAs.

Flow diversion for posterior circulation aneurysms: a multicenter retrospective study

Background

The prevalence of intracranial aneurysms is approximately 3% worldwide. Posterior circulation (PC) aneurysms have a higher risk of treatment complications than anterior circulation aneurysms. Improving the survival rate and quality of life of patients with PC aneurysms remains one of the most important issues in the field.

Objectives

Flow diverter (FD) treatment of PC aneurysms remains controversial. We aimed to investigate the effects of FD treatment and analyze differences among different application methods or aneurysm types in PC aneurysms.

Design

This is a multicenter retrospective study.

Methods

Patients with PC aneurysms treated with the pipeline embolization device (PED) or Tubridge embolization device (TED) between 2015 and 2020 in five neurovascular centers were retrospectively enrolled. The primary outcomes were major perioperative complication, clinical outcome, and aneurysm occlusion rates. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to determine the risk factors of each outcome.

Results

In total, 252 aneurysms were included. Major perioperative complication, favorable clinical outcome, and complete occlusion rates were 7.5%, 91.0%, and 79.1%, respectively. Compared with other types of aneurysms, dissecting aneurysms had the best clinical outcome and highest occlusion rate. Both clinical and angiographic outcomes were independently associated with the aneurysm location at the basilar artery. Aneurysm size was not associated with any outcome. TED had similar clinical and angiographic outcomes compared with PED but more perioperative major complications. Tandem treatment and coiling assistance may have poorer clinical outcomes but similar occlusion rates. Single- and multiple-stent treatments had similar outcomes.

Conclusion

FD treatment of PC aneurysms achieved favorable clinical outcomes and long-term aneurysm occlusion rates with acceptable perioperative complication rates, especially in dissecting and non-basilar artery aneurysms. There was no additional improvement in outcomes with coiling assistance, multi-stent application, or tandem treatment. Therefore, the use of PC aneurysms should be carefully considered.