Early diagnosis of intracranial atherosclerotic large vascular occlusion: A prediction model based on DIRECT-MT data

Multiphase CTA Collateral Score to Identify Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis-Related Large Vessel Occlusion

OBJECTIVE

Identification of acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO) etiology is crucial for effective revascularization therapy. As collaterals are pivotal in maintaining cerebral perfusion in intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS), we investigated whether multiphase CT angiography (mCTA) collateral score can be a diagnosis marker of ICAS-related LVO.

METHODS

We reviewed clinical and imaging data from 92 patients who presented with AIS-LVO and underwent mCTA (57 ICAS-related LVO and 35 embolic LVO). Logistic regression was used to identify ICAS-related LVO. The diagnostic accuracy of the mCTA collateral score for identifying ICAS-related LVO was determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS

Compared with patients with embolic LVO, those with ICAS-related LVO had a high median mCTA collateral score (4 vs. 3; P<0.0001). The multinomial logistic regression analysis revealed a significant increase in the mCTA collateral score (OR: 3.717, 95% CI: 2.009-6.876, P<0.0001) in patients with ICAS-related LVO. ROC analysis revealed that the optimal cutoff point of the mCTA collateral score to diagnosis the ICAS-related LVO was 3.5, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.817 (95% CI: 0.736-0.899; P<0.0001), sensitivity was 80.7%, and specificity was 74.3%. Further analysis revealed that patients with a 4 to 5 mCTA collateral score exhibited a significantly higher median modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at discharge compared with those with a 0 to 3 score (P=0.0464).

CONCLUSIONS

The mCTA collateral score may be associated with ICAS-related LVO and could be beneficial in identifying the etiology of AIS-LVO.

Impact of atherosclerotic etiology on technical and clinical outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy with a stent retriever: subanalysis of the Japan Trevo Registry

BACKGROUND

The safety and effectiveness of stent retriever use for patients with acute large vessel occlusion (LVO) due to intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) is not well established. We investigated the differences in clinical outcomes in patients with and without ICAD.

METHODS

We analyzed the Japan Trevo Registry, a nationwide registry which enrolled patients with acute LVO who underwent endovascular therapy (EVT) using the Trevo retriever alone or in combination with an aspiration catheter. We compared the technical and clinical outcomes of EVT between the ICAD and No-ICAD groups. The primary outcome was effective reperfusion and the secondary outcome was modified Rankin scale (mRS) score 0-2 at 90 days. Safety outcomes were worsening of neurologic symptoms within 24 hours, any intracranial hemorrhage within 24 hours, vessel dissection/vessel perforation related to using the Trevo retriever and mortality at 90 days.

RESULTS

A total of 835 patients (45 in the ICAD group and 790 in the No-ICAD group) were analyzed. In the ICAD group, more men (68.9% vs 50.8%, P=0.02) and a lower median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at admission (11 vs 18, P<0.0001) were observed. The primary outcome was significantly more common in the No-ICAD group (92.5%) than in the ICAD group (80.0%) (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.21, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.50). The proportion of patients with mRS score 0-2 at 90 days was significantly lower in the ICAD group (44.4% vs 42.4%, aOR 0.49, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.00, P=0.0496). Other secondary and safety outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with LVO with ICAD had a lower rate of effective reperfusion than those with No-ICAD.

Endovascular therapy for acute intracranial large vessel occlusion due to atherothrombosis: Multicenter historical registry

BACKGROUND

Atherothrombotic stroke-related large vessel occlusion (AT-LVO) is caused by two etiologies, the intracranial artery occlusion due to in situ occlusion (intracranial group) or due to embolism from cervical carotid occlusion or stenosis (tandem group). The prognosis and reocclusion rate of each etiology after endovascular therapy (EVT) is unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a historical multicenter registry study at 51 Japanese centers to compare the prognoses of AT-LVO between two etiologies. The primary outcome was the incidence of recurrent ischemic stroke or reocclusion of the treated vessels within 90 days after EVT. Each of the primary outcome means the incidence of recurrent ischemic stroke and reocclusion of the treated vessels within 90 days after EVT.

RESULTS

We analyzed 582 patients (338 in the intracranial group and 244 in the tandem group). Patients in the intracranial group were younger (mean 71.9 vs 74.5, p=0.003), more of them were female and fewer of them were current smokers than those in the tandem group. In the tandem group, the patients' National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score on admission was higher (13 vs 15, p=0.006), onset to puncture time was shorter (299 [145-631] vs 232 [144-459] minutes, p=0.03) and Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) was lower (8 [7-9] vs 8 [6-9], p=0.0002). The primary outcome was higher in the intracranial group (22.5% vs 8.2%, p<0.0001). However, any ICH and death were not significantly different in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of recurrent ischemic stroke or reocclusion after EVT for AT-LVO was higher in the intracranial group.

Balloon angioplasty as first-choice recanalization strategy for intracranial atherosclerosis-related emergent large vessel occlusion with small clot burden

PURPOSE

The optimal primary recanalization strategy for intracranial atherosclerosis-related emergent large vessel occlusion (ICAS-ELVO) remains controversial. We aimed to explore the safety and efficacy of balloon angioplasty as the first-choice recanalization strategy for ICAS-ELVO with small clot burden.

METHODS

Consecutive ICAS-ELVO patients presenting with microcatheter "first-pass effect" during endovascular treatment (EVT) were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into preferred balloon angioplasty (PBA) and preferred mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) groups based on the first-choice recanalization strategy. The reperfusion and clinical outcomes between the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients with ICAS-ELVO involving the microcatheter "first-pass effect" during EVT were enrolled. Compared with patients in the PMT group, those in the PBA group were associated with (i) a higher rate of first-pass recanalization (54.0% vs. 28.9%, p = .010) and complete reperfusion (expanded thrombolysis in cerebral ischemia ≥ 2c; 76.0% vs. 53.8%, p = .049), (ii) shorter puncture-to-recanalization time (49.5 min vs. 89.0 min, p < .001), (iii) lower operation costs (¥48,499.5 vs. ¥ 99,086.0, p < .001), and (iv) better 90-day functional outcomes (modified Rankin scale:0-1; 44.0% vs. 19.2%, p = .032). Logistic regression analysis revealed that balloon angioplasty as the first-choice recanalization strategy was an independent predictor of 90-day excellent functional outcomes for ICAS-ELVO patients with microcatheter "first-pass effect" (adjusted odds ratio = 6.01, 95% confidence interval: 1.15-31.51, p = .034).

CONCLUSION

Direct balloon angioplasty potentially improves 90-day functional outcomes for ICAS-ELVO patients with small clot burden, and may be a more appropriate first-choice recanalization strategy than mechanical thrombectomy for these patients.

Emergent Large Vessel Occlusion due to Intracranial Stenosis: Identification, Management, Challenges, and Future Directions

This comprehensive literature review focuses on acute stroke related to intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS), with an emphasis on ICAS-large vessel occlusion. ICAS is the leading cause of stroke globally, with high recurrence risk, especially in Asian, Black, and Hispanic populations. Various risk factors, including hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, smoking, and advanced age lead to ICAS, which in turn results in stroke through different mechanisms. Recurrent stroke risk in patients with ICAS with hemodynamic failure is particularly high, even with aggressive medical management. Developments in advanced imaging have improved our understanding of ICAS and ability to identify high-risk patients who could benefit from intervention. Herein, we focus on current management strategies for ICAS-large vessel occlusion discussed, including the use of perfusion imaging, endovascular therapy, and stenting. In addition, we focus on strategies that aim at identifying subjects at higher risk for early recurrent risk who could benefit from early endovascular intervention The review underscores the need for further research to optimize ICAS-large vessel occlusion treatment strategies, a traditionally understudied topic.

Endovascular Treatment for Acute Large Vessel Occlusion Due to Underlying Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease

Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) is one of the most common causes of acute ischemic stroke worldwide. Patients with acute large vessel occlusion due to underlying ICAD (ICAD-LVO) often do not achieve successful recanalization when undergoing mechanical thrombectomy (MT) alone, requiring rescue treatment, including intra-arterial thrombolysis, balloon angioplasty, and stenting. Therefore, early detection of ICAD-LVO before the procedure is important to enable physicians to select the optimal treatment strategy for ICAD-LVO to improve clinical outcomes. Early diagnosis of ICAD-LVO is challenging in the absence of consensus diagnostic criteria on noninvasive imaging and early digital subtraction angiography. In this review, we summarize the clinical and diagnostic criteria, prediction of ICAD-LVO prior to the procedure, and EVT strategy of ICAD-LVO and provide recommendations according to the current literature.