1
|
Bartkoski M, Tumberger J, Martin L, Choi IY, Lee P, Strawn JR, Brooks WM, Stancil SL. Neuroimaging as a Tool for Advancing Pediatric Psychopharmacology. Paediatr Drugs 2025; 27:307-330. [PMID: 39899194 PMCID: PMC12031650 DOI: 10.1007/s40272-025-00683-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/14/2025] [Indexed: 02/04/2025]
Abstract
Neuroimaging, specifically magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), and positron emission tomography (PET), plays an important role in improving the therapeutic landscape of pediatric neuropsychopharmacology by detecting target engagement, pathway modulation, and disease-related changes in the brain. This review provides a comprehensive update on the application of neuroimaging to detect neural effects of psychotropic medication in pediatrics. Additionally, we discuss opportunities and challenges for expanding the use of neuroimaging to advance pediatric neuropsychopharmacology. PubMed and Embase were searched for studies published between 2012 and 2024 reporting neural effects of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medications (e.g., methylphenidate, amphetamine, atomoxetine, guanfacine), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (e.g., fluoxetine, escitalopram, sertraline), serotonin/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (e.g., duloxetine, venlafaxine), second-generation antipsychotics (e.g., aripiprazole, olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, ziprasidone), and others (e.g., lithium, carbamazepine, lamotrigine, ketamine, naltrexone) used to treat pediatric psychiatric conditions. Of the studies identified (N = 57 in 3314 pediatric participants), most (86%, total participants n = 3045) used MRI to detect functional pathway modulation or anatomical changes. Fewer studies (14%, total participants n = 269) used MRS to understand neurochemical modulation. No studies used PET. Studies that included healthy controls detected normalization of disease-altered pathways following treatment. Studies that focused on affected youth detected neuromodulation following single-dose and ongoing treatment. Neuroimaging is positioned to serve as a biomarker capable of demonstrating acute brain modulation, predicting clinical response, and monitoring disease, yet biomarker validation requires further work. Neuroimaging is also well suited to fill the notable knowledge gap of long-term neuromodulatory effects of psychotropic medications in the context of ongoing brain development in children and adolescents. Future studies can leverage advancements in neuroimaging technology, acquisition, and analysis to fill these gaps and accelerate the discovery of novel therapeutics, leading to more effective prescribing and ensuring faster recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Bartkoski
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Toxicology and Therapeutic Innovation, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA
- Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - John Tumberger
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Toxicology and Therapeutic Innovation, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA
- Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Laura Martin
- Department of Population Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
- Hoglund Biomedical Imaging Center, University of Kansas, Kansas City, KS, USA
- Department of Neurology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - In-Young Choi
- Hoglund Biomedical Imaging Center, University of Kansas, Kansas City, KS, USA
- Department of Neurology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
- Department of Radiology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Phil Lee
- Hoglund Biomedical Imaging Center, University of Kansas, Kansas City, KS, USA
- Department of Neurology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
- Department of Radiology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Jeffrey R Strawn
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - William M Brooks
- Hoglund Biomedical Imaging Center, University of Kansas, Kansas City, KS, USA
- Department of Neurology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Stephani L Stancil
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Toxicology and Therapeutic Innovation, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA.
- Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA.
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine and University of Kansas School of Medicine, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kara F, Kantarci K. Understanding Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Neurochemical Changes Using Alzheimer's Disease Biofluid, PET, Postmortem Pathology Biomarkers, and APOE Genotype. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:10064. [PMID: 39337551 PMCID: PMC11432594 DOI: 10.3390/ijms251810064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2024] [Revised: 09/15/2024] [Accepted: 09/17/2024] [Indexed: 09/30/2024] Open
Abstract
In vivo proton (1H) magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is a powerful non-invasive method that can measure Alzheimer's disease (AD)-related neuropathological alterations at the molecular level. AD biomarkers include amyloid-beta (Aβ) plaques and hyperphosphorylated tau neurofibrillary tangles. These biomarkers can be detected via postmortem analysis but also in living individuals through positron emission tomography (PET) or biofluid biomarkers of Aβ and tau. This review offers an overview of biochemical abnormalities detected by 1H MRS within the biologically defined AD spectrum. It includes a summary of earlier studies that explored the association of 1H MRS metabolites with biofluid, PET, and postmortem AD biomarkers and examined how apolipoprotein e4 allele carrier status influences brain biochemistry. Studying these associations is crucial for understanding how AD pathology affects brain homeostasis throughout the AD continuum and may eventually facilitate the development of potential novel therapeutic approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Firat Kara
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Kejal Kantarci
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rahmani F, Batson RD, Zimmerman A, Reddigari S, Bigler ED, Lanning SC, Ilasa E, Grafman JH, Lu H, Lin AP, Raji CA. Rate of abnormalities in quantitative MR neuroimaging of persons with chronic traumatic brain injury. BMC Neurol 2024; 24:235. [PMID: 38969967 PMCID: PMC11225195 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-024-03745-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 06/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) can result in lasting brain damage that is often too subtle to detect by qualitative visual inspection on conventional MR imaging. Although a number of FDA-cleared MR neuroimaging tools have demonstrated changes associated with mTBI, they are still under-utilized in clinical practice. METHODS We investigated a group of 65 individuals with predominantly mTBI (60 mTBI, 48 due to motor-vehicle collision, mean age 47 ± 13 years, 27 men and 38 women) with MR neuroimaging performed in a median of 37 months post-injury. We evaluated abnormalities in brain volumetry including analysis of left-right asymmetry by quantitative volumetric analysis, cerebral perfusion by pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (PCASL), white matter microstructure by diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and neurometabolites via magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). RESULTS All participants demonstrated atrophy in at least one lobar structure or increased lateral ventricular volume. The globus pallidi and cerebellar grey matter were most likely to demonstrate atrophy and asymmetry. Perfusion imaging revealed significant reductions of cerebral blood flow in both occipital and right frontoparietal regions. Diffusion abnormalities were relatively less common though a subset analysis of participants with higher resolution DTI demonstrated additional abnormalities. All participants showed abnormal levels on at least one brain metabolite, most commonly in choline and N-acetylaspartate. CONCLUSION We demonstrate the presence of coup-contrecoup perfusion injury patterns, widespread atrophy, regional brain volume asymmetry, and metabolic aberrations as sensitive markers of chronic mTBI sequelae. Our findings expand the historic focus on quantitative imaging of mTBI with DTI by highlighting the complementary importance of volumetry, arterial spin labeling perfusion and magnetic resonance spectroscopy neurometabolite analyses in the evaluation of chronic mTBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farzaneh Rahmani
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | - Richard D Batson
- Endocrine & Brain Injury Research Alliance, Neurevolution Medicine, PLLC, NUNM Helfgott Research Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | | | | | - Erin D Bigler
- Department of Neurology, Department of Psychiatry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | | | - Jordan H Grafman
- Departments of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Neurology, Cognitive Neurology and Alzheimer's Center, Department of Psychiatry, Feinberg School of Medicine, Department of Psychology, Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Hanzhang Lu
- Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Alexander P Lin
- Center for Clinical Spectroscopy, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Cyrus A Raji
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Berto RP, Bugler H, Dias G, Oliveira M, Ueda L, Dertkigil S, Costa PDP, Rittner L, Merkofer JP, van de Sande DMJ, Amirrajab S, Drenthen GS, Veta M, Jansen JFA, Breeuwer M, van Sloun RJG, Qayyum A, Rodero C, Niederer S, Souza R, Harris AD. Results of the 2023 ISBI challenge to reduce GABA-edited MRS acquisition time. MAGMA (NEW YORK, N.Y.) 2024; 37:449-463. [PMID: 38613715 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-024-01156-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2023] [Revised: 02/16/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/15/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Use a conference challenge format to compare machine learning-based gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-edited magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) reconstruction models using one-quarter of the transients typically acquired during a complete scan. METHODS There were three tracks: Track 1: simulated data, Track 2: identical acquisition parameters with in vivo data, and Track 3: different acquisition parameters with in vivo data. The mean squared error, signal-to-noise ratio, linewidth, and a proposed shape score metric were used to quantify model performance. Challenge organizers provided open access to a baseline model, simulated noise-free data, guides for adding synthetic noise, and in vivo data. RESULTS Three submissions were compared. A covariance matrix convolutional neural network model was most successful for Track 1. A vision transformer model operating on a spectrogram data representation was most successful for Tracks 2 and 3. Deep learning (DL) reconstructions with 80 transients achieved equivalent or better SNR, linewidth and fit error compared to conventional 320 transient reconstructions. However, some DL models optimized linewidth and SNR without actually improving overall spectral quality, indicating a need for more robust metrics. CONCLUSION DL-based reconstruction pipelines have the promise to reduce the number of transients required for GABA-edited MRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodrigo Pommot Berto
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
- Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Hanna Bugler
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
- Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
| | - Gabriel Dias
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
| | - Mateus Oliveira
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
| | - Lucas Ueda
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
- Research and Development Center in Telecommunications, CPQD, Campinas, Brazil
| | - Sergio Dertkigil
- School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
| | - Paula D P Costa
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
- Artificial Intelligence Lab., Recod.Ai, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
| | - Leticia Rittner
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
| | - Julian P Merkofer
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Dennis M J van de Sande
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Sina Amirrajab
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Gerhard S Drenthen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Mitko Veta
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Jacobus F A Jansen
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
- School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Marcel Breeuwer
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands
- MR R&D-Clinical Science, Philips Healthcare, Best, Netherlands
| | - Ruud J G van Sloun
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Abdul Qayyum
- National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Cristobal Rodero
- National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Steven Niederer
- National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
- The Alan Turing Institute, London, UK
| | - Roberto Souza
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
- Department of Electrical and Software Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Ashley D Harris
- Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lu B, Chen X, Xavier Castellanos F, Thompson PM, Zuo XN, Zang YF, Yan CG. The power of many brains: Catalyzing neuropsychiatric discovery through open neuroimaging data and large-scale collaboration. Sci Bull (Beijing) 2024; 69:1536-1555. [PMID: 38519398 DOI: 10.1016/j.scib.2024.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Revised: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
Recent advances in open neuroimaging data are enhancing our comprehension of neuropsychiatric disorders. By pooling images from various cohorts, statistical power has increased, enabling the detection of subtle abnormalities and robust associations, and fostering new research methods. Global collaborations in imaging have furthered our knowledge of the neurobiological foundations of brain disorders and aided in imaging-based prediction for more targeted treatment. Large-scale magnetic resonance imaging initiatives are driving innovation in analytics and supporting generalizable psychiatric studies. We also emphasize the significant role of big data in understanding neural mechanisms and in the early identification and precise treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders. However, challenges such as data harmonization across different sites, privacy protection, and effective data sharing must be addressed. With proper governance and open science practices, we conclude with a projection of how large-scale imaging resources and collaborations could revolutionize diagnosis, treatment selection, and outcome prediction, contributing to optimal brain health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bin Lu
- CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Beijing 100101, China; Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
| | - Xiao Chen
- CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Beijing 100101, China; Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
| | - Francisco Xavier Castellanos
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York 10016, USA; Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg 10962, USA
| | - Paul M Thompson
- Imaging Genetics Center, Mark & Mary Stevens Institute for Neuroimaging & Informatics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles 90033, USA
| | - Xi-Nian Zuo
- Developmental Population Neuroscience Research Center, IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China; National Basic Science Data Center, Beijing 100190, China
| | - Yu-Feng Zang
- Centre for Cognition and Brain Disorders, The Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 310004, China; Institute of Psychological Science, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 310030, China; Zhejiang Key Laboratory for Research in Assessment of Cognitive Impairment, Hangzhou 311121, China
| | - Chao-Gan Yan
- CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Beijing 100101, China; Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; International Big-Data Center for Depression Research, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; Magnetic Resonance Imaging Research Center, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Martinez Luque E, Liu Z, Sung D, Goldberg RM, Agarwal R, Bhattacharya A, Ahmed NS, Allen JW, Fleischer CC. An Update on MR Spectroscopy in Cancer Management: Advances in Instrumentation, Acquisition, and Analysis. Radiol Imaging Cancer 2024; 6:e230101. [PMID: 38578207 PMCID: PMC11148681 DOI: 10.1148/rycan.230101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
MR spectroscopy (MRS) is a noninvasive imaging method enabling chemical and molecular profiling of tissues in a localized, multiplexed, and nonionizing manner. As metabolic reprogramming is a hallmark of cancer, MRS provides valuable metabolic and molecular information for cancer diagnosis, prognosis, treatment monitoring, and patient management. This review provides an update on the use of MRS for clinical cancer management. The first section includes an overview of the principles of MRS, current methods, and conventional metabolites of interest. The remainder of the review is focused on three key areas: advances in instrumentation, specifically ultrahigh-field-strength MRI scanners and hybrid systems; emerging methods for acquisition, including deuterium imaging, hyperpolarized carbon 13 MRI and MRS, chemical exchange saturation transfer, diffusion-weighted MRS, MR fingerprinting, and fast acquisition; and analysis aided by artificial intelligence. The review concludes with future recommendations to facilitate routine use of MRS in cancer management. Keywords: MR Spectroscopy, Spectroscopic Imaging, Molecular Imaging in Oncology, Metabolic Reprogramming, Clinical Cancer Management © RSNA, 2024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Martinez Luque
- From the Departments of Radiology and Imaging Sciences (E.M.L., Z.L.,
D.S., J.W.A., C.C.F.) and Neurology (J.W.A.), Emory University School of
Medicine, Atlanta, Ga; Department of Biomedical Engineering (E.M.L., Z.L., D.S.,
J.W.A., C.C.F.), Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta,
Ga; College of Arts and Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga (R.M.G.); and
College of Business (R.A.) and College of Sciences (A.B., N.S.A.), Georgia
Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Zexuan Liu
- From the Departments of Radiology and Imaging Sciences (E.M.L., Z.L.,
D.S., J.W.A., C.C.F.) and Neurology (J.W.A.), Emory University School of
Medicine, Atlanta, Ga; Department of Biomedical Engineering (E.M.L., Z.L., D.S.,
J.W.A., C.C.F.), Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta,
Ga; College of Arts and Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga (R.M.G.); and
College of Business (R.A.) and College of Sciences (A.B., N.S.A.), Georgia
Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Dongsuk Sung
- From the Departments of Radiology and Imaging Sciences (E.M.L., Z.L.,
D.S., J.W.A., C.C.F.) and Neurology (J.W.A.), Emory University School of
Medicine, Atlanta, Ga; Department of Biomedical Engineering (E.M.L., Z.L., D.S.,
J.W.A., C.C.F.), Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta,
Ga; College of Arts and Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga (R.M.G.); and
College of Business (R.A.) and College of Sciences (A.B., N.S.A.), Georgia
Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Rachel M. Goldberg
- From the Departments of Radiology and Imaging Sciences (E.M.L., Z.L.,
D.S., J.W.A., C.C.F.) and Neurology (J.W.A.), Emory University School of
Medicine, Atlanta, Ga; Department of Biomedical Engineering (E.M.L., Z.L., D.S.,
J.W.A., C.C.F.), Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta,
Ga; College of Arts and Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga (R.M.G.); and
College of Business (R.A.) and College of Sciences (A.B., N.S.A.), Georgia
Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Rishab Agarwal
- From the Departments of Radiology and Imaging Sciences (E.M.L., Z.L.,
D.S., J.W.A., C.C.F.) and Neurology (J.W.A.), Emory University School of
Medicine, Atlanta, Ga; Department of Biomedical Engineering (E.M.L., Z.L., D.S.,
J.W.A., C.C.F.), Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta,
Ga; College of Arts and Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga (R.M.G.); and
College of Business (R.A.) and College of Sciences (A.B., N.S.A.), Georgia
Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Aditya Bhattacharya
- From the Departments of Radiology and Imaging Sciences (E.M.L., Z.L.,
D.S., J.W.A., C.C.F.) and Neurology (J.W.A.), Emory University School of
Medicine, Atlanta, Ga; Department of Biomedical Engineering (E.M.L., Z.L., D.S.,
J.W.A., C.C.F.), Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta,
Ga; College of Arts and Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga (R.M.G.); and
College of Business (R.A.) and College of Sciences (A.B., N.S.A.), Georgia
Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Nadine S. Ahmed
- From the Departments of Radiology and Imaging Sciences (E.M.L., Z.L.,
D.S., J.W.A., C.C.F.) and Neurology (J.W.A.), Emory University School of
Medicine, Atlanta, Ga; Department of Biomedical Engineering (E.M.L., Z.L., D.S.,
J.W.A., C.C.F.), Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta,
Ga; College of Arts and Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga (R.M.G.); and
College of Business (R.A.) and College of Sciences (A.B., N.S.A.), Georgia
Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jason W. Allen
- From the Departments of Radiology and Imaging Sciences (E.M.L., Z.L.,
D.S., J.W.A., C.C.F.) and Neurology (J.W.A.), Emory University School of
Medicine, Atlanta, Ga; Department of Biomedical Engineering (E.M.L., Z.L., D.S.,
J.W.A., C.C.F.), Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta,
Ga; College of Arts and Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga (R.M.G.); and
College of Business (R.A.) and College of Sciences (A.B., N.S.A.), Georgia
Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Candace C. Fleischer
- From the Departments of Radiology and Imaging Sciences (E.M.L., Z.L.,
D.S., J.W.A., C.C.F.) and Neurology (J.W.A.), Emory University School of
Medicine, Atlanta, Ga; Department of Biomedical Engineering (E.M.L., Z.L., D.S.,
J.W.A., C.C.F.), Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta,
Ga; College of Arts and Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga (R.M.G.); and
College of Business (R.A.) and College of Sciences (A.B., N.S.A.), Georgia
Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dennis EL, Keleher F, Bartnik-Olson B. Neuroimaging Correlates of Functional Outcome Following Pediatric TBI. ADVANCES IN NEUROBIOLOGY 2024; 42:33-84. [PMID: 39432037 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-69832-3_3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2024]
Abstract
Neuroimaging plays an important role in assessing the consequences of TBI across the postinjury period. While identifying alterations to the brain is important, associating those changes to functional, cognitive, and behavioral outcomes is an essential step to establishing the value of advanced neuroimaging for pediatric TBI. Here we highlight research that has revealed links between advanced neuroimaging and outcome after TBI and point to opportunities where neuroimaging could expand our ability to prognosticate and potentially uncover opportunities to intervene.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily L Dennis
- Department of Neurology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Finian Keleher
- Department of Neurology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Brenda Bartnik-Olson
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
La PL, Bell TK, Craig W, Doan Q, Beauchamp MH, Zemek R, Yeates KO, Harris AD. Comparison of different approaches to manage multi-site magnetic resonance spectroscopy clinical data analysis. Front Psychol 2023; 14:1130188. [PMID: 37151330 PMCID: PMC10157208 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1130188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The effects caused by differences in data acquisition can be substantial and may impact data interpretation in multi-site/scanner studies using magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). Given the increasing use of multi-site studies, a better understanding of how to account for different scanners is needed. Using data from a concussion population, we compare ComBat harmonization with different statistical methods in controlling for site, vendor, and scanner as covariates to determine how to best control for multi-site data. Methods The data for the current study included 545 MRS datasets to measure tNAA, tCr, tCho, Glx, and mI to study the pediatric concussion acquired across five sites, six scanners, and two different MRI vendors. For each metabolite, the site and vendor were accounted for in seven different models of general linear models (GLM) or mixed-effects models while testing for group differences between the concussion and orthopedic injury. Models 1 and 2 controlled for vendor and site. Models 3 and 4 controlled for scanner. Models 5 and 6 controlled for site applied to data harmonized by vendor using ComBat. Model 7 controlled for scanner applied to data harmonized by scanner using ComBat. All the models controlled for age and sex as covariates. Results Models 1 and 2, controlling for site and vendor, showed no significant group effect in any metabolites, but the vendor and site were significant factors in the GLM. Model 3, which included a scanner, showed a significant group effect for tNAA and tCho, and the scanner was a significant factor. Model 4, controlling for the scanner, did not show a group effect in the mixed model. The data harmonized by the vendor using ComBat (Models 5 and 6) had no significant group effect in both the GLM and mixed models. Lastly, the data harmonized by the scanner using ComBat (Model 7) showed no significant group effect. The individual site data suggest there were no group differences. Conclusion Using data from a large clinical concussion population, different analysis techniques to control for site, vendor, and scanner in MRS data yielded different results. The findings support the use of ComBat harmonization for clinical MRS data, as it removes the site and vendor effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parker L. La
- Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- *Correspondence: Parker L. La,
| | - Tiffany K. Bell
- Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - William Craig
- Department of Pediatrics, Stollery Children’s Hospital, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Quynh Doan
- Department of Pediatrics, BC Children’s Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Miriam H. Beauchamp
- Department of Psychology, Ste-Justine Hospital Research Centre, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Roger Zemek
- Department of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Keith Owen Yeates
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Ashley D. Harris
- Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|