A Method to Combine Neurofilament Light Measurements From Blood Serum and Plasma in Clinical and Population-Based Studies

Blood-based biomarkers of neuronal and glial injury in active major neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus

BACKGROUND

Neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE) is a poorly understood and heterogeneous manifestation of SLE. Common major NPSLE syndromes include strokes, seizures, myelitis, and aseptic meningitis. Easily obtainable biomarkers are needed to assist in early diagnosis and improve outcomes for NPSLE. A frequent end-result of major syndromes is neuronal or glial injury. Blood-based neurofilament light (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) have been utilized as markers for monitoring disease activity and/or severity in other neurodegenerative and neuroinflammatory diseases; however, they have not been evaluated in active major NPSLE.

METHODS

This was a case-control study. We enrolled patients aged 12-60 years with active major NPSLE, SLE without active major NPSLE, and healthy controls. Active NPSLE was defined as being <6 months from last new or worsening neuropsychiatric symptom. Demographics, clinical data, and serum or plasma biosamples were collected.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients with active major NPSLE, 13 age/sex/kidney function matched SLE controls without active major NPSLE, and 13 age/sex matched healthy controls (mean ages 26.8, 27.3, 26.6 years) were included. 92% of each group were female. Major syndromes included stroke (5), autonomic disorder (3), demyelinating disease (2), aseptic meningitis (2), sensorimotor polyneuropathy (2), cranial neuropathy (1), seizures (1), and myelopathy (2). Mean (standard deviation) blood NfL and GFAP were 3.6 pg/ml (2.0) and 50.4 pg/ml (15.0), respectively, for the healthy controls. Compared to healthy controls, SLE without active major NPSLE had mean blood NfL and GFAP levels 1.3 pg/ml (p = .42) and 1.2 pg/ml higher (p = .53), respectively. Blood NfL was on average 17.9 pg/ml higher (95% CI: 9.2, 34.5; p < .001) and blood GFAP was on average 3.2 pg/ml higher (95% CI: 1.9, 5.5; p < .001) for cases of active major NPSLE compared to SLE without active major NPSLE. In a subset of 6 patients sampled at multiple time points, blood NfL and GFAP decreased after immunotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Blood NfL and GFAP levels are elevated in persons with SLE with active major NPSLE compared to disease matched controls and may lower after immunotherapy initiation. Larger and longitudinal studies are needed to ascertain their utility in a clinical setting.

Clinical utility of the Lumipulse™ immunoassay for plasma neurofilament light chain in multiple sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

Blood neurofilament light chain (NfL) is robustly associated with disease worsening in multiple sclerosis (MS), though potentially affected by concomitant factors also determining neuro-axonal loss. We investigated the association between plasma NfL (pNfL) measured with Lumipulse™ immunoassay and demographic and clinical variables in MS.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included 685 people with MS (age 49.7 ± 12.4 years; sex 65.55% females). On the same day, we collected plasma samples, along with demographics, comorbidities, and clinical variables (MS disease duration, expanded disability status scale (EDSS), Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), descriptor of disease progression, current disease modifying treatment (DMT), number of previous DMTs, evidence of disease activity in the past year (i.e. relapse or MRI new lesions), EDSS progression). pNfL was evaluated using Lumipulse™ fully automated chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay.

RESULTS

On multivariable linear regression model, higher pNfL was associated with higher EDSS (Coeff = 1.73; 95%CI 0.78, 2.68; p < 0.01), recent disease activity (Coeff = 15.70; 95%CI = 5.35, 26.06; p < 0.01), and presence of cardiovascular comorbidity (Coeff = 3.84; 95%CI 0.48, 7.20; p = 0.025). Lower pNfL was found in patients on DMT treatment (Coeff = -10.23; 95%CI -18.42, -2.04; p = 0.015), when compared with no DMT (reference). For 77.81% of our population there was correspondence between pNfL levels and two previously-validated cutoffs.

CONCLUSIONS

pNfL measured using Lumipulse™ confirms known associations with MS activity, disability and treatments, and related confounding (e.g., cardiovascular comorbidity), thus granting further utilization in research and clinical practice.

Dynamics and prognostic value of serum neurofilament light chain in Guillain-Barré syndrome

BACKGROUND

Neurofilament light chain (NfL) is a biomarker for axonal damage in several neurological disorders. We studied the longitudinal changes in serum NfL in patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) in relation to disease severity, electrophysiological subtype, treatment response, and prognosis.

METHODS

We included patients with GBS who participated in a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial that evaluated the effects of a second course of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) on clinical outcomes. Serum NfL levels were measured before initiation of treatment and at one, two, four, and twelve weeks using a Simoa HD-X Analyzer. Serum NfL dynamics were analysed using linear mixed-effects models. Logistic regression was employed to determine the associations of serum NfL with clinical outcome and the prognostic value of serum NfL after correcting for known prognostic markers included in the modified Erasmus GBS Outcome Score (mEGOS).

FINDINGS

NfL levels were tested in serum from 281 patients. Serum NfL dynamics were associated with disease severity and electrophysiological subtype. Strong associations were found between high levels of serum NfL at two weeks and inability to walk unaided at four weeks (OR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.27-2.45), and high serum NfL levels at four weeks and inability to walk unaided at 26 weeks (OR = 2.79, 95% CI = 1.72-4.90). Baseline serum NfL had the most significant prognostic value for ability to walk, independent of predictors included in the mEGOS. The time to regain ability to walk unaided was significantly longer for patients with highest serum NfL levels at baseline (p = 0.0048) and week 2 (p < 0.0001). No differences in serum NfL were observed between patients that received a second IVIg course vs. IVIg and placebo.

INTERPRETATION

Serum NfL levels are associated with disease severity, axonal involvement, and poor outcome in GBS. Serum NfL potentially represents a biomarker to monitor neuronal damage in GBS and an intermediate endpoint to evaluate the effects of treatment.

FUNDING

Prinses Beatrix Spierfonds W.OR19-24.

Neurofilament Light Chains in Systemic Amyloidosis: A Systematic Review

Peripheral and autonomic neuropathy are common disease manifestations in systemic amyloidosis. The neurofilament light chain (NfL), a neuron-specific biomarker, is released into the blood and cerebrospinal fluid after neuronal damage. There is a need for an early and sensitive blood biomarker for polyneuropathy, and this systematic review provides an overview on the value of NfL in the early detection of neuropathy, central nervous system involvement, the monitoring of neuropathy progression, and treatment effects in systemic amyloidosis. A literature search in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was performed on 14 February 2024 for studies investigating NfL levels in patients with systemic amyloidosis and transthyretin gene-variant (TTRv) carriers. Only studies containing original data were included. Included were thirteen full-text articles and five abstracts describing 1604 participants: 298 controls and 1306 TTRv carriers or patients with or without polyneuropathy. Patients with polyneuropathy demonstrated higher NfL levels compared to healthy controls and asymptomatic carriers. Disease onset was marked by rising NfL levels. Following the initiation of transthyretin gene-silencer treatment, NfL levels decreased and remained stable over an extended period. NfL is not an outcome biomarker, but an early and sensitive disease-process biomarker for neuropathy in systemic amyloidosis. Therefore, NfL has the potential to be used for the early detection of neuropathy, monitoring treatment effects, and monitoring disease progression in patients with systemic amyloidosis.

Blood-Based Biomarkers for Early Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis in Real-World Settings

As our knowledge about the biology of Alzheimer's disease (AD) expands and we recognize the significance of early intervention for effective treatment, there is a shift in focus toward detecting the disease at an early stage. AD is characterized by the accumulation of misfolded amyloid-β (Aβ) and phosphorylated tau proteins in the brain, leading to the formation of senile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles. While a definitive diagnosis of AD can only be confirmed through autopsy by examining these pathological features, there are now reliable methods available for diagnosing the disease in living individuals. These methods involve analyzing cerebrospinal fluid and using positron emission tomography to accurately assess the presence of Aβ and tau proteins. While these diagnostic markers have shown high accuracy in memory-clinic populations, they do have limitations such as the requirement for invasive lumbar puncture or exposure to ionizing radiation. Additionally, they are not easily accessible outside of specialized healthcare settings. Blood-based biomarkers of the core pathological features of AD are being developed, showing promise for less invasive, scalable identification of AD cases in the community. The advantages for the healthcare systems of this development are obvious, but the diagnostic performance of blood-based biomarkers in broader, non-selected populations outside of retrospective analyses and research cohorts still requires further investigation, including the combination with more effective neuropsychological assessments such as digital cognitive test solutions.

Agreement Between Published Reference Resources for Neurofilament Light Chain Levels in People With Multiple Sclerosis

OBJECTIVES

To examine the agreement between published reference resources for neurofilament light chain (NfL) applied to a large population of people with multiple sclerosis (MS).

METHODS

Six published reference resources were used to classify NfL in participants in the Multiple Sclerosis Partners Advancing Technology and Health Solutions (MS PATHS) network as elevated or normal and to derive age-specific NfL Z-scores. NfL values were classified as elevated if they exceeded the >95th percentile (i.e., Z-score >1.645) of the age-specific reference range. Furthermore, age-specific NfL Z-scores could be derived for 4 of 6 reference resources.

RESULTS

NfL measurements were assessed from 12,855 visits of 6,687 people with MS (median 2 samples per individual [range 1-7]). The mean ± SD age was 47.1 ± 11.7 years, 72.1% of participants were female, disease duration was 15.0 ± 10.6 years, body mass index was 28.6 ± 6.9 kg/m2, and serum NfL was 12.87 ± 12.86 pg/mL. Depending on the selection of the reference resource, the proportion of NfL measurements classified as elevated varied from 3.7% to 30.9%. The kappa coefficient across the 6 reference resources used was 0.576 (95% CI 0.571-0.580) indicating moderate agreement. Spearman correlations between Z-scores derived from the various reference resources exceeded 0.90; however, concordance coefficients were lower, ranging from 0.72 to 0.89.

DISCUSSION

Interpretation of blood NfL values may vary markedly depending on the selection of the reference resource. Borderline elevated values should be interpreted with caution, and future studies should focus on standardizing NfL measurement and reporting across laboratories/platforms, better characterizing the effects of confounding/influencing factors, and defining the performance of NfL (including as part of multimodal predictive algorithms) for prediction of disease-specific outcomes.

Neuro-Urology and Biobanking: An Integrated Approach for Advancing Research and Improving Patient Care

Understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying neuro-urological disorders is crucial for the development of targeted therapeutic interventions. Through the establishment of comprehensive biobanks, researchers can collect and store various biological specimens, including urine, blood, tissue, and DNA samples, to study these mechanisms. In the context of neuro-urology, biobanking facilitates the identification of genetic variations, epigenetic modifications, and gene expression patterns associated with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction. These conditions often present as symptoms of neurological diseases such as Alzheimer's disease, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, spinal cord injury, and many others. Biobanking of tissue specimens from such patients is essential to understand why these diseases cause the respective symptoms and what can be done to alleviate them. The utilization of high-throughput technologies, such as next-generation sequencing and gene expression profiling, enables researchers to explore the molecular landscape of these conditions in an unprecedented manner. The development of specific and reliable biomarkers resulting from these efforts may help in early detection, accurate diagnosis, and effective monitoring of neuro-urological conditions, leading to improved patient care and management. Furthermore, these biomarkers could potentially facilitate the monitoring of novel therapies currently under investigation in neuro-urological clinical trials. This comprehensive review explores the synergistic integration of neuro-urology and biobanking, with particular emphasis on the translation of biobanking approaches in molecular research in neuro-urology. We discuss the advantages of biobanking in neuro-urological studies, the types of specimens collected and their applications in translational research. Furthermore, we highlight the importance of standardization and quality assurance when collecting samples and discuss challenges that may compromise sample quality and impose limitations on their subsequent utilization. Finally, we give recommendations for sampling in multicenter studies, examine sustainability issues associated with biobanking, and provide future directions for this dynamic field.

Neurofilament-Light, a Promising Biomarker: Analytical, Metrological and Clinical Challenges

Neurofilament-light chain (Nf-L) is a non-specific early-stage biomarker widely studied in the context of neurodegenerative diseases (NDD) and traumatic brain injuries (TBI), which can be measured in biofluids after axonal damage. Originally measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), Nf-L can now be quantified in blood with the emergence of ultrasensitive assays. However, to ensure successful clinical implementation, reliable clinical thresholds and reference measurement procedures (RMP) should be developed. This includes establishing and distributing certified reference materials (CRM). As a result of the complexity of Nf-L and the number of circulating forms, a clear definition of what is measured when immunoassays are used is also critical to achieving standardization to ensure the long-term success of those assays. The use of powerful tools such as mass spectrometry for developing RMP and defining the measurand is ongoing. Here, we summarize the current methods in use for quantification of Nf-L in biofluid showing potential for clinical implementation. The progress and challenges in developing RMP and defining the measurand for Nf-L standardization of diagnostic tests are addressed. Finally, we discuss the impact of pathophysiological factors on Nf-L levels and the establishment of a clinical cut-off.

The multifaceted role of neurofilament light chain protein in non-primary neurological diseases

The advancing validation and exploitation of CSF and blood neurofilament light chain protein as a biomarker of neuroaxonal damage has deeply changed the current diagnostic and prognostic approach to neurological diseases. Further, recent studies have provided evidence of potential new applications of this biomarker also in non-primary neurological diseases. In the present review we summarize the state of the art, future perspectives, but also limitations, of neurofilament light chain protein as a CSF and blood biomarker in several medical fields, including intensive care medicine, surgery, internal medicine and psychiatry. In particular, neurofilament light chain protein is associated with the degree of neurological impairment and outcome in patients admitted to intensive care units or in the perioperative phase and it seems to be highly interconnected with cardiovascular risk factors. Beyond that, interesting diagnostic and prognostic insights have been provided by the investigation of neurofilament light chain protein in psychiatric disorders as well as in the current coronavirus disease-19 pandemic and in normal ageing. Altogether, current data outline a multifaceted applicability of CSF and blood neurofilament light chain protein ranging from the critical clinical setting to the development of precision medicine models suggesting a strict interplay between the nervous system pathophysiology and the health-illness continuum.