Photogrammetry-Based Head Digitization for Rapid and Accurate Localization of EEG Electrodes and MEG Fiducial Markers Using a Single Digital SLR Camera

Mark3D - A semi-automated open-source toolbox for 3D head- surface reconstruction and electrode position registration using a smartphone camera video

Source localization in EEG necessitates co-registering the EEG sensor locations with the subject's MRI, where EEG sensor locations are typically captured using electromagnetic tracking or 3D scanning of the subject's head with EEG cap, using commercially available 3D scanners. Both methods have drawbacks, where, electromagnetic tracking is slow and immobile, while 3D scanners are expensive. Photogrammetry offers a cost-effective alternative but requires multiple photos to sample the head, with good spatial sampling to adequately reconstruct the head surface. Post-reconstruction, the existing tools for electrode position labelling on the 3D head-surface have limited visual feedback and do not easily accommodate customized montages, which are typical in multi-modal measurements. We introduce Mark3D, an open-source, integrated tool for 3D head-surface reconstruction from phone camera video. It eliminates the need for keeping track of spatial sampling during image capture for video-based photogrammetry reconstruction. It also includes blur detection algorithms, a user-friendly interface for electrode and tracking, and integrates with popular toolboxes such as FieldTrip and MNE Python. The accuracy of the proposed method was benchmarked with the head-surface derived from a commercially available handheld 3D scanner Einscan-Pro + (Shining 3D Inc.,) which we treat as the "ground truth". We used reconstructed head-surfaces of ground truth (G1) and phone camera video (M1080) to mark the EEG electrode locations in 3D space using a dedicated UI provided in the tool. The electrode locations were then used to form pseudo-specific MRI templates for individual subjects to reconstruct source information. Somatosensory source activations in response to vibrotactile stimuli were estimated and compared between G1 and M1080. The mean positional errors of the EEG electrodes between G1 and M1080 in 3D space were found to be 0.09 ± 0.01 mm across different cortical areas, with temporal and occipital areas registering a relatively higher error than other regions such as frontal, central or parietal areas. The error in source reconstruction was found to be 0.033 ± 0.016 mm and 0.037 ± 0.017 mm in the left and right cortical hemispheres respectively.

EEG electrodes and where to find them: automated localization from 3D scans

Objective.The accurate localization of electroencephalography (EEG) electrode positions is crucial for accurate source localization. Recent advancements have proposed alternatives to labor-intensive, manual methods for spatial localization of the electrodes, employing technologies such as 3D scanning and laser scanning. These novel approaches often integrate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as part of the pipeline in localizing the electrodes. The limited global availability of MRI data restricts its use as a standard modality in several clinical scenarios. This limitation restricts the use of these advanced methods.Approach.In this paper, we present a novel, versatile approach that utilizes 3D scans to localize EEG electrode positions with high accuracy. Importantly, while our method can be integrated with MRI data if available, it is specifically designed to be highly effective even in the absence of MRI, thus expanding the potential for advanced EEG analysis in various resource-limited settings. Our solution implements a two-tiered approach involving landmark/fiducials localization and electrode localization, creating an end-to-end framework.Main results.The efficacy and robustness of our approach have been validated on an extensive dataset containing over 400 3D scans from 278 subjects. The framework identifies pre-auricular points and achieves correct electrode positioning accuracy in the range of 85.7% to 91.0%. Additionally, our framework includes a validation tool that permits manual adjustments and visual validation if required.Significance.This study represents, to the best of the authors' knowledge, the first validation of such a method on a substantial dataset, thus ensuring the robustness and generalizability of our innovative approach. Our findings focus on developing a solution that facilitates source localization, without the need for MRI, contributing to the critical discussion on balancing cost effectiveness with methodological accuracy to promote wider adoption in both research and clinical settings.

Accurate digitization of EEG electrode locations by electromagnetic tracking system: The proposed head rotation method and comparison against optical system

Electroencephalogram (EEG) electrode digitization is crucial for accurate EEG source estimation, and several commercial systems are available for this purpose. The present study aimed to evaluate the digitizing accuracy of electromagnetic and optical systems. Additionally, we introduced a novel rotation method for the electromagnetic system and compared its accuracy with the conventional method of electromagnetic and optical systems. In the conventional method, the operator moves around a stationary participant to digitize, while the participant does not move their head or body. In contrast, in our proposed rotation method with an electromagnetic system, the operator rotates the participant sitting on a swivel chair to digitize in a consistent position. We showed high localization accuracy in both the optical and electromagnetic systems, with an average localization error of less than 3.6 mm. Comparisons of the digitization methods revealed that the electromagnetic system demonstrates superior digitizing accuracy compared to the optical system. Notably, the proposed rotational method is the most accurate among the three methods, which can be attributed to the consistent positioning of EEG electrode digitization within the electromagnetic field. Considering the affordability of the electromagnetic system, our findings provide valuable insights for researchers aiming for precise EEG source estimation.•The study compares the accuracy of electromagnetic and optical systems for EEG electrode digitization, introducing a novel rotation method for improved consistency and precision.•The electromagnetic system, especially with the proposed rotation method, achieves superior digitizing accuracy over the optical system.•Highlighting the cost-effectiveness and precision of the electromagnetic system with the rotation method, this research offers significant insights for achieving precise EEG source estimation.

Setting up EEG Source Imaging in Practice

SUMMARY

Adding EEG source imaging to a clinical practice has clear advantages over visual inspection of EEG. This article offers insight on incorporating EEG source imaging into an EEG laboratory and the best practices for producing optimal source analysis results.

EEG electrode localization with 3D iPhone scanning using point-cloud electrode selection (PC-ES)

Objective.Electroencephalography source imaging (ESI) is a valuable tool in clinical evaluation for epilepsy patients but is underutilized in part due to sensitivity to anatomical modeling errors. Accurate localization of scalp electrodes is instrumental to ESI, but existing localization devices are expensive and not portable. As a result, electrode localization challenges further impede access to ESI, particularly in inpatient and intensive care settings.Approach.To address this challenge, we present a portable and affordable electrode digitization method using the 3D scanning feature in modern iPhone models. This technique combines iPhone scanning with semi-automated image processing using point-cloud electrode selection (PC-ES), a custom MATLAB desktop application. We compare iPhone electrode localization to state-of-the-art photogrammetry technology in a human study with over 6000 electrodes labeled using each method. We also characterize the performance of PC-ES with respect to head location and examine the relative impact of different algorithm parameters.Main Results.The median electrode position variation across reviewers was 1.50 mm for PC-ES scanning and 0.53 mm for photogrammetry, and the average median distance between PC-ES and photogrammetry electrodes was 3.4 mm. These metrics demonstrate comparable performance of iPhone/PC-ES scanning to currently available technology and sufficient accuracy for ESI.Significance.Low cost, portable electrode localization using iPhone scanning removes barriers to ESI in inpatient, outpatient, and remote care settings. While PC-ES has current limitations in user bias and processing time, we anticipate these will improve with software automation techniques as well as future developments in iPhone 3D scanning technology.

ECG Electrode Localization: 3D DS Camera System for Use in Diverse Clinical Environments

Models of the human body representing digital twins of patients have attracted increasing interest in clinical research for the delivery of personalized diagnoses and treatments to patients. For example, noninvasive cardiac imaging models are used to localize the origin of cardiac arrhythmias and myocardial infarctions. The precise knowledge of a few hundred electrocardiogram (ECG) electrode positions is essential for their diagnostic value. Smaller positional errors are obtained when extracting the sensor positions, along with the anatomical information, for example, from X-ray Computed Tomography (CT) slices. Alternatively, the amount of ionizing radiation the patient is exposed to can be reduced by manually pointing a magnetic digitizer probe one by one to each sensor. An experienced user requires at least 15 min. to perform a precise measurement. Therefore, a 3D depth-sensing camera system was developed that can be operated under adverse lighting conditions and limited space, as encountered in clinical settings. The camera was used to record the positions of 67 electrodes attached to a patient's chest. These deviate, on average, by 2.0 mm ±1.5 mm from manually placed markers on the individual 3D views. This demonstrates that the system provides reasonable positional precision even when operated within clinical environments.

Smartphone-based photogrammetry provides improved localization and registration of scalp-mounted neuroimaging sensors

Functional near infrared spectroscopy and electroencephalography are non-invasive techniques that rely on sensors placed over the scalp. The spatial localization of the measured brain activity requires the precise individuation of sensor positions and, when individual anatomical information is not available, the accurate registration of these sensor positions to a head atlas. Both these issues could be successfully addressed using a photogrammetry-based method. In this study we demonstrate that sensor positions can be accurately detected from a video recorded with a smartphone, with a median localization error of 0.7 mm, comparable if not lower, to that of conventional approaches. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the additional information of the shape of the participant’s head can be further exploited to improve the registration of the sensor’s positions to a head atlas, reducing the median sensor localization error of 31% compared to the standard registration approach.

Accuracy of high-density EEG electrode position measurement using an optical scanner compared with the photogrammetry method

•

We measured EEG electrode positions in high-density array.

•

We compared an optical scanner with the conventional photogrammetry method.

•

The optical scanner was more accurate than photogrammetry.

The real-time scanning was feasible – it took 5–10 min per patient.

Objective

To determine the feasibility and accuracy of a handheld optical scanner to measure the three-dimensional (3D) EEG electrode coordinates in a high-density array of 256 electrodes.

Methods

We compared the optical scanning with a previously validated method, based on photogrammetry. Electrode coordinates were co-registered with the MRI of the patients, and mean distance error relative to the three-dimensional MRI reconstruction was determined for each patient. We included 60 patients: 30 were measured using the photogrammetry method, and 30 age and gender matched patients were measured with the optical scanner.

Results

Using the optical scanner, the mean distance error was 1.78 mm (95% confidence interval: 1.59–1.98 mm) which was significantly lower (p < 0.001) compared with the photogrammetry method (mean distance error: 2.43 mm; 95% confidence interval: 2.28–2.57 mm). The real-time scanning took 5–10 min per patient.

Conclusions

The handheld optical scanner is more accurate and feasible, compared to the photogrammetry method.

Significance

Measuring EEG electrode positions in high-density array, using the optical scanner is suitable for clinical implementation in EEG source imaging for presurgical evaluation.

Three-Dimensional Human Head Reconstruction Using Smartphone-Based Close-Range Video Photogrammetry

Creation of head 3D models from videos or pictures of the head by using close-range photogrammetry techniques has many applications in clinical, commercial, industrial, artistic, and entertainment areas. This work aims to create a methodology for improving 3D head reconstruction, with a focus on using selfie videos as the data source. Then, using this methodology, we seek to propose changes for the general-purpose 3D reconstruction algorithm to improve the head reconstruction process. We define the improvement of the 3D head reconstruction as an increase of reconstruction quality (which is lowering reconstruction errors of the head and amount of semantic noise) and reduction of computational load. We proposed algorithm improvements that increase reconstruction quality by removing image backgrounds and by selecting diverse and high-quality frames. Algorithm modifications were evaluated on videos of the mannequin head. Evaluation results show that baseline reconstruction is improved 12 times due to the reduction of semantic noise and reconstruction errors of the head. The reduction of computational demand was achieved by reducing the frame number needed to process, reducing the number of image matches required to perform, reducing an average number of feature points in images, and still being able to provide the highest precision of the head reconstruction.

Detection of Resting-State Functional Connectivity from High-Density Electroencephalography Data: Impact of Head Modeling Strategies

Recent technological advances have been permitted to use high-density electroencephalography (hdEEG) for the estimation of functional connectivity and the mapping of resting-state networks (RSNs). The reliable estimate of activity and connectivity from hdEEG data relies on the creation of an accurate head model, defining how neural currents propagate from the cortex to the sensors placed over the scalp. To the best of our knowledge, no study has been conducted yet to systematically test to what extent head modeling accuracy impacts on EEG-RSN reconstruction. To address this question, we used 256-channel hdEEG data collected in a group of young healthy participants at rest. We first estimated functional connectivity in EEG-RSNs by means of band-limited power envelope correlations, using neural activity estimated with an optimized analysis workflow. Then, we defined a series of head models with different levels of complexity, specifically testing the effect of different electrode positioning techniques and head tissue segmentation methods. We observed that robust EEG-RSNs can be obtained using a realistic head model, and that inaccuracies due to head tissue segmentation impact on RSN reconstruction more than those due to electrode positioning. Additionally, we found that EEG-RSN robustness to head model variations had space and frequency specificity. Overall, our results may contribute to defining a benchmark for assessing the reliability of hdEEG functional connectivity measures.

Semi-Automated and Direct Localization and Labeling of EEG Electrodes Using MR Structural Images for Simultaneous fMRI-EEG

Electroencephalography (EEG) source reconstruction estimates spatial information from the brain’s electrical activity acquired using EEG. This method requires accurate identification of the EEG electrodes in a three-dimensional (3D) space and involves spatial localization and labeling of EEG electrodes. Here, we propose a new approach to tackle this two-step problem based on the simultaneous acquisition of EEG and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). For the step of spatial localization of electrodes, we extract the electrode coordinates from the curvature of the protrusions formed in the high-resolution T1-weighted brain scans. In the next step, we assign labels to each electrode based on the distinguishing feature of the electrode’s distance profile in relation to other electrodes. We then compare the subject’s electrode data with template-based models of prelabeled distance profiles of correctly labeled subjects. Based on this approach, we could localize EEG electrodes in 26 head models with over 90% accuracy in the 3D localization of electrodes. Next, we performed electrode labeling of the subjects’ data with progressive improvements in accuracy: with ∼58% accuracy based on a single EEG-template, with ∼71% accuracy based on 3 EEG-templates, and with ∼76% accuracy using 5 EEG-templates. The proposed semi-automated method provides a simple alternative for the rapid localization and labeling of electrodes without the requirement of any additional equipment than what is already used in an EEG-fMRI setup.

Using the MoBI motion capture system to rapidly and accurately localize EEG electrodes in anatomic space

During mobile brain/body imaging (MoBI) experiments, electroencephalography and motion capture systems are used in concert to record high temporal resolution neural activity and movement kinematics while participants perform demanding perceptual and cognitive tasks in a naturalistic environment. A typical MoBI setup involves positioning multi‐channel electrode caps based on anatomical fiducials as well as experimenter and participant intuition regarding the scalp midpoint location (i.e., Cz). Researchers often use the “template” electrode locations provided by the manufacturer, however, the “actual” electrode locations can vary based on each participant's head morphology. Accounting for differences in head morphologies could provide more accurate clinical diagnostic information when using MoBI to identify neurological deficits in patients with motor, sensory, or cognitive impairments. Here, we asked whether the existing motion capture system used in a MoBI setup could be easily adapted to improve spatial localization of electrodes across participants without requiring additional or specialized equipment that might impede clinical adoption. Using standard electrode configurations, infrared markers were placed on a subset of electrodes and anatomical fiducials, and the remaining electrode locations were estimated using spherical or ellipsoid models. We identified differences in event‐related potentials between “template” and “actual” electrode locations during a Go/No‐Go task (p < 9.8e–5) and an object‐manipulation task (p < 9.8e–5). Thus, the motion capture system already used in MoBI experiments can be effectively deployed to accurately register and quantify the neural activity. Improving the spatial localization without needing specialized hardware or additional setup time to the workflow has important real‐world implications for translating MoBI to clinical environments.

Photogrammetry-based stereoscopic optode registration method for functional near-infrared spectroscopy

SIGNIFICANCE

Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is an emerging brain imaging technique due to its small size, low cost, minimum scanning sonic noise, and portability. Unfortunately, because this technique does not provide neuroanatomical information to accompany the functional data, its data interpretation remains a persistent challenge in fNIRS brain imaging applications. The two most popular approaches for fNIRS anatomical registration are magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and three-dimensional (3-D) digitization. MRI scanning yields high-precision registration but reduces the cost-effectiveness and accessibility of fNIRS imaging. Alternatively, the low cost and portable 3-D digitizers are affected by magnetic properties of ambient metal objects, including participant clothing, testing equipment, medical implants, and so forth.

AIM

To overcome these obstacles and provide accessible and reliable neuroanatomical registration for fNIRS imaging, we developed and explored a photogrammetry optode registration (POR) method.

APPROACH

The POR method uses a consumer-grade camera to reconstruct a 3-D image of the fNIRS optode-set, including light emitters and detectors, on a participant's head. This reconstruction process uses a linear-time incremental structure from motion (LTI-SfM) algorithm, based on 100 to 150 digital photos. The POR method then aligns the reconstructed image with an anatomical template of the brain.

RESULTS

To validate this method, we tested 22 adult and 19 child participants using the POR method and MRI imaging. The results comparisons suggest on average 55% and 46% overlap across all data channel measurements registered by the two methods in adult and children, respectively. Importantly, this overlap reached 65% and 60% in only the frontal channels.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggested that the mismatch in registration was partially due to higher variation in backward optode placement rather than the registration efficacy. Therefore, the photo-based registration method can offer an accessible and reliable approach to neuroanatomical registration of fNIRS as well as other surface-based neuroimaging and neuromodulation methods.

Can EEG and MEG detect signals from the human cerebellum?

The cerebellum plays a key role in the regulation of motor learning, coordination and timing, and has been implicated in sensory and cognitive processes as well. However, our current knowledge of its electrophysiological mechanisms comes primarily from direct recordings in animals, as investigations into cerebellar function in humans have instead predominantly relied on lesion, haemodynamic and metabolic imaging studies. While the latter provide fundamental insights into the contribution of the cerebellum to various cerebellar-cortical pathways mediating behaviour, they remain limited in terms of temporal and spectral resolution. In principle, this shortcoming could be overcome by monitoring the cerebellum's electrophysiological signals. Non-invasive assessment of cerebellar electrophysiology in humans, however, is hampered by the limited spatial resolution of electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) in subcortical structures, i.e., deep sources. Furthermore, it has been argued that the anatomical configuration of the cerebellum leads to signal cancellation in MEG and EEG. Yet, claims that MEG and EEG are unable to detect cerebellar activity have been challenged by an increasing number of studies over the last decade. Here we address this controversy and survey reports in which electrophysiological signals were successfully recorded from the human cerebellum. We argue that the detection of cerebellum activity non-invasively with MEG and EEG is indeed possible and can be enhanced with appropriate methods, in particular using connectivity analysis in source space. We provide illustrative examples of cerebellar activity detected with MEG and EEG. Furthermore, we propose practical guidelines to optimize the detection of cerebellar activity with MEG and EEG. Finally, we discuss MEG and EEG signal contamination that may lead to localizing spurious sources in the cerebellum and suggest ways of handling such artefacts. This review is to be read as a perspective review that highlights that it is indeed possible to measure cerebellum with MEG and EEG and encourages MEG and EEG researchers to do so. Its added value beyond highlighting and encouraging is that it offers useful advice for researchers aspiring to investigate the cerebellum with MEG and EEG.

Video-based motion-resilient reconstruction of three-dimensional position for functional near-infrared spectroscopy and electroencephalography head mounted probes

Significance: We propose a video-based, motion-resilient, and fast method for estimating the position of optodes on the scalp. Aim: Measuring the exact placement of probes (e.g., electrodes and optodes) on a participant's head is a notoriously difficult step in acquiring neuroimaging data from methods that rely on scalp recordings (e.g., electroencephalography and functional near-infrared spectroscopy) and is particularly difficult for any clinical or developmental population. Existing methods of head measurements require the participant to remain still for a lengthy period of time, are laborious, and require extensive training. Therefore, a fast and motion-resilient method is required for estimating the scalp location of probes. Approach: We propose an innovative video-based method for estimating the probes' positions relative to the participant's head, which is fast, motion-resilient, and automatic. Our method builds on capitalizing the advantages and understanding the limitations of cutting-edge computer vision and machine learning tools. We validate our method on 10 adult subjects and provide proof of feasibility with infant subjects. Results: We show that our method is both reliable and valid compared to existing state-of-the-art methods by estimating probe positions in a single measurement and by tracking their translation and consistency across sessions. Finally, we show that our automatic method is able to estimate the position of probes on an infant head without lengthy offline procedures, a task that has been considered challenging until now. Conclusions: Our proposed method allows, for the first time, the use of automated spatial co-registration methods on developmental and clinical populations, where lengthy, motion-sensitive measurement methods routinely fail.

More Reliable EEG Electrode Digitizing Methods Can Reduce Source Estimation Uncertainty, but Current Methods Already Accurately Identify Brodmann Areas

Electroencephalography (EEG) and source estimation can be used to identify brain areas activated during a task, which could offer greater insight on cortical dynamics. Source estimation requires knowledge of the locations of the EEG electrodes. This could be provided with a template or obtained by digitizing the EEG electrode locations. Operator skill and inherent uncertainties of a digitizing system likely produce a range of digitization reliabilities, which could affect source estimation and the interpretation of the estimated source locations. Here, we compared the reliabilities of five digitizing methods (ultrasound, structured-light 3D scan, infrared 3D scan, motion capture probe, and motion capture) and determined the relationship between digitization reliability and source estimation uncertainty, assuming other contributors to source estimation uncertainty were constant. We digitized a mannequin head using each method five times and quantified the reliability and validity of each method. We created five hundred sets of electrode locations based on our reliability results and applied a dipole fitting algorithm (DIPFIT) to perform source estimation. The motion capture method, which recorded the locations of markers placed directly on the electrodes had the best reliability with an average electrode variability of 0.001 cm. Then, in order of decreasing reliability were the method using a digitizing probe in the motion capture system, an infrared 3D scanner, a structured-light 3D scanner, and an ultrasound digitization system. Unsurprisingly, uncertainty of the estimated source locations increased with greater variability of EEG electrode locations and less reliable digitizing systems. If EEG electrode location variability was ∽1 cm, a single source could shift by as much as 2 cm. To help translate these distances into practical terms, we quantified Brodmann area accuracy for each digitizing method and found that the average Brodmann area accuracy for all digitizing methods was >80%. Using a template of electrode locations reduced the Brodmann area accuracy to ∽50%. Overall, more reliable digitizing methods can reduce source estimation uncertainty, but the significance of the source estimation uncertainty depends on the desired spatial resolution. For accurate Brodmann area identification, any of the digitizing methods tested can be used confidently.

SPOT3D: Spatial positioning toolbox for head markers using 3D scans

Recent studies have highlighted the importance of an accurate individual head model for reliably using high-density electroencephalography (hdEEG) as a brain imaging technique. Correct identification of sensor positions is fundamental for accurately estimating neural activity from hdEEG recordings. We previously introduced a method of automated localization and labelling of hdEEG sensors using an infrared colour-enhanced 3D scanner. Here, we describe an extension of this method, the spatial positioning toolbox for head markers using 3D scans (SPOT3D), which integrates a graphical user interface (GUI). This enables the correction of imprecisions in EEG sensor positioning and the inclusion of additional head markers. The toolbox was validated using 3D scan data collected in four participants wearing a 256-channel hdEEG cap. We quantified the misalignment between the 3D scan and the head shape, and errors in EEG sensor locations. We assessed these parameters after using the automated approach and after manually adjusting its results by means of the GUI. The GUI overcomes the main limitations of the automated method, yielding enhanced precision and reliability of head marker positioning.

Using a structured-light 3D scanner to improve EEG source modeling with more accurate electrode positions

BACKGROUND

In this study, we evaluated the use of a structured-light 3D scanner for EEG electrode digitization. We tested its accuracy, robustness and evaluated its practical feasibility. Furthermore, we assessed how 3D scanning of EEG electrode positions affects the accuracy of EEG volume conduction models and source localization.

NEW METHOD

To assess the improvement in electrode positions and source results, we compared the electrode positions both at the scalp level and by quantifying source model accuracy between the 3D scanner, generic template, and cap-specific electrode positions.

RESULTS AND COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS

The use of the 3D scanner significantly improves the accuracy of EEG electrode positions to a median error of 9.4 mm and maximal error of 32.8 mm, relative to the custom (median error of 10.9 mm, maximal error 39.1 mm) and manufacturer's template positions (median error of 13.8 mm, maximal error 57.0 mm). The relative difference measure (RDM) of the EEG source model averaged over the brain improves from 0.18 to 0.11. The dipole localization error averaged over the brain improves from 11.4 mm to 7.0 mm.

CONCLUSION

A structured-light 3D scanner improves the electrode position accuracy and thereby the EEG source model accuracy. It is more affordable than systems currently used for this, and allows for robust and fast digitization. Therefore, we consider it a cost and time-efficient way to improve EEG source reconstruction.

Spatial Localization of EEG Electrodes in a TOF+CCD Camera System

A crucial link of electroencephalograph (EEG) technology is the accurate estimation of EEG electrode positions on a specific human head, which is very useful for precise analysis of brain functions. Photogrammetry has become an effective method in this field. This study aims to propose a more reliable and efficient method which can acquire 3D information conveniently and locate the source signal accurately in real-time. The main objective is identification and 3D location of EEG electrode positions using a system consisting of CCD cameras and Time-of-Flight (TOF) cameras. To calibrate the camera group accurately, differently to the previous camera calibration approaches, a method is introduced in this report which uses the point cloud directly rather than the depth image. Experimental results indicate that the typical distance error of reconstruction in this study is 3.26 mm for real-time applications, which is much better than the widely used electromagnetic method in clinical medicine. The accuracy can be further improved to a great extent by using a high-resolution camera.

Spatial localization of EEG electrodes using 3D scanning

OBJECTIVE

A reliable reconstruction of neural activity using high-density electroencephalography (EEG) requires an accurate spatial localization of EEG electrodes aligned to the structural magnetic resonance (MR) image of an individual's head. Current technologies for electrode positioning, such as electromagnetic digitization, are yet characterized by non-negligible localization and co-registration errors. In this study, we propose an automated method for spatial localization of EEG electrodes using 3D scanning, a non-invasive and easy-to-use technology with potential applications in clinical settings.

APPROACH

Our method consists of three main steps: (1) the 3D scan is ambient light-corrected and spatially aligned to the head surface extracted from the anatomical MR image; (2) electrode positions are identified by segmenting the 3D scan based on predefined colour and topological properties; (3) electrode labelling is performed by aligning an EEG montage template to the electrode positions. The performance of the method was assessed on data collected in eight participants wearing high-density EEG caps with 128 sensors, from three different manufacturers. We estimated the co-registration error using the distance between the MR-based head shape and the closest 3D scan points. Also, we quantified the positioning error using the distance between the detected electrode positions and the corresponding locations manually selected on the 3D scan data.

MAIN RESULTS

For all participants and EEG caps, we obtained a median error of co-registration below 3.0 mm and of spatial localization below 1.4 mm. The method based on 3D scanning data was significantly more precise compared to the electromagnetic digitization technique, and the total time required for obtaining electrode positions was reduced by about half.

SIGNIFICANCE

We have introduced a method to automatically detect EEG electrodes based on 3D scanning information. We believe that our work can contribute to a more effective, reliable and widespread use of high-density EEG as brain imaging tool.

EEG electrode digitization with commercial virtual reality hardware

Accurate spatial co-registration of EEG electrode positions with individual head models is an important component for EEG source localization and imaging. Due to variations in head shape between individuals, this requires measurements of electrode locations in each individual. Existing hardware for digitization can be accurate, but also relatively expensive. With the goal of making digitization more accessible for a range of research laboratories, we have developed an open-source software tool that can make use of less expensive consumer virtual reality hardware for EEG electrode digitization. Here we describe our developed VRDigitizer system and compare it to existing digitization solutions. Experimental evaluations were performed in a phantom head model and in 12 human subjects. In our comparison experiments, VRDigitizer was able to measure electrode positions with a mean error of 3.74 mm, compared to 1.73 mm and 2.98 mm for the commercial systems tested.

Proposal for an accurate TMS-MRI co-registration process via 3D laser scanning

An important technical issue in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) usage is how accurately the specific brain areas activated by TMS are assessed. However, in practice, electric field induced in TMS is dispersed and therefore actual estimation is still difficult. As a preliminary step, the projection line which is perpendicular to the TMS stimulation coil beneath the center of the coil must be accurately estimated into the brain. Therefore, we have developed a new TMS-MRI co-registration procedure that employs a 3D laser-scanner system that is very useful for general hand-manipulated TMS, and which easily estimates the TMS projection point onto the brain. The proposed system accurately captures the positional relationship between the TMS coil and anatomical images. The results of 3D image processing revealed that the registration error at each stage was kept within the submillimeter level. In addition, a motor evoked potential experiment examining the right finger motor area revealed that understandable responses were obtained when stimulation was targeted to the three different motor areas according to Penfield's map. 3D laser scanning is a technique of substantial recent interest for anatomical co-registration. The proposed method demonstrated submillimeter level accuracy of TMS-MRI co-registration.