1
|
Morozumi K, Morishita K, Tojima M, Inomata T. Effect of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation of the common fibular nerve on the soleus muscle Hoffmann reflex. J Phys Ther Sci 2024; 36:278-283. [PMID: 38694014 PMCID: PMC11060763 DOI: 10.1589/jpts.36.278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024] Open
Abstract
[Purpose] This study aimed to investigate the effects of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation of the common fibular nerve on the modification of neural circuit function as measured through the soleus muscle Hoffmann reflex. [Participants and Methods] Twenty-four healthy adult males were randomly and equally divided into the magnetic stimulation (experimental) and control groups. The Hoffmann reflex of the soleus muscle was analyzed before and after 10 min of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation for the experimental group and before and after 10 min of rest for the control group. The averages of the values for the maximum amplitude and latency of the Hoffman reflex across twenty repetitions were recorded and compared. [Results] The Hoffmann reflex amplitude decreased following stimulation in the experimental group, and significant variations were observed between the experimental and control groups. [Conclusion] The change in the Hoffmann reflex amplitude may have been caused by the magnetic stimulation to I-a sensory fibers on the common fibular nerve, suggesting that magnetic stimulation induces reciprocal inhibition of motor neurons through synapses in the spinal cord.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazunori Morozumi
- Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health Sciences,
Tokyo International University: 1-13-1 Matobakita, Kawagoe-shi, Saitama 350-1197,
Japan
| | - Katsuyuki Morishita
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Social Work
Studies, Josai International University, Japan
| | - Michio Tojima
- Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health Sciences,
Tokyo International University: 1-13-1 Matobakita, Kawagoe-shi, Saitama 350-1197,
Japan
| | - Takashi Inomata
- Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health Sciences,
Tokyo International University: 1-13-1 Matobakita, Kawagoe-shi, Saitama 350-1197,
Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zschorlich VR, Qi F, Schorer J, Büsch D. Sensory Stimulation of the Triceps Surae Muscle Complex Modulates Spinal Reflex Responses-A Comparison between Tapotement Massage and Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation (rPMS). Brain Sci 2024; 14:119. [PMID: 38391694 PMCID: PMC10887412 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14020119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2023] [Revised: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The reduction of muscular hypertonia is important in the treatment of various diseases or rehabilitation. This study aims to test the efficacy of a 5 Hz mechanical muscle stimulation (tapotement massage) in comparison to a 5 Hz repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) on the neuromuscular reflex response. METHODS In a randomized control trial, 15 healthy volunteers were administered with either 5 Hz rPMS, tapotement massage, or rPMS sham stimulation. The posterior tibial nerve was stimulated with rPMS and sham stimulation. The Achilles tendon was exposed to a mechanically applied high-amplitude 5 Hz repetitive tendon tapotement massage (rTTM). The tendon reflex (TR) was measured for the spinal response of the soleus muscle. RESULTS After rPMS, there was a reduction of the TR response (-9.8%, p ≤ 0.034) with no significant changes after sham stimulation. Likewise, TR decreased significantly (-17.4%, p ≤ 0.002) after Achilles tendon tapotement intervention. CONCLUSIONS These findings support the hypothesis that both afferent 5 Hz sensory stimulations contributed to a modulation within the spinal and/or supraspinal circuits, which resulted in a reduction of the spinal reflex excitability. The effects could be beneficial for patients with muscle hypertonia and could improve the functional results of rehabilitation programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Volker R Zschorlich
- Institute of Sports Science, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Rostock, Ulmenstr. 69-House 2, 18057 Rostock, Germany
- Institute of Sport Science, School IV-School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Ammerländer Heerstraße 114-118, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany
- Department Aging of Individuals and Society, Faculty of Interdisciplinary Research, University of Rostock, Gehlsheimer Str. 20, 18051 Rostock, Germany
| | - Fengxue Qi
- Sports, Exercise and Brain Sciences Laboratory, Beijing Sport University, Beijing 100084, China
| | - Jörg Schorer
- Institute of Sport Science, School IV-School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Ammerländer Heerstraße 114-118, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Dirk Büsch
- Institute of Sport Science, School IV-School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Ammerländer Heerstraße 114-118, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Grosse L, Meuche AC, Parzefall B, Börner C, Schnabel JF, Späh MA, Klug P, Sollmann N, Klich L, Hösl M, Heinen F, Berweck S, Schröder SA, Bonfert MV. Functional Repetitive Neuromuscular Magnetic Stimulation (frNMS) Targeting the Tibialis Anterior Muscle in Children with Upper Motor Neuron Syndrome: A Feasibility Study. CHILDREN (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 10:1584. [PMID: 37892247 PMCID: PMC10605892 DOI: 10.3390/children10101584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023]
Abstract
Non-invasive neurostimulation as an adjunctive intervention to task-specific motor training is an approach to foster motor performance in patients affected by upper motor neuron syndrome (UMNS). Here, we present first-line data of repetitive neuromuscular magnetic stimulation (rNMS) in combination with personalized task-specific physical exercises targeting the tibialis anterior muscle to improve ankle dorsiflexion (functional rNMS (frNMS)). The main objective of this pilot study was to assess the feasibility in terms of adherence to frNMS, safety and practicability of frNMS, and satisfaction with frNMS. First, during 10 training sessions, only physical exercises were performed (study period (SP) A). After a 1 week break, frNMS was delivered during 10 sessions (SPC). Twelve children affected by UMNS (mean age 8.9 ± 1.6 years) adhered to 93% (SPA) and 94% (SPC) of the sessions, and omittance was not related to the intervention itself in any case. frNMS was safe (no AEs reported in 88% of sessions, no AE-related discontinuation). The practicability of and satisfaction with frNMS were high. Patient/caregiver-reported outcomes revealed meaningful benefits on the individual level. The strength of the ankle dorsiflexors (MRC score) clinically meaningfully increased in four participants as spasticity of ankle plantar flexors (Tardieu scores) decreased in four participants after SPC. frNMS was experienced as a feasible intervention for children affected by UMNS. Together with the beneficial effects achieved on the individual level in some participants, this first study supports further real-world, large-scale, sham-controlled investigations to investigate the specific effects and distinct mechanisms of action of frNMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonie Grosse
- Division of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics—Dr. von Hauner Children’s Hospital, LMU Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80336 Munich, Germany
- LMU Center for Children with Medical Complexity—iSPZ Hauner, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Anne C. Meuche
- Division of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics—Dr. von Hauner Children’s Hospital, LMU Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80336 Munich, Germany
- LMU Center for Children with Medical Complexity—iSPZ Hauner, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Barbara Parzefall
- Division of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics—Dr. von Hauner Children’s Hospital, LMU Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80336 Munich, Germany
- LMU Center for Children with Medical Complexity—iSPZ Hauner, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Corinna Börner
- Division of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics—Dr. von Hauner Children’s Hospital, LMU Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80336 Munich, Germany
- LMU Center for Children with Medical Complexity—iSPZ Hauner, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80336 Munich, Germany
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
- TUM-Neuroimaging Center, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Julian F. Schnabel
- Division of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics—Dr. von Hauner Children’s Hospital, LMU Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80336 Munich, Germany
- LMU Center for Children with Medical Complexity—iSPZ Hauner, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Malina A. Späh
- Division of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics—Dr. von Hauner Children’s Hospital, LMU Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80336 Munich, Germany
- LMU Center for Children with Medical Complexity—iSPZ Hauner, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Pia Klug
- Division of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics—Dr. von Hauner Children’s Hospital, LMU Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80336 Munich, Germany
- LMU Center for Children with Medical Complexity—iSPZ Hauner, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Nico Sollmann
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
- TUM-Neuroimaging Center, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Luisa Klich
- Specialist Center for Pediatric Neurology, Neurorehabilitation and Epileptology, Schoen Clinic Vogtareuth, 83569 Vogtareuth, Germany
| | - Matthias Hösl
- Gait and Motion Analysis Laboratory, Schoen Clinic Vogtareuth, Krankenhausstr. 20, 83569 Vogtareuth, Germany
| | - Florian Heinen
- Division of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics—Dr. von Hauner Children’s Hospital, LMU Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80336 Munich, Germany
- LMU Center for Children with Medical Complexity—iSPZ Hauner, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Steffen Berweck
- Division of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics—Dr. von Hauner Children’s Hospital, LMU Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80336 Munich, Germany
- Specialist Center for Pediatric Neurology, Neurorehabilitation and Epileptology, Schoen Clinic Vogtareuth, 83569 Vogtareuth, Germany
| | - Sebastian A. Schröder
- Division of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics—Dr. von Hauner Children’s Hospital, LMU Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80336 Munich, Germany
- LMU Center for Children with Medical Complexity—iSPZ Hauner, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Michaela V. Bonfert
- Division of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics—Dr. von Hauner Children’s Hospital, LMU Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80336 Munich, Germany
- LMU Center for Children with Medical Complexity—iSPZ Hauner, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80336 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Grosse L, Späh MA, Börner C, Schnabel JF, Meuche AC, Parzefall B, Breuer U, Warken B, Sitzberger A, Hösl M, Heinen F, Berweck S, Schröder SA, Bonfert MV. Addressing gross motor function by functional repetitive neuromuscular magnetic stimulation targeting to the gluteal muscles in children with bilateral spastic cerebral palsy: benefits of functional repetitive neuromuscular magnetic stimulation targeting the gluteal muscles. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1161532. [PMID: 37564737 PMCID: PMC10410564 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1161532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Impaired selective motor control, weakness and spasticity represent the key characteristics of motor disability in the context of bilateral spastic cerebral palsy. Independent walking ability is an important goal and training of the gluteal muscles can improve endurance and gait stability. Combining conventional physical excercises with a neuromodulatory, non-invasive technique like repetitive neuromuscular magnetic stimulation probably enhances effects of the treatment. This prospective study aimed to assess the clinical effects of repetitive neuromuscular magnetic stimulation in combination with a personalized functional physical training offered to children and adolescents with bilateral spastic cerebral palsy. Methods Eight participants Gross Motor Function Classification System level II and III (10.4 ± 2y5m; 50% Gross Motor Function Classification System level II) received a personalized intervention applying functional repetitive neuromuscular magnetic stimulation (12 sessions within 3 weeks; 12,600 total stimuli during each session). At baseline and follow up the following assessments were performed: 10-m-walking-test, 6-min-walking-test, GMFM-66. Six weeks after the end of treatment the patient-reported outcome measure Gait Outcome Assessment List was completed. Results GMFM-66 total score improved by 1.4% (p = 0.002), as did scoring in domain D for standing (1.9%, p = 0.109) and domain E for walking, jumping and running (2.6%, p = 0.021). Gait speed or distance walked during 6 min did not improve from baseline to follow up. Patient-reported outcome showed improvement in 4 patients in altogether 14 ratings. Caregiver-reported outcome reported benefits in 3 participants in altogether 10 ratings. Conclusion Repetitive neuromuscular magnetic stimulation promises to be a meaningful, non-invasive treatment approach for children and adolescents with bilateral spastic cerebral palsy that could be offered in a resource-efficient manner to a broad number of patients. To further investigate the promising effects of repetitive neuromuscular magnetic stimulation and its mechanisms of action, larger-scaled, controlled trials are needed as well as comprehensive neurophysiological investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonie Grosse
- LMU Hospital, Department of Pediatrics – Dr. von Hauner Children’s Hospital, Division of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Malina A. Späh
- LMU Hospital, Department of Pediatrics – Dr. von Hauner Children’s Hospital, Division of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
- LMU Center for Children with Medical Complexity – iSPZ Hauner, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Corinna Börner
- LMU Hospital, Department of Pediatrics – Dr. von Hauner Children’s Hospital, Division of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
- LMU Center for Children with Medical Complexity – iSPZ Hauner, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Julian F. Schnabel
- LMU Hospital, Department of Pediatrics – Dr. von Hauner Children’s Hospital, Division of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
- LMU Center for Children with Medical Complexity – iSPZ Hauner, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Anne C. Meuche
- LMU Hospital, Department of Pediatrics – Dr. von Hauner Children’s Hospital, Division of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
- LMU Center for Children with Medical Complexity – iSPZ Hauner, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Barbara Parzefall
- LMU Hospital, Department of Pediatrics – Dr. von Hauner Children’s Hospital, Division of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
- LMU Center for Children with Medical Complexity – iSPZ Hauner, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Ute Breuer
- LMU Center for Children with Medical Complexity – iSPZ Hauner, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Birgit Warken
- LMU Center for Children with Medical Complexity – iSPZ Hauner, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexandra Sitzberger
- LMU Hospital, Department of Pediatrics – Dr. von Hauner Children’s Hospital, Division of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
- LMU Center for Children with Medical Complexity – iSPZ Hauner, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Hösl
- Gait and Motion Analysis Laboratory, Schoen Clinic Vogtareuth, Vogtareuth, Germany
| | - Florian Heinen
- LMU Hospital, Department of Pediatrics – Dr. von Hauner Children’s Hospital, Division of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
- LMU Center for Children with Medical Complexity – iSPZ Hauner, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Steffen Berweck
- LMU Hospital, Department of Pediatrics – Dr. von Hauner Children’s Hospital, Division of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
- Specialist Center for Pediatric Neurology, Neurorehabilitation and Epileptology, Schoen Clinic Vogtareuth, Vogtareuth, Germany
| | - Sebastian A. Schröder
- LMU Hospital, Department of Pediatrics – Dr. von Hauner Children’s Hospital, Division of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
- LMU Center for Children with Medical Complexity – iSPZ Hauner, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Michaela V. Bonfert
- LMU Hospital, Department of Pediatrics – Dr. von Hauner Children’s Hospital, Division of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
- LMU Center for Children with Medical Complexity – iSPZ Hauner, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Panathoop A, Saengsuwan J, Vichiansiri R. Effects of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation vs. conventional therapy in the management of carpal tunnel syndrome: a pilot randomized controlled trial. PeerJ 2023; 11:e15398. [PMID: 37220528 PMCID: PMC10200096 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a prevalent entrapment neuropathy resulting in hand pain, numbness and/or weakness, which significantly impairs hand function in daily activities. Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) is a potential therapeutic option for focal peripheral nerve disease and may be beneficial for CTS treatment. We aimed to compare the effects of rPMS and conventional therapy in the management of CTS. Methods A blinded assessor randomly assigned 24 participants with electrodiagnostically-confirmed mild or moderate CTS to either rPMS or conventional therapy. Both groups were briefed on disease progression and tendon-gliding exercises. In the intervention group, the rPMS protocol, five sessions of rPMS-with a frequency of 10 Hz, 10 pulses/train, and 100 trains/session-were performed over a period of 2 weeks, with three sessions in the first week and two sessions in the second week. At baseline and the end of the second week, the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire, pinch strength, and electrodiagnostic results were evaluated. Results The rPMS group demonstrated significantly greater within-group improvement in symptom severity scores (2.3 vs. 1.6, p = 0.009) and pinch strength (10.6 lbs vs. 13.8 lbs, p < 0.001). Regarding electrodiagnostic parameters, sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) amplitude was significantly increased (8.7 µV vs. 14.3 µV, p = 0.002) within the group treated with rPMS. With conventional therapy, there were no statistically significant within-group differences. Multiple linear regression models showed that there were no significant differences in other outcomes in between-group comparisons. Conclusions Five sessions of rPMS resulted in significant reduction in symptom severity, improvement in pinch strength and increase in SNAP amplitude. Future research should investigate the clinical utility of rPMS using a larger sample and longer treatment and follow-up durations.
Collapse
|
6
|
Chen ZJ, Li YA, Xia N, Gu MH, Xu J, Huang XL. Effects of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation for the upper limb after stroke: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Heliyon 2023; 9:e15767. [PMID: 37180919 PMCID: PMC10172780 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2022] [Revised: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) can stimulate profound neuromuscular tissues painlessly to evoke action potentials in motor axons and induce muscle contraction for treating neurological conditions. It has been increasingly used in stroke rehabilitation as an easy-to-administer approach for therapeutic neuromodulation. Objective We performed this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to systematically evaluate the effects of rPMS for the upper limb in patients with stroke, including motor impairment, muscle spasticity, muscle strength, and activity limitation outcomes. Methods The meta-analysis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) were searched for articles published before June 2022. Forest plots were employed to estimate the pooled results of the included studies, and the I2 statistical analysis was used to identify the source of heterogeneity. Publication bias was examined by Egger's regression tests or visual inspection of the funnel plots. Results The database searches yielded 1052 potential eligible literature; of them, five randomized controlled trials met the eligible criteria, involving a total of 188 participants. Patients in the rPMS group showed better improvement in motor impairment as measured by the FM-UE (MD: 5.39 [95% CI, 4.26 to 6.52]; P < 0.001; I2 = 0%) compared with the control group. Among the secondary outcomes, no difference was found in the improvement of muscle spasticity (SMD: 0.36 [95% CI, -0.05 to 0.77]; P = 0.08; I2 = 41%). There was a significant difference in the proximal (SMD: 0.58 [95% CI, 0.10 to 1.06]; P = 0.02; I2 = 0%) but not the distal muscle strength (SMD: 1.18 [95% CI, -1.00 to 3.36]; P = 0.29; I2 = 93%). Moreover, the activity limitation outcomes were significantly improved with rPMS intervention (SMD: 0.59 [95% CI, 0.08 to 1.10]; P = 0.02; I2 = 0%). Conclusion This meta-analysis showed that rPMS might improve upper limb motor impairment, proximal muscle strength, and activity limitation outcomes but not muscle spasticity and distal strength in patients after stroke. Due to the limited number of studies, further randomized clinical trials are still warranted for more accurate interpretation and clinical recommendation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ze-Jian Chen
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China
- World Health Organization Cooperative Training and Research Center in Rehabilitation, Wuhan, 430030, China
| | - Yang-An Li
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China
- World Health Organization Cooperative Training and Research Center in Rehabilitation, Wuhan, 430030, China
| | - Nan Xia
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China
- World Health Organization Cooperative Training and Research Center in Rehabilitation, Wuhan, 430030, China
| | - Ming-Hui Gu
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China
- World Health Organization Cooperative Training and Research Center in Rehabilitation, Wuhan, 430030, China
| | - Jiang Xu
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China
- World Health Organization Cooperative Training and Research Center in Rehabilitation, Wuhan, 430030, China
| | - Xiao-Lin Huang
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China
- World Health Organization Cooperative Training and Research Center in Rehabilitation, Wuhan, 430030, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Motor Imagery Changes Resting-State EEG Activity: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Brain Sci 2022; 12:brainsci12111548. [DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12111548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Revised: 11/12/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation is a novel non-invasive technique for applying repetitive magnetic stimulation to the peripheral nerves and muscles. Contrarily, a person imagines that he/she is exercising during motor imagery. Resting-state electroencephalography can evaluate the ability of motor imagery; however, the effects of motor imagery and repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation on resting-state electroencephalography are unknown. We examined the effects of motor imagery and repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation on the vividness of motor imagery and resting-state electroencephalography. The participants were divided into a motor imagery group and motor imagery and repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation group. They performed 60 motor imagery tasks involving wrist dorsiflexion movement. In the motor imagery and repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation group, we applied repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation to the extensor carpi radialis longus muscle during motor imagery. We measured the vividness of motor imagery and resting-state electroencephalography before and after the task. Both groups displayed a significant increase in the vividness of motor imagery. The motor imagery and repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation group exhibited increased β activity in the anterior cingulate cortex by source localization for electroencephalography. Hence, combined motor imagery and repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation changes the resting-state electroencephalography activity and may promote motor imagery.
Collapse
|
8
|
Xia Y, Tanaka K, Yang M, Izumi S. Body representation underlies response of proprioceptive acuity to repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation. Front Hum Neurosci 2022; 16:924123. [PMID: 36016664 PMCID: PMC9395609 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.924123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Proprioceptive acuity is of great significance in basic research exploring a possible neural mechanism of fine motor control and in neurorehabilitation practice promoting motor function recovery of limb-disabled people. Moreover, body representation relies on the integration of multiple somatic sensations, including proprioception that is mainly generated in muscles and tendons of human joints. This study aimed to examine two hypotheses: First, different extension positions of wrist joint have different proprioceptive acuities, which might indicate different body representations of wrist joint in the brain. Second, repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) applied peripherally to the forearm radial nerve and extensors could change proprioceptive acuity at the wrist joint. Thirty-five healthy participants were recruited then randomly divided into the real stimulation group (n = 15) and the sham stimulation group (n = 20). The participants’ non-dominant side wrist joint position sense was tested at six extension positions within the physiological joint motion range (i.e., 10°, 20°, 30°, 40°, 50°, 60°) both before stimulation and after stimulation. Results showed that proprioceptive bias (arithmetic difference of target position and replicated position) among six extension positions could be divided into lower-extension position (i.e., 10°, 20°, 30°) and higher-extension position (i.e., 40°, 50°, 60°). One session rPMS could influence proprioceptive bias in lower-extension position but not in higher-extension position. However, proprioceptive precision (standard deviation within lower-extension position and higher-extension position) was not influenced. To conclude, proprioceptive bias may vary between different wrist extension positions due to different hand postures being related to changes in body representation, and different functions relating to proprioceptive bias and proprioceptive precision may underlie two aspects of body representation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunxiang Xia
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
| | - Kento Tanaka
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
| | - Man Yang
- Graduate School of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Shinichi Izumi
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
- *Correspondence: Shinichi Izumi,
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Implicit Body Representation of the Hand Enlarged by Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation within the Boundary of a Real Hand. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/app12105250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Deafferentation induced by local anesthesia causes a larger perceived area than the real area of the mouth, which, in the perspective of body representation, belongs to implicit body representation. In this study, we applied repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) on the motor branch of the radial nerve of participants’ non-dominant-side forearm to induce extension movements of wrist and fingers. This intervention was supposed to increase proprioception to the brain and had an enlargement effect on implicit body representation of the hand in our hypothesis. A total of 39 participants were randomly allocated to the real rPMS group (n = 19) or the sham rPMS group (n = 20). Implicit representation of the hand was measured by a simplified paradigm based on the proposal of Longo and Haggard that depicted perceived locations of fingertips and metacarpophalangeal joints of participants’ occluded hand, in which they showed that implicit body representation of the hand was smaller than the real hand. We compare the main effect of real rPMS vs. sham rPMS and its interaction effect with time by setting four timepoints—before stimulation, right after stimulation, 10 min after stimulation and 20 min after stimulation—to demonstrate the possible short-lasting effect. Results showed that real rPMS had a short-lasting enlargement effect on implicit representation of the hand in general, which was significant especially on the ulnar side of fingers. What is more, the enlarged implicit body representation of the hand was still within the boundary of a real hand, which might indicate the identification role of a real body part.
Collapse
|
10
|
Schneider C, Zangrandi A, Sollmann N, Bonfert MV, Beaulieu LD. Checklist on the Quality of the Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation (rPMS) Methods in Research: An International Delphi Study. Front Neurol 2022; 13:852848. [PMID: 35392633 PMCID: PMC8981720 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.852848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
An increasing number of clinical research studies have used repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) in recent years to alleviate pain or improve motor function. rPMS is non-invasive, painless, and administrated over peripheral nerve, spinal cord roots, or a muscle using a coil affixed to the skin and connected to a rapid-rate magnetic stimulator. Despite the clinical impact and scientific interest, the methodological inconsistencies or incomplete details and findings between studies could make the rPMS demonstration difficult to replicate. Given the lack of guidelines in rPMS literature, the present study aimed at developing a checklist to improve the quality of rPMS methods in research. An international panel of experts identified among those who had previously published on the topic were enrolled in a two-round web-based Delphi study with the aim of reaching a consensus on the items that should be reported or controlled in any rPMS study. The consensual rPMS checklist obtained comprises 8 subject-related items (e.g., age, sex), 16 methodological items (e.g., coil type, pulse duration), and 11 stimulation protocol items (e.g., paradigm of stimulation, number of pulses). This checklist will contribute to new interventional or exploratory rPMS research to guide researchers or clinicians on the methods to use to test and publish rPMS after-effects. Overall, the checklist will guide the peer-review process on the quality of rPMS methods reported in a publication. Given the dynamic nature of a consensus between international experts, it is expected that future research will affine the checklist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cyril Schneider
- Noninvasive Stimulation Laboratory (NovaStim), Neuroscience Division, Research Center of CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
- Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
- *Correspondence: Cyril Schneider
| | - Andrea Zangrandi
- Noninvasive Stimulation Laboratory (NovaStim), Neuroscience Division, Research Center of CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
- Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Nico Sollmann
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- TUM-Neuroimaging Center, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Michaela Veronika Bonfert
- Division of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Medicine and LMU Center for Children With Medical Complexity, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, LMU Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Effects of Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation through Hand Splint Materials on Induced Movement and Corticospinal Excitability in Healthy Participants. Brain Sci 2022; 12:brainsci12020280. [PMID: 35204043 PMCID: PMC8869939 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12020280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Revised: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique. Magnetic fields induced by rPMS pass through almost all materials, and it has clinical applications for neurorehabilitation. However, the effects of rPMS through clothing and orthosis on induced movement and corticospinal excitability remain unclear. The aim of this study was to determine whether rPMS induces movement and enhances corticospinal excitability through hand splint materials. rPMS was applied directly to the skin (L0) and through one (L1) or two (L2) layers of splint material in 14 healthy participants at 25-Hz, 2-s train per 6 s for a total of 20 min. rPMS was delivered to the forearm with the stimulus intensity set to 1.5-times the train intensity-induced muscle contractions under the L0 condition. We recorded induced wrist movements during rPMS and motor-evoked potentials of the extensor carpi radialis pre- and post-application. The results showed that rPMS induced wrist movements in L0 and L1, and it facilitated corticospinal excitability in L0 but not in L1 and L2. This suggests that rPMS can make electromagnetic induction on periphery even when applied over clothing and orthosis and demonstrates the potential clinical applications of this technique for neurorehabilitation.
Collapse
|
12
|
Asao A, Wada K, Nomura T, Shibuya K. Time course changes in corticospinal excitability during repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation combined with motor imagery. Neurosci Lett 2021; 771:136427. [PMID: 34971770 DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2021.136427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2021] [Revised: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) induces proprioceptive afferents and facilitates corticospinal excitability. Short-term sessions of rPMS combined with motor imagery (MI) enhance corticospinal excitability more than rPMS alone. However, it is not clear how long the intervention of rPMS combined with MI would be needed to facilitate corticospinal excitability. Therefore, we investigated the time course change in corticospinal excitability during the combination of rPMS and MI. Thirteen healthy volunteers participated in a 20-min intervention under the following three experimental conditions on different days: rPMS, MI, and rPMS combined with MI (rPMS + MI). In the rPMS and rPMS + MI, the participants were delivered rPMS, which was 25 Hz, 2 s/train at 1.5 × of the train intensity induced muscle contractions, through the wrist extensor muscles. In the MI and rPMS + MI, the participants repeatedly imagined wrist movements for 2 s. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the extensor carpi radialis (ECR) and flexor carpi radialis (FCR) muscles every 5 min for each condition. The MEP amplitudes of the ECR after > 10 min of intermittent rPMS combined with MI were greater than baseline. The MEP amplitude of the ECR in rPMS + MI was greater than that in rPMS condition after 20 min of intervention. The present results suggest that over 10 min of intermittent rPMS combined with MI facilitates corticospinal excitability, and that the effect of rPMS combined with MI on corticospinal excitability might be greater than that of rPMS alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akihiko Asao
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan.
| | - Kento Wada
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan
| | - Tomonori Nomura
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan
| | - Kenichi Shibuya
- Department of Health and Nutrition, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan
| |
Collapse
|