Cervical alignment and clinical outcome of anterior decompression with fusion vs. posterior decompression with fixation in kyphotic cervical spondylotic myelopathy

[Analysis of imaging characteristics and effectiveness of cervical spondylotic myelopathy with cervical kyphosis]

Objective

To investigate the imaging characteristics of cervical kyphosis and spinal cord compression in cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) with cervical kyphosis and the influence on effectiveness.

Methods

The clinical data of 36 patients with single-segment CSM with cervical kyphosis who were admitted between January 2020 and December 2022 and met the selection criteria were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to the positional relationship between the kyphosis focal on cervical spine X-ray film and the spinal cord compression point on MRI: the same group (group A, 20 cases, both points were in the same position), the adjacent group (group B, 10 cases, both points were located adjacent to each other), and the separated group (group C, 6 cases, both points were located >1 vertebra away from each other). There was no significant difference between groups ( P>0.05) in baseline data such as gender, age, body mass index, lesion segment, disease duration, and preoperative C 2-7 angle, C 2-7 sagittal vertical axis (C 2-7 SVA), C 7 slope (C 7S), kyphotic Cobb angle, fusion segment height, and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score. The patients underwent single-segment anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF). The occurrence of postoperative complications was recorded; preoperatively and at last follow-up, the patients' neurological function was evaluated using the JOA score, and the sagittal parameters (C 2-7 angle, C 2-7 SVA, C 7S, kyphotic Cobb angle, and height of the fused segments) were measured on cervical spine X-ray films and MRI and the correction rate of the cervical kyphosis was calculated; the correlation between changes in cervical sagittal parameters before and after operation and the JOA score improvement rate was analyzed using Pearson correlation analysis.

Results

In 36 patients, only 1 case of dysphagia occurred in group A, and the dysphagia symptoms disappeared at 3 days after operation, and the remaining patients had no surgery-related complications during the hospitalization. All patients were followed up 12-42 months, with a mean of 20.1 months; the difference in follow-up time between the groups was not significant ( P>0.05). At last follow-up, all the imaging indicators and JOA scores of patients in the 3 groups were significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones ( P<0.05). The correction rate of cervical kyphosis in group A was significantly better than that in group C, and the improvement rate of JOA score was significantly better than that in groups B and C, all showing significant differences ( P<0.05), and there was no significant difference between the other groups ( P>0.05). The correlation analysis showed that the improvement rate of JOA score was negatively correlated with C 2-7 angle and kyphotic Cobb angle at last follow-up ( r=-0.424, P=0.010; r=-0.573, P<0.001), and positively correlated with the C 7S and correction rate of cervical kyphosis at last follow-up ( r=0.336, P=0.045; r=0.587, P<0.001), and no correlation with the remaining indicators ( P>0.05).

Conclusion

There are three main positional relationships between the cervical kyphosis focal and the spinal cord compression point on imaging, and they have different impacts on the effectiveness and sagittal parameters after ACDF, and those with the same position cervical kyphosis focal and spinal cord compression point have the best improvement in effectiveness and sagittal parameters.

Current Concepts of Cervical Spine Alignment, Sagittal Deformity, and Cervical Spine Surgery

There are not many reports on cervical spine alignment, and only a few analyze ideal surgical approaches and optimal amounts of correction needed for the various types of deformity. We comprehensively reviewed the present literature on cervical spinal deformities (with or without myelopathy) and their surgical management to provide a framework for surgical planning. A general assessment of the parameters actually in use and correlations between cervical and thoracolumbar spine alignment are provided. We also analyzed posterior, anterior, and combined cervical surgical approaches and indications for the associated techniques of laminoplasty, laminectomy and fusion, and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Finally, on the basis of the NDI, SF-36, VAS, and mJOA questionnaires, we fully evaluated the outcomes and measures of postoperative health-related quality of life. We found the need for additional prospective studies to further enhance our understanding of the importance of cervical alignment when assessing and treating cervical deformities with or without myelopathy. Future studies need to focus on correlations between cervical alignment parameters, disability scores, and myelopathy outcomes. Through this comprehensive literature review, we offer guidance on practical and important points of surgical technique, cervical alignment, and goals surgeons can meet to improve symptoms in all patients.

Cervical alignment and clinical outcome of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion vs. anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion in local kyphotic cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Background

Cervical local kyphosis (CLK) is a common degenerative disorder with a potentially debilitating and intractable condition. Currently, there is still debate on the optimal treatment of local kyphotic cervical spondylotic myelopathy (LKCSM) via different anterior approaches.

Objective

The objective of this study was to evaluate the surgical efficacy of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) vs. anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) for the treatment of LKCSM. In addition, the cervical sagittal alignment parameters and axial symptoms (AS) severity after CLK correction were analyzed.

Materials and methods

From January 2016 and December 2020, 104 patients who suffered LKCSM were retrospectively reviewed. These patients underwent ACDF (n = 53) and ACCF (n = 51). Pre- and postoperatively, cervical sagittal alignment parameters were measured on the lateral X-rays, including local kyphotic angles (LKA), C2-7 Cobb angle, T1 slope, and C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (C2-7 SVA). The neurological recovery rate was calculated according to the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score. The AS severity was evaluated using Neck Disability Index (NDI).

Results

Significant differences (P < 0.05) were demonstrated between ACDF and ACCF groups regarding LKA, LKA correction, C2-7 Cobb angle, T1 slope, C2-7 SVA, NDI, NDI recovery and NDI ranking system. However, no significant differences (P > 0.05) existed in JOA score, recovery rate, and neurological recovery rate grade. In both groups, significant differences (P < 0.05) were demonstrated between pre- and postoperative LKA, T1 slope, C2-7 Cobb angle, C2-7 SVA, JOA score, and NDI. LKA correction showed the positive correlations with the recovery rate (r = 0.48, P < 0.001), and with the NDI recovery in ACDF group (r = 0.49, P < 0.001) and in ACCF group (r = 0.55, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

LKCSM with ≤3 segments of spinal cord compression can be improved with either ACDF or ACCF, resulting in satisfactory neurological outcomes. CLK correction can significantly improve the neurological function and AS, and increase the T1 slope and C2-7 SVA. However, ACDF was more favorable than ACCF in the CLK correction.