The Effect and Mechanism of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Episodic Memory in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment

Pathological forgetting from a predictive processing perspective

Recent research suggests that natural forgetting is beneficial, allowing the brain to prioritize relevant information and disregard the irrelevant, thus aiding decision-making and mental health. Conversely, pathological conditions may arise from disruptions in these memory control processes. Without adequate memory control capacities, individuals can suffer from conditions like PTSD or addiction (where unwanted or addiction-related memories persist) on one end of the scale, to conditions such as dementia, Parkinson's disease or traumatic brain injury, which are characterised by heightened rates of forgetting on the other side. This review will explore the concept of predictive processing as a potential mechanism underlying pathological forgetting. It will summarise the neurobiological basis of predictive processing and how it influences what we remember or forget. As evident in the emerging literature, this has distinct implications for understanding pathological forgetting in psychological disorders. Finally, this review will highlight therapeutic interventions that have recently targeted predictive processes and consequently improved symptoms related to forgetting, suggesting translational applications for treatment approaches in these conditions.

Predicting the Beneficial Effects of Cognitive Stimulation and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment with Clinical, Inflammation, and Human Microglia Exposed to Serum as Potential Markers: A Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial

In amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), neuroinflammation evolves during disease progression, affecting microglial function and potentially accelerating the pathological process. Currently, no effective treatment exists, leading to explorations of various symptomatic approaches, though few target the underlying physiological mechanisms. Modulating inflammatory processes may be critical in slowing disease progression. Cognitive stimulation (CS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (l-DLPFC) show promise, but the results are heterogeneous. Thus, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial is currently underway. The first-stage results were examined after three weeks of intervention in two groups: active tDCS combined with CS and sham tDCS combined with CS. Twenty-two participants underwent two assessments: T0 (baseline) and T1 (after 15 sessions of tDCS, active or sham, and 9 sessions of CS). The results demonstrated that CS improved cognition, increased brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels, and reduced peripheral proinflammatory cytokine levels (interleukin IL-6 and chemokine CX3CL1) in serum. This decrease in IL-6 may promote microglial proliferation and survival as a modulatory effect response, while the increase in BDNF might suggest a regulatory mechanism in microglia-neuron interaction responses. However, tDCS did not enhance the cognitive or modulatory effects of CS, suggesting that longer interventions might be required to achieve substantial benefits.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of transcranial direct current stimulation on cognitive function in older adults with cognitive impairments: the influence of dosage parameters

INTRODUCTION

Numerous studies have demonstrated the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on cognitive function in the older people. This study further explores the impact of tDCS and its dosage parameters on cognitive enhancement in older people with cognitive impairments.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published through November 2023 were retrieved from databases including PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, EBSCO, and the Cochrane Library. Participants were older adults with cognitive impairments, including Alzheimer's disease (AD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and dementia. AD was diagnosed based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV), or the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke - Alzheimer' Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) criteria. Dementia was diagnosed using the DSM-V or NINCDS-ADRDA criteria, while MCI was diagnosed using the DSM-V, the Petersen criteria, or assessments such as Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR). Standardized mean difference (SMD) values were analyzed to assess the effects.

RESULTS

A total of 19 RCTs were included. tDCS significantly improved the Mini-Mental State Examination score both immediately post-intervention (SMD = 0.51, p = 0.005) and at follow-up (SMD = 2.29, p = 0.0003). Significant effects were observed when tDCS was used alone (SMD = 0.39, p = 0.04), at current densities ≤ 0.06 mA/cm2 (SMD = 0.25, p = 0.04), session durations exceeding 20 min (SMD = 0.89, p = 0.01), up to 15 sessions (SMD = 0.28, p = 0.009), and when an active electrode was placed over the temporal area (SMD = 0.33, p = 0.02). People with AD showed greater improvements compared to those with MCI or dementia (SMD = 0.91, p = 0.02). However, tDCS did not significantly improve memory or executive function.

CONCLUSION

tDCS demonstrated efficacy in enhancing global cognition in older people with cognitive impairments, providing insight into optimal parameters for clinical application. However, no improvement were observed in memory or executive function.

The emerging field of non-invasive brain stimulation in Alzheimer's disease

Treating cognitive impairment is a holy grail of modern clinical neuroscience. In the past few years, non-invasive brain stimulation is increasingly emerging as a therapeutic approach to ameliorate performance in patients with cognitive impairment and as an augmentation approach in persons whose cognitive performance is within normal limits. In patients with Alzheimer's disease, better understanding of brain connectivity and function has allowed for the development of different non-invasive brain stimulation protocols. Recent studies have shown that transcranial stimulation methods enhancing brain plasticity with several modalities have beneficial effects on cognitive functions. Amelioration has been shown in preclinical studies on behaviour of transgenic mouse models for Alzheimer's pathology and in clinical studies with variable severity of cognitive impairment. While the field is still grappling with issues related to the standardization of target population, frequency, intensity, treatment duration and stimulated region, positive outcomes have been reported on cognitive functions and on markers of brain pathology. Here we review the most encouraging protocols based on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation, transcranial alternating current stimulation, visual-auditory stimulation, photobiomodulation and transcranial focused ultrasound, which have demonstrated efficacy to enhance cognitive functions or slow cognitive decline in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Beneficial non-invasive brain stimulation effects on cognitive functions are associated with the modulation of specific brain networks. The most promising results have been obtained targeting key hubs of higher-level cognitive networks, such as the frontal-parietal network and the default mode network. The personalization of stimulation parameters according to individual brain features sheds new light on optimizing non-invasive brain stimulation protocols for future applications.

Comparative efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation on cognition function in patients with mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a critical time window for implementing prevention strategies to attenuate or delay cognitive decline. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques are promising non-pharmacological therapies for improving the cognitive function of MCI, but it is unclear which type of NIBS protocol is most effective. This study aimed to compare and rank the beneficial effect of different NIBS methods/protocols on cognitive function and examine the acceptability of NIBS in patients with MCI.

METHODS

Electronic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, and Chongqing VIP Database up to November 2023. Patients with diagnosis of MCI were included. The primary outcomes were acceptability and pre-post treatment changes in global cognitive function, and the secondary outcomes were specific cognitive domains (language and executive function). All network meta‑analysis procedures were performed under the frequentist model. A protocol for this systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (Registration number: CRD42023441448).

RESULTS

A network meta-analysis was conducted on 19 eligible RCTs consisting of 599 subjects. Compared with the sham stimulation, Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation over the Bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (rTMS-F3F4) showed the strongest improvement in global cognitive function in MCI patients (SMD =1.52[95 %CIs =0.49-2.56]), followed by rTMS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (rTMS-F3) (SMD =1.25[95 %CIs =0.57-1.93]); Moreover, rTMS-F3F4 showed more significant efficacy in language function (SMD =0.96[95 %CIs = 0.20-1.72]); No statistically significant differences were found among the other cognitive domains. Compared with the rTMS-F4, rTMS-F3F4 showed a stronger improvement in global cognitive function in MCI patients (SMD =1.80[95 %CIs =0.02-3.59]). Similar results were obtained in subgroup analyses of cognitive function. All the methods were well-tolerated with an acceptable safety profile.

CONCLUSION

The present findings provide evidence of the benefits of NIBS, especially TMS stimulating the bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, for the beneficial effect on cognitive and language function in patients with MCI. However, because few studies were available for inclusion, additional well-designed, large-scale RCTs are warranted to support exploring longer-term dynamic effects.

Optimal dose and type of exercise to improve cognitive function in patients with mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs

Background

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) represents a prodromal stage of dementia, characterized by cognitive decline exceeding that expected with normal aging. Exercise interventions have emerged as a promising approach to counter functional decline and enhance cognitive function in the elderly MCI population. However, the optimal exercise modalities and dosage (dose-response relationship) are understudied.

Objective

It aims to determine the most effective exercise modality for MCI patients by optimizing the dose-response relationship to ensure sufficient intensity to induce positive neurological adaptations.

Methods

A systematic search of electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted from inception to April 15, 2024. Studies evaluating the efficacy of exercise interventions in MCI participants were included. Primary outcomes of interest are global cognition and executive function. Random-effects models will be utilized for both pairwise and network meta-analysis.

Results

Following the application of specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 42 articles, encompassing 2832 participants, were chosen for inclusion in a network meta-analysis. The findings revealed that multi-component exercise demonstrated superior efficacy in mitigating the deterioration of global cognition, as evidenced by standard mean differences (SMDs) of 1.09 (95% CI: 0.68 to 1.51) compared to passive controls. Additionally, multi-component exercise exhibited a significant impact on executive function, with SMDs of 2.50 (95% CI: 0.88 to 4.12) when contrasted with passive controls. Our research has demonstrated that sessions lasting 30 minutes, occurring 3-4 times per week, with interventions lasting 12-24 weeks and an intensity of 60-85% of maximum heart rate, yield higher effect sizes in improving global cognition. However, sessions lasting 30-61 minutes, with interventions lasting 25 weeks or longer, show greater effectiveness in enhancing executive function.

Conclusion

A network meta-analysis identified multi-component exercise as the most effective intervention for improving global cognitive and executive function in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Notably, moderate-intensity exercise performed at least three times weekly appears beneficial, with evidence suggesting shorter sessions and higher frequencies may optimize cognitive outcomes.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier CRD42024534922.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for global cognition in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease

OBJECTIVE

To systematically assess the effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on global cognition in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD).

DATA SOURCES

Ten databases were retrieved for pertinent Chinese and English studies published up until February 2023.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two researchers independently selected the literature, extracted the data, evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration's quality criteria, and then cross-checked. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4.

RESULTS

22 studies involving 1074 patients were included. Compared with the control group received the interventions such as pharmacotherapy, cognitive stimulation, et al., with/without sham-tDCS, while the experiment group received tDCS added to the interventions of the control group. The meta-analysis found that tDCS increased MMSE, MoCA, MODA scores and reduced the P300 latency scores (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The tDCS can ameliorate the global cognition of patients with MCI and AD, and it has a better rehabilitation effect than non-tDCS or sham-tDCS.

The effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic and transcranial direct current stimulation on memory functions in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a condition that impairs activities of daily living, and often transforms to dementia. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) show promise in improving cognitive functions in MCI patients. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to compare the effects of rTMS and tDCS on memory functions in MCI patients. We explored eight databases from their inception to March 16, 2024. We obtained 11 studies with 406 patients with MCI. We used the standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) to synthesize the effect size. rTMS and tDCS significantly improved memory functions in MCI patients (SMD = 0.61; 95% CI: 0.41-0.82; p < 0.00001; I2 = 22%). In subgroup analysis of number of stimulation sessions, both rTMS and tDCS over 10 sessions (SMD = 0.84; 95% CI: 0.50-1.17, p < 0.00001, I2 = 0%) significantly improved the memory function in MCI patients. The subgroup analyses on different stimulation types (SMD = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.51-1.06; p < 0.00001; I2 = 0%) and treatment persistent effects (SMD = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.51-1.35, p < 0.0001, I2 = 0%) showed that rTMS was more effective than tDCS. rTMS with a stimulation frequency of 10 Hz (SMD = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.51-1.21; p < 0.00001; I2 = 0%) and over 10 sessions (SMD = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.58-1.38; p < 0.00001; I2 = 0%) at multiple sites (SMD = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.44-1.49; p = 0.0003; I2 = 0%) showed a great improvement in the memory performance of patients with MCI. rTMS was more likely to appear temporary side effects (risk ratio (RR) = 3.18, 95% CI: 1.29-7.83, p = 0.01). This meta-analysis suggests that rTMS and tDCS are safe and efficient tools to improve memory functions in patients with MCI, while rTMS had a larger effect than tDCS. rTMS with a stimulation frequency of 10 Hz targeted on multiple sites over 10 sessions showed the greatest effect. We could not conclude parameters of tDCS because of insufficient data.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024558991.

Identifying Critical Nodes in the Cognitive Decline Process through EEG Network Community Detection Based on Autoencoder

Cognitive impairment is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by a decline in cognitive functions. In recent years, the application of non-pharmacological interventions such as physical stimuli has garnered attention due to their convenience and efficacy. However, the selection of stimulation targets significantly impacts the therapeutic outcomes, and there is yet to be a mature method for specific target selection. This study considers the neural network alterations during the progression from healthy individuals to those with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), utilizing autoencoders to encode the network structure of resting-state Electroencephalography (EEG) to reveal its community information. By integrating node behavior analysis, the dynamic influence of network nodes was calculated to explore the critical brain regions during disease progression. The findings demonstrate that Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) treatment targeting these key nodes significantly improved the cognitive performance of MCI patients. Our research introduces a novel method for discovering critical brain regions, providing a new avenue for non-pharmacological treatment of MCI. By elucidating the neural network alterations and key nodes during MCI progression, our work offers valuable insights for early diagnosis and treatment of neurodegenerative diseases in the future.

Long-lasting improvements in episodic memory among subjects with mild cognitive impairment who received transcranial direct current stimulation combined with cognitive treatment and telerehabilitation: a multicentre, randomized, active-controlled study

Background

In recent years, an increasing number of studies have examined the potential efficacy of cognitive training procedures in individuals with normal ageing and mild cognitive impairment (MCI).

Objective

The aims of this study were to (i) evaluate the efficacy of the cognitive Virtual Reality Rehabilitation System (VRRS) combined with anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex compared to placebo tDCS stimulation combined with VRRS and (ii) to determine how to prolong the beneficial effects of the treatment. A total of 109 subjects with MCI were assigned to 1 of 5 study groups in a randomized controlled trial design: (a) face-to-face (FTF) VRRS during anodal tDCS followed by cognitive telerehabilitation (TR) (clinic-atDCS-VRRS+Tele@H-VRRS); (b) FTF VRRS during placebo tDCS followed by TR (clinic-ptDCS-VRRS+Tele@H-VRRS); (c) FTF VRRS followed by cognitive TR (clinic-VRRS+Tele@H-VRRS); (d) FTF VRRS followed by at-home unstructured cognitive stimulation (clinic-VRRS+@H-UCS); and (e) FTF cognitive treatment as usual (clinic-TAU).

Results

An improvement in episodic memory was observed after the end of clinic-atDCS-VRRS (p < 0.001). We found no enhancement in episodic memory after clinic-ptDCS-VRRS or after clinic-TAU.Moreover, the combined treatment led to prolonged beneficial effects (clinic-atDCS-VRRS+Tele@H-VRRS vs. clinic-ptDCS-VRRS+Tele@H-VRRS: p = 0.047; clinic-atDCS-VRRS+Tele@H-VRRS vs. clinic-VRRS+Tele@H-VRRS: p = 0.06).

Discussion

The present study provides preliminary evidence supporting the use of individualized VRRS combined with anodal tDCS and cognitive telerehabilitation for cognitive rehabilitation.

Clinical trial registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03486704?term=NCT03486704&rank=1, NCT03486704.

The Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) came into consideration in recent years as a promising, non-invasive form of neuromodulation for individuals suffering from mild cognitive impairment (MCI). MCI represents a transitional stage between normal cognitive aging and more severe cognitive decline, which appears in neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease. Numerous studies have shown that tDCS can have several useful effects in patients with MCI. It is believed to enhance cognitive functions, including memory and attention, potentially slowing down the progression of neurodegeneration and cognitive decline. tDCS is believed to work by modulating neuronal activity and promoting synaptic plasticity in the brain regions associated with cognition. Moreover, tDCS is generally considered safe and well-tolerated, making it an attractive option for long-term therapeutic use in MCI. However, further research is needed to determine the optimal stimulation parameters and long-term effects of tDCS in this population, as well as its potential to serve as a complementary therapy alongside other interventions for MCI. In this review, we included 16 randomized clinical trials containing patients with MCI who were treated with tDCS. We aim to provide important evidence for the cognitive enhancement using tDCS in patients with MCI, summarizing the effects and conclusions found in several clinical trials, and discuss its main mechanisms.

The effects of noninvasive brain stimulation on cognitive function in patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) on cognition using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD), thus providing the neuroimaging mechanism of cognitive intervention.

METHODS

English articles published up to April 30, 2023 were searched in the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. We included randomized controlled trials where resting-state fMRI was used to observe the effect of NIBS in patients with MCI or AD. RevMan software was used to analyze the continuous variables, and SDM-PSI software was used to perform an fMRI data analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 17 studies comprising 258 patients in the treatment group and 256 in the control group were included. After NIBS, MCI patients in the treatment group showed hyperactivation in the right precuneus and decreased activity in the left cuneus and right supplementary motor area. In contrast, patients in the control group showed decreased activity in the right middle frontal gyrus and no hyperactivation. The clinical cognitive scores in MCI patients were significantly improved by NIBS, while not in AD. Some evidence regarding the modulation of NIBS in resting-state brain activity and functional brain networks in patients with AD was found.

CONCLUSIONS

NIBS could improve cognitive function in patients with MCI and AD. fMRI evaluations could be added to evaluate the contribution of specific NIBS treatment therapeutic effectiveness.

The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on cognitive function for mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) emerged as a potential modality for enhancing cognitive functions in patients with cognitive decline, including mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Our systematic review and meta-analysis aim to synthesize the available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effects of tDCS on cognitive functions in patients with MCI.

METHODS

Our review protocol was registered on PROSPERO with ID: CRD42022360587. We conducted a systematic database search until September 2022. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and pooled effect size (ES) for robust variance estimation (RVE) method were used as effect estimates for our meta-analysis.

RESULTS

We included 11 RCTs with a total of 429 participants. The meta-analysis showed that, compared to sham groups, tDCS did not improve global functioning (measured by MOCA) (SMD = 0.02, CI =  - 0.30 to 0.35; p = 0.88), memory domain (ES = 0.681, CI =  - 2.15 to 3.51, p = 0.576), sustained attention (measured by TMT-A) (SMD =  - 0.21, CI =  - 0.52 to 0.10, p = 0.19), and executive function (measured by TMT-B) (SMD =  - 0.53, CI =  - 1.56 to 0.50, p = 0.20).

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis found no significant effect of tDCS on cognitive functions in MCI patients, including effects on global functioning, memory, sustained attention, and executive function. Therefore, an important change to be tested in future studies is to look for a better combination with tDCS for patients with MCI.

Transcranial Electrical Stimulation for Associative Memory Enhancement: State-of-the-Art from Basic to Clinical Research

Associative memory (AM) is the ability to bind new information into complex memory representations. Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS), especially transcranial electric stimulation (tES), has gained increased interest in research of associative memory (AM) and its impairments. To provide an overview of the current state of knowledge, we conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines covering basic and clinical research. Out of 374 identified records, 41 studies were analyzed-twenty-nine in healthy young adults, six in the aging population, three comparing older and younger adults, as well as two studies on people with MCI, and one in people with Alzheimer's dementia. Studies using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) as well as oscillatory (otDCS) and high-definition protocols (HD-tDCS, HD-tACS) have been included. The results showed methodological heterogeneity in terms of study design, stimulation type, and parameters, as well as outcome measures. Overall, the results show that tES is a promising method for AM enhancement, especially if the stimulation is applied over the parietal cortex and the effects are assessed in cued recall paradigms.

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Intervention in Alzheimer's Disease and Its Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Alzheimer's disease (AD) stands as the prevailing type of dementia, marked by gradual memory loss and cognitive decline. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive method used to regulate cortical brain function and has been explored as a potential treatment for cognitive impairment.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the effects of daily home-based active or sham tDCS on cognitive function in patients with early-stage AD and its follow-up after one month.

METHODS

The study involved a randomized, blinded, and controlled-placebo design, with 18 participants enrolled. The primary outcome measures were general cognitive function, immediate, and delayed recall, and executive function. Participants included in the study were randomly assigned to the anodal and sham tDCS groups. Participants were assessed before and after the intervention and one month after the end of treatment. The home-based intervention was applied for 5 consecutive days, daily.

RESULTS

The results showed a significant interaction between the active and sham groups; in particular, improvements in MMSE scores, immediate memory and delayed recall were observed at one-month follow-up in the active group.

CONCLUSIONS

The positive effects of tDCS on cognitive function in AD patients observed suggest that tDCS may induce long-term neuroplastic changes, leading to sustained improvements in cognitive abilities.