Regional citrate anticoagulation for replacement therapy in patients with liver failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Construction and Validation of a Prediction Model for Postoperative Fatigue Syndrome in Chinese Patients with Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Postoperative fatigue syndrome (POFS) is prevalent in patients with lung cancer after surgery but often overlooked clinically, affecting patient care and recovery. Predictive models for assessing the risk and severity of postoperative fatigue in persons diagnosed with lung cancer are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a predictive model for POFS in patients with lung cancer to address under-recognition and its impact on recovery.

METHODS

Data from 203 lung cancer surgery patients were analyzed through univariate analysis to compare the relevant factors between 2 groups . Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression were used to screen potential key predictors. Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify independent influencing factors and build a nomogram. Receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the discrimination, accuracy, and clinical usability of the prediction model, with internal validation by the Bootstrap method.

RESULTS

Of the 203 patients, 57.1% developed POFS. The prediction model included 5 significant predictors: sleep quality, pain, activated partial thromboplastin time, forced vital capacity, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity ratio. The nomogram based on this model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.870, indicating good accuracy, with strong predictive power in internal validation. DCA showed clinical utility when the probability of POFS was above approximately 13%.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a high prevalence of POFS in survivors with lung cancer and successfully constructed a comprehensive nomogram with 5 factors.

Protocolized Regional Citrate Anticoagulation during Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A Single Center Experience

Background

Regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) has emerged as a treatment modality that reduces bleeding risk and filter clotting. With initial experience of using RCA with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), we have formulated a working protocol based on published literature.

Objective

The study aimed to evaluate the protocol for routine use of RCA during CRRT requiring anticoagulation and evaluation of filter life.

Methodology

It is a single-center, open-label, prospective, non-randomized, non-interventional, single-arm, observational study conducted at a tertiary care hospital between September 2022 and July 2023. All adult patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) or hyperammonemia requiring CRRT and necessitating the use of anticoagulation were enrolled in the study. The study used Prisma Flex M100 AN 69 dialyzer on Prisma Flex (Baxter) CRRT machines during continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF). The targeted CRRT dose in all the study patients was 25-30 mL/kg/hour. Based on the published literature, we have developed a working protocol (Appendix 1) for managing patients on CRRT using RCA.

Results

A total of 159 patients were analyzed for the study. The median [interquartile range (IQR)] filter life using RCA was 30 (12-55) hours. Filter clotting was observed in 33.3% of patients. Citrate accumulation was present in 52.25% of patients, but no CRRT was discontinued as citrate accumulation resolved after following the corrective steps in the protocol. None of the patients had citrate toxicity. Chronic liver disease (CLD) (p ≤ 0.001) and those who were post-living donor liver transplant recipients (p = 0.004) had a statistically significant increase in citrate accumulation. Also, patients who had higher lactate at baseline (6 hours post-CRRT initiation), had a higher chance of citrate accumulation.

Conclusion

Our RCA protocol provides a safe approach to regional anticoagulation during CRRT in critically ill patients.

How to cite this article

Pachisia AV, Kumar GP, Harne R, Jagadeesh KN, Patel SJ, Pal D, et al. Protocolized Regional Citrate Anticoagulation during Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A Single Center Experience. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(9):859-865.

How to safeguard the continuous renal replacement therapy circuit: a narrative review

The high prevalence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in ICU patients emphasizes the need to understand factors influencing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) circuit lifespan for optimal outcomes. This review examines key pharmacological interventions-citrate (especially in regional citrate anticoagulation), unfractionated heparin (UFH), low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), and nafamostat mesylate (NM)-and their effects on filter longevity. Citrate shows efficacy with lower bleeding risks, while UFH remains cost-effective, particularly in COVID-19 cases. LMWH is effective but associated with higher bleeding risks. NM is promising for high-bleeding risk scenarios. The review advocates for non-tunneled, non-cuffed temporary catheters, especially bedside-inserted ones, and discusses the advantages of surface-modified dual-lumen catheters. Material composition, such as polysulfone membranes, impacts filter lifespan. The choice of treatment modality, such as Continuous Veno-Venous Hemodialysis (CVVHD) or Continuous Veno-Venous Hemofiltration with Dialysis (CVVHDF), along with the management of effluent volume, blood flow rates, and downtime, are critical in prolonging filter longevity in CRRT. Patient-specific conditions, particularly the type of underlying disease, and the implementation of early mobilization strategies during CRRT are identified as influential factors that can extend the lifespan of CRRT filters. In conclusion, this review offers insights into factors influencing CRRT circuit longevity, supporting evidence-based practices and suggesting further multicenter studies to guide ICU clinical decisions.

Filter Lifespan, Treatment Effect, and Influencing Factors of Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy for Severe Burn Patients

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is often disrupted due to various factors, such as patient-related issues, vascular access complications, treatment plans, and medical staff factors. This unexpected interruption is referred to as non-selective filter stoppage and can result in additional treatment expenses. This study conducted a retrospectively analyzed 501 CRRT filters used in 62 patients with severe burns, lifespan and therapeutic effect of all filters were mainly analyzed, used logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors associated with non-selective cessation filters. Out of 493 filters, 279 cases received heparin (56.60%), the median lifespan of the filter was 14.08 h (25th, 75th quantile: 7.30, 21.50); 128 cases were treated with nafamostat mesylate (26.00%), and the median lifespan of the filter was 16.42 h (10.49, 22.76); 86 cases were treated with sodium citrate (17.40%), and the median lifespan of the filter was 31.06 h (19.25, 48.75). In addition, significant differences were observed in the electrolyte index, renal function index, and procalcitonin levels before and after treatment with a single filter (P < .001). Multivariate logistic regression showed that the risk of non-selective cessation of sodium citrate anticoagulants was lower than that of heparin anticoagulation. Overall, CRRT is progressively becoming more prevalent in the treatment of patients with severe burns. The lifespan of individual filters and total patient treatment duration showed a consistent upward trend. The filter's lifespan was notably greater during sodium citrate anticoagulation when compared to nafamostat mesylate and heparin, meanwhile notably reducing the risk of non-selective cessation. Therefore, we recommend sodium citrate for anticoagulation in patients without any contraindications.

A single center retrospective study: Comparison between centrifugal separation plasma exchange with ACD-A and membrane separation plasma exchange with heparin on acute liver failure and acute on chronic liver failure

The purpose of this retrospective study is to compare the efficacy and safety of the centrifugal separation therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) using citrate anticoagulant (cTPEc) with membrane separation TPE using heparin anticoagulant (mTPEh) in liver failure patients. The patients treated by cTPEc were defined as cTPEc group and those treated by mTPEh were defined as mTPEh group, respectively. Clinical characteristics were compared between the two groups. Survival analyses of two groups and subgroups classified by the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score were performed by Kaplan-Meier method and were compared by the log-rank test. In this study, there were 51 patients in cTPEc group and 18 patients in mTPEh group, respectively. The overall 28-day survival rate was 76% (39/51) in cTPEc group and 61% (11/18) in mTPEh group (P > .05). The 90-day survival rate was 69% (35/51) in cTPEc group and 50% (9/18) in mTPEh group (P > .05). MELD score = 30 was the best cut-off value to predict the prognosis of patients with liver failure treated with TPE, in mTPEh group as well as cTPEc group. The median of total calcium/ionized calcium ratio (2.84, range from 2.20 to 3.71) after cTPEc was significantly higher than the ratio (1.97, range from 1.73 to 3.19) before cTPEc (P < .001). However, there was no significant difference between the mean concentrations of total calcium before cTPEc and at 48 h after cTPEc. Our study concludes that there was no statistically significant difference in survival rate and complications between cTPEc and mTPEh groups. The liver failure patients tolerated cTPEc treatment via peripheral vascular access with the prognosis similar to mTPEh. The prognosis in patients with MELD score < 30 was better than in patients with MELD score ≥ 30 in both groups. In this study, the patients with acute liver failure (ALF) and acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF) treated with cTPEc tolerated the TPE frequency of every other day without significant clinical adverse event of hypocalcemia with similar outcomes to the mTPEh treatment. For liver failure patients treated with cTPEc, close clinical observation and monitoring ionized calcium are necessary to ensure the patients' safety.

Growing Evidence for Survival Benefit with Plasma Exchange to Treat Liver Failure

Plasma exchange (PLEX) to treat liver failure patients is gaining increasing momentum in recent years. Most reports have used PLEX to treat patients with acute liver failure (ALF) or acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF). Etiology of liver disease has an important bearing on the prognosis of the illness in these patients. The accruing data suggest survival benefit with PLEX compared with standard medical treatment to treat ALF and ACLF patients, in randomised controlled trials done world-over. The American College of Apheresis now recommends high-volume PLEX as first-line treatment for ALF patients. Most matched cohort studies done from India which recruited patients with a specific etiology of ALF or ACLF report survival benefit with PLEX compared to standard medical treatment. The survival benefit with PLEX appears more pronounced in ALF patients rather than in ACLF patients. Systematic analysis of the efficacy of PLEX to treat ALF and ACLF patients is needed. There is also a need to identify dynamic predictive scores to assess which patients with ALF or ACLF will respond to PLEX.

Management of regional citrate anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy: guideline recommendations from Chinese emergency medical doctor consensus

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is widely used for treating critically-ill patients in the emergency department in China. Anticoagulant therapy is needed to prevent clotting in the extracorporeal circulation during CRRT. Regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) has been shown to potentially be safer and more effective and is now recommended as the preferred anticoagulant method for CRRT. However, there is still a lack of unified standards for RCA management in the world, and there are many problems in using this method in clinical practice. The Emergency Medical Doctor Branch of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association (CMDA) organized a panel of domestic emergency medicine experts and international experts of CRRT to discuss RCA-related issues, including the advantages and disadvantages of RCA in CRRT anticoagulation, the principle of RCA, parameter settings for RCA, monitoring of RCA (mainly metabolic acid-base disorders), and special issues during RCA. Based on the latest available research evidence as well as the paneled experts' clinical experience, considering the generalizability, suitability, and potential resource utilization, while also balancing clinical advantages and disadvantages, a total of 16 guideline recommendations were formed from the experts' consensus.