An Intraoperative Model for Predicting Survival and Deciding Therapeutic Schedules: A Comprehensive Analysis of Peritoneal Metastasis in Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer

Effect of hyperthermia combined with opioids on cancer pain control and surgical stress in patients with gastrointestinal cancer

BACKGROUND

Surgical palliative surgery is a common method for treating patients with middle and late stage gastrointestinal tumors. However, these patients generally experience high levels of cancer pain, which can in turn stimulate the body's stress and undermine the effect of external surgery. Although opioid drugs have a significantly positive effect on controlling cancer pain, they can induce adverse drug reactions and potential damage to the body 's immune function. Hyperthermia therapy produces a thermal effect that shrinks tumor tissues. However, its effect on relieving the pain of middle and late stage gastrointestinal tumors but also the stress of surgical palliative surgery remains unclear.

AIM

To investigate the effect of hyperthermia combined with opioids on controlling cancer pain in patients with middle and late stage gastrointestinal cancer and evaluate its impact on surgical palliative surgical stress.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study using the data of 70 patients with middle and late stage gastrointestinal tumors who underwent cancer pain treatment and surgical palliative surgery in the Ninth People 's Hospital of Suzhou, China from January 2021 to June 2024. Patients were grouped according to different cancer pain control regimens before surgical palliative surgery, with n = 35 cases in each group, as follows: Patients who solely used opioid drugs to control cancer pain were included in Group S, while patients who received hyperthermia treatment combined with opioid drugs were included in Group L. In both groups, we compared the effectiveness of cancer pain control (pain score, burst pain score, 24-hour burst pain frequency, immune function, daily dosage of opioid drugs, and adverse reactions), surgical palliative indicators (surgery time, intraoperative bleeding, stress response), and postoperative recovery time, including first oral feeding time, postoperative hospital stay).

RESULTS

Analgesic treatment resulted in a significant decrease in the average pain score, burst pain score, and 24-hour burst pain frequency in both Groups L and S; however, these scores were statistically significantly lower in Group L than in Group S group (P < 0.001). Analgesic treatment also resulted in significant differences, namely serum CD4+ (29.18 ± 5.64 vs 26.05 ± 4.76, P = 0.014), CD8+ (26.28 ± 3.75 vs 29.23 ± 3.89, P = 0.002), CD4+/CD8+ (0.97 ± 0.12 vs 0.83 ± 0.17, P < 0.001), between Group L and Group S, respectively. The daily dosage of opioid drugs incidence of adverse reactions such as nausea, vomiting, constipation, and difficulty urinating were statistically significantly lower in Group L than those in group S (P < 0.05). Furthermore, palliative surgery time and intraoperative blood loss in Group L were slightly lower than those in Group S; however, the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). On the first day after surgery, serum cortisol and C-reactive protein levels of patients in group L and group S were 161.43 ± 21.07 vs 179.35 ± 27.86 ug/L (P = 0.003) and 10.51 ± 2.05 vs 13.49 ± 2.17 mg/L (P < 0.001), respectively. Finally, the first oral feeding time and hospitalization time after surgery in group L were statistically significantly shorter than those in group S (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our findings showed that hyperthermia combined with opioids is effective in controlling cancer pain in patients with middle and late stage gastrointestinal tumors. Furthermore, this method can reduce the dosage of opioids used and minimize potential adverse drug reactions, reduce the patient's surgical palliative surgical stress response, and shorten the overall postoperative recovery time required.

CT characteristics for predicting prognosis of gastric cancer with synchronous peritoneal metastasis

Introduction

To explore the CT characteristics for the prediction of long term survival in gastric cancer patients with synchronous peritoneal metastasis (PM).

Materials and methods

Sixty-six patients diagnosed as gastric cancer with synchronous peritoneum metastasis were enrolled in this retrospective study. Ten anatomic peritoneal regions were evaluated to check for the signs of PM on CT. One positive area equaled one score. The CT characteristic-based PM score (CT-PMS) was the sum of the total points assigned to all 10 regions, with a range of 0-10. The triple tract dilatation (TTD) sign caused by peritoneal metastasis, the presence of extensive lymph node metastasis (ELM), and the grade of ascites were recorded. The overall survival (OS) was used as the prognostic indicator. The performance of the CT characteristics was assessed by the Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards model, while its reproducibility was evaluated by Kappa statistic and weighted Kappa statistic.

Results

Patients with a CT-PMS of 3-10 had significantly poorer OS (P = .02). Patients with either the presence of TTD sign, or ELM had a trend toward unfavorable OS (both P = .07), and when CT-PMS of 3-10 was detected simultaneously, the survival was further reduced (P = .00 for TTD sign; P = .01 for ELM). The grade of ascites failed to show a significant correlation with OS. The interobserver reproducibility for assessing the CT-PMS, the presence of TTD sign, the presence of ELM, and the grade of ascites had a substantial to almost perfect agreement.

Conclusion

The prognosis of gastric cancer patients with PM has a correlation with the extent of metastasis dissemination on baseline CT. A CT-PMS of 3-10 is associated with a worse prognosis than that of 0-2. The presence of TTD sign and ELM may help further select patients with extraordinarily poor prognoses.

Incidence, Risk Factors and Prognosis of T4a Gastric Cancer: A Population-Based Study

Background: T4a gastric cancer (GC) is a subtype of advanced GC (AGC), which urgently needs a comprehensive grade method for better treatment strategy choosing. The purpose of this study was to develop two nomograms for predicting the prognosis of patients with T4a GC.

Methods: A total of 1,129 patients diagnosed as T4a GC between 2010 and 2015 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) program database. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were performed to explore the independent predictors and to establish nomogram for overall survival (OS) of the patients, whereas competing risk analyses were performed to find the independent predictors and to establish nomogram for cancer-specific survival (CSS) of the patients. The area under the curve (AUC), calibration curve, decision curve analysis (DCA), and Kaplan–Meier analysis were performed to evaluate the nomograms.

Results: Older age, larger tumor size, black race, signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC), more lymph node involvement, the absence of surgery, the absence of radiotherapy, and the absence of chemotherapy were identified as independent prognostic factors for both OS and CSS. In the training cohort, the AUCs of the OS nomogram were 0.760, 0.743, and 0.723 for 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS, whereas the AUCs of the CSS nomogram were 0.724, 0.703, and 0.713 for 1-, 3-, and 5-year CSS, respectively. The calibration curve and DCA indicated that both nomograms can effectively predict OS and CSS, respectively. The abovementioned results were also confirmed in the validation cohort. Stratification of the patients into high- and low-risk groups highlighted the differences in prognosis between the two groups both in training and in validation cohorts.

Conclusions: Age, tumor size, race, histologic type, N stage, surgery status, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy were confirmed as independent prognostic factors for both OS and CSS in patients with T4a GC. Two nomograms based on the abovementioned variables were constructed to provide more accurate individual survival predictions for them.