Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Lymph Node Oligometastases: Real-World Evidence From 90 Consecutive Patients

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Salvage for Lymph Node Recurrent Prostate Cancer in the Era of PSMA PET Imaging

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Our understanding of patterns of prostate cancer recurrence after primary treatment of localized disease has significantly evolved since the development of positron emission tomography (PET) agents targeting prostate cancer. Previously, most biochemical recurrences were not associated with imaging correlates when restaging with computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or bone scintigraphy and, hence, were typically assumed to represent occult metastases. A rising prostate specific antigen (PSA) after previous local therapy prompting a PET scan showing uptake limited to regional lymph nodes is an increasingly common clinical scenario as advanced prostate cancer imaging becomes more widely utilized. The optimal management strategy for patients who have lymph node recurrent prostate cancer is both unclear and evolving, particularly in terms of local and regionally directed therapies. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) utilizes ablative radiation doses with steep gradients to achieve local tumor control while sparing nearby normal tissues. SBRT is an attractive therapeutic modality due to its efficacy, favorable toxicity profile, and flexibility to administer elective doses to areas of potential occult involvement. The purpose of this review is to briefly describe how SBRT is being implemented in the era of PSMA PET for the management of solely lymph node recurrent prostate cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

SBRT has been shown to effectively control individual lymph node tumor deposits within the pelvis and retroperitoneum for prostate cancer and is well-tolerated with a favorable toxicity profile. However, a major limitation thus far has been the lack of prospective trials supporting the use of SBRT for oligometastatic nodal recurrent prostate cancer. As further trials are conducted, its exact role in the treatment paradigm of recurrent prostate cancer will be better established. Although PET-guided SBRT appears feasible and potentially beneficial, there is still considerable uncertainty about the use of elective nodal radiotherapy (ENRT) in patients with nodal recurrent oligometastatic prostate cancer. PSMA PET has undoubtedly advanced imaging of recurrent prostate cancer, revealing anatomic correlates for disease recurrence that previously went undetected. At the same time, SBRT continues to be explored in prostate cancer with feasibility, a favorable risk profile, and satisfactory oncologic outcomes. However, much of the existing literature comes from the pre-PSMA PET era and integration of this novel imaging approach has led to greater focus on new and ongoing clinical trials to rigorously evaluate this approach and compare to other established treatment modalities utilized for oligometastatic, nodal recurrence of prostate cancer.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for the treatment of lymph node metastases: a retrospective mono-institutional study in a large cohort of patients

Introduction

Lymph node metastases (NMs) are a common site of tumor spread that can occur at different times of the disease. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) can be a therapeutic option for the treatment of NMs in the setting of oligometastatic disease (OMD). The aim of this study was to evaluate as primary end points the local control (LC) and secondary end points the locoregional nodal control (LRNC), distant nodal control (DNC), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), and concurrently to assess the predictive factors of response.

Methods

This is a retrospective study that analyzes a group of patients treated with SBRT on NMs from different primary tumors, with a of maximum five metastasis. Treated lesions were divided into four groups: oligometastatics, oligorecurrents, oligoprogressives, and oligopersistents.

Results

From 2007 to 2021, 229 NMs were treated in 174 patients with different primary tumor. The schedule most represented was 30 Gy in five fractions. The LC was obtained in 90% of NMs treated by SBRT with rates at 1, 3, and 5 years of 93%, 86%, and 86%, respectively. The LRNC was reached in 84% of cases with rates at 1, 3, and 5 years of 88%, 83%, and 77%, respectively. The DNC was obtained in 87% of cases with rates at 1, 3, and 5 years of 92%, 82%, and 78%, respectively. The DMFS was obtained in 38% of cases with rates at 1, 3, and 5 years of 57%, 40%, and 30%, respectively. The rate of PFS were 44%, 23%, and 13% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The rates at 1, 3, and 5 years of OS were 78%, 48%, and 36%, respectively.

Conclusion

SBRT is an option for the treatment of NMS, with high rates of LC, improving survival, and with a good safety and tolerance. Tumor volume, tumor burden, lesion site, and doses can be predictive factors of response; however, multi-institutional studies with a greater number of patients could be helpful to better select patients and understand the right integrations between ablative treatment and systemic therapies.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for mediastinal lymph node with CyberKnife®: Efficacy and toxicity

PUPRPOSE

Stereotactic body radiotherapy is more and more used for treatment of oligometastatic mediastinal lymph nodes. The objective of this single-centre study was to evaluate its efficacy in patients with either a locoregional recurrence of a pulmonary or oesophageal cancer or with distant metastases of extrathoracic tumours.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with oligometastatic mediastinal lymph nodes treated with CyberKnife from June 2010 to September 2020 were screened. The primary endpoint was to assess local progression free survival and induced toxicity. Secondary endpoints were overall survival and progression free survival. The delay before introduction of systemic treatment in the subgroup of patients who did not receive systemic therapy for previous progression was also evaluated.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were included: 15 with a locoregional progression of a thoracic primary tumour (87% pulmonary) and 35 with mediastinal metastasis of especially renal tumour (29%). Median follow-up was 27 months (6-110 months). Local progression free survival at 6, 12 and 18 months was respectively 94, 88 and 72%. The rate of local progression was significantly lower in patients who received 36Gy in six fractions (66% of the cohort) versus other treatment schemes. Two grade 1 acute oesophagitis and one late grade 2 pulmonary fibrosis were described. Overall survival at 12, 18 and 24 months was respectively 94, 85 and 82%. Median progression free survival was 13 months. Twenty-one patients were treated by stereotactic body irradiation alone without previous history of systemic treatment. Among this subgroup, 11 patients (52%) received a systemic treatment following stereotactic body radiotherapy with a median introduction time of 17 months (5-52 months) and 24% did not progress.

CONCLUSION

Stereotactic body irradiation as treatment of oligometastatic mediastinal lymph nodes is a well-tolerated targeted irradiation that leads to a high control rate and delay the introduction of systemic therapy in selected patients.

Intra-fraction motion of pelvic oligometastases and feasibility of PTV margin reduction using MRI guided adaptive radiotherapy

Purpose

This study assesses the impact of intra-fraction motion and PTV margin size on target coverage for patients undergoing radiation treatment of pelvic oligometastases. Dosimetric sparing of the bowel as a function of the PTV margin is also evaluated.

Materials and methods

Seven patients with pelvic oligometastases previously treated on our MR-linac (35 Gy in 5 fractions) were included in this study. Retrospective adaptive plans were created for each fraction on the daily MRI datasets using PTV margins of 5 mm, 3 mm, and 2 mm. Dosimetric constraint violations and GTV coverage were measured as a function of PTV margin size. The impact of intra-fraction motion on GTV coverage was assessed by tracking the GTV position on the cine MR images acquired during treatment delivery and creating an intra-fraction dose distribution for each IMRT beam. The intra-fraction dose was accumulated for each fraction to determine the total dose delivered to the target for each PTV size.

Results

All OAR constraints were achieved in 85.7%, 94.3%, and 100.0% of fractions when using 5 mm, 3 mm, and 2 mm PTV margins while scaling to 95% PTV coverage. Compared to plans with a 5 mm PTV margin, there was a 27.4 ± 12.3% (4.0 ± 2.2 Gy) and an 18.5 ± 7.3% (2.7 ± 1.4 Gy) reduction in the bowel D_0.5cc dose for 2 mm and 3 mm PTV margins, respectively. The target dose (GTV V_{35 Gy}) was on average 100.0 ± 0.1% (99.6 - 100%), 99.6 ± 1.0% (97.2 - 100%), and 99.0 ± 1.4% (95.0 - 100%), among all fractions for the 5 mm, 3 mm, and 2 mm PTV margins on the adaptive plans when accounting for intra-fraction motion, respectively.

Conclusion

A 2 mm PTV margin achieved a minimum of 95% GTV coverage while reducing the dose to the bowel for all patients.

SMART ablation of lymphatic oligometastases in the pelvis and abdomen: Clinical and dosimetry outcomes

PURPOSE

To demonstrate dosimetry benefits and report clinical outcomes of stereotactic magnetic resonance (MR)-guided online adaptive radiotherapy (SMART) of abdominopelvic lymphatic oligometastases.

PATIENTS & METHODS

Prospective registry data of 26 patients with 31 oligoprogressive lymphatic metastases (1 - 2 lesions) who received SMART between April 2020 and April 2021 was analyzed. Prostate cancer was the most common histology (69%). Most patients (63%) had received previous abdominopelvic radiotherapy (RT). SMART was delivered in 3 - 7 fractions based on planning target volume (PTV) location and previous dose exposures. For SMART, the baseline plan was recalculated on daily 3D MR-imaging (predicted plan), and plan adaptation was mandatory in case of planning objective violations.

RESULTS

Plan adaptation was mostly performed due to violation of planning objectives in the predicted plan (134/140 fractions, 96%) and significantly improved plan dosimetry: 1) PTV coverage was increased (predicted: median 89%, adapted: median 95%, p < 0.001), 2) organs-at-risk (OAR) overdoses were reduced (predicted: 27/140 (19%), adapted: 1/140 (1%), p < 0.001) and 3) PTV overdoses were reduced (predicted: 21/140 (15%), adapted: 1/140 (1%), p < 0.001). After a median follow-up of 9.8 months, one patient had in-field tumor progression and twelve patients had out-field tumor progression (at 6 months: progression-free survival: 63% [46 - 88%], local control rate: 97% [90 - 100%]). Treatment was tolerated well and no grade ≥ 3 toxicity was reported.

CONCLUSION

SMART improves target volume coverage and yields superior OAR protection compared to non-adaptive radiotherapy, thus representing an innovative approach to challenging cases, such as repeated radiotherapy.