1
|
Carlet F, Kirova Y, Djerroudi L. [Rare tumours of the breast]. Cancer Radiother 2023; 27:759-767. [PMID: 37925348 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2023.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Revised: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/06/2023]
Abstract
Breast tumours are the most common tumours in women but represent a very heterogeneous group. On the one hand, there are ductal and lobular carcinomas of the breast, representing 90% of tumours, whose clinicopathologic characteristics are well known. On the other hand, there are rare breast tumours, each of which represents less than 1% that limits their study through large cohorts. The objective of this work was to collect, update and synthesize knowledge on these rare tumours. A literature review was performed on the Medline and Google Scholar databases. We present here a selection of several rare tumours, providing updated data at the epidemiological, histopathological, genetic, clinical and radiographic, prognostic and therapeutic levels, taking into account the place of radiotherapy. Each tumour histology is unique and has its own characteristics, the management must therefore be adapted as much as possible and decided in a multidisciplinary meeting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Carlet
- Département de radiothérapie, CHU de Saint-Étienne, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France.
| | - Y Kirova
- Département d'oncologie-radiothérapie, institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - L Djerroudi
- Département de médecine diagnostique et théranostique, institut Curie, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Corso G, Criscitiello C, Nicosia L, Pesapane F, Vicini E, Magnoni F, Sibilio A, Zanzottera C, De Scalzi AM, Mannucci S, Marabelli M, Calvello M, Feroce I, Zagami P, Porta FM, Toesca A, Tarantino P, Nicolò E, Mazzarol G, La Vecchia C, Bonanni B, Leonardi MC, Veronesi P, Fusco N. Metaplastic breast cancer: an all-round multidisciplinary consensus. Eur J Cancer Prev 2023; 32:348-363. [PMID: 37021548 DOI: 10.1097/cej.0000000000000794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
Metaplastic breast cancer (MpBC) is a rare and aggressive histologic subtype of breast cancer (BC) characterized by the presence of at least two cellular types, commonly epithelial and mesenchymal components. Despite growing evidence that MpBC is a unique entity, it has long been treated as a variant of nonspecial type (NST) BC. MpBC typically shows the phenotype of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), but compared to NST-TNBC, it is a relatively chemorefractory tumor associated with worse outcomes. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop management guidelines specifically for MpBC to improve the prognosis of patients with early MpBC. This expert consensus aims to guide diagnosis and standardize clinical management of early MpBC among treating physicians. We provide guidance on the challenging radiological and pathological diagnosis of MpBC. Evidence on the involvement of genetic predisposition in the development of MpBC is also explored. We emphasize the importance of a multidisciplinary approach for the treatment of patients with early MpBC. The optimal surgery and radiotherapy approach is presented, as well as the opportunity offered by novel therapeutic approaches to increase treatment response in this chemoresistant subtype. Appropriate management of patients with MpBC is critical to reduce the high risk of local and distant recurrence that characterizes this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Corso
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan
- European Cancer Prevention Organization (ECP)
| | - Carmen Criscitiello
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS
| | - Luca Nicosia
- Breast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan
| | - Filippo Pesapane
- Breast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan
| | - Elisa Vicini
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS
| | - Francesca Magnoni
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS
| | - Andrea Sibilio
- Division of Breast Surgery Forlì (Ravenna), AUSL Romagna, Ravenna
| | - Cristina Zanzottera
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan
| | | | - Sara Mannucci
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan
| | - Monica Marabelli
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan
| | - Mariarosaria Calvello
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan
- Division of Hematology, Clinica Moncucco, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Irene Feroce
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan
| | - Paola Zagami
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS
- Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences
| | | | - Antonio Toesca
- Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Candiolo (TO), Italy
| | - Paolo Tarantino
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS
- Division of Breast Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Eleonora Nicolò
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS
| | - Giovanni Mazzarol
- Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo La Vecchia
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, and
| | - Bernardo Bonanni
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan
| | | | - Paolo Veronesi
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan
| | - Nicola Fusco
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zheng C, Fu C, Wen Y, Liu J, Lin S, Han H, Han Z, Xu C. Clinical characteristics and overall survival prognostic nomogram for metaplastic breast cancer. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1030124. [PMID: 36937402 PMCID: PMC10018193 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1030124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Metaplastic breast cancer (MBC) is a rare breast tumor and the prognostic factors for survival in patients still remain controversial. This study aims to develop and validate a nomogram to predict the overall survival (OS) of patients with MBC. Methods We searched the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for data about patients including metaplastic breast cancer and infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) from 2010 to 2018. The survival outcomes of patients between MBC and IDC were analyzed and compared with the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method. MBC patients were randomly allocated to the training set and validation I set by a ratio of eight to two. Meanwhile, the performance of this model was validated again by the validation II set, which consisted of MBC patients from the Union Hospital of Fujian Medical University between 2010 and 2018. The independent prognostic factors were selected by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. The nomogram was constructed to predict individual survival outcomes for MBC patients. The discriminative power, calibration, and clinical effectiveness of the nomogram were evaluated by the concordance index (C-index), the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and the decision curve analysis (DCA). Results MBC had a significantly higher T stage (T2 and above accounting for 75.1% vs 39.9%), fewer infiltrated lymph nodes (N0 accounted for 76.2% vs 67.7%), a lower proportion of ER (22.2% vs 81.2%), PR (13.6% vs 71.4%), and HER-2(6.7% vs 17.7%) positive, radiotherapy(51.6% vs 58.0%) but more chemotherapy(67.5% vs 44.7%), and a higher rate of mastectomy(53.2% vs 36.8%), which was discovered when comparing the clinical baseline data between MBC and IDC. Age at diagnosis, T, N, and M stage, as well as surgery and radiation treatment, were all significant independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). In the validation I cohort, the nomogram's C-index (0.769 95% CI 0.710 -0.828) was indicated to be considerably higher than the standard AJCC model's (0.700 95% CI 0.644 -0.756). Nomogram's great predictive capability capacity further was supported by the comparatively high C-index of the validation II sets (0.728 95%CI 0.588-0.869). Conclusions Metaplastic breast cancer is more aggressive, with a worse clinical prognosis than IDC. This nomogram is recommended for patients with MBC, both American and Chinese, which can help clinicians make more accurate individualized survival analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caihong Zheng
- The Graduate School of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Chengbin Fu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Yahui Wen
- The Graduate School of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Jiameng Liu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Women and Children’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China
| | - Shunguo Lin
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Hui Han
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Zhonghua Han
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- *Correspondence: Zhonghua Han, ; Chunsen Xu,
| | - Chunsen Xu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- *Correspondence: Zhonghua Han, ; Chunsen Xu,
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang G, Sun X, Ren X, Wang M, Wang Y, Zhang S, Li J, Lu W, Zhang B, Chen P, Shi Z, Liu L, Zhuang J. Establishment of prognostic model for postoperative patients with metaplastic breast cancer: Based on a retrospective large data analysis and Chinese multicenter study. Front Genet 2022; 13:993116. [PMID: 36092916 PMCID: PMC9454815 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.993116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Models for predicting postoperative overall survival of patients with metaplastic breast cancer have not yet been discovered. The purpose of this study is to establish a model for predicting postoperative overall survival of metaplastic breast cancer patients. Methods: Patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database diagnosed with MBC from 2010 to 2015 were selected and randomized into a SEER training cohort and an internal validation cohort. We identified independent prognostic factors after MBC surgery based on multivariate Cox regression analysis to construct nomograms. The discriminative and predictive power of the nomogram was assessed using Harrell's consistency index (C-index) and calibration plots. The decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the model. We verify the performance of the prediction model with a Chinese multi-center data set. Results: Multifactorial analysis showed that age at diagnosis, T stage, N stage, M stage, tumor size, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy were important prognostic factors affecting OS. The C-index of nomogram was higher than the eighth edition of the AJCC TNM grading system in the SEER training set and validation set. The calibration chart showed that the survival rate predicted by the nomogram is close to the actual survival rate. It has also been verified in the SEER internal verification set and the Chinese multi-center data set. Conclusion: The prognostic model can accurately predict the post-surgical OS rate of patients with MBC and can provide a reference for doctors and patients to establish treatment plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ge Wang
- Clinical Medical Colleges, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China
| | - Xiaomin Sun
- Clinical Medical Colleges, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China
| | - Xin Ren
- Clinical Medical Colleges, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China
| | - Mengmeng Wang
- Clinical Medical Colleges, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China
| | - Yongsheng Wang
- Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Shukun Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Weihai Municipal Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Weihai, China
| | - Jingye Li
- Department of Oncology, Linyi Central Hospital, Linyi, China
| | - Wenping Lu
- Department of Oncology, Guang’ Anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medicine Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Baogang Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China
| | - Pingping Chen
- Department of Pathology, The People’s Hospital of Rizhao, Rizhao, China
| | - Zhiqiang Shi
- Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Lijuan Liu
- Department of Oncology, Weifang Traditional Chinese Hospital, Weifang, China
| | - Jing Zhuang
- Department of Oncology, Weifang Traditional Chinese Hospital, Weifang, China
| |
Collapse
|