The Efficacy and Safety of Apatinib Plus Camrelizumab in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Prospective Clinical Study

Camrelizumab in combination with chemotherapy and targeted therapy improves the prognosis in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: a single-center retrospective clinical study

Background

Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is an aggressive neoplasm with poor overall survival. Chemotherapy has improved the prognosis of BTC, but the outcomes still remain very unsatisfactory. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has shown promising efficacy in multiple solid tumors, including BTC. However, despite significant progress, the use of immunotherapy for the treatment of BTC is still in its early stages, and the evidence for its use is mixed, possibly due to inaccurate grouping based on the expression of programmed death ligand 1, a reliable candidate biomarker if carefully handled. Here, we reviewed the outcomes of camrelizumab, an Food and Drug Administration-approved anti-PD-1 ICI, combined with chemotherapy or targeted therapy in patients with advanced BTC.

Methods

Patients with advanced BTC treated with camrelizumab in combination with chemotherapy or targeted therapy as the first-line therapy from September 2020 to September 2023 were included in this retrospective, non-randomized and single-center design study. Treatment efficacy and treatment-related adverse events were subjected to statistical analysis.

Results

Fifteen patients were enrolled in this study. The mean age of the patients was 62 years (ranging from 25 to 75 years old), comprising 9 males and 6 females. The pathological diagnoses included 11 cases of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, 1 case of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and 3 cases of gallbladder carcinoma. Among them, 5 cases diagnosed at stage IIa were deemed inoperable for surgery due to anticipated insufficient residual liver volume. Additionally, there were 5 cases classified as stage IIIb and 5 cases as stage IV. Seven patients achieved a partial response, and the study had an overall response rate of 46.7%. Seven patients had stable disease, with a disease control rate of 93.3%. At the cut-off date of September 30, 2023, the median follow-up time was 15.7 months (range, 1.7-33 months). The patients had a median progression-free survival time of 18 months (95% confidence interval: 12.4-not reached). Of the patients, nine (60.0%) were deemed eligible for surgery. Six patients (40%) developed grade III neutropenia, one (6.7%) developed grade IV neutropenia, and one (6.7%) developed grade III thrombocytopenia.

Conclusions

The application of camrelizumab as neoadjuvant therapy in the treatment of patients with advanced BTC showed encouraging efficacy and safety.

Adrenomedullin Inhibits the Efficacy of Combined Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapy in Biliary Tract Cancer by Disrupting Endothelial Cell Functions

The global incidence of biliary tract cancer (BTC) is on the rise, presenting a substantial healthcare challenge. The integration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with molecularly targeted therapies is emerging as a strategy to enhance immune responses. However, the efficacy and underlying mechanisms of these treatments in BTC are still largely unexplored. In this study, tissue samples from 19 BTC patients treated with camrelizumab and apatinib were analysed using the NanoString 289-panel to identify key molecular biomarkers. Comparative analyses and subsequent experimental validations, including cell-based assays and histopathological examinations, identified adrenomedullin (ADM) as a critical molecular marker associated with treatment efficacy and poor prognosis. ADM has been shown to promote BTC cell proliferation, migration and angiogenesis, primarily by interacting with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and increasing AKT phosphorylation. Furthermore, ADM disrupts endothelial cell barrier function via the calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CRLR) and vascular endothelial (VE)-cadherin signalling pathway. Preclinical inhibition of ADM or CRLR resulted in suppressed tumour growth. Additionally, elevated ADM expression was correlated with increased tumour-infiltrating immune cells and higher immune checkpoint expression. These findings suggest that ADM plays a pivotal role in resistance to immunotherapy and anti-angiogenic treatment in BTC, and thus, targeting ADM may offer a promising therapeutic approach to enhance treatment efficacy.

Efficacy and safety of camrelizumab, apatinib, and capecitabine combination therapy in advanced biliary tract cancer: a phase 2, nonrandomized, prospective study

BACKGROUND

Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is a highly malignant tumor, with limited therapy regimens and short response duration. In this study, we aim to assess the efficacy and safety of the combination of camrelizumab, apatinib, and capecitabine as the first- or second-line treatment in patients with advanced BTC.

METHODS

In this phase 2, nonrandomized, prospective study, eligible patients received camrelizumab (200 mg, d1, Q3W), apatinib (250 mg, qd, d1-d21, Q3W), and capecitabine (1000 mg/m², bid, d1-d14, Q3W) until trial discontinued. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints were disease control rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.

RESULTS

From July 2019 to April 2023, we enrolled a total of 28 patients, of whom 14 patients were in the first-line treatment setting and 14 patients were in the second-line setting. At the data cutoff (April 30, 2023), the median follow-up duration was 18.03 months. Eight of 28 patients reached objective response (ORR: 28.57%), with an ORR of 50% and 7.1% for first-line and second-line treatment patients (P = .033). The median PFS was 6.30 months and the median OS was 12.80 months. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 9 (32.14%) patients, including elevated transaminase, thrombocytopenia, etc. No serious treatment-related AEs or treatment-related deaths occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

In this trial, the combination of camrelizumab, apatinib, and capecitabine showed promising antitumor activity and manageable toxicity in patients with advanced BTC, especially in the first-line setting.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04720131.

Effectiveness, safety, and biomarker analysis of lenvatinib plus toripalimab as chemo-free therapy in advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a real-world study

BACKGROUND

Treatment options for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) are currently limited. Chemo-containing regimens are the mainstay treatments but associated with notable toxicity, poor tolerance, and reduced compliance, necessitating exploration of alternative therapies. Lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitors has shown substantial clinical activity in preliminary studies. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of lenvatinib plus toripalimab (a novel PD-1 antibody) as chemo-free therapy in advanced ICC.

METHODS

This retrospective study included consecutive advanced ICC patients receiving lenvatinib plus toripalimab between February 2019 and December 2023. The main outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. Prognostic factors and exploratory analyses for genetic alternations were also conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 78 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 25.9 months. Median OS and PFS were 11.3 (95% CI: 9.5-13.1) and 5.4 (95% CI: 3.8-7.0) months, respectively. ORR was 19.2% and DCR was 75.6%. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) was 50.0%, with no grade 5 AEs reported. Patients with normal baseline CA19-9 levels exhibited a higher ORR (p = 0.011), longer PFS (11.5 versus 4.6 months; HR 0.47; p=0.005), and OS (21.0 versus 9.7 months; HR 0.43; p=0.003). The presence of IDH1 mutations correlated with increased ORR (60.0% versus 8.9%, p=0.016).

CONCLUSION

Lenvatinib plus toripalimab represents an effective and well-tolerated chemo-free therapeutic option for advanced ICC. Baseline CA19-9 levels and IDH1 mutations may serve as predictive treatment-related biomarkers.

Advances in target drugs and immunotherapy for biliary tract cancer

INTRODUCTION

After years of treatment stagnation in biliary tract cancers (BTC), there has been a notable shift with the emergence of targeted therapies and immunotherapy, leading to substantial progress in tackling this aggressive disease.

AREAS COVERED

We provide a comprehensive overview of the target therapies that are already part of the treatment algorithm for BTC, such as FGFR, IDH, and HER2 inhibitors. Additionally, we delve into some less known targets that are being explored, such as KRAS proto-oncogene, MAPK cascade, PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway and novel molecules directed against P53, claudin, histones, and mitochondrial metabolism. Furthermore, we discuss agnostic drugs and analyze the efficacy data available for BTC specifically. We also examine the expanding world of immunotherapy, with an eye on predictive factors of response for immune checkpoint inhibitors, and on novel immune drugs such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T and vaccines.

EXPERT OPINION

In the expert opinion, we discuss the problem of the scarcity of patients eligible for target therapies and how can clinical trials be designed to overcome this challenge. We also summarize the most promising trials that have the potential to change clinical practice both for immunotherapies and target drugs.

Efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus anti-PD-1 agents in patients with refractory advanced biliary tract cancers

BACKGROUND

Anlotinib has demonstrated promising anti-tumor efficacy in various solid tumors. Additionally, there is evidence suggesting that immune therapy can enhance the systemic responses of anlotinib. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of combining anlotinib with PD-1 inhibitors compared to fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy as a second-line treatment option for advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs).

METHODS

A total of 242 patients with BTCs were screened at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from October 2015 to October 2022. Among them, 78 patients who received either anlotinib plus PD-1 inhibitors (AP) or fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy (FB) as second-line treatment were included in the study. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), safety, and predictive tumor biomarkers.

RESULTS

Among the 78 patients with BTCs, 39 patients received AP, while 39 patients were administered FB. The ORR in the AP group was 20.5%, compared to 5.1% in the FB group. The DCR was 87.2% in the AP group and 66.7% in the FB group. The AP group demonstrated significantly better ORR and DCR compared to the FB group (p = 0.042, p = 0.032). The median PFS and OS in the AP group were 7.9 months (95% CI: 4.35-11.45) and 13.9 months (95% CI: 5.39-22.41), respectively. In the FB group, the median PFS and OS were 4.1 months (95% CI: 3.17-5.03) and 13.2 months (95% CI: 8.72-17.68), respectively. The AP group exhibited significantly better median PFS than the FB group (p = 0.027). In the subgroup analysis, patients without liver metastasis had a much longer PFS in the AP group compared to the FB group (14.3 vs. 5.5 months, p = 0.016). Similarly, patients with CEA ≤ 5 μg/L also demonstrated a longer PFS in the AP group compared to the FB group (8.7 vs. 3.9 months, p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of anlotinib and PD-1 inhibitors demonstrated a promising clinical effect compared to fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in the second-line treatment of refractory advanced BTCs. Liver metastases and CEA levels may serve as predictive factors for identifying patients who may benefit from AP therapy.

Efficacy and biomarker analysis of second-line nab-paclitaxel plus sintilimab in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer

Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is a highly aggressive malignancy with limited second-line therapy. We conducted this phase 2 trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of second-line nab-paclitaxel plus sintilimab in advanced BTC. Histologically confirmed advanced BTC patients with documented disease progression after first-line chemotherapy were enrolled. Subjects received nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 plus sintilimab 200 mg on day 1, administered every 3 weeks. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR). The secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse reactions. Simultaneously, next-generation sequencing, programmed cell death ligand 1 immunohistochemistry and multiplex immunofluorescence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were applied to explore potential biomarkers. Twenty-six subjects were consecutively enrolled. The ORR was 26.9% (7/26), including two complete responses and five partial responses, which met the primary end point. The disease control rate was 61.5% (16/26). The median PFS was 169 days (about 5.6 months, 95% confidence interval [CI] 60-278 days). The median OS was 442 days (about 14.7 months, 95% CI 298-586 days). Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were mainly anemia (27%), leukopenia (23%), neutropenia (19%), and peripheral sensory neuropathy (8%). No grade 4 or 5 TRAEs occurred. Biomarker analysis suggested that positive PD-L1 and high proportions of CD8+ T-cell infiltration were correlated with improved clinical outcome. Nab-paclitaxel plus sintilimab is a potentially effective and tolerable second-line regimen for advanced BTC that deserves to be studied in large-scale trials. PD-L1 status and CD8+ T cell infiltration might be promising biomarkers for efficacy prediction.

Practice guidelines for managing extrahepatic biliary tract cancers

Backgrounds/Aims

Reported incidence of extrahepatic bile duct cancer is higher in Asians than in Western populations. Korea, in particular, is one of the countries with the highest incidence rates of extrahepatic bile duct cancer in the world. Although research and innovative therapeutic modalities for extrahepatic bile duct cancer are emerging, clinical guidelines are currently unavailable in Korea. The Korean Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery in collaboration with related societies (Korean Pancreatic and Biliary Surgery Society, Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology, Korean Society of Medical Oncology, Korean Society of Radiation Oncology, Korean Society of Pathologists, and Korean Society of Nuclear Medicine) decided to establish clinical guideline for extrahepatic bile duct cancer in June 2021.

Methods

Contents of the guidelines were developed through subgroup meetings for each key question and a preliminary draft was finalized through a Clinical Guidelines Committee workshop.

Results

In November 2021, the finalized draft was presented for public scrutiny during a formal hearing.

Conclusions

The extrahepatic guideline committee believed that this guideline could be helpful in the treatment of patients.

Clinical outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor combined with other targeted or immunological therapy regimens for the treatment of advanced bile tract cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and aims

A single immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) regimen has limited value in treating advanced bile tract cancer (BTC); therefore, ICI combination therapy is often applied. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ICI combination therapy for advanced BTC.

Methods

The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023452422). Data on the median progression-free survival (PFS), median overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) reported in relevant studies were pooled and analyzed to determine the efficacy and safety of ICI combination therapy.

Results

In total, 15 studies with 665 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The overall ORR and DCR were 34.6% and 77.6%, respectively. The overall median PFS and OS were 6.06 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.91-7.21] and 12.11 months (95% CI: 10.66-13.55), respectively. Patients receiving ICI combination therapy in addition to other therapies had a considerably prolonged median PFS and OS (z=9.69, p<0.001 and z=16.17, p<0.001). Patients treated as first-line treatment had a substantially longer median PFS and OS compared to patients treated as non-first-line treatment (z=11.19, p<0.001 and z=49.17, p<0.001). The overall pooled grade ≥3 AEs rate was 38.2% (95% CI: 0.268-0.497) and was not influenced by whether ICI therapy was combined with other treatments or not or the treatment line.

Conclusion

Advanced BTC patients may benefit from ICI combination treatment without additional AEs. However, concurrent chemotherapy or radiotherapy is still needed to achieve better outcomes.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023452422.

The more the merrier? Evidence and efficacy of immune checkpoint- and tyrosine kinase inhibitor combinations in advanced solid cancers

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have gained therapeutical significance in cancer therapy over the last years. Due to the high efficacy of each substance group, additive or complementary effects are considered, and combinations are the subject of multiple prospective trials in different tumor entities. The majority of available data results from clinical phase I and II trials. Although regarded as well-tolerated therapies ICI-TKI combinations have higher toxicities compared to monotherapies of one of the substance classes and some combinations were shown to be excessively toxic leading to discontinuation of trials. So far, ICI-TKI combinations with nivolumab + cabozantinib, pembrolizumab + axitinib, avelumab + axitinib, pembrolizumab + lenvatinib have been approved in advanced renal cell (RCC), with pembrolizumab + lenvatinib in endometrial carcinoma and with camrelizumab + rivoceranib in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Several ICI-TKI combinations are currently investigated in phase I to III trials in various other cancer entities. Further, the optimal sequence of ICI-TKI combinations is an important subject of investigation, as cross-resistances between the substance classes were observed. This review reports on clinical trials with ICI-TKI combinations in different cancer entities, their efficacy and toxicity.

The predictive value of PD-L1 expression in response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy for biliary tract cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Recently, anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunotherapy offers promising results for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). However, patients show highly heterogeneous responses to treatment, and predictive biomarkers are lacking. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the potential of PD-L1 expression as a biomarker for treatment response and survival in patients with BTC undergoing anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive systematic literature search through June 2023, utilizing the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. The outcomes of interest included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) according to PD-L1 expression. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were performed to identify possible sources of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

A total of 30 studies was included in the final analysis. Pooled analysis showed no significant differences in ORR (odds ratio [OR], 1.56; 95% confidence intervals [CIs], 0.94-2.56) and DCR (OR, 1.84; 95% CIs, 0.88-3.82) between PD-L1 (+) and PD-L1 (-) patients. In contrast, survival analysis showed improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.54, 95% CIs, 0.41-0.71) and OS (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.47-0.72) among PD-L1 (+) patients compared to PD-L1 (-) patients. Sensitivity analysis excluding retrospective studies showed no significant differences with the primary results. Furthermore, meta-regression demonstrated that drug target (PD-1 vs. PD-L1), presence of additional intervention (monotherapy vs. combination therapy), and PD-L1 cut-off level (1% vs. ≥5%) significantly affected the predictive value of PD-L1 expression.

CONCLUSION

PD-L1 expression might be a helpful biomarker for predicting PFS and OS in patients with BTC undergoing anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. The predictive value of PD-L1 expression can be significantly influenced by diagnostic or treatment variables.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier CRD42023434114.

Locoregional therapy combined with systemic therapy (LRT + ST) for unresectable and metastatic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The outcome of systemic therapy (ST) for unresectable and metastatic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is poor. This study aims to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of locoregional therapy combined with systemic therapy (LRT + ST) compared with only ST in unresectable and metastatic iCCA by performing a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library up to November 3, 2022. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Ten retrospective cohort studies with 3,791 unresectable or metastatic iCCA patients were enrolled in this study, including 1,120 who received ablation, arterially directed therapy (ADT), or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) combined with ST. The meta-analysis showed that the LRT + ST group had a better OS (HR = 0.51; 95% CI =0.41-0.64; p value < 0.001), PFS (HR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.22-0.71, p value = 0.002) and ORR (RR = 1.68; 95% CI = 1.17-2.42; p value = 0.005). Subgroup analysis showed that both ST combined with ADT (HR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.31-0.56, p value < 0.001) and EBRT (HR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.63-0.72, p value < 0.001) could improve OS. Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, anorexia, and vomiting did not show significant differences between the groups (p value > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with only ST, LRT + ST improved survival outcomes for unresectable and metastatic iCCA patients without increasing severe AEs, which can further provide a basis for guidelines.

Lacking Immunotherapy Biomarkers for Biliary Tract Cancer: A Comprehensive Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy has recently been incorporated into the spectrum of biliary tract cancer (BTC) treatment. The identification of predictive response biomarkers is essential in order to identify those patients who may benefit most from this novel treatment option. Here, we propose a systematic literature review and a meta-analysis of PD-1, PD-L1, and other immune-related biomarker expression levels in patients with BTC.

METHODS

Prisma guidelines were followed for this systematic review and meta-analysis. Eligible studies were searched on PubMed. Studies published between 2017 and 2022, reporting data on PD-1/PD-L1 expression and other immune-related biomarkers in patients with BTC, were considered eligible.

RESULTS

A total of 61 eligible studies were identified. Despite the great heterogeneity between 39 studies reporting data on PD-L1 expression, we found a mean PD-L1 expression percentage (by choosing the lowest cut-off per study) of 25.6% (95% CI 21.0 to 30.3) in BTCs. The mean expression percentages of PD-L1 were 27.3%, 21.3%, and 27.4% in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (iCCAs-15 studies), perihilar-distal CCAs (p/dCCAs-7 studies), and gallbladder cancer (GBC-5 studies), respectively. Furthermore, 4.6% (95% CI 2.38 to 6.97) and 2.5% (95% CI 1.75 to 3.34) of BTCs could be classified as TMB-H and MSI/MMRd tumors, respectively.

CONCLUSION

From our analysis, PD-L1 expression was found to occur approximately in 26% of BTC patients, with minimal differences based on anatomical location. TMB-H and MSI molecular phenotypes occurred less frequently. We still lack a reliable biomarker, especially in patients with mismatch-proficient tumors, and we must need to make an effort to conceive new prospective biomarker discovery studies.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors and combinations with other agents in cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma consists of a heterogeneous group of malignancies with generally poor prognoses. Immunotherapy has emerged in the treatment landscape of many tumors, offering survival benefits, but data regarding the use of immunotherapy for cholangiocarcinoma remain vague. In this review, the authors analyze differences in the tumor microenvironment and various immune escape mechanisms and discuss available immunotherapy combinations with other agents among completed and ongoing clinical trials, such as chemotherapy, targeted agents, antiangiogenic drugs, local ablative therapies, cancer vaccines, adoptive cell therapy and PARP and TGF-β inhibitors. Ongoing research to identify appropriate biomarkers is warranted.

A phase I open-label study of the safety and efficacy of apatinib (rivoceranib) administered to patients with advanced malignancies to improve sensitivity to pembrolizumab in the second- or later-line setting (APPEASE)

OBJECTIVE

APPEASE is a phase I study to assess the safety, dosing, and efficacy of rivoceranib (a selective, small-molecule inhibitor of VEGFR2) in combination with pembrolizumab. We aimed to treat patients with metastatic malignancies who have progressed through at least first-line therapy, with pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks, as well as escalating doses of rivoceranib until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

RESULTS

Five patients were enrolled on the starting dose of rivoceranib 300 mg once daily. There were no dose-limiting toxicities observed in combination with pembrolizumab. The dose of rivoceranib was not escalated due to study closure. We note a treatment related grade 3 adverse event (AE) rate of 40%, predominantly in urothelial cancer patients, with no deaths related to treatment related AEs. The disease control rate was 75% (3 of 4) and the median progression free survival (PFS) was 3.6 months. Tumor shrinkage was noted in patients who were previously progressing on pembrolizumab alone. Apatinib 300 mg is safe and demonstrates anti-tumor activity in advanced solid tumors in combination with pembrolizumab. Further dose escalation and efficacy need to be investigated in larger disease-specific patient populations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Clinical trial registration number: NCT03407976. Date of registration: January 17, 2018.

Efficacy and safety of a triple combination of atezolizumab, bevacizumab plus GEMOX for advanced biliary tract cancer: a multicenter, single-arm, retrospective study

Background

Anti-programmed cell death ligand 1/vascular endothelial growth factor inhibition, coupled with chemotherapy, may potentiate antitumor immunity leading to enhanced clinical benefit, but it has not been investigated in advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC).

Objectives

We investigated the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab, bevacizumab, and gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin (GEMOX) in advanced BTC and explore the potential biomarkers related to the response.

Design

Multicenter, single-arm, retrospective study.

Methods

Advanced BTC patients, who received a triple combination therapy at three medical centers between 18 March 2020 and 1 September 2021, were included. Treatment response was evaluated via mRECIST and RECIST v1.1. Endpoints included the overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. The whole exome sequencing of pathological tissues was conducted for bioinformatic analysis.

Results

In all, 30 patients were enrolled. The best ORR was 76.7% and the DCR was 90.0%. The median PFS was 12.0 months, and the median OS was not reached. During the treatment, 10.0% (3/30) of patients suffered from ⩾grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Furthermore, fever (73.3%), neutropenia (63.3%), increased aspartate transaminase and alanine aminotransferase levels (50.0% and 43.3%, respectively) are the most common TRAEs. Bioinformatics analysis revealed patients with altered ALS2CL had a higher ORR.

Conclusion

The triple combination of atezolizumab, bevacizumab, and GEMOX may be efficacious and safe for patients with advanced BTC. ALS2CL may be a potential predictive biomarker for the efficacy of triple combination therapy.

PD-1-mAb Plus Regimen in the First and Second Lines of Advanced and Unresectable Biliary Tract Carcinoma: A Real-World, Multicenter Retrospective Analysis

Introduction

Advanced biliary tract carcinoma (BTC) has a poor prognosis and few treatment options. We compared the efficacy of the PD-1 monoclonal antibody (PD-1-mAb) combined regimens with the standard chemotherapy in the first-line and second-line treatment of advanced BTC.

Methods

We retrospectively assessed the patients with advanced BTC, who received treatment at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University and the Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center. The patients were treated with PD-1-mAb combined regimens or standard chemotherapy at the first line or treated with PD-1-mAb combined regimens or systematic therapy at the second line. Further subgroup analyses were assessed to identify superior regimens.

Results

This study included 210 patients. The first-line PD-1-mAb combination group (n = 83) achieved longer median PFS (mPFS) (7.3 vs 5.3 months, p=0.001) and median OS (mOS) (15.6 vs 11.4 months, p=0.002) than the first-line standard chemotherapy group (n=76). Similarly, the second-line PD-1-mAb combination group (n=50) yielded longer mPFS (6.1 vs 2.6 months, p<0.001) and mOS (11.7 vs 7.2 months, p=0.008) than the second-line systematic therapy group (n=51). Subgroup analyses showed that the PD-1-mAb combined with TKI group achieved better mPFS than the chemotherapy group whether in the first-line (HR = 0.468, p=0.005) or the second-line setting (HR = 0.45, p=0.009), but did not achieve superiority in mOS (both p>0.05). Compared with the chemotherapy group, the PD-1-mAb combined with chemotherapy group achieved longer mOS (HR = 0.53, p=0.023) in the first-line setting and longer mPFS in the second-line setting (HR = 0.54, p=0.044).

Conclusion

The PD-1-mAb combination therapy is superior to the standard chemotherapy in advanced or unresectable BTC, whether as a first-line or second-line treatment. Among the combination therapy, both the PD-1-mAb combined with TKI and combined with standard chemotherapy were promising options for advanced BTC patients.

Response to apatinib and camrelizumab combined treatment in a radioiodine refractory differentiated thyroid cancer patient resistant to prior anti-angiogenic therapy: A case report and literature review

Background

Patients with radioactive iodine refractory progressive (RAIR) differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) often developed resistance after first-line therapy. Apatinib plus camrelizumab is a therapy with promising efficacy in patients with other malignant cancers. Herein, we presented a case of progressive RAIR DTC treated with apatinib plus camrelizumab.

Case presentation

We reported a 43-year-old man diagnosed as DTC with metastases in the lungs, the 7th cervical vertebra, and malignant lymph nodes mainly in the mediastinum. While initially showing disease stabilization after giving the first-line multitargeted kinase inhibitor (MKI) therapy, the patient developed progressive disease and was enrolled into a combined therapy with both apatinib and camrelizumab on November 10, 2020. Upon the first 6 months, the combination therapy showed disease control in terms of both stable structural lesions and biochemical thyroglobulin (Tg) level. Six months later, a decrease over the targeted lesions was observed and a partial response (PR) according to RECIST 1.1 criteria was finally achieved upon 12 months’ assessment, followed by the decline in serum Tg level. The main adverse event was occasional diarrhea without treatment interruption.

Conclusion

We reported a case with RAIR DTC that benefited from combination immunotherapy, apatinib plus camrelizumab, after resistance from donafenib. We observed a gradually getting better efficacy and a mild and long duration of this combination therapy and hoped to provide a therapeutic choice for these patients.

Case report: immunotherapy successfully treated brain metastasis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and literature review

Brain metastasis from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is extremely rare, and no standard therapeutic strategy has been established. Camrelizumab is a programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor that has been widely studied in treating liver cancer. Combined immunotherapy and targeted therapy are a promising approach for treating advanced iCCA. Despite that immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based neoadjuvant therapy on iCCA has shown a significant response rate and resection rate, few reports have shown the therapeutic efficacy of immunotherapy in treating brain metastasis from iCCA. Although PD-1 inhibitors such as pembrolizumab, nivolumab, or camrelizumab are increasingly applied in clinic practice to treat multiple malignancies, to the best of our knowledge, we report the first case of an iCCA patient with brain metastasis successfully treated with a combined immunotherapy and targeted therapy. The patient is a 54-year-old man with metastatic iCCA in brain treated though camrelizumab plus lenvatinib therapy with a complete response (CR). By the time of writing, he has had a progression-free survival of 17.5 months and did not experience any severe side effects related to this therapy. Camrelizumab plus lenvatinib therapy showed favorable efficacy and manageable toxicity for this patient with advanced iCCA and could be of interest for more prospective randomized trials to further verify the potential clinical benefits.

Sintilimab Combined with Lenvatinib for Advanced Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma in Second-Line Setting—A Multi-Center Observational Study

Background

Patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) have a poor prognosis and a substantial unmet clinical need. The study was aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of sintilimab combined with lenvatinib for advanced iCCA in second-line setting.

Methods

The patients at multiple centers, who progressed after the first-line chemotherapy or could not tolerate chemotherapy, were treated with the combination of sintilimab plus lenvatinib. The primary endpoint was time to progression (TTP), and the secondary endpoints included tumor objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. Prognostic factors were analyzed using Cox regression analysis.

Results

A total of 41 patients with advanced iCCA were enrolled for this multi-center observational study. Under a median follow-up of 12.1 months, the median age was 59 years (range, 33–75 years). Sixteen patients died of disease progression, with a median TTP of 6.6 months (95% CI, 4.9–8.3). ORR and DCR were 46.3% and 70.3%, respectively. The patients with PD-L1 TPS ≥10% reported a significantly higher ORR compared to those with PD-L1 TPS <10%, 93.8% (15/16) vs. 16.0% (4/25), p<0.001. The median TTP was significantly improved in patients with PD-L1 TPS ≥10%, 16.9 months (95% CI, 7.5–26.3) vs. 4.1 months (95% CI, 1.8–6.4), p=0.001. Attaining treatment response predicts favorable TTP in a multivariate Cox model. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred with 70.3% probability, and no treatment-related death had been reported.

Conclusion

The combination of sintilimab plus lenvatinib is effective and well tolerated for advanced iCCA in the second-line setting. PD-L1 TPS expression may predict the efficacy of the combination therapy. Further investigation is warranted to investigate this combination regimen in advanced iCCA.

Triple therapy in biliary tract cancers: GemOX plus immune checkpoint inhibitor in combination with lenvatinib or NGS-guided targeted therapy

PURPOSE

The combination of gemcitabine-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors has a good efficacy in advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). The multi-target TKI lenvatinib and NGS-guided targeted therapy are also promising in BTC treatment. This study aimed to explore the performance of GemOX plus sintilimab and TKI (either lenvatinib or by NGS-guided targeted therapy) for local advanced or metastatic BTCs.

METHODS

This prospective single-arm study included patients with local advanced or metastatic BTCs and applied intravenous infusion of standard GemOX plus sintilimab and lenvatinib (no targetable gene alterations) or targeted therapy based on NGS (olaparib for BRCA1/2 mutation, dasatinib for IDH1/2 mutation, afatinib for EGFR amplification, lenvatinib for PDGFR and KIT mutation, and lenvatinib for FGFR/KIT mutation).

RESULTS

From November 2020 to December 2021, 22 patients BTCs (6 GBC, 14 iCCA, 1 pCCA and 1 dCCA cases) were enrolled, with an average age of 58.4 years. Partial response (PR) was achieved in 10 cases, stable disease (SD) in 9 cases and progression disease (PD) in 3 cases (13.6%). The objective response rate (ORR) was 45.5%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 86.4%. During the treatment, the incidence of adverse reactions was 81.8%, and the incidence of grade 3/4 adverse events was 9.09%. For 14 patients with NGS, 5 patients were treated by targeted therapy and there were 1 SD and 4 PR cases. For four patients with positive PD-L1 expression, the ORR was 100%. While among the three patients with super-progression markers such as RET, MDM2 and FGF14/STK24, there were two SD and one PD cases.

CONCLUSION

In patients with advanced BTCs, the combination of GemOX plus sintilimab and lenvatinib or NGS-guided targeted therapy showed promising ORR and DCR, especially for the patients with positive PD-L1 expression and targetable gene alterations.

Apatinib: A Novel Antiangiogenic Drug in Monotherapy or Combination Immunotherapy for Digestive System Malignancies

Digestive system malignancies are one of the primary causes of cancer-related death. Meanwhile, angiogenesis has been proved to play an important role in the process of cancer neovascularization. Apatinib, a novel targeted antiangiogenic molecule, could generate highly selective competition in the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2, involved in tumor progression and metastasis. It has been implied as a promising cancer treatment agent that can prevent tumor cell proliferation meanwhile inhibit tumor angiogenesis. Furthermore, completed clinical trials demonstrated that apatinib could prolong the progression-free survival and overall survival in advanced gastric cancer and primary liver cancer. Recent studies revealed that apatinib had a synergistic effect with immunotherapy as a second-line and third-line treatment regimen for some other cancers. In this review, we summarize the pharmacological properties of apatinib and the latest clinical application in chemotherapy-refractory patients with advanced digestive system cancer. Based on the comparable survival results, the molecular mechanisms of apatinib are prospective to include the antiangiogenic, apoptosis-inducing, and autophagy-inducing properties in the corresponding signaling pathway. Treatment of apatinib monotherapy or combination immunotherapy remains the optimal option for patients with digestive system malignancies in the future.

Treatment Response, Survival Benefit and Safety Profile of PD-1 Inhibitor Plus Apatinib Versus Apatinib Monotherapy in Advanced Colorectal Cancer Patients

Purpose

Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor plus apatinib is reported to be a promising strategy for advanced cancers. Moreover, a PD-1 inhibitor or apatinib exerts a certain efficacy in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC), whereas their synergistic effect is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the treatment efficacy and safety of a PD-1 inhibitor plus apatinib in advanced CRC patients.

Methods

In total, 45 advanced CRC patients who received a PD-1 inhibitor plus apatinib (PD-1 inhibitor plus apatinib group, N=20) or apatinib monotherapy (apatinib group, N=25) as third-line therapies were enrolled in the current study.

Results

The objective response rate (20.0% vs. 8.0%) (P=0.383) and disease control rate (70.0% vs. 52.0%) (P=0.221) were numerically increased in the PD-1 inhibitor plus apatinib group, respectively, compared with the apatinib group, but no statistical significance was observed. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.5 versus 4.8 months; the 1-year PFS rate was 32.5% versus 9.9%; the median overall survival (OS) was 12.3 versus 8.7 months; and the 1-year OS rate was 50.7% versus 27.0% in the PD-1 inhibitor plus apatinib group versus the apatinib group, respectively. PFS (P=0.038) and OS (P=0.048) were prolonged in the PD-1 inhibitor plus apatinib group compared with the apatinib group. PD-1 inhibitor plus apatinib (versus apatinib) was independently associated with longer PFS (P=0.012) and OS (P=0.009). The majority of the adverse events were of grade 1-2, wherein the incidence was similar between groups, except for the fact that the incidence of capillary proliferation was elevated in the PD-1 inhibitor plus apatinib group compared with the apatinib group (25.5% versus 0.0%) (P=0.013).

Conclusion

PD-1 inhibitor plus apatinib presents a potential improvement in efficacy and survival benefit compared with apatinib monotherapy, with tolerable safety in advanced CRC patients.

Efficacy and Safety of Anti-PD1/PDL1 in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Anti-programmed cell death protein 1 and its ligand (anti-PD1/PDL1) have been proposed as a promising therapeutic option for advanced biliary tract cancer (aBTC). Given the scarce quantitative analyses of anti-PD1/PDL1 in aBTC, we thus did a meta-analysis to assess the benefits and risks of this emerging treatment strategy in patients with aBTC.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and meeting resources were searched for relevant studies. The main endpoints were median progression-free survival (mPFS), median overall survival (mOS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), any-grade adverse events (AEs), and grade 3-4 AEs.

Results

Twenty-eight studies with 1,338 participants were included. The best curative effect was found in the anti-PD1/PDL1 combined with anti-CTLA4 and chemotherapy group (mPFS: 12.4 months; mOS: 16.0 months; ORR: 45.1%; DCR: 95.0%), followed by the anti-PD1/PDL1 plus chemotherapy group (mPFS: 8.2 months; mOS: 14.8 months; ORR: 36.3%; DCR: 84.6%), the anti-PD1/PDL1 plus antiangiogenesis group (mPFS: 4.9 months; mOS: 10.2 months; ORR: 17.5%; DCR: 68.7%), the anti-PD1/PDL1 plus anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (anti-CTLA4) group (mPFS: 2.9 months; mOS: 8.3 months; ORR: 9.9%; DCR: 36.8%), and the anti-PD1/PDL1 monotherapy group (mPFS: 2.5 months; mOS: 7.6 months; ORR: 6.8%; DCR: 34.7%). Compared with anti-PD1-containing regimens, anti-PDL1-containing regimens achieved preferable mPFS (11.1 vs. 3.8 months), mOS (12.2 vs. 9.8 months), and ORR (23.7% vs. 17.4%), despite a similar DCR (61.1% vs. 61.3%). The mPFS, mOS, ORR, and DCR were 10.6 months, 15.8 months, 42.3%, and 88.6% of first-line anti-PD1/PDL1 and 3.0 months, 9.1 months, 11.6%, and 51.1% of second-line therapy or beyond, respectively. There were 80.6% and 34.0% of the patients suffering any-grade AEs and grade 3-4 AEs. Anti-PD1/PDL1 monotherapy might be considered as a safer alternative than combination regimens. Meanwhile, obvious toxicities in the first-line setting could not be neglected.

Conclusions

Anti-PD1/PDL1 showed encouraging efficacy and acceptable safety profile in aBTC and, thus, could be an alternative treatment.

Changing Landscape of Systemic Therapy in Biliary Tract Cancer

Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are often diagnosed at advanced stages and have a grave outcome due to limited systemic options. Gemcitabine and cisplatin combination (GC) has been the first-line standard for more than a decade. Second-line chemotherapy (CT) options are limited. Targeted therapy or TT (fibroblast growth factor 2 inhibitors or FGFR2, isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 or IDH-1, and neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase or NTRK gene fusions inhibitors) have had reasonable success, but <5% of total BTC patients are eligible for them. The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) such as pembrolizumab is restricted to microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) patients in the first line. The success of the TOPAZ-1 trial (GC plus durvalumab) is promising, with numerous trials underway that might soon bring targeted therapy (pemigatinib and infrigatinib) and ICI combinations (with CT or TT in microsatellite stable cancers) in the first line. Newer targets and newer agents for established targets are being investigated, and this may change the BTC management landscape in the coming years from traditional CT to individualized therapy (TT) or ICI-centered combinations. The latter group may occupy major space in BTC management due to the paucity of targetable mutations and a greater toxicity profile.

Prognostic and Predictive Molecular Markers in Cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the second most common primary liver cancer and subsumes a heterogeneous group of malignant tumors arising from the intra- or extrahepatic biliary tract epithelium. A rising mortality from CCA has been reported worldwide during the last decade, despite significant improvement of surgical and palliative treatment. Over 50% of CCAs originate from proximal extrahepatic bile ducts and constitute the most common CCA entity in the Western world. Clinicopathological characteristics such as lymph node status and poor differentiation remain the best-studied, but imperfect prognostic factors. The identification of prognostic molecular markers as an adjunct to traditional staging systems may not only facilitate the selection of patients who would benefit the most from surgical, adjuvant or palliative treatment strategies, but may also be helpful in defining the aggressiveness of the disease and identifying patients at high-risk for tumor recurrence. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of currently known molecular prognostic and predictive markers and their role in CCA.

Recurrent Gallbladder Carcinoma With pMMR/MSS Achieved a Complete Response Following Camrelizumab Combined With Apatinib: A Case Report

Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) with proficient mismatch repair (pMMR)/microsatellite stable (MSS) is associated with limited response to programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor monotherapy. Limited data of PD-1 blockade combined with anti-angiogenic therapy in GBC are reported. One recurrent GBC patient with pMMR/MSS was treated with camrelizumab plus apatinib. After 4 cycles of combination therapy, the patient achieved a durable complete response with manageable toxicity. The next-generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry analysis showed that tumor mutation burden (TMB) was 7.26 mutants/Mb and PD-L1 expression was 10% (tumor proportion score) and 20% (immune proportion score). This case suggests that camrelizumab in combination with apatinib may be an effective treatment option for GBC patients with pMMR/MSS status, who have moderate expression of TMB and PD-L1. Additionally, TMB and PD-L1 expression may serve as potential biomarkers for predicting PD-1 inhibitor response of GBC. Furthermore, this needs to be verified in future studies.

Effect of different doses of apatinib mesylate combined with chemotherapy on advanced oral cancer

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the therapeutic effect and safety of different doses of apatinib mesylate combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced oral cancer.

METHODS

Totally 100 patients with advanced oral cancer admitted to our hospital from January 2019 to July 2020 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into a control group (500 mg apatinib mesylate combined with chemotherapy) and an experimental group (250 mg apatinib mesylate combined with chemotherapy). The two groups were compared in terms of the incidence of adverse reactions, treatment effective rate, disease control rate, objective response rate, Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score (quality of life), score of the mental status scale in non-psychiatric settings (MSSNS), survival rates and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2) after treatment. In addition, logistic regression was used to analyze the influencing factors for KPS<85 after oral cancer treatment.

RESULTS

The treatment effective rate, disease control rate, objective response rate, KPS score (quality of life), survival rates in the experimental group were all significantly improved compared to those in the control group (all P<0.05), and the incidence of adverse reactions, MSSNS score, and the levels of VEGF and VEGFR-2 after treatment in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group (all P<0.05). Furthermore, a history of smoking, a history of drinking, a tooth brushing index <3, the frequency of teeth cleansing ≤1 time per year, a history of oral diseases >3 times, and poor nutritional status were independent risk factors for KPS<85 after oral cancer treatment.

CONCLUSION

Apatinib mesylate (250 mg) combined with chemotherapy can reach optimal efficacy with highest safety but least adverse effects for patients with advanced oral cancer.

Cholangiocarcinoma: the role of genetic and epigenetic factors; current and prospective treatment with checkpoint inhibitors and immunotherapy

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) represents 3% of all gastrointestinal cancers worldwide and is the second most common primary liver tumor after hepatocellular carcinoma. CCA is an aggressive tumor that involves the intrahepatic, perihilar and distal biliary tree, with a poor prognosis and an increasing incidence worldwide. Various genetic and epigenetic factors have been implicated in CCA development. Gene mutations involving apoptosis control and cell cycle evolution, histone modifications, methylation dysregulation and abnormal expression of non-coding RNA are the most important of these factors. Regarding treatment, surgical resection, cisplatin and gemcitabine have long been the most common treatment options, but 5-year survival (7-20%) is disappointing. For that reason, inhibitors and small molecules related to specific mutations and molecular pathways have been introduced. Among them, immunotherapy seems to be a promising treatment in CCA, with multiple regimens being under clinical trial studies. The combinatorial therapy of traditional CCA treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and/or immunotherapy seem to be the future, depending on the molecular profile of each patient's tumor.