Diagnosis and Molecular Profiles of Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma With Potential Targets for Therapy

Capivasertib augments chemotherapy via Akt inhibition in preclinical small cell lung cancer models

BACKGROUND

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive type of lung cancer for which platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard of care. Despite an initial response to this therapy, patients eventually develop resistance to the chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the potential of capivasertib, an approved drug for advanced breast cancer, to enhance the efficacy of cisplatin in preclinical SCLC models and explore the underlying mechanisms.

METHODS

SCLC cell lines were treated with capivasertib and cisplatin, alone or in combination, to assess cell viability, proliferation, colony formation, and apoptosis. Next, capivasertib's effects, alone and combined with cisplatin, were evaluated in an SCLC mouse model. Mechanistic studies focused on Akt and MYC signaling, with constitutively active Akt overexpression used to assess its role.

RESULTS

Capivasertib is active against a panel of SCLC cell lines regardless of cellular origin and genetic profiling with IC50 at a clinically achievable range. Particularly, capivasertib inhibits proliferation and anchorage-independent colony formation and induces apoptosis in SCLC cells. It significantly augments cisplatin's inhibitory effects in all tested cell lines. Importantly, capivasertib at a non-toxic dose is effective in delaying SCLC growth in mice and its combination with cisplatin achieves nearly complete tumor growth inhibition. Mechanistic studies confirm that capivasertib inhibits Akt and MYC signaling, and furthermore, that overexpression of constitutively active Akt reversed anti-SCLC activity of capivasertib.

CONCLUSION

Our work is the first to reveal that Akt inhibition can augment chemotherapy in SCLC, and capivasertib is a useful addition to the treatment armamentarium for SCLC.

Clinical characteristics and treatment management of combined large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, a subtype of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma

Combined large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (CLCNEC) is a rare neuroendocrine carcinoma, accounting for approximately 10% of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC). Mainly composed of coexisting adenocarcinoma components, with strong invasiveness and poor prognosis. The treatment regimen for CLCNEC mainly refers to complete surgical resection as the first choice in the early stage, while patients with stage II or higher require adjuvant treatment. At present, research on CLCNEC is mostly small sample and retrospective, and there is no consensus on whether molecular typing and treatment should be carried out. There is considerable controversy over whether it should be managed as small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) or non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Therefore, in order to solve the problem of confusion in the selection of treatment regimens for CLCNEC, while also considering the therapeutic effects, this article summarizes and analyzes previous studies, fully seeks evidence, and boldly proposes new therapeutic insights: the etoposide-platinum (EP) regimen serves as the basis for adjuvant therapy; In addition, SCLC/NSCLC-CLCNEC can be distinguished based on presence of RB1 and TP53 co-mutation, and targeted therapy or NSCLC type chemotherapy including platinum + gemcitabine or taxanes (NSCLC-GEM/TAX) can be used in combination or sequentially for NSCLC-CLCNEC.

Clinical and pathological characteristics of gastric large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: A report of 2 cases series and literature review

RATIONALE

Gastric large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare, aggressive neuroendocrine carcinoma that arises from the stomach and with high malignancy. Patients with gastric LCNEC usually have a poor prognosis. The standard treatment plan has not been established and its curative effect is poor. The present study described 2 cases diagnosed with gastric LCNEC and reviewed in depth the literature to improve our understanding more about this uncommon tumor and further to provide more experience to diagnose and treat this disease.

PATIENT CONCERNS

The present study reported 2 cases of gastric LCNEC in male patients aged 51 and 73 years old, respectively. Both patients had epigastric discomfort, pain, acid reflux and heartburn. The medical history was unremarkable.

DIAGNOSES

The ulcerative lesion located at gastric was examined in the 2 patients by taking the esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGO), computed tomography (CT) and digital gastrointestinal radiography (GI), that both were suspected gastric malignancy. Endoscopic biopsies of the tumor led to the initial diagnosis of gastric cancer. Postoperative pathological and immunohistochemical examinations of the surgical specimens confirmed that 1 case had mixed adeno-neuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC) and the other had LCNEC.

INTERVENTIONS

Both patients underwent surgical resection and received etoposide-cisplatin combination chemotherapy following surgery.

OUTCOMES

The operation was successful. Both patients had uneventful recoveries following surgery, and had been followed-up regularly. The general condition was satisfactory, and no tumor metastasis was observed at present.

BRAF V600E-mutated large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma responding to targeted therapy: a case report and review of the literature

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare and aggressive high-grade neuroendocrine tumor, commonly arising in the lung or in the gastrointestinal tract, with a frequent proportion of unknown primary origin (20%). In the metastatic setting, platinum-based or fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapeutic regimens are as considered the first-line treatment, despite the limited duration of response. To date, the prognosis of advanced high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma remains poor, suggesting the need to explore new treatment strategies in this orphan tumor. The evolving molecular landscape of LCNEC, not yet been completely defined, could explain the heterogeneous response to different chemotherapeutic regimens and suggest that treatment strategy could be driven by molecular features. v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF) mutations, well described in melanoma, thyroid cancer, colon cancer and lung adenocarcinoma, account for approximately 2% of cases in lung LCNEC. Here, we describe the case of a patient with a BRAF V600E-mutated LCNEC of unknown primary origin who partially responded to BRAF/mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase inhibitors after standard treatment. Additionally, BRAF V600E circulating tumor DNA was used to monitor disease response. Thereafter, we reviewed the available literature about the role of targeted therapy in high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms to provide insight for future research to identify patients with driver oncogenic mutations, who can potentially benefit from target therapy.

Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC): a population-based study addressing recent molecular-genetic advances and emerging therapeutic approaches

BACKGROUND

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the lung is a rare, aggressive cancer most commonly found in the lungs but not exclusively, with a worse prognosis than non-small cell lung carcinomas. Currently, LCNEC patients are treated using small cell and non-small cell protocols. This study aims to use the SEER database to identify demographic, clinical, pathological, and therapeutic factors affecting the prognosis and survival of patients with LCNEC of the lung.

METHODS

Demographic, clinical, and management data of patients with lung LCNEC were extracted from the SEER database for the period 2000-2018.

RESULTS

In the USA, LCNEC has a higher incidence in elderly white men: M:F ratio = 1.2:1, Caucasian: 83.3%, mean age: 67 ± 10.2 years. The most common treatment modality was chemotherapy only: 29.2%, followed by surgery: 21.5% (but in this group the statuses of chemotherapy were unknown), and combination surgery/chemotherapy: 8.8%. The overall and cause-specific 5-year survival was 17.5% (95% CI 16.3-18.8) and 21.9% (95% CI 20.5-23.4), respectively. By treatment, the best 5-year survival was for surgery alone (48%), followed by multimodality therapy (chemo + surgery + radiation) at 35% (95% CI 27-43). Age > 60 years, male gender, size > 7 cm, and nodal and liver metastasis were independent risk factors associated with increased mortality.

CONCLUSION

Lung LCNEC is an aggressive neoplasm most common in older white males that presents at an advanced stage despite small primary tumors. Most patients die within 2 years. The best predictor of survival is surgery with chemotherapy. Given its dismal prognosis, new treatment guidelines are needed for this aggressive cancer.

Clinical activity of pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy in advanced pulmonary large-cell and large-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)-based combination strategies have improved the survival outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancers; however, data regarding their efficacy remains limited for uncommon histological types, including large-cell carcinoma (LCC) and large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed a total of 60 patients with advanced LCC and LCNEC - 37 treatment-naïve and 23 pre-treated - who received pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy. Treatment and survival outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 37 treatment-naïve patients who received first-line pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy, the 27 patients with LCC had an overall response rate (ORR) of 44.4% (12/27) and a disease control rate (DCR) of 88.9% (24/27); whereas 10 patients with LCNEC had an ORR of 70% (7/10) and DCR of 90% (9/10). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 7.0 months (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 2.2-11.8) and median overall survival (mOS) was 24.0 months (95%CI: 0.0-50.1) for first-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy of LCC (n = 27), whereas mPFS was 5.5 months (95%CI: 2.3-8.7) and mOS was 13.0 months (95%CI: 11.0-15.0) for first-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy of LCNEC (n = 10). Of the 23 pre-treated patients who received subsequent-line pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy, mPFS was 2.0 months (95% CI: 0.6-3.4) and mOS was 4.5 months (95% CI: 0.0-9.0) for LCC and mPFS was 3.8 months (95% CI: 0.0-7.6) and mOS was not reached for LCNEC.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides real-world clinical evidence of the anti-tumor activity of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in advanced LCC and LCNEC, indicating that this regimen could serve as a treatment option, particularly as first-line therapy, for improving the survival outcomes of patients with these rare histological subtypes of lung cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05023837(ESPORTA, 27/08/2021).

Differential response in patients with large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung to initial therapy: A case series

BACKGROUND

Large cell neuroendocrine tumors of the lung (LCNEC) are rare. Chemotherapy with the small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) regimen is the most appropriate treatment for LCNEC. However, there is evidence that the non-small cell lung cancer regimen is also effective in some reported cases. Due to the differences in response to LCNEC treatment, a standard of care for LCNEC has not been established.

CASES

The clinical records of nine patients with LCNEC who were treated with anticancer drugs based on an SCLC regimen from March 2016 to March 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients who responded to treatment after one cycle of systemic chemotherapy were compared to those who did not respond. All patients in the responder group had a performance status (PS) of 0 or 1. However, 5 of the 6 patients in the non-responder group had a PS of 2 or 3, indicating that many patients were in poor general condition. Although patients with multiple metastases to more than one organ prior to treatment were not identified in the responder group, five of these patients were in the non-responder group. In the non-responder group, all patients discontinued treatment due to deterioration of general condition during first-line treatment. Thus, none of them were able to start the second-line treatment.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study may suggest that early diagnosis and initiation of treatment before multiple organ metastasis development and PS decline may have clinical implications that could lead to improved treatment response in patients with LCNEC.