1
|
Signorelli C, Chilelli MG, Giannarelli D, Basso M, Calegari MA, Anghelone A, Lucchetti J, Minelli A, Angotti L, Zurlo IV, Schirripa M, Morelli C, Dell’Aquila E, Cosimati A, Gemma D, Ribelli M, Emiliani A, Corsi DC, Arrivi G, Mazzuca F, Zoratto F, Morandi MG, Santamaria F, Saltarelli R, Ruggeri EM. Retrospective Correlation between First Drug Treatment Duration and Survival Outcomes in Sequential Treatment with Regorafenib and Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Real-World Subgroup Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5758. [PMID: 38136304 PMCID: PMC10741389 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15245758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Revised: 12/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) rarely receive third-line or further treatment. In this context, regorafenib (R) and trifluridine/tipiracil (T) are two important novel therapeutic choices with statistically significant increases in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and disease control, with different toxicity profiles. This study is a subgroup analysis of our larger retrospective study, already published, whose objective was to assess the outcomes of patients when R and T were given sequentially. Patients and Methods: The study involved thirteen Italian cancer centers on a 10-year retrospective observation (2012-2022). In this subgroup analysis, we focused our attention on the correlation between the first drug treatment duration (<3 months, 3 to <6 months and ≥6 months) and survival outcomes in patients who had received the sequence regorafenib-to-trifluridine/tipiracil, or vice versa. Results: The initial study included 866 patients with mCRC who received sequential T/R, or R/T, or T or R alone. This analysis is focused on evaluating the impact of the duration of the first treatment in the sequence on clinical outcomes (OS, PFS) and includes 146 and 116 patients of the T/R and R/T sequences, respectively. Based on the duration of the first drug treatment, subgroups for the T/R sequence included 27 patients (18.4%) who received T for <3 months, 86 (58.9%) treated for 3 to <6 months, and 33 (22.6%) treated for ≥6 months; in the reverse sequence (R as the first drug), subgroups included 18 patients (15.5%) who received their first treatment for <3 months, 62 (53.4%) treated for 3 to <6 months, and 35 (31.0%) treated for ≥6 months. In patients who received their first drug treatment for a period of 3 to <6 months, the R/T sequence had a significantly longer median OS (13.7 vs. 10.8 months, p = 0.0069) and a longer median PFS (10.8 vs. 8.5 months, p = 0.0003) than the T/R group. There were no statistically significant differences between groups with first drug treatment durations of <3 months and ≥6 months. Conclusions: Our analysis seems to suggest that the administration of R for a period of 3 to <6 months before that of T can prolong both OS and PFS, as compared to the opposite sequence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Signorelli
- Medical Oncology Unit, Belcolle Hospital, ASL Viterbo, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| | | | - Diana Giannarelli
- Biostatistics Unit, Scientific Directorate, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Michele Basso
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Alessandra Calegari
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Annunziato Anghelone
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Jessica Lucchetti
- Division of Medical Oncology, Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Minelli
- Division of Medical Oncology, Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Angotti
- Division of Medical Oncology, Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | | | - Marta Schirripa
- Medical Oncology Unit, Belcolle Hospital, ASL Viterbo, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| | - Cristina Morelli
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University Hospital, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Emanuela Dell’Aquila
- Medical Oncology 1, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Antonella Cosimati
- Medical Oncology 1, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Donatello Gemma
- Medical Oncology Unit, ASL Frosinone, 03039 Sora (FR), Italy
| | - Marta Ribelli
- Medical Oncology Unit, Isola Tiberina Hospital-Gemelli Isola, 00186 Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandra Emiliani
- Medical Oncology Unit, Isola Tiberina Hospital-Gemelli Isola, 00186 Rome, Italy
| | | | - Giulia Arrivi
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Oncology Unit, Sant’ Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy
| | - Federica Mazzuca
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Oncology Unit, Sant’ Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy
| | | | - Maria Grazia Morandi
- Medical Oncology Unit, San Camillo de Lellis Hospital, ASL Rieti, 02100 Rieti, Italy
| | - Fiorenza Santamaria
- UOC Oncology A, Policlinico Umberto I, 00185 Rome, Italy
- Experimental Medicine, Network Oncology and Precision Medicine, Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy
| | - Rosa Saltarelli
- UOC Oncology, San Giovanni Evangelista Hospital, ASL RM5, 00019 Tivoli (RM), Italy
| | - Enzo Maria Ruggeri
- Medical Oncology Unit, Belcolle Hospital, ASL Viterbo, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Signorelli C, Calegari MA, Basso M, Anghelone A, Lucchetti J, Minelli A, Angotti L, Zurlo IV, Schirripa M, Chilelli MG, Morelli C, Dell'Aquila E, Cosimati A, Gemma D, Ribelli M, Emiliani A, Corsi DC, Arrivi G, Mazzuca F, Zoratto F, Morandi MG, Santamaria F, Saltarelli R, Ruggeri EM. Treatment Settings and Outcomes with Regorafenib and Trifluridine/Tipiracil at Third-Line Treatment and beyond in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Real-World Multicenter Retrospective Study. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:5456-5469. [PMID: 37366896 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30060413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2023] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with refractory mCRC rarely undergo third-line or subsequent treatment. This strategy could negatively impact their survival. In this setting, regorafenib (R) and trifluridine/tipiracil (T) are two key new treatment options with statistically significant improvements in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and disease control with different tolerance profiles. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety profiles of these agents in real-world practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS In 2012-2022, 866 patients diagnosed with mCRC who received sequential R and T (T/R, n = 146; R/T, n = 116]) or T (n = 325]) or R (n = 279) only were retrospectively recruited from 13 Italian cancer institutes. RESULTS The median OS is significantly longer in the R/T group (15.9 months) than in the T/R group (13.9 months) (p = 0.0194). The R/T sequence had a statistically significant advantage in the mPFS, which was 8.8 months with T/R vs. 11.2 months with R/T (p = 0.0005). We did not find significant differences in outcomes between groups receiving T or R only. A total of 582 grade 3/4 toxicities were recorded. The frequency of grade 3/4 hand-foot skin reactions was higher in the R/T sequence compared to the reverse sequence (37.3% vs. 7.4%) (p = 0.01), while grade 3/4 neutropenia was slightly lower in the R/T group than in the T/R group (66.2% vs. 78.2%) (p = 0.13). Toxicities in the non-sequential groups were similar and in line with previous studies. CONCLUSIONS The R/T sequence resulted in a significantly longer OS and PFS and improved disease control compared with the reverse sequence. R and T given not sequentially have similar impacts on survival. More data are needed to define the best sequence and to explore the efficacy of sequential (T/R or R/T) treatment combined with molecular-targeted drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Signorelli
- Medical Oncology Unit, Belcolle Hospital, ASL Viterbo, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| | - Maria Alessandra Calegari
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Michele Basso
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Annunziato Anghelone
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Jessica Lucchetti
- Division of Medical Oncology, Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Minelli
- Division of Medical Oncology, Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Angotti
- Division of Medical Oncology, Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | | | - Marta Schirripa
- Medical Oncology Unit, Belcolle Hospital, ASL Viterbo, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| | | | - Cristina Morelli
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University Hospital, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Emanuela Dell'Aquila
- Medical Oncology 1, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Antonella Cosimati
- Medical Oncology 1, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Donatello Gemma
- Medical Oncology Unit, ASL Frosinone, 03039 Sora (FR), Italy
| | - Marta Ribelli
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale San Giovanni Calibita Fatebenefratelli, Isola Tiberina, Gemelli Isola, 00186 Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandra Emiliani
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale San Giovanni Calibita Fatebenefratelli, Isola Tiberina, Gemelli Isola, 00186 Rome, Italy
| | - Domenico Cristiano Corsi
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale San Giovanni Calibita Fatebenefratelli, Isola Tiberina, Gemelli Isola, 00186 Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Arrivi
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Oncology Unit, Sant' Andrea Hospital, 00189 Rome, Italy
| | - Federica Mazzuca
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Oncology Unit, Sant' Andrea Hospital, 00189 Rome, Italy
| | | | - Maria Grazia Morandi
- Medical Oncology Unit, San Camillo de Lellis Hospital, ASL Rieti, 02100 Rieti, Italy
| | - Fiorenza Santamaria
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
- Medical Oncology A, Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Rosa Saltarelli
- UOC Oncology, San Giovanni Evangelista Hospital, ASL RM5, 00019 Tivoli (RM), Italy
| | - Enzo Maria Ruggeri
- Medical Oncology Unit, Belcolle Hospital, ASL Viterbo, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Matsumoto T, Ikoma T, Yamamura S, Miura K, Tsuduki T, Watanabe T, Nagai H, Takatani M, Yasui H. Regorafenib is suitable for advanced colorectal cancer patients who have previously received trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab. Sci Rep 2023; 13:2433. [PMID: 36765099 PMCID: PMC9918455 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-29706-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Regorafenib is a standard salvage line therapy used for advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Recently, trifluridine/tipiracil (TFTD) plus bevacizumab also showed promising efficacy as a salvage line therapy for advanced CRC. However, the efficacy and safety of regorafenib for patients with advanced CRC who have previously received TFTD plus bevacizumab is unclear. We retrospectively collected clinicopathologic data from patients with advanced CRC who received regorafenib after TFTD plus bevacizumab in multiple institutions between April 2017 and June 2020.Thirty-four advanced CRC patients who received regorafenib were analyzed. The median age was 66.5 (range 43-81 years), 11 patients were male, and all had an ECOG performance status(PS) of 0 or 1. Twenty-two patients had left-sided tumors, 18 patients had RAS mutants, and 1 patient had a BRAF V600E mutation. The response rate was 0%, and the disease control rate was 31%. The median progression-free survival was 70 days (95% CI: 56-91), and the overall survival was 233 days (95% CI: 188-324). Treatment was discontinued in 32 patients, and 28 (82%) discontinued treatment due to progressive disease. The major grade 3 and4 toxicities were proteinurea (29%), hypertension (26%), hand-foot syndrome(15%), and platelet decrease (6%). Regorafenib after TFTD plus bevacizumab showed efficacy similar to that of the previous study, and no new adverse events were observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toshihiko Matsumoto
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, 2-1-1, Minatojima Minamimachi, Chuo-Ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 6500047, Japan.
- Cancer Treatment Center, Kansai Medical University, 2-3-1, Hirakatashinmachi, Hirakata, Osaka, 573-1191, Japan.
| | - Tatsuki Ikoma
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, 2-1-1, Minatojima Minamimachi, Chuo-Ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 6500047, Japan
| | - Shogo Yamamura
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, 2-1-1, Minatojima Minamimachi, Chuo-Ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 6500047, Japan
| | - Kou Miura
- Department of Internal Medicine, Himeji Red Cross Hospital, 1-12-1, Shimoteno, Himeji, Hyogo, 6708540, Japan
| | - Takao Tsuduki
- Department of Internal Medicine, Himeji Red Cross Hospital, 1-12-1, Shimoteno, Himeji, Hyogo, 6708540, Japan
| | - Takanori Watanabe
- Department of Surgery, Himeji Red Cross Hospital, 1-12-1, Shimoteno, Himeji, Hyogo, 6708540, Japan
| | - Hiroki Nagai
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, 2-1-1, Minatojima Minamimachi, Chuo-Ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 6500047, Japan
| | - Masahiro Takatani
- Department of Internal Medicine, Himeji Red Cross Hospital, 1-12-1, Shimoteno, Himeji, Hyogo, 6708540, Japan
| | - Hisateru Yasui
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, 2-1-1, Minatojima Minamimachi, Chuo-Ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 6500047, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Salvatore L, Bensi M, Vivolo R, Zurlo IV, Dell'Aquila E, Grande R, Anghelone A, Emiliani A, Citarella F, Calegari MA, Ribelli M, Basso M, Pozzo C, Tortora G. Efficacy of third-line anti-EGFR-based treatment versus regorafenib or trifluridine/tipiracil according to primary tumor site in RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1125013. [PMID: 36895480 PMCID: PMC9989252 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1125013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Right- (R) and left-sided (L) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) exhibit different clinical and molecular features. Several retrospective analyses showed that survival benefit of anti-EGFR-based therapy is limited to RAS/BRAF wt L-sided mCRC patients. Few data are available about third-line anti-EGFR efficacy according to primary tumor site. Methods RAS/BRAF wt patients mCRC treated with third-line anti-EGFR-based therapy versus regorafenib or trifluridine/tipiracil (R/T) were retrospectively collected. The objective of the analysis was to compare treatment efficacy according to tumor site. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), response rate (RR) and toxicity. Results A total of 76 RAS/BRAF wt mCRC patients, treated with third-line anti-EGFR-based therapy or R/T, were enrolled. Of those, 19 (25%) patients had a R-sided tumor (9 patients received anti-EGFR treatment and 10 patients R/T) and 57 (75%) patients had a L-sided tumor (30 patients received anti-EGFR treatment and 27 patients R/T). A significant PFS [7.2 vs 3.6 months, HR 0.43 (95% CI 0.2-0.76), p= 0.004] and OS benefit [14.9 vs 10.9 months, HR 0.52 (95% CI 0.28-0.98), p= 0.045] in favor of anti-EGFR therapy vs R/T was observed in the L-sided tumor group. No difference in PFS and OS was observed in the R-sided tumor group. A significant interaction according to primary tumor site and third-line regimen was observed for PFS (p= 0.05). RR was significantly higher in L-sided patients treated with anti-EGFR vs R/T (43% vs. 0%; p <0.0001), no difference was observed in R-sided patients. At the multivariate analysis, third-line regimen was independently associated with PFS in L-sided patients. Conclusions Our results demonstrated a different benefit from third-line anti-EGFR-based therapy according to primary tumor site, confirming the role of L-sided tumor in predicting benefit from third-line anti-EGFR vs R/T. At the same time, no difference was observed in R-sided tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Salvatore
- Oncologia Medica, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Oncologia Medica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Bensi
- Oncologia Medica, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Oncologia Medica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Raffaella Vivolo
- Oncologia Medica, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Oncologia Medica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Ina Valeria Zurlo
- Oncologia Medica, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Oncologia Medica, Ospedale Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina - Gemelli Isola, Rome, Italy
| | - Emanuela Dell'Aquila
- Department of Medical Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy.,Medical Oncology 1, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberta Grande
- UOSD Coordinamento Screening Oncologici, ASL Frosinone, Frosinone, Italy.,DH Oncologico, Ospedale F. Spaziani - ASL, Frosinone, Italy
| | - Annunziato Anghelone
- Oncologia Medica, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Oncologia Medica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandra Emiliani
- Oncologia Medica, Ospedale Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina - Gemelli Isola, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Citarella
- Department of Medical Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Alessandra Calegari
- Oncologia Medica, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Marta Ribelli
- Oncologia Medica, Ospedale Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina - Gemelli Isola, Rome, Italy
| | - Michele Basso
- Oncologia Medica, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Carmelo Pozzo
- Oncologia Medica, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giampaolo Tortora
- Oncologia Medica, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Oncologia Medica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Biomarkers of Trifluridine-Tipiracil Efficacy. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10235568. [PMID: 34884270 PMCID: PMC8658167 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10235568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Revised: 11/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) is a newer generation chemotherapy that has been approved for the later-line treatment of metastatic colorectal and gastric/gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas. The oral drug provides a modest benefit of prolongation of survival over placebo in pretreated patients with these cancers with acceptable toxicity. Studies have shown rare objective responses (2-4%), and the disease control rates were 44% in both colorectal and gastric cancer randomized trials. Thus, the majority of patients progress through treatment and are burdened by toxicities. To better characterize the sub-group of patients with a higher probability of benefit from trifluridine/tipiracil, predictive biomarkers have been sought using data from randomized trials as well as from non-randomized trials and real-world series. Biomarkers examined include clinical characteristics of the patients, laboratory tests, and tumor derived biomarkers. These studies show that early neutropenia on treatment, and ratios of leukocyte subsets, are potential biomarkers able to predict trifluridine/tipiracil benefit. Combinations of laboratory values and clinical characteristics and proteins involved in trifluridine transport and activation have been examined with initial positive results.
Collapse
|