Multi-Phase CT-Based Radiomics Nomogram for Discrimination Between Pancreatic Serous Cystic Neoplasm From Mucinous Cystic Neoplasm

Radiomics for Differentiating Pancreatic Mucinous Cystic Neoplasm from Serous Cystic Neoplasm: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

As pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCN) differ in current standard of care, and these treatments can affect quality of life to varying degrees, a definitive preoperative diagnosis must be reliable. Current diagnostic approaches, specifically traditional cross-sectional imaging techniques, face certain limitations. But radiomics has been shown to have high diagnostic accuracy across a range of diseases. Objective to conduct a comprehensive review of the literature on the use of radiomics to differentiate Mucinous Cystic Neoplasm (MCN) from Serous Cystic Neoplasm (SCN).

METHODS

This study was comprehensively searched in Pubmed, Scopus and Web of Science databases for meta-analysis of studies that used radiomics to distinguish MCN from SCN. Risk of bias was assessed using the diagnostic accuracy study quality assessment method and combined with sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC)curve analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 884 patients from 8 studies were included in this analysis, including 365 MCN and 519 SCN. The Meta-analysis found that radiomics identified MCN and SCN with high sensitivity and specificity, with combined sensitivity and specificity of 0.84(0.82-0.87) and 0.82(0.79-0.84). The positive likelihood ratio (PLR) and the negative likelihood ratio (NLR) are 5.61(3.72, 8.47) and 0.14(0.09-0.26). In addition, the area under the SROC curve (AUC) was drawn at 0.93. No significant risk of publication bias was detected through the funnel plot analysis. The performances of feature extraction from the volume of interest (VOI) or Using AI classifier in the radiomics models were superior to those of protocols employing region of interest (ROI) or absence of AI classifier.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrates that radiomics exhibits high sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing between MCN and SCN, and has the potential to become a reliable diagnostic tool for their identification.

Radiomics advances in the evaluation of pancreatic cystic neoplasms

With the development of medical imaging, the detection rate of pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs) has increased greatly. Serous cystic neoplasm, solid pseudopapillary neoplasm, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm and mucinous cystic neoplasm are the main subtypes of PCN, and their treatment options vary greatly due to the different biological behaviours of the tumours. Different from conventional qualitative imaging evaluation, radiomics is a promising noninvasive approach for the diagnosis, classification, and risk stratification of diseases involving high-throughput extraction of medical image features. We present a review of radiomics in the diagnosis of serous cystic neoplasm and mucinous cystic neoplasm, risk classification of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm and prediction of solid pseudopapillary neoplasm invasiveness compared to conventional imaging diagnosis. Radiomics is a promising tool in the field of medical imaging, providing a noninvasive, high-performance model for preoperative diagnosis and risk stratification of PCNs and improving prospects regarding management of these diseases. Further studies are warranted to investigate MRI image radiomics in connection with PCNs to improve the diagnosis and treatment strategies in the management of PCN patients.

Role of artificial intelligence in the characterization of indeterminate pancreatic head mass and its usefulness in preoperative diagnosis

Artificial intelligence (AI) has been used in various fields of day-to-day life and its role in medicine is immense. Understanding of oncology has been improved with the introduction of AI which helps in diagnosis, treatment planning, management, prognosis, and follow-up. It also helps to identify high-risk groups who can be subjected to timely screening for early detection of malignant conditions. It is more important in pancreatic cancer as it is one of the major causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide and there are no specific early features (clinical and radiological) for diagnosis. With improvement in imaging modalities (computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, endoscopic ultrasound), most often clinicians were being challenged with lesions that were difficult to diagnose with human competence. AI has been used in various other branches of medicine to differentiate such indeterminate lesions including the thyroid gland, breast, lungs, liver, adrenal gland, kidney, etc. In the case of pancreatic cancer, the role of AI has been explored and is still ongoing. This review article will focus on how AI can be used to diagnose pancreatic cancer early or differentiate it from benign pancreatic lesions, therefore, management can be planned at an earlier stage.

CT classification model of pancreatic serous cystic neoplasm and mucinous cystic neoplasm based on deep transfer learning

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer is a highly lethal disease. The preoperative distinction between pancreatic serous cystic neoplasm (SCN) and mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN) remains a clinical challenge.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study is to provide clinicians with supportive advice and avoid overtreatment by constructing a convolutional neural network (CNN) classifier to automatically identify pancreatic cancer using computed tomography (CT) images.

METHODS

We construct a CNN model using a dataset of 6,173 CT images obtained from 107 pathologically confirmed pancreatic cancer patients at Shanghai Changhai Hospital from January 2017 to February 2022. We divide CT slices into three categories namely, SCN, MCN, and no tumor, to train the DenseNet201-based CNN model with multi-head spatial attention mechanism (MSAM-DenseNet201). The attention module enhances the network's attention to local features and effectively improves the network performance. The trained model is applied to process all CT image slices and finally realize the two categories classification of MCN and SCN patients through a joint voting strategy.

RESULTS

Using a 10-fold cross validation method, this new MSAM-DenseNet201 model achieves a classification accuracy of 92.52%, a precision of 92.16%, a sensitivity of 92.16%, and a specificity of 92.86%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the feasibility of using a deep learning network or classification model to help diagnose MCN and SCN cases. This, the new method has great potential for developing new computer-aided diagnosis systems and applying in future clinical practice.

Artificial intelligence in pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is the deadliest disease, with a five-year overall survival rate of just 11%. The pancreatic cancer patients diagnosed with early screening have a median overall survival of nearly ten years, compared with 1.5 years for those not diagnosed with early screening. Therefore, early diagnosis and early treatment of pancreatic cancer are particularly critical. However, as a rare disease, the general screening cost of pancreatic cancer is high, the accuracy of existing tumor markers is not enough, and the efficacy of treatment methods is not exact. In terms of early diagnosis, artificial intelligence technology can quickly locate high-risk groups through medical images, pathological examination, biomarkers, and other aspects, then screening pancreatic cancer lesions early. At the same time, the artificial intelligence algorithm can also be used to predict the survival time, recurrence risk, metastasis, and therapy response which could affect the prognosis. In addition, artificial intelligence is widely used in pancreatic cancer health records, estimating medical imaging parameters, developing computer-aided diagnosis systems, etc. Advances in AI applications for pancreatic cancer will require a concerted effort among clinicians, basic scientists, statisticians, and engineers. Although it has some limitations, it will play an essential role in overcoming pancreatic cancer in the foreseeable future due to its mighty computing power.

Pancreatic Incidentaloma

Pancreatic incidentalomas (PIs) represent a clinical entity increasingly recognized due to advances in and easier access to imaging techniques. By definition, PIs should be detected during abdominal imaging performed for indications other than a pancreatic disease. They range from small cysts to invasive cancer. The incidental diagnosis of pancreatic cancer can contribute to early diagnosis and treatment. On the other hand, inadequate management of PIs may result in overtreatment and unneeded morbidity. Therefore, there is a strong need to evaluate the nature and clinical features of individual PIs. In this review, we summarize the major characteristics related to PIs and present suggestions for their management.

Radiomics based on enhanced CT for differentiating between pulmonary tuberculosis and pulmonary adenocarcinoma presenting as solid nodules or masses

PURPOSE

To investigate the incremental value of enhanced CT-based radiomics in discriminating between pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) and pulmonary adenocarcinoma (PAC) presenting as solid nodules or masses and to develop an optimal radiomics model.

METHODS

A total of 128 lesions (from 123 patients) from three hospitals were retrospectively analyzed and were randomly divided into training and test datasets at a ratio of 7:3. Independent predictors in subjective image features were used to develop the subjective image model (SIM). The plain CT-based and enhanced CT-based radiomics features were screened by the correlation coefficient method, univariate analysis, and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, then used to build the plain CT radiomics model (PRM) and enhanced CT radiomics model (ERM), respectively. Finally, the combined model (CM) combining PRM and ERM was established. In addition, the performance of three radiologists and one respiratory physician was evaluated. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) were used to assess the performance of each model.

RESULTS

The differential diagnostic capability of the ERM (training: AUC = 0.933; test: AUC = 0.881) was better than that of the PRM (training: AUC = 0.861; test: AUC = 0.756) and the SIM (training: AUC = 0.760; test: AUC = 0.611). The CM was optimal (training: AUC = 0.948; test: AUC = 0.917) and outperformed the respiratory physician and most radiologists.

CONCLUSIONS

The ERM was more helpful than the PRM for identifying PTB and PAC that present as solid nodules or masses, and the CM was the best.