Clinical Significance of Metastasis or Micrometastasis to the Lymph Node Along the Superior Mesenteric Vein in Gastric Carcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis

The role of unconventional lymph node metastasis in neck recurrence among patients with tongue cancer

OBJECTIVES

Statistics on the rate of unconventional lymph node metastases (ULNM) at the time of one-stage radical surgery in tongue cancer patients. To assess whether an extended neck dissection group with additional removal of ULNs has a lower rate of neck recurrence compared to the traditional neck dissection group.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 336 patients with TSCC who underwent radical surgery were recruited and underwent traditional or extended neck dissection. Compared to traditional neck dissection, the aim of extended neck dissection is designed to additional resect ULNs.

RESULTS

In total, 180 patients underwent extended neck dissection, while 156 underwent traditional neck dissection. The incidence of ULNM was 11.67% (21/180) in patients treated with extended neck dissection. The incidence of ipsilateral neck recurrence was 9.49% and 0.56% in patients who underwent traditional and extended neck dissection, respectively (p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Extended neck dissection is effective for preventing neck recurrence in TSCC patients with ULNs.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

ULNM may be the main cause of neck recurrence after neck dissection in patients with tongue cancer. A better prognosis may be achieved by additional resection of ULNs on the basis of traditional neck dissection.

Prognostic value of lymph node micrometastasis in esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

Whether lymph node micrometastasis (LNM) increases the risk in esophageal cancer patients remains controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the prognosis value of LNM in esophageal cancer patients.

Methods

Two reviewers independently searched electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, for eligible citations until February 2022. We calculated pooled estimates of the hazards ratio with a random-effects model. The certainty of evidence was determined by the Grade of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) method. A sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the stability. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger's test. We also performed subgroup analysis to explore the source of heterogeneity.

Results

A total of 16 studies, with 1,652 patients, were included. The overall survival (OS) was significantly increased with LNM negativity compared with LNM positivity (HR 1.95; 95% CI, 1.53-2.49; P < 0.001; I² = 0.0%, P = 0.930; certainty of evidence: low). Relapse-free survival (RFS) was significantly increased with LNM negativity compared with LNM positivity (HR 3.39; 95% CI, 1.87-6.16; P < 0.001; I² = 50.18%, P = 0.060; certainty of evidence: moderate). No significant difference was observed in recurrence between the two groups (certainty of evidence: low). Sensitivity analysis revealed a stable trend. In addition, the funnel plot and Egger's test did not show significant publication bias.

Conclusion

LNM positivity worsens the prognosis in esophageal cancer, and the evidence for RFS is moderate. Future relevant high-quality studies are warranted to validate our results further and provide a reference for guidelines.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier (CRD42022321768).