Diagnostic Value of Delayed PET/MR in Liver Metastasis in Comparison With PET/CT

Head-to-Head Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of FDG PET/CT and FDG PET/MRI in Patients With Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND. The available evidence on the use of FDG PET/MRI performed using an integrated system in patients with cancer has grown substantially. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the diagnostic performance of FDG PET/CT and FDG PET/MRI in patients with cancer. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION. MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched for studies reporting a head-to-head comparison of the diagnostic performance of FDG PET/CT and FDG PET/MRI in patients with cancer from July 1, 2015, to January 25, 2023. The two modalities' diagnostic performance was summarized, stratified by performance end point. For end points with sufficient data, a meta-analysis was performed using bivariate modeling to produce summary estimates of pooled sensitivity and specificity. For the remaining end points, reported performance in individual studies was recorded. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS. The systematic review included 29 studies with a total of 1656 patients. For patient-level detection of regional nodal metastases (five studies), pooled sensitivity and specificity for PET/MRI were 88% (95% CI, 74-95%) and 92% (95% CI, 71-98%), respectively, and for PET/CT were 86% (95% CI, 70-94%) and 86% (95% CI, 68-95%). For lesion-level detection of recurrence and/or metastases (five studies), pooled sensitivity and specificity for PET/MRI were 94% (95% CI, 78-99%) and 83% (95% CI, 76-88%), respectively, and for PET/CT were 91% (95% CI, 77-96%) and 81% (95% CI, 72-88%). In individual studies not included in the meta-analysis, PET/MRI in comparison with PET/CT showed staging accuracy in breast cancer of 98.0% versus 74.5% and in colorectal cancer of 96.2% versus 69.2%; sensitivity for primary tumor detection in cervical cancer of 93.2% versus 66.2%; and sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for lesion-level liver metastasis detection of 91.1-98.0% versus 42.3-71.1%, 100.0% versus 83.3-98.6%, and 96.5-98.2% versus 44.7-86.7%, respectively. In three studies, management was more commonly impacted by information from PET/MRI (5.2-11.1%) than PET/CT (0.0-2.6%). CONCLUSION. PET/MRI showed comparable or superior diagnostic performance versus PET/CT across a range of cancers and end points. CLINICAL IMPACT. The findings help to identify clinical settings where PET/MRI may provide clinical benefit for oncologic evaluation. TRIAL REGISTRATION. Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42023433857.

[18F]FDG PET/CT versus [18F]FDG PET/MRI in the evaluation of liver metastasis in patients with primary cancer: A head-to-head comparative meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This meta-analysis aimed to compare the diagnostic effectiveness of [18F]FDG PET/CT with that of [18F]FDG PET/MRI in terms of identifying liver metastasis in patients with primary cancer.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched, and studies evaluating the diagnostic efficacy of [18F]FDG PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/MRI in patients with liver metastasis of primary cancer were included. We used a random effects model to analyze their sensitivity and specificity. Subgroup analyses and corresponding meta-regressions focusing on race, image analysis, study design, and analysis methodologies were conducted. Cochrane Q and I2 statistics were used to assess intra-group and inter-group heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Seven articles with 343 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The sensitivity of [18F]FDG PET/CT was 0.82 (95 % CI: 0.63-0.96), and that of [18F]FDG PET/MRI was 0.91 (95 % CI: 0.82-0.98); there was no significant difference between the two methods (P = 0.32). Similarly, both methods showed equal specificity: 1.00 (95 % CI: 0.95-1.00) for [18F]FDG PET/CT and 1.00 (95 % CI: 0.96-1.00) for [18F]FDG PET/MRI, and thus, there was no significant difference between the methods (P = 0.41). Furthermore, the subgroup analyses revealed no differences. Meta-regression analysis revealed that race was a potential source of heterogeneity for [18F]FDG PET/CT (P = 0.01), while image analysis and contrast agent were found to be potential sources of heterogeneity for [18F]FDG PET/MRI (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

[18F]FDG PET/MRI has similar sensitivity and specificity to [18F]FDG PET/CT for detecting liver metastasis of primary cancer in both the general population and in subgroups. [18F]FDG PET/CT may be a more cost-effective option. However, the conclusions of this meta-analysis are tentative due to the limited number of studies included, and further research is necessary for validation.

Use of 18F-FDG PET/MRI as an Initial Staging Procedure for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Compared with the conventional work-up (CWU) including computed tomography (CT) of the chest and abdomen, MRI of the head and neck, and skeletal scintigraphy, positron emission tomography (PET)/MRI might improve diagnostic accuracy, shorten the work-up time, and reduce false-positive (FP) findings in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, evidence of cost-effectiveness is needed for the adoption of PET/MRI for the initial staging in NPC.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness and clinical value of PET/MRI as an initial staging procedure for NPC.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective cohort cost effectiveness study.

SUBJECTS

Three hundred forty-three patients with a median age of 51 (13-81) years underwent PET/MRI before treatment (the PET/MRI group) and the remaining 677 patients with a median age of 55 (15-95) years only underwent CWU (the CWU group). There were 80 (23.3%) females and 193 (28.5%) females in the PET/MRI and CWU groups, respectively.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

3-T integrated PET/MRI system, diffusion-weighted echo-planar imaging (b = 0 and 1000 s/mm2 ) and [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose PET.

ASSESSMENT

The primary end point was the FP rate. Costs were determined as issued in 2021 by the Medical Insurance Administration Bureau of Zhejiang, China.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) measured cost of using PET/MRI per percent of patients who avoided a FP. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

For the whole group, the de novo metastatic disease rate was 5.2% (53/1020). A total of 187 patients with FP results were observed. Significantly more patients with FP results were observed in the CWU group compared to the PET/MRI group (25.6% vs. 4.1%). The ICER was $54 for each percent of patients avoiding a FP finding.

DATA CONCLUSION

Compared with CWU, PET/MRI may reduce the FP risk. Furthermore, PET/MRI may be cost-effective as an initial staging procedure for NPC.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 6.

Added value of regional 18F-FDG PET/MRI-assisted whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT in malignant ascites with unknown primary origin

BACKGROUND

Comparing to PET/CT, integrative PET/MRI imaging provides superior soft tissue resolution. This study aims to evaluate the added value of regional delayed 18F-FDG PET/MRI-assisted whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT in diagnosing malignant ascites patients.

RESULTS

The final diagnosis included 22 patients with ovarian cancer (n = 11), peritoneal cancer (n = 3), colon cancer (n = 2), liver cancer (n = 2), pancreatic cancer (n = 2), gastric cancer (n = 1), and fallopian tube cancer (n = 1). The diagnosis of the primary tumor using whole-body PET/CT was correct in 11 cases. Regional PET/MRI-assisted whole-body PET/CT diagnosis was correct in 18 cases, including 6 more cases of ovarian cancer and 1 more case of fallopian tube cancer. Among 4 cases that were not diagnosed correctly, 1 case had the primary tumor outside of the PET/MRI scan area, 2 cases were peritoneal cancer, and 1 case was colon cancer. The diagnostic accuracy of regional PET/MRI-assisted whole-body PET/CT was higher than PET/CT alone (81.8% vs. 50.0%, κ 2 = 5.14, p = 0.023). The primary tumor conspicuity score of PET/MRI was higher than PET/CT (3.67 ± 0.66 vs. 2.76 ± 0.94, P < 0.01). In the same scan area, more metastases were detected in PET/MRI than in PET/CT (156 vs. 86 in total, and 7.43 ± 5.17 vs. 4.10 ± 1.92 per patient, t = 3.89, P < 0.01). Lesion-to-background ratio in PET/MRI was higher than that in PET/CT (10.76 ± 5.16 vs. 6.56 ± 3.45, t = 13.02, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Comparing to whole-body PET/CT alone, additional delayed regional PET/MRI with high soft tissue resolution is helpful in diagnosing the location of the primary tumor and identifying more metastases in patients with malignant ascites. Yet larger sample size in multicenter and prospective clinical researches is still needed.

Update on Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Cancer and Inflammation Imaging in the Clinic

Hybrid PET/MRI is highly valuable, having made significant strides in overcoming technical challenges and offering unique advantages such as reduced radiation, precise data coregistration, and motion correction. Growing evidence highlights the value of PET/MRI in broad clinical aspects, including inflammatory and oncological imaging in adults, pregnant women, and pediatrics, potentially surpassing PET/CT. This newly integrated solution may be preferred over PET/CT in many clinical conditions. However, further technological advancements are required to facilitate its broader adoption as a routine diagnostic modality.

18F-FDG PET/CT and MR imaging features of liver metastases in gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a cross-sectional analysis

BACKGROUND

Early detection of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) liver metastases is crucial for the management and prognosis. In our experience, GIST liver metastases can display hypermetabolism on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) and marked enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which are uncommon in other tumors before treatment. Most literature focus on the imaging evaluation, prognosis after treatment and less is known about imaging features on both imaging methods before treatment. This study analyzes the imaging features of newly diagnosed GIST liver metastases on 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI, with goal of improving diagnostic accuracy.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 55 patients with pathological or radiographical confirmed GIST liver metastases who underwent PET/CT (n=29), MRI (n=22), or both methods (n=4). PET/CT and MRI interpretation including lesion's morphologic features, number, density or signal intensity, hemorrhage, cystic changes or necrosis, maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of liver metastases and liver background on PET imaging, degree and pattern of enhancement on MRI were obtained by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians and two radiologists respectively. Data are presented as numbers, percentages, means ± standard deviations or median (interquartile range). The correlation between diameter and SUVmax of metastases, and primary tumor SUVmax and synchronous liver metastases SUVmax were analyzed by Spearman's rank test.

RESULTS

On PET/CT visual analysis, 38.9%, 23.9%, and 37.2% of lesions showed significant hypermetabolism, slightly higher metabolism, and equal or lower metabolism than liver, respectively. There was a weak correlation between the diameter and SUVmax of liver metastases (rs =0.370, P<0.001), and a moderate correlation between SUVmax of synchronous liver metastases and the primary tumors (rs =0.492, P<0.001). On contrast-enhanced MRI, 90.8% of lesions showed heterogeneous enhancement in the arterial phase with the variable presentation, and 74.3% had different enhancement patterns between margins and intratumoral parenchyma.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver lesions in GIST displaying significant, slight hypermetabolism on 18F-FDG PET/CT, marked or heterogeneous gradual enhancement within the intratumoral parenchyma with ring-like enhancement on MRI may denote the diagnosis of liver metastasis. However, GIST liver metastases may also display equal or lower metabolism than liver parenchyma on PET, making small lesions more difficult to diagnose.

The Value of 18F-FDG-PET-CT Imaging in Treatment Evaluation of Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review

(1) Background: Up to 50% of patients with colorectal cancer either have synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) or develop CRLM over the course of their disease. Surgery and thermal ablation are the most common local treatment options of choice. Despite development and improvement in local treatment options, (local) recurrence remains a significant clinical problem. Many different imaging modalities can be used in the follow-up after treatment of CRLM, lacking evidence-based international consensus on the modality of choice. In this systematic review, we evaluated ¹⁸F-FDG-PET-CT performance after surgical resection, thermal ablation, radioembolization, and neoadjuvant and palliative chemotherapy based on current published literature. (2) Methods: A systematic literature search was performed on the PubMed database. (3) Results: A total of 31 original articles were included in the analysis. Only one suitable study was found describing the role of ¹⁸F-FDG-PET-CT after surgery, which makes it hard to draw a firm conclusion. ¹⁸F-FDG-PET-CT showed to be of additional value in the follow-up after thermal ablation, palliative chemotherapy, and radioembolization. ¹⁸F-FDG-PET-CT was found to be a poor to moderate predictor of pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. (4) Conclusions: ¹⁸F-FDG-PET-CT is superior to conventional morphological imaging modalities in the early detection of residual disease after thermal ablation and in the treatment evaluation and prediction of prognosis during palliative chemotherapy and after radioembolization, and ¹⁸F-FDG-PET-CT could be considered in selected cases after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgical resection.