Variation in Plasma Levels of TRAF2 Protein During Development of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Tongue

Proteome-wide mendelian randomization study implicates therapeutic targets in common cancers

BACKGROUND

The interest in targeted cancer therapies has been growing rapidly. While numerous cancer biomarkers and targeted treatment strategies have been developed and employed, there are still significant limitations and challenges in the early diagnosis and targeted treatment of cancers. Accordingly, there is an urgent need to identify novel targets and develop new targeted drugs.

METHODS

The study was conducted using combined cis-Mendelian randomization (cis-MR) and colocalization analysis. We analyzed data from 732 plasma proteins to identify potential drug targets associated with eight site-specific cancers. These findings were further validated using the UK Biobank dataset. Then, a protein-protein interaction network was also constructed to examine the interplay between the identified proteins and the targets of existing cancer medications.

RESULTS

This MR analysis revealed associations between five plasma proteins and prostate cancer, five with breast cancer, and three with lung cancer. Subsequently, these proteins were classified into four distinct target groups, with a focus on tier 1 and 2 targets due to their higher potential to become drug targets. Our study indicatied that genetically predicted KDELC2 (OR: 0.89, 95% CI 0.86-0.93) and TNFRSF10B (OR: 0.74, 95% CI 0.65-0.83) are inversely associated with prostate cancer. Furthermore, we observed an inverse association between CPNE1 (OR: 0.96, 95% CI 0.94-0.98) and breast cancer, while PDIA3 (OR: 1.19, 95% CI 1.10-1.30) were found to be associated with the risk of breast cancer. In addition, we also propose that SPINT2 (OR: 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.06), GSTP1 (OR: 0.82, 95% CI 0.74-0.90), and CTSS (OR: 0.91, 95% CI 0.88-0.95) may serve as potential therapeutic targets in prostate cancer. Similarly, GDI2 (OR: 0.85, 95% CI 0.80-0.91), ISLR2 (OR: 0.87, 95% CI 0.82-0.93), and CTSF (OR: 1.14, 95% CI 1.08-1.21) could potentially be targets for breast cancer. Additionally, we identified SFTPB (OR: 0.93, 95% CI 0.91-0.95), ICAM5 (OR: 0.95, 95% CI 0.93-0.97), and FLRT3 (OR: 1.10, 95% CI 1.05-1.15) as potential targets for lung cancer. Notably, TNFRSF10B, GSTP1, and PDIA3 were found to interact with the target proteins of current medications used in prostate or breast cancer treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This comprehensive analysis has highlighted thirteen plasma proteins with potential roles in three site-specific cancers. Continued research in this area may reveal their therapeutic potential, particularly KDELC2, TNFRSF10B, CPNE1, and PDIA3, paving the way for more effective cancer treatments.

An Integrated Analysis of Prognostic Signature and Immune Microenvironment in Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Tongue squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC) is a prevalent cancer of the oral cavity. Survival metrics are usually unsatisfactory, even using combined treatment with surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors can prolong survival, especially in patients with recurrent or metastatic disease. However, there are few effective biomarkers to provide prognosis and guide immunotherapy. Here, we utilized weighted gene co-expression network analysis to identify the co-expression module and selected the turquoise module for further scrutiny. Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analyses revealed the innate pathways. The findings indicated that cell junction organization, response to topologically incorrect protein, and regulation of cell adhesion pathways may be essential. Eleven crucial predictive genes (PLXNB1, N4BP3, KDELR2, INTS8, PLAU, PPFIBP2, OAF, LMF1, IL34, ZFP3, and MAP7D3) were used to establish a risk model based on Cox and LASSO analyses of The Cancer Genome Atlas and GSE65858 databases (regarding overall survival). Kaplan–Meier analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve suggested that the risk model had better prognostic effectiveness than other clinical traits. Consensus clustering was used to classify TSCC samples into two groups with significantly different survival rates. ESTIMATE and CIBERSORT were used to display the immune landscape of TSCC and indicate the stromal score; specific types of immune cells, including naïve B cells, plasma cells, CD8 T cells, CD4 memory resting and memory activated T cells, follicular helper T cells, and T regulatory cells, may influence the heterogeneous immune microenvironment in TSCC. To further identify hub genes, we downloaded GEO datasets (GSE41613 and GSE31056) and successfully validated the risk model. Two hub genes (PLAU and PPFIBP2) were strongly associated with CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) and PD-ligand 1.