Programmed Death Ligand 2 Gene Polymorphisms Are Associated With Lung Adenocarcinoma Risk in Female Never-Smokers

MiRNA and Potential Prognostic Value in Non-Smoking Females with Lung Adenocarcinoma by High-Throughput Sequencing

Background

Non-smoking females with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) account for a unique disease entity and miRNA play critical roles in cancer development and progression. The purpose of this study is to explore prognosis-related differentially expressed miRNA (DEmiRNA) and establish a prognostic model for non-smoking females with LUAD.

Methods

Eight specimens were collected from thoracic surgery of non-smoking females with LUAD and implemented the miRNA sequencing. The intersection of our miRNA sequencing data and TCGA database were identified as common DEmiRNA. Then, we predicted the target genes of the common DEmiRNAs (DETGs) and explored the functional enrichment and prognosis of DETGs. A risk model by overall survival (OS)-related DEmiRNA was constructed based on multivariate Cox regression analyses.

Results

A total of 34 overlapping DEmiRNA were obtained. The DETGs were enriched in pathways including "Cell cycle" and "miRNAs in cancer". The DETGs (KPNA2, CEP55, TRIP13, MYBL2) were risk factors, significantly related to OS, progression-free survival (PFS), and were also hub genes. ScRNA-seq data also validated the expression of the four DETGs. Hsa-mir-200a, hsa-mir-21, and hsa-mir-584 were significantly associated with OS. The prognostic prediction model constructed by the 3 DEmiRNA could effectively predict OS and can be used as an independent prognostic factor of non-smoking females with LUAD.

Conclusion

Hsa-mir-200a, hsa-mir-21, and hsa-mir-584 can serve as potential prognostic predictors in non-smoking females with LUAD. A novel prognostic model based on the three DEmiRNAs was also constructed to predict the survival of non-smoking females with LUAD and showed good performance. The result of our paper can be helpful for treatment and prognosis prediction for non-smoking females with LUAD.

Evolutionary Origins of Metabolic Reprogramming in Cancer

Metabolic changes that facilitate tumor growth are one of the hallmarks of cancer. These changes are not specific to tumors but also take place during the physiological growth of tissues. Indeed, the cellular and tissue mechanisms present in the tumor have their physiological counterpart in the repair of tissue lesions and wound healing. These molecular mechanisms have been acquired during metazoan evolution, first to eliminate the infection of the tissue injury, then to enter an effective regenerative phase. Cancer itself could be considered a phenomenon of antagonistic pleiotropy of the genes involved in effective tissue repair. Cancer and tissue repair are complex traits that share many intermediate phenotypes at the molecular, cellular, and tissue levels, and all of these are integrated within a Systems Biology structure. Complex traits are influenced by a multitude of common genes, each with a weak effect. This polygenic component of complex traits is mainly unknown and so makes up part of the missing heritability. Here, we try to integrate these different perspectives from the point of view of the metabolic changes observed in cancer.

Lung cancer in never smokers: Tumor immunology and challenges for immunotherapy

Lung cancer is the second most common and the most lethal malignancy worldwide. It is estimated that lung cancer in never smokers (LCINS) accounts for 10-25% of cases, and its incidence is increasing according to recent data, although the reasons remain unclear. If considered alone, LCINS is the 7th most common cause of cancer death. These tumors occur more commonly in younger patients and females. LCINS tend to have a better prognosis, possibly due to a higher chance of bearing an actionable driver mutation, making them amenable to targeted therapy. Notwithstanding, these tumors respond poorly to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). There are several putative explanations for the poor response to immunotherapy: low immunogenicity due to low tumor mutation burden and hence low MANA (mutation-associated neo-antigen) load, constitutive PD-L1 expression in response to driver mutated protein signaling, high expression of immunosuppressive factors by tumors cells (like CD39 and TGF-beta), non-permissive immune TME (tumor microenvironment), abnormal metabolism of amino acids and glucose, and impaired TLS (Tertiary Lymphoid Structures) organization. Finally, there is an increasing concern of offering ICI as first line therapy to these patients owing to several reports of severe toxicity when TKIs (tyrosine kinase inhibitors) are administered sequentially after ICI. Understanding the biology behind the immune response against these tumors is crucial to the development of better therapeutic strategies.

The relationship between previous pulmonary tuberculosis and risk of lung cancer in the future

Various investigations have expanded the views that tuberculosis is an important risk factor for lung cancer occurrence. Lung cancer originates from chronic inflammation and infection. It is becoming clearer that Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb) in tuberculosis patients meticulously schemes multiple mechanisms to induce tumor formation and is indispensable to participate in the occurrence of lung cancer. In addition, some additional factors such as age, sex and smoking, accelerate the development of lung cancer after Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. The clarification of these insights is fostering new diagnoses and therapeutic approaches to prevention of the patients developing from tuberculosis into lung cancer.