1
|
Cucinella G, Di Donna MC, De Maria F, Etrusco A, Zaccaria G, Buono N, Abbate A, Restaino S, Scaffa C, Vizzielli G, Laganà AS, Chiantera V. Chemoembolization, Radioembolization, and Percutaneous Ablation: New Opportunities for Treating Ovarian Cancer Liver Metastasis. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2024; 25:1428-1437. [PMID: 39425830 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-024-01266-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/21/2024] [Indexed: 10/21/2024]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Parenchymal liver metastases from ovarian cancer, occurring in 2-12.5% of cases, significantly worsen prognosis. While surgery and systemic treatments remain primary options, unresectable or chemotherapy-resistant multiple liver metastases pose a significant challenge. Recent advances in liver-directed therapies, including radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, cryoablation, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), and radioembolization, offer potential treatment alternatives. However, the efficacy of these techniques is limited by factors such as tumor size, number, and location. The ideal candidate for tumor ablation is a patient with paucifocal disease, a single tumor up to 5 cm or up to 3 tumors smaller than 3 cm and tumors 1 cm away from major bile ducts and high-flow vessels. Transarterial chemoembolization could be performed in patients with less than 70% tumor load. Differently, radioembolization is available with less limitation on the sites or number of liver cancers. Radioembolization techniques are also able to downsize liver metastases. However, there are limited data regarding the outcomes of loco-regional therapy in patients with hepatic metastases from ovarian cancer. Advancing liver-directed therapies through interventional oncology, combined with robust data on the oncological efficacy of these local treatments, will validate their potential as effective locoregional therapies for liver metastases. This could offer a promising treatment option for patients with ovarian cancer and unresectable hepatic metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Cucinella
- Gynecology Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Naples, Italy.
| | - Mariano Catello Di Donna
- Gynecology Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Naples, Italy
| | - Francesca De Maria
- Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Andrea Etrusco
- Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Giulia Zaccaria
- Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Natalina Buono
- Ospedale San Leonardo, Castellammare di Stabia, ASL NA3 SUD, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonino Abbate
- Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, ARNAS "Civico-Di Cristina-Benfratelli", University of Palermo, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Stefano Restaino
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Santa Maria della Misericordia" University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy
- PhD School in Biomedical Sciences, Gender Medicine, Child and Women Health, University of Sassari, Sassari, Sardinia, Italy
| | - Cono Scaffa
- Gynecology Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Naples, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Vizzielli
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Santa Maria della Misericordia" University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy
- Department of Medicine (DMED), University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Antonio Simone Laganà
- Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, 90127, Palermo, Italy
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Paolo Giaccone" Hospital, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Vito Chiantera
- Gynecology Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jiang W, Caruana DL, Dussik CM, Conway D, Latich I, Chapiro J, Lindskog DM, Friedlaender GE, Lee FY. Bone Mass Changes Following Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation, Osteoplasty, Reinforcement, and Internal Fixation of Periacetabular Osteolytic Metastases. J Clin Med 2023; 12:4613. [PMID: 37510728 PMCID: PMC10380351 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12144613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Revised: 07/08/2023] [Accepted: 07/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The success of orthopedic interventions for periacetabular osteolytic metastases depends on the progression or regression of cancer-induced bone loss. PURPOSE To characterize relative bone mass changes following percutaneous radiofrequency ablation, osteoplasty, cement reinforcement, and internal screw fixation (AORIF). METHODS Of 70 patients who underwent AORIF at a single institution, 21 patients (22 periacetabular sites; average follow-up of 18.5 ± 12.3 months) had high-resolution pelvic bone CT scans, with at least one scan within 3 months following their operation (baseline) and a comparative scan at least 6 months post-operatively. In total, 73 CT scans were measured for bone mass changes using Hounsfield Units (HU). A region of interest was defined for the periacetabular area in the coronal, axial, and sagittal reformation planes for all CT scans. For 6-month and 1-year scans, the coronal and sagittal HU were combined to create a weight-bearing HU (wbHU). Three-dimensional volumetric analysis was performed on the baseline and longest available CT scans. Cohort survival was compared to predicted PathFx 3.0 survival. RESULTS HU increased from baseline post-operative (1.2 ± 1.1 months) to most recent follow-up (20.2 ± 12.1 months) on coronal (124.0 ± 112.3), axial (140.3 ± 153.0), and sagittal (151.9 ± 162.4), p < 0.05. Grayscale volumetric measurements increased by 173.4 ± 166.4 (p < 0.05). AORIF median survival was 27.7 months (6.0 months PathFx3.0 predicted; p < 0.05). At 12 months, patients with >10% increase in wbHU demonstrated superior median survival of 36.5 months (vs. 26.4 months, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION Percutaneous stabilization leads to improvements in bone mass and may allow for delays in extensive open reconstruction procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Will Jiang
- Department of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, 47 College Street, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| | - Dennis L. Caruana
- Department of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, 47 College Street, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| | - Christopher M. Dussik
- Department of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, 47 College Street, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| | - Devin Conway
- Department of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, 47 College Street, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| | - Igor Latich
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale Interventional Oncology, P.O. Box 208042, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Julius Chapiro
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale Interventional Oncology, P.O. Box 208042, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Dieter M. Lindskog
- Department of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, 47 College Street, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| | - Gary E. Friedlaender
- Department of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, 47 College Street, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| | - Francis Y. Lee
- Department of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, 47 College Street, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dai Q, Cao B, Zhao S, Zhang A. Synergetic Thermal Therapy for Cancer: State-of-the-Art and the Future. Bioengineering (Basel) 2022; 9:bioengineering9090474. [PMID: 36135020 PMCID: PMC9495761 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering9090474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Revised: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
As a safe and minimal-invasive modality, thermal therapy has become an effective treatment in cancer treatment. Other than killing the tumor cells or destroying the tumor entirely, the thermal modality results in profound molecular, cellular and biological effects on both the targeted tissue, surrounding environments, and even the whole body, which has triggered the combination of the thermal therapy with other traditional therapies as chemotherapy and radiation therapy or new therapies like immunotherapy, gene therapy, etc. The combined treatments have shown encouraging therapeutic effects both in research and clinic. In this review, we have summarized the outcomes of the existing synergistic therapies, the underlying mechanisms that lead to these improvements, and the latest research in the past five years. Limitations and future directions of synergistic thermal therapy are also discussed.
Collapse
|
4
|
Tomita K, Matsui Y, Uka M, Umakoshi N, Kawabata T, Munetomo K, Nagata S, Iguchi T, Hiraki T. Evidence on percutaneous radiofrequency and microwave ablation for liver metastases over the last decade. Jpn J Radiol 2022; 40:1035-1045. [PMID: 36097234 PMCID: PMC9529678 DOI: 10.1007/s11604-022-01335-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Purpose This review aimed to summarize the treatment outcomes of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) for metastatic liver tumors based on the findings of published studies over the last decade. Materials and methods Literature describing the survival outcomes of ablation therapy for liver metastases was explored using the PubMed database on April 26, 2022, and articles published in 2012 or later were selected. The included studies met the following criteria: (i) English literature, (ii) original clinical studies, and (iii) literature describing overall survival (OS) of thermal ablation for metastatic liver tumors. All case reports and cohort studies with fewer than 20 patients and those that evaluated ablation for palliative purposes were excluded. Results RFA was the most commonly used method for ablation, while MWA was used in several recent studies. RFA and MWA for liver metastases from various primary tumors have been reported; however, majority of the studies focused on colorectal cancer. The local control rate by RFA and MWA varied widely among the studies, ranging approximately 50–90%. Five-year survival rates of 20–60% have been reported following ablation for colorectal liver metastases by a number of studies, and several reports of 10-year survival rates were also noted. Conclusion Comparative studies of local therapies for colorectal liver metastases demonstrated that RFA provides comparable survival outcomes to surgical metastasectomy and stereotactic body radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Tomita
- Department of Radiology, Okayama University Hospital, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
| | - Yusuke Matsui
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| | - Mayu Uka
- Department of Radiology, Okayama University Hospital, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| | - Noriyuki Umakoshi
- Department of Radiology, Okayama University Hospital, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kawabata
- Department of Radiology, Okayama University Hospital, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| | - Kazuaki Munetomo
- Department of Radiology, Okayama University Hospital, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| | - Shoma Nagata
- Department of Radiology, Okayama University Hospital, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| | - Toshihiro Iguchi
- Department of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| | - Takao Hiraki
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| |
Collapse
|