Meta-analysis of the diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the recurrence of epithelial ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer staging and follow-up: updated guidelines from the European Society of Urogenital Radiology female pelvic imaging working group

OBJECTIVE

To provide up-to-date European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines for staging and follow-up of patients with ovarian cancer (OC).

METHODS

Twenty-one experts, members of the female pelvis imaging ESUR subcommittee from 19 institutions, replied to 2 rounds of questionnaires regarding imaging techniques and structured reporting used for pre-treatment evaluation of OC patients. The results of the survey were presented to the other authors during the group's annual meeting. The lexicon was aligned with the Society of American Radiology (SAR)-ESUR lexicon; a first draft was circulated, and then comments and suggestions from the other authors were incorporated.

RESULTS

Evaluation of disease extent at diagnosis should be performed by chest, abdominal, and pelvic CT. The radiological report should map the disease with specific mention of sites that may preclude optimal cytoreductive surgery. For suspected recurrence, CT and [18F]FDG PET-CT are both valid options. MRI can be considered in experienced centres, as an alternative to CT, considering the high costs and the need for higher expertise in reporting.

CONCLUSIONS

CT is the imaging modality of choice for preoperative evaluation and follow-up in OC patients. A structured radiological report, including specific mention of sites that may preclude optimal debulking, is of value for patient management.

KEY POINTS

Question Guidelines were last published for ovarian cancer (OC) imaging in 2010; here, guidance on imaging techniques and reporting, incorporating advances in the field, are provided. Findings Structured reports should map out sites of disease, highlighting sites that limit cytoreduction. For suspected recurrence, CT and 18FDG PET-CT are options, and MRI can be considered. Clinical relevance Imaging evaluation of OC patients at initial diagnosis (mainly based on CT), using a structured report that considers surgical needs is valuable in treatment selection and planning.

Comparing the Diagnostic Value of FDG PET or PET/CT With FDG PET/MR in Inflammatory Bowel Disease-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic value of 18 F-FDG PET or PET/CT with FDG PET/MR in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed for studies reporting the diagnostic performance of FDG PET (PET/CT) and FDG PET/MR in IBD from the inception of the database to March 14, 2024, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Fourteen studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Pooled estimates of segment-based sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio for FDG PET (PET/CT) and FDG PET/MR were calculated alongside 95% confidence intervals. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were plotted, and the area under the SROC curve was determined alongside the Q * index.

RESULTS

The segment-based pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and area under the SROC curve of FDG PET (PET/CT) for diagnosing IBD (9 studies) were 0.81, 0.86, 5.76, 0.22, 31.92, and 0.92, respectively. Those of FDG PET/MR (5 studies) were 0.78, 0.92, 10.97, 0.25, 51.79, and 0.95. There was no significant difference in the abilities of detecting or excluding IBD between FDG PET (PET/CT) and FDG PET/MR.

CONCLUSIONS

For diagnostic value in patients with IBD, there was no significant difference between FDG PET (PET/CT) and FDG PET/MR. Both FDG PET (PET/CT) and FDG PET/MR have demonstrated high diagnostic performance for accurate diagnosing in patients with IBD.

Statistical plots in oncologic imaging, a primer for neuroradiologists

The simplest approach to convey the results of scientific analysis, which can include complex comparisons, is typically through the use of visual items, including figures and plots. These statistical plots play a critical role in scientific studies, making data more accessible, engaging, and informative. A growing number of visual representations have been utilized recently to graphically display the results of oncologic imaging, including radiomic and radiogenomic studies. Here, we review the applications, distinct properties, benefits, and drawbacks of various statistical plots. Furthermore, we provide neuroradiologists with a comprehensive understanding of how to use these plots to effectively communicate analytical results based on imaging data.

Imaging of Peritoneal Metastases in Ovarian Cancer Using MDCT, MRI, and FDG PET/CT: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This review aims to compare the diagnostic performance of multidetector CT (MDCT), MRI, including diffusion-weighted imaging, and FDG PET/CT in the detection of peritoneal metastases (PMs) in ovarian cancer (OC). A comprehensive search was performed for articles published from 2000 to February 2023. The inclusion criteria were the following: diagnosis/suspicion of PMs in patients with ovarian/fallopian/primary peritoneal cancer; initial staging or suspicion of recurrence; MDCT, MRI and/or FDG PET/CT performed for the detection of PMs; population of at least 10 patients; surgical results, histopathologic analysis, and/or radiologic follow-up, used as reference standard; and per-patient and per-region data and data for calculating sensitivity and specificity reported. In total, 33 studies were assessed, including 487 women with OC and PMs. On a per-patient basis, MRI (p = 0.03) and FDG PET/CT (p < 0.01) had higher sensitivity compared to MDCT. MRI and PET/CT had comparable sensitivities (p = 0.84). On a per-lesion analysis, no differences in sensitivity estimates were noted between MDCT and MRI (p = 0.25), MDCT and FDG PET/CT (p = 0.68), and MRI and FDG PET/CT (p = 0.35). Based on our results, FDG PET/CT and MRI are the preferred imaging modalities for the detection of PMs in OC. However, the value of FDG PET/CT and MRI compared to MDCT needs to be determined. Future research to address the limitations of the existing studies and the need for standardization and to explore the cost-effectiveness of the three imaging modalities is required.

Impact of 18 F-FDG PET on the Management in Patients With Recurrent Gynecologic cancer : A Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Gynecological cancer is the most prevalent cancer among women worldwide. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the impact of 18 F-FDG PET on the management of patients with recurrent gynecological cancers, including cervical, uterine, and ovarian cancers.

METHODS

We systematically searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for English-language publications. All published studies on the impact of PET scans on the management of patients with recurrent gynecological cancers were reviewed. The proportion of management change (%), defined as the percentage of patients whose management changed after FDG PET to those who underwent FDG PET, was calculated. The data from each study were analyzed using MedCalc Statistical Software version 14.12.0 (MedCalc Software, Ostend, Belgium).

RESULTS

Nineteen studies including 6191 patients were eligible for inclusion. The impact of FDG PET scan for detecting recurrence/metastasis in patients with gynecologic cancer was evaluated using management change rates, ranging from 9.4% to 60.7% with a pooled effect of 42.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 34.5%-49.6%; I2 = 92.9%). In the subtype analysis, FDG PET scanning resulted in changes in the management in 48.5% (95% CI, 37.8%-59.3%; I2 = 67.8%) of cervical cancer, 34.7% (95% CI, 33.4%-36.0%; I2 = 0%) of uterine cancer, and 40.3% (95% CI, 26.7%-54.7%; I2 = 95.2%) of ovarian cancer cases.

CONCLUSIONS

FDG PET has a significant impact on the restaging of patients with gynecological cancer. These findings suggest that FDG PET should be performed, especially in cases of suspected recurrence/metastasis in the main gynecologic cancer types, including cervical, ovarian, and uterine cancers.

18F-FDG PET/MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT for the Management of Gynecological Malignancies: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature

OBJECTIVE

Positron emission tomography with 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18] fluoro- D-glucose integrated with computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (18F-FDG PET/MRI) has emerged as a promising tool for managing various types of cancer. This review study was conducted to investigate the role of 18F- FDG PET/CT and FDG PET/MRI in the management of gynecological malignancies.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched for relevant articles in the three databases PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All studies reporting data on the FDG PET/CT and FDG PET MRI in the management of gynecological cancer, performed anywhere in the world and published exclusively in the English language, were included in the present study.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used the EndNote software (EndNote X8.1, Thomson Reuters) to list the studies and screen them on the basis of the inclusion criteria. Data, including first author, publication year, sample size, clinical application, imaging type, and main result, were extracted and tabulated in Excel. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of the modalities were extracted and summarized.

MAIN RESULTS

After screening 988 records, 166 studies published between 2004 and 2022 were included, covering various methodologies. Studies were divided into the following five categories: the role of FDG PET/CT and FDG-PET/MRI in the management of: (a) endometrial cancer (n = 30); (b) ovarian cancer (n = 60); (c) cervical cancer (n = 50); (d) vulvar and vagina cancers (n = 12); and (e) gynecological cancers (n = 14).

CONCLUSIONS

FDG PET/CT and FDG PET/MRI have demonstrated potential as non-invasive imaging tools for enhancing the management of gynecological malignancies. Nevertheless, certain associated challenges warrant attention.