Propensity score-matched comparison of robotic- and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, and open lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer patients aged 75 years or older

Comparison of Early Functional Recovery Following Triportal Robot-Assisted and Uniportal Video-Assisted Segmentectomy in Patients With Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

Robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) is more precise and flexible than video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment. This study compared the early postoperative functional recovery of patients who underwent triportal RATS with that of patients who underwent uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (UVATS) for segmentectomy.

METHODS

This observational, prospective study included 172 patients with clinical stage I or II peripheral NSCLC who underwent RATS or UVATS segmentectomy. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance differences between groups. The functional recovery data were collected during the first 4 weeks after discharge via portable devices and questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30, Christensen Fatigue Scale, MD Anderson Symptom Inventory, and Leicester Cough Questionnaire).

RESULTS

After PSM, the baseline characteristics were consistent between the groups. RATS was associated with shorter operation time and lower total drainage volume compared to UVATS. However, RATS was associated with more cases of severe postoperative pain. Despite this, patients who underwent RATS recovered well, showed good short-term outcomes in fatigue and physical function, and experienced few postoperative adverse events. The differences in average daily step count and sleep duration were not significant. In terms of global health status (GHS), RATS was slightly but nonsignificantly advantageous.

CONCLUSIONS

In the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway, triportal RATS has potential benefits in terms of perioperative and early postoperative functional recovery after segmentectomy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Biomedical Research Ethics Committee of Shandong Province: 2022-580; Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2300067977.

[The Results of RATS and VATS Anatomical Resections in the Initial Phase]

Robot-assisted (RATS) anatomical resection is a new method in the treatment of lung tumours, but is controversial due to its cost. The aim of our retrospective study was to compare the clinical results of the RATS and VATS anatomical resections.The first 100 VATS and RATS resections were analysed with regard to tumour stage, intra- and postoperative complications, conversion, operation time, hospital stay and length of drainage treatment, postoperative pain (numerical rating scale, NRS) and mortality. The results were compared using the chi-square, Fisher and independent t tests.In the VATS group, stage I was more frequent, stage II less frequent (stage I: 73.4%, stage II: 19.2%) than in the RATS group (stage I: 65.5%, stage II. 23%, p = 0.695). The operating time was longer with RATS (213.5 min vs. 190.3 min, p = 0.008), due to the docking and undocking time of the robotic system to the patient. The proportion of sublobar resections was significantly higher in the RATS group (28% vs. 7%, p < 0.001). The proportion of intraoperative complications (7% vs. 14%, p = 0.073) and conversion rate (9% vs. 11%, p = 0.407) were lower in the RATS surgery. The number of lymph nodes removed was high in both groups and not significantly different (VATS: 21.6, RATS: 22.1). The hospital stay was shorter after RATS (8.8 days) than after VATS (12.5 days, p < 0.001), as was the length of postoperative drainage treatment (5.6 vs. 8 days, p < 0.001). In the RATS group, postoperative pain on the 1st and 2nd postoperative day was significantly lower, as based on the numeric rating scale (1.68 vs. 2.83, p < 0.001, 0.99 vs. 2.41, p < 0.001). The complication rate was significantly higher after VATS than after RATS (57% vs. 33%, p = 0.001), and fewer reoperations were necessary after RATS (3%) than in the VATS group (8%, p = 0.121). Four patients died in the VATS group, none after RATS (p = 0.043).The robot-assisted technique enables anatomical resections with lower conversion, complication rates and mortality, as well as less postoperative pain. Robotic surgery has proven to be safe and oncologically comparable to anatomical VATS resections for lung cancer.

[Observational studies to evaluate robotic-assisted lung cancer surgery?]

BACKGROUND

The aim of this work is to assess the quality of observational studies and to make direct and indirect comparisons of robotic surgery with other approaches.

METHOD

We searched various databases between 2014 and 2024 for observational studies comparing robotic-assisted surgery to thoracoscopy or thoracotomy.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. Risk of confounding bias was present in 90% of studies, while risk of classification bias appeared in 80%. Robotic-assisted surgery reduced the risk of conversion to thoracotomy compared with thoracoscopy with an odds ratio of 0.21 (95% confidence interval: 0.06-0.65), with high heterogeneity between studies (I2=80%). Robotic-assisted surgery did not significantly reduce postoperative complications or 30-day mortality compared with thoracotomy or thoracoscopy. For 5-year overall survival, comparisons of robotic-assisted surgery to thoracoscopy or thoracotomy were non-significant with I2 of 55%.

CONCLUSION

This work demonstrates the need for a randomized controlled trial to validate robotic surgery for the treatment of bronchial cancer.

Ten-year survival outcomes of video-assisted thoracic surgery vs. open major lung resection for stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer: a large cohort study in China

Background

Despite the widespread adoption of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for major lung resection, the 10-year long-term survival outcomes of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with VATS compared with open major lung resection is lacking. The purpose of this study was to analyze the short- and long-term outcomes of VATS vs. open major lung resection for NSCLC.

Methods

The perioperative outcomes and long-term survival of p-stage I-III NSCLC patients who underwent major lung resection via VATS vs. open major lung resection in the Western China Lung Cancer Database (WCLCD) between May 2006 and June 2018 were studied using propensity score matching (PSM).

Results

Of the 10,167 patients who underwent surgery for lung malignancies, 6,405 patients with stage I-III NSCLC were included in the study, including 4,224 in the VATS group and 2,181 in the open group. PSM resulted in 1,487 patients in both the VATS and open groups. The patients were matched by patient demographics, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), tumor histology and TNM stage. Compared with open surgery, major lung resection via VATS resulted in less blood loss (median: 50 vs. 100 mL, P<0.001) and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (7.6±6.0 vs. 8.6±4.9 days, P<0.001) but higher total hospital costs (52.5±21.2 vs. 45.0±16.4 kRMB, P<0.001). The matched cohort showed that patients who underwent major lung resection via VATS had better overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) than did patients who underwent major lung resection via open surgery (5-year survival: 64.9% vs. 57.7%, P<0.001; 5-year RFS: 50.3% vs. 45.3%, P=0.003). Patients who underwent VATS had a better 10-year OS rate (47.8% vs. 42.6%). According to the subgroup analysis, patients with stage II NSCLC who underwent major lung resection via VATS had better OS and RFS (OS: P<0.001; RFS: P=0.004), while there were no significant differences in OS or RFS between stage I and III NSCLC patients.

Conclusions

Major lung resection via the VATS should be the preferred surgical option for stage I-III NSCLC patients due to its superior long-term survival outcome and advantages of less blood loss and shorter postoperative hospital stays.

Quality of lymph node dissection and early recurrence in robotic versus thoracoscopic lobectomy for stage N1-2 non-small cell lung cancer: Eleven-year real-world data from a high-volume center

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of lymph node dissection (LND) and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted (RL) versus video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy (VL) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with nodal involvement remains controversial. This study aims to compare LND quality and early recurrence (ER) rate between RL and VL for stage N1-2 NSCLC patients based on eleven-year real-world data from a high-volume center.

METHODS

Pathologic stage IIB-IIIB (T1-3N1-2) NSCLC patients undergoing RL or VL in Shanghai Chest Hospital from 2010 to 2021 were retrospectively reviewed from a prospectively maintained database. Propensity-score matching (PSM, 1:4 RL versus VL) was performed to mitigate baseline differences. LND quality was evaluated by adequate (≥16) LND and nodal upstaging rates. ER was defined as recurrence occurring within 24 months post-surgery.

RESULTS

Out of 1578 cases reviewed, PSM yielded 200 RL and 800 VL cases. Without compromising perioperative outcomes, RL assessed more N1 and N2 LNs and N1 stations, and led to higher incidences of adequate LND (58.5 % vs. 42.0 %, p < 0.001) and nodal upstaging (p = 0.026), compared to VL. Notably, RL improved perioperative outcomes for patients undergoing adequate LND than VL. Finally, RL notably reduced ER rate (22.0 % vs. 29.6 %, p = 0.032), especially LN ER rate (15.0 % vs. 21.5 %, p = 0.041), and prolonged disease-free survival (DFS; hazard ratio = 0.837, p = 0.040) compared with VL. Further subgroup analysis of ER and DFS within the cN1-2-stage cohort verified this survival benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

RL surpasses VL in enhancing LND quality, reducing ER rates, and improving perioperative outcomes when adequate LND is performed for stage N1-2 NSCLC patients.

A comparative study of robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and conventional approaches for short-term outcomes of anatomical segmentectomy

OBJECTIVES

Since anatomical segmentectomy requires meticulous dissection of the segmental pulmonary vessels and bronchus, robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) has been widely adopted in recent years. We investigated the usefulness of RATS segmentectomy by comparing perioperative outcomes with conventional approaches including open thoracotomy or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). We compared perioperative outcomes of segmentectomy between RATS and conventional approaches including open thoracotomy or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS).

METHODS

This single-institutional retrospective study comprised 231 patients with primary lung cancer who underwent segmentectomy by RATS or conventional approaches between January 2011 and December 2022. Surgical outcomes and postoperative complications were analyzed among patients whose background factors were adjusted by propensity score matching (PSM).

RESULTS

Before PSM, there were significant differences in age, smoking status, and types of segmentectomy. After PSM, 126 patients (63 patients in each group) were included in this analysis. The RATS group had significantly shorter operative time (154 vs 210 min; p < 0.01), fewer bleeding amounts (10 vs 40 mL; p < 0.01), and shorter duration of chest drainage (2 vs 2 days; p = 0.04) than the conventional-approach group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of all complications; however, the incidence of postoperative pneumonia was significantly lower than in the conventional-approach group (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

RATS segmentectomy is proposed to be useful. It was suggested that RATS segmentectomy may be useful with better perioperative results than the conventional approach. Further studies on oncological long-term outcomes and cost-benefit comparisons are needed.

Robotic Versus Thoracoscopic Sub-lobar Resection for Octogenarians with Clinical Stage IA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Real-World Study

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive sub-lobectomy is sufficient in treating small early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, comparison of the feasibility and oncologic efficacy between robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in performing sub-lobectomy for early-stage NSCLC patients age 80 years or older is scarce.

METHODS

Octogenarians with clinical stage IA NSCLC (tumor size, ≤ 2 cm) undergoing minimally invasive wedge resection or segmentectomy at Shanghai Chest Hospital from 2011 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed from a prospectively maintained database. Propensity score-matching (PSM) with a RATS versus VATS ratio of 1:4 was performed. Perioperative and long-term outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

The study identified 594 patients (48 RATS and 546 VATS patients), and PSM resulted in 45 cases in the RATS group and 180 cases in the VATS group. The RATS patients experienced less intraoperative bleeding (60 mL [interquartile range (IQR), 50-100 mL] vs. 80 mL [IQR, 50-100 mL]; P = 0.027) and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (4 days [IQR, 3-5 days] vs. 5 days [IQR, 4-6 days]; P = 0.041) than the VATS patients. The two surgical approaches were comparable concerning other perioperative outcomes and postoperative complications (20.00% vs. 26.11%; P = 0.396). Additionally, during a median follow-up period of 66 months, RATS and VATS achieved comparable 5-year overall survival (90.48% vs. 87.93%; P = 0.891), recurrence-free survival (83.37% vs. 83.18%; P = 0.782), and cumulative incidence of death. Further subgroup comparison also demonstrated comparable long-term outcomes between the two approaches. Finally, multivariate Cox analysis indicated that the surgical approach was not independently correlated with long-term outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The RATS approach shortened the postoperative hospital stay, reduced intraoperative bleeding by a statistically notable but clinically insignificant amount, and achieved long-term outcomes comparable with VATS in performing sub-lobectomy for octogenarians with early-stage small NSCLC.

Comparison of transfusion rates between robotic- and video-assisted lobectomy: a propensity score matching analysis

The objective is to compare the perioperative blood transfusion rate and postoperative complications between robot-assisted surgery and thoracoscopic surgery in lung cancer patients. This is a single-center retrospective study. Patients underwent lung cancer minimally invasive resection at Fujian Cancer Hospital from April 1, 2022, to April 30, 2023, were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into robotic-assisted lobectomy (RAL) and video-assisted lobectomy (VAL) groups according to the surgical methods. Data, including demographics, clinic variables, and endpoint outcomes were collected from the electronic medical record. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to analyze the baseline data of patients. The RAL group and the VAL group were matched 1:1. Then, the blood transfusion rates and short-term outcomes of the two groups were compared. A logistic regression was performed to analyze the independent risk factors of perioperative blood transfusion. A total of 558 patients were enrolled in this study. 166 of 558 patients were divided into the RAL group, and 392 patients were into the VAL group. A total of 118 patients were selected and analyzed following propensity score matching. After PSM, there was no difference in perioperative transfusion rates, including RBC transfusion and frozen plasma transfusion, between the VAL and RAL groups (P > 0.05). The RAL group had fewer days of drainage tubes (P = 0.036). There was no difference in other short-term outcomes, including the volume of thoracic drainage, the volume of intraoperative blood loss, the length of hospitalization, and the rate of postoperative pulmonary infection (P > 0.05). Volume of intraoperative blood loss, volume of thoracic drainage, and preoperative hemoglobin were independent risk factors of perioperative red blood cell or frozen plasma transfusion; however, RAL or VAL was not. The study showed that the rates of perioperative blood transfusion were comparable between RAL and VAL. RAL is superior for patient recovery in terms of short-term outcomes.

Effects of da Vinci robot versus thoracoscopic surgery on body trauma and lymphocyte subsets in lung cancer patients: A propensity score matching study

BACKGROUND

To assess the impact of da Vinci robot versus thoracoscopic surgery on body trauma and lymphocyte subsets in lung cancer patients.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 352 patients with lung cancer treated by minimally invasive surgery completed by the same operator in the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Gansu Provincial People's Hospital from October 2019 to October 2022. According to the surgical procedure, the patients were divided into a robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) group (n = 159) and a video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery group (VATS) (n = 193), respectively. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed in both groups, and perioperative indicators were recorded. Levels of inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein, CRP; interleukin-6, IL-6) and lymphocyte subsets (CD3+ , CD4+ , CD8+ , and CD4+ /CD8+ ) were measured 1 day before surgery and 1, 3, and 5 days after surgery, respectively. To compare the effects of the two surgical procedures on the trauma and lymphocyte subsets of the patient's organism.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-eight patients in each group after PSM. Compared with the VATS group, the RATS group had shorter operative time (p < 0.001), less intraoperative bleeding (p < 0.001), less postoperative chest drainage (p = 0.029), shorter postoperative chest drainage time (p = 0.008), and shorter postoperative hospital stay (p = 0.005). The levels of CRP and IL-6 increased in both groups after surgery compared with those before surgery, and the increase was less in the RATS group than that in the VATS group. Postoperative T-lymphocyte levels were lower in both groups compared with preoperative levels, and T-lymphocyte levels were significantly lower in the VATS group compared with the RATS group.

CONCLUSION

Compared with VATS for treating lung cancer, RATS has advantages in short-term efficacy, and smaller surgical trauma to patients, which can reduce the body's inflammatory response. It also has less impact on T lymphocyte subpopulations, which can better protect patients' immune function.

Short- and long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy in non-small cell lung cancer patients aged 35 years or younger: a real-world study with propensity score-matched analysis

PURPOSE

This study compared short- and long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) versus video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for lobectomy in young adults aged ≤ 35 years with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), aiming to assess the superiority of RATS over VATS for this special group of patients.

METHODS

A total of 1355 consecutive NSCLC cases aged 18-35 years undergoing RATS (n = 105) or VATS (n = 1250) between 2014 and 2021 were retrospectively identified from a prospectively maintained database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to establish a 1:3 RATS versus VATS ratio. Baseline clinicopathological characteristics, perioperative outcomes, lymph node (LN) assessment, and long-term survival were investigated.

RESULTS

Following PSM, 105 and 315 cases were in the RATS and VATS groups, respectively. RATS led to a shorter postoperative hospital stay than VATS (4.0 ± 1.5 vs 4.3 ± 1.7 days, p = 0.02). The two groups were comparable in other perioperative outcomes and postoperative complications (all p > 0.05). Moreover, RATS assessed more LNs (9.4 ± 4.4 vs 8.3 ± 3.6, p = 0.03), especially N1 LNs (4.2 ± 3.1 vs 3.5 ± 2.2, p = 0.02), than VATS. By comparison, no difference in 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), or recurrence or mortality patterns was found between the two groups (all p > 0.05). Further subgroup analyses also observed similar long-term outcomes between the two groups regarding age, gender, and smoking history. Finally, Cox's analyses found that the surgical approach was not independently correlated with RFS or OS.

CONCLUSION

RATS shortened postoperative hospital stay, assessed more N1 and total LNs, and achieved comparable long-term outcomes to VATS for very young NSCLC patients.

Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for non-small cell lung cancer patients with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy: a single-center retrospective study

Background

Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy has been increasingly applied to treat non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the comparison between robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in the feasibility and oncological efficacy following neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy is scarce. This study aims to assess the superiorities of RATS over (VATS) concerning short-term outcomes in treating NSCLC patients with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy.

Methods

NSCLC patients receiving RATS or VATS lobectomy following neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy at Shanghai Chest Hospital from 2019 to 2022 were retrospectively identified. Baseline clinical characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and survival profiles were analyzed.

Results

Forty-six NSCLC patients with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy were included and divided into the RATS (n=15) and VATS (n=31) groups. The baseline clinical characteristics and induction-related adverse events were comparable between the two groups (all p>0.050). The 30-day mortality in the RATS and VATS groups were 0% and 3.23%, respectively (p=1.000). Patients undergoing RATS were associated with reduced surgical-related intensive unit care (ICU) stay than those receiving VATS (0.0 [0.0-0.0] vs. 0.0 [0.0-1.0] days, p=0.026). Moreover, RATS assessed more N1 LNs (6.27 ± 1.94 vs 4.90 ± 1.92, p=0.042) and LN stations (3.07 ± 1.03 vs 2.52 ± 0.57, p=0.038) compared with VATS. By comparison, no difference was found in surgical outcomes, pathological results, and postoperative complications between the RATS and VATS groups (all p>0.050). Finally, RATS and VATS achieved comparable one-year recurrence-free survival (82.96% vs. 85.23%, p=0.821) and the timing of central nervous system, LN, and bone recurrences (all p>0.050).

Conclusion

RATS is safe and feasible for NSCLC patients with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy, reducing surgical-related ICU stay, assessing increased N1 LNs and stations, and achieving similar survival profiles to VATS.

[Robotics in thoracic surgery]

The increasing diffusion of the robotic-assisted technique in thoracic surgery (RATS) in Germany was initially delayed in comparison with other countries. Therefore, there is a large potential to implement the volume of the surgical procedures performed by RATS.The RATS-technique has many positive aspects. For example, the angulated instruments allow a full wristed dexterity like the human hand, but with a greater range of motion. The surgical Robot has a tremor filter and replicates perfectly the surgeon's movements. Furthermore, the 3D-scope enables an image magnification up to 10 times compared to the normal thoracoscopes. The RATS has also some disadvantages. For example, the operating surgeon sits far away from the patient and is not sterile while performing surgery. This is an important factor in in case of emergency situations, like major bleeding, which often require a conversion to thoracotomy.All robotic systems are built after the same master-slave technology, that allows the operating surgeon to have full control of the master system. The slave system consists of mechanical actuators that respond to the master system's inputs, so the surgical robot will translate every single movement of the surgeon at the console.The main surgical indications for RATS are: mediastinal tumors, diaphragm plication and anatomical lung resection like segment resections, lobectomies or sleeve resections.In the future, the implementation of virtual and augmented reality is expected in the training but also in the planning of RATS-operations.

Perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: A propensity score matched analysis

BACKGROUND

The existing literature on perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) versus video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for lung lobectomy is inconclusive.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of VATS and RATS lobectomy procedures for patients with non-small cell lung cancer to compare the short-term perioperative outcomes by propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 418 patients were enrolled in this study. After PSM, 71 patients each received VATS and RATS lobectomy for further analysis. RATS lobectomy was associated with a lower rate of conversion to thoracotomy (0% vs. 5.63%, p = 0.006), a lower rate of postoperative prolonged air leak (1.14% vs. 19.72%, p = 0.001) and a shorter duration of postoperative chest tube drainage (3 days interquartile range [IQR: 3, 4] vs. 4 days IQR [3-5], p = 0.027). Subgroup analysis indicated that after acquiring proficiency in the RATS procedure, its disadvantages diminished while its advantages were enhanced. In terms of rate of conversion to thoracotomy, length of hospital stays, and duration of postoperative chest tube drainage, RATS was comparable to uniportal VATS and superior to triportal VATS.

CONCLUSION

RATS has advantages over VATS in terms of early chest tube removal, early discharge, lower thoracotomy rate, less postoperative air leak, and a potential trend of more lymph node dissection numbers. These advantages are more pronounced after acquiring proficiency in RATS.

How Much Stress Does a Surgeon Endure? The Effects of the Robotic Approach on the Autonomic Nervous System of a Surgeon in the Modern Era of Thoracic Surgery

(1) Objective: the purpose of this study was to evaluate and quantify the stress to which a surgeon is subjected during his/her surgical activity; we compared the individual clinical and psychological responses to stress of two surgeons during their surgical activities via robotic and open approaches. (2) Materials and methods: This was a prospective observational study in which we progressively collected data concerning the surgical performances of two different thoracic surgeons (October 2021-June 2022). We evaluated 20 lung resections performed via robot-assisted surgery and 20 lung resections performed via an open approach by each surgeon; in particular, we evaluated a panel of pre-, peri-, and postoperative data concerning the interventions, the patients, and other outcomes concerning the autonomic nervous system (ANS) and psychological responses to stress of the surgeons during their surgical activities. (3) Results: When analyzing data concerning the ANS activity of two surgeons, during robotic activity we found lower maximum, minimum, and mean heart rates; lower mean respiratory frequencies; lower body temperatures; and lower mean desaturations compared to the open approach activity for both surgeons. The psychological monitoring showed that the open approach created more physical fatigue and frustration but higher levels of satisfaction and performance evaluation. The robot-assisted surgeries showed higher levels of anxiety. (4) Conclusions: for different reasons, the robotic approach stimulated the ANS to a lesser degree, causing less stress for surgeons and ensuring greater comfort.

Learning Curve of Robotic Lobectomy for the Treatment of Lung Cancer: How Does It Impact on the Autonomic Nervous System of the Surgeon?

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose is to define the learning curve for robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy by reporting the experience of a single surgeon.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We progressively collected the data concerning the surgical performance of a single male thoracic surgeon, from the beginning of his robotic activity as first operator from January 2021 to June 2022. We evaluated several pre-, intra- and postoperative parameters concerning patients and intraoperative cardiovascular and respiratory outcomes of the surgeon, recorded during surgical interventions, in order to evaluate his cardiovascular stress. We used cumulative sum control charts (CUSUM) to analyze the learning curve.

RESULTS

A total of 72 lung lobectomies were performed by a single surgeon in this period. Analyzing the CUSUM of several parameters, the inflection point identifying the transition beyond the surgeon learning phase was reached at cases 28, 22, 27 and 33 when considering operating time, mean heart rate, max heart rate and mean respiratory rate, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The learning curve for robotic lobectomy seems to be safe and feasible with a correct robotic training program. The analysis of a single surgeon from the beginning of his robotic activity demonstrates that confidence, competence, dexterity and security are achieved after about 20-30 procedures, without compromising efficiency and oncological radicality.

Opioid Free Anesthesia in Thoracic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis

Introduction: Recent studies showed that balanced opioid-free anesthesia is feasible and desirable in several surgical settings. However, in thoracic surgery, scientific evidence is still lacking. Thus, we conducted the first systematic review and meta-analysis of opioid-free anesthesia in this field. Methods: The primary outcome was the occurrence of any complication. Secondary outcomes were the length of hospital stay, recovery room length of stay, postoperative pain at 24 and 48 h, and morphine equivalent consumption at 48 h. Results: Out of 375 potentially relevant articles, 6 studies (1 randomized controlled trial and 5 observational cohort studies) counting a total of 904 patients were included. Opioid-free anesthesia compared to opioid-based anesthesia, was associated with a lower rate of any complication (74 of 175 [42%] vs. 200 of 294 [68%]; RR = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.65−0.89; p < 0.001; I2 = 0%), lower 48 h morphine equivalent consumption (MD −14.5 [−29.17/−0.22]; p = 0.05; I2 = 95%) and lower pain at 48 h (MD −1.95 [−3.6/0.3]; p = 0.02, I = 98%). Conclusions: Opioid-free anesthesia in thoracic surgery is associated with lower postoperative complications, and less opioid demand with better postoperative analgesia at 48 h compared to opioid-based anesthesia.