A novel difficulty scoring system of laparoscopic liver resection for liver tumor

Navigating Complexity in Liver Resection: A Narrative Review of Factors Influencing Intraoperative Difficulty

Background: Liver resection remains the cornerstone for curative management in primary liver malignancies. Liver surgery ranges from simple wedge resections to complex hepatectomies involving vascular or biliary reconstructions. The anatomical complexity of the liver and these varied surgical approaches create challenges in assessing operative difficulty. This literature review explores the key factors influencing operative difficulty in liver resection for primary liver malignancy across surgical techniques. Methods: A broad literature review was conducted to determine the factors that were associated with increased operative difficulty in liver resection using the Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane databases for studies published between 2000 and 2025. Results: This review identifies several patient, tumor, and surgical factors that influence operative difficulty in liver resection. Numerous difficult scoring systems were identified, yet their applicability across different operative approaches remains uncertain. Across open and minimally invasive techniques, tumor size and location are commonly used to determine complexity. However, debate remains regarding the optimal cutoff for tumor diameter. Other identified factors include the extent of resection, patient-specific variables (e.g., cirrhosis, body mass index, previous surgeries), and surgical technique. In addition, liver resection procedures classified based on the 2000 Brisbane terminology have been stratified into three groups of increasing difficulty. Conclusion: The ability to predict operative difficulty is useful for case selection, surgical planning, and risk stratification for meaningful shared decision-making. Future research should focus on refining predictive models by integrating composite measures, including patient-reported outcomes and long-term survival. A unified, validated scoring system applicable across surgical techniques could enhance consistency in clinical practice and research to improve outcomes.

Should lymphadenectomy be recommended in radical surgery of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients? A retrospective study

PURPOSE

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is an extremely deadly cancer with high recurrence incidence, particularly in patients with lymph node metastasis (LNM). The necessity of lymphadenectomy including lymph node biology (LNB) and dissection (LND) during ICC radical surgery remains debate.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the patients diagnosed with ICC and underwent radical surgery at the Cancer Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from 2012 to 2023.

RESULTS

A total of 308 ICC patients were involved in this study. pLNM+ group had poorer OS (P < 0.0001) and poorer DFS (P < 0.0001) compared with pLNM- group. Compared to the LN- group, LN+ group exhibited worse OS (P = 0.038) and worse DFS (P = 0.003). After PSM and IPTW, compared with LN- group, LNB exhibited longer operation time (IPTW: P = 0.0024) and longer hospitalization days (IPTW: P = 0.0112) with no significant differences in complications, DFS, and OS. Compared with LN- group, LND group had no better DFS and OS, only more complications (IPTW: P = 0.0191), longer operation time (all P < 0.001), higher risk of bleeding (all P < 0.05), transfusion (IPTW: P = 0.014) and longer hospitalization days (IPTW: P = 0.0044). Compared with LNB group, LND had longer operation time (P = 0.0227), higher risk of bleeding (P = 0.017) and transfusion (P = 0.0321), and more postoperative complications (P = 0.0425), with no difference in DFS and OS.

CONCLUSION

Lymphadenectomy does not necessarily provide long-term survival or recurrence benefits. LND only achieves the effect of LNB while negatively affects postoperative recovery without survival benefit for ICC patients. LNB can be performed for accurate pathological staging while not all patients may require LND based on their specific circumstances.

Difficulty score for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions with the Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel technique: a preliminary reliability study

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to propose a new difficulty score for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions (GRs) with Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel (MCAT), and to test the score's reliability.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A difficulty score was developed for the assessment and grading of 13 relevant anatomical parameters at baseline. Six experienced dental practitioners evaluated existing GRs in three patients. The scale was assessed at two levels: for each single tooth, and seven days later for whole quadrants. Accuracy was estimated using Fleiss' kappa statistics and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) to determine the inter- and intra-examiner agreement.

RESULTS

During the evaluation of individual teeth, all parameters exhibited very good to excellent agreement, with Fleiss' kappa statistics ranging between 0.74 and 1. Only recession type, CEJ detectability, and cervical step displayed minor variations. The total MCAT score also produced a minor discrepancy (kappa = 0.78). During the evaluation of whole quadrants, excellent reproducibility was recorded for individual parameters (kappa 0.9-1). Minor variation was observed for recession type and CEJ detectability. Excellent reliability in the total MCAT scores was noted between examiners (kappa = 0.9). Overall intra-examiner agreement values were very high (0.75-1).

CONCLUSIONS

The reliability of the proposed difficulty score was assessed between very good and excellent. Some difficulties arose in the evaluation of recession type, CEJ detectability and cervical step.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The presented score may be considered for assessing the difficulty of multiple GRs treatment using MCAT in order to improve the process of clinical decision-making.

Risk factor analysis of conversion in laparoscopic liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The risk factors of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) requiring conversion to open surgery have not been adequately studied. This study aimed to determine the risk factors and postoperative outcomes of conversion in patients with ICC.

METHODS

From May 2014 to September 2022, Unplanned conversions were compared with successful LLRs.

RESULTS

153 patients with ICC initially underwent LLR, of which 41 (26.8%) required conversion to open surgery. Multivariate analysis for those factors that were statistically significant or confirmed by clinical studies, tumor proximity to the major vessels (OR 6.643, P < 0.001), and previous upper abdominal surgery (OR 3.140, P = 0.040) were independent predictors of unplanned conversions. Compared to successful LLRs, unplanned conversions showed longer operative times (300.0 vs. 225.0 min, P < 0.001), more blood loss (500.0 vs. 200.0 mL, P < 0.001), higher transfusion rates (46.3% vs. 11.6%, P < 0.001), longer length of stays (13.0 vs. 8.0 days, P < 0.001), and higher rates of major morbidity (39.0% vs. 11.6%, P < 0.001). However, there was no statistically significant difference in 30-day or 90-day mortality between the conversion group and the laparoscopic group.

CONCLUSION

Conversion during LLR should be anticipated in ICC patients with prior upper abdominal surgery or tumor proximity to major vessels as features.

Risk Factors and Long-Term Implications of Unplanned Conversion During Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background: Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has become a widely used standardized operation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the field of hepatic surgery. However, the risk factors and long-term implications associated with unplanned conversion to an open procedure during the LLR have not been adequately studied. Methods: The study incorporated 96 patients with HCC. Risk factors of conversion and their prognosis were analyzed by comparing patients who successfully underwent LLR with those who required unplanned conversion. Results: In this study, the unplanned conversion rate for laparoscopic hepatectomy was 42.7%. Patients who underwent conversion had longer length of stay (8 versus 7 days, P < .001), longer operation time (297.73 versus 194.03 minutes, P = .000), a higher transfusion rate (29.3% versus 5.5%, P < .001), and more postoperative complications compared with patients who successfully underwent LLR. The two surgical maneuvers did not show substantial disparities in terms of total survival and disease-free survival rates. Risk factors of unplanned conversion contained tumor location (odds ratio [OR], 3.129; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.214-8.066; P = 0.018) and tumor size (OR, 2.652; 95% CI: 1.039-6.767; P = 0.041). Conclusions: The unplanned conversion during LLR for HCC was linked to unfavorable short-term prognosis, yet it did not influence long-term oncologic outcomes. Moreover, preoperative evaluation of tumor size and location may effectively reduce the probability of unplanned conversion during LLR.

Delimiting Low Level of Difficulty Scoring System Based on the Extent of Resection Difficulty Scoring System for Laparoscopic Liver Resection

Background: The difficulty scoring system based on the extent of resection (DSS-ER) is a common tool for assessing the difficulty and risk of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR), but DSS-ER fails to comprehensively and accurately assess low level for beginners. Methods: The 93 cases of LLRs for primary liver cancer in the general surgery department of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University from 2017 to 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The low level of DSS-ER difficulty scoring system was reclassified into three grades. The intraoperative and postoperative complications were compared among different groups. Results: There were significant differences in the operative time, blood loss, intraoperative allogeneic blood transfusion, conversion to laparotomy, and allogeneic blood transfusion among the different groups. Meanwhile, the postoperative complications were mainly pleural effusion and pneumonia, and the incidence of grade III was higher compared with other two grades. No significant difference existed in the postoperative biliary leakage and liver failure among three grades. Conclusions: This reclassified low level of DSS-ER difficulty scoring system has certain clinical value for LLR beginners to complete the corresponding learning curve.