The current role of secondary cytoreductive surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer

The Histomorphology to Molecular Transition: Exploring the Genomic Landscape of Poorly Differentiated Epithelial Endometrial Cancers

The peremptory need to circumvent challenges associated with poorly differentiated epithelial endometrial cancers (PDEECs), also known as Type II endometrial cancers (ECs), has prompted therapeutic interrogation of the prototypically intractable and most prevalent gynecological malignancy. PDEECs account for most endometrial cancer-related mortalities due to their aggressive nature, late-stage detection, and poor response to standard therapies. PDEECs are characterized by heterogeneous histopathological features and distinct molecular profiles, and they pose significant clinical challenges due to their propensity for rapid progression. Regardless of the complexities around PDEECs, they are still being administered inefficiently in the same manner as clinically indolent and readily curable type-I ECs. Currently, there are no targeted therapies for the treatment of PDEECs. The realization of the need for new treatment options has transformed our understanding of PDEECs by enabling more precise classification based on genomic profiling. The transition from a histopathological to a molecular classification has provided critical insights into the underlying genetic and epigenetic alterations in these malignancies. This review explores the genomic landscape of PDEECs, with a focus on identifying key molecular subtypes and associated genetic mutations that are prevalent in aggressive variants. Here, we discuss how molecular classification correlates with clinical outcomes and can refine diagnostic accuracy, predict patient prognosis, and inform therapeutic strategies. Deciphering the molecular underpinnings of PDEECs has led to advances in precision oncology and protracted therapeutic remissions for patients with these untamable malignancies.

Secondary cytoreductive surgery in platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

To evaluate the role of secondary cytoreduction in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.

METHODS

The PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compare secondary cytoreduction plus chemotherapy with chemotherapy alone in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer were selected. Pooled hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

RESULTS

There was no difference in overall survival (OS) between the surgery group and no surgery group (HR = 0.89; 95% CI 0.77, 1.04; p = 0.14), but secondary cytoreduction showed a significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.67; 95% CI 0.54, 0.76; p < 0.00001). A subgroup analysis comparing the complete gross resection subpopulation with the no surgery group achieved a significant longer OS (HR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.58-0.85; p = 0.0003) and a greater PFS benefit (HR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.48-0.66; p < 0.00001). In addition, as compared with incomplete resection, the OS benefit of complete gross resection was more evident (HR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.37-0.69; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In women with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer, although secondary cytoreduction followed by chemotherapy resulted in longer PFS than chemotherapy alone, it did not lead to significant benefit in OS. However, when complete gross resection was achieved, it significantly prolonged OS and provided a greater PFS benefit.

Robotic Recto-Sigmoid Resection with Total Intracorporeal Colorectal Anastomosis (TICA) in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

BACKGROUND

About 70% of women affected by ovarian cancer experience relapse within 2 years of diagnosis. Traditionally, the standard treatment for recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC) has been represented by systemic chemotherapy.1 Recently, several retrospective studies have suggested that secondary cytoreductive surgery could provide better clinical outcomes than chemotherapy alone, in the case of complete tumor cytoreduction.2,3 About 50% of patients with ROC have a pelvic component of the disease and 22% of patients present isolated pelvic recurrence, often involving the rectum.4,5 Minimally invasive secondary cytoreductive surgery is a feasible option and is associated with favorable perioperative outcomes.6-8 It is crucial to fully explore the peritoneal cavity before starting cytoreductive procedures in order to confirm the absence of carcinomatosis.9 The robotic system facilitates the identification of anatomical structures and makes it easier to perform complex surgical steps in narrow spaces. It also allows the integrated use of surgical tools such as intraoperative ultrasound and indocyanine green application.

METHODS

In this video, we present the case of a 64-year-old woman who experienced a rectal recurrence of ovarian cancer after a platinum-free interval of 12 months. We describe, in a step-by-step manner, the surgical procedure of a robotic rectosigmoid resection with totally intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis (TICA).10-12 RESULTS: Robotic secondary cytoreduction with complete gross resection was achieved. The patient did not report any intraoperative or postoperative complications. Final histology confirmed ROC.

CONCLUSION

Totally robotic rectosigmoid resection is a feasible option in isolated bowel recurrences. Thanks to continuous technical evolution, robot-assisted surgery has the potential to have a central role in the fight against solid tumors. Integration of multiple pre- and intraoperative technologies allows personalized surgery to be performed for each different patient.13,14.

NMR Metabolomics of Primary Ovarian Cancer Cells in Comparison to Established Cisplatin-Resistant and -Sensitive Cell Lines

Cancer cell lines are frequently used in metabolomics, such as in vitro tumor models. In particular, A2780 cells are commonly used as a model for ovarian cancer to evaluate the effects of drug treatment. Here, we compare the NMR metabolomics profiles of A2780 and cisplatin-resistant A2780 cells with those of cells derived from 10 patients with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (collected during primary cytoreduction before any chemotherapeutic treatment). Our analysis reveals a substantial similarity among all primary cells but significant differences between them and both A2780 and cisplatin-resistant A2780 cells. Notably, the patient-derived cells are closer to the resistant A2780 cells when considering the exo-metabolome, whereas they are essentially equidistant from A2780 and A2780-resistant cells in terms of the endo-metabolome. This behavior results from dissimilarities in the levels of several metabolites attributable to the differential modulation of underlying biochemical pathways. The patient-derived cells are those with the most pronounced glycolytic phenotype, whereas A2780-resistant cells mainly diverge from the others due to alterations in a few specific metabolites already known as markers of resistance.

Major vessel resection for complete cytoreduction in primary advanced and recurrent ovarian malignancies: A case series and systematic review of the literature - pushing the boundaries in oncovascular surgery

INTRODUCTION

Oncovascular surgery (the removal of major blood vessels infiltrated by cancer) is challenging but can be key to achieve complete cytoreduction in patient with advanced ovarian cancer. The aim of this study was to review the literature on oncovascular surgery in ovarian cancer and to report the details of all the cases performed at our institution.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the database of ovarian cancer patients who underwent debulking surgery at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Verona University between January 2021 and 2023. Patients with at least one major vessel resection during cytoreduction were identified. We then systematically review the literature searching Pubmed and Embase from inception to January 2023 to report all cases of surgery for ovarian cancer with concomitant major vessel resection.

RESULTS

Five patients with advanced/recurrent ovarian cancer underwent major vascular resection at our institution. Vascular involvement was preoperatively identified in all cases and no case of vascular resection was performed after accidental injury. The major vessels removed were the inferior vena cava (n = 2), the common iliac veins (n = 2), the external iliac arteries (n = 2), the left common iliac artery (n = 1), and the left external iliac vein (n = 1). All patients underwent other non-gynecological cytoreductive procedures prior to vessel removal and had R0 obtained. Three (60%) patients experienced one or more postoperative complications. The literature search identified a total of seven cases of major vessels resection in ovarian cancer surgery. A single or multiple major vessels were removed in two (28.6%) and five (72.4%) cases, respectively. All the seven patients underwent vascular reconstruction. Four (57.1%) patients reported postoperative complications. Overall, 66.7% of the 12 total identified patients were free from disease at the last follow-up [median 15.5 months (range 5-25)].

CONCLUSIONS

Oncovascular surgery is feasible in selected patients with ovarian cancer, provided that a multidisciplinary approach with customized care is available.

Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC): New Approaches and Controversies on the Treatment of Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) after cytoreductive surgery has been extensively studied in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, and it holds promise as a therapeutic strategy, but its role remains elusive. The aim of this study was to assess the existing evidence for the use or not of HIPEC in primary debulking surgery (PDS), interval debulking surgery (IDS), and recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC), evaluated in terms of survival rates and post-surgical morbidity.

METHODS

Medline, Pubmed, Cochrane, and Medscape were systematically searched for any article comparing the use of HIPEC treatment with any other therapy in patients with ovarian cancer in PDS, IDS, and ROC. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines were followed. We only considered English-language published studies.

RESULTS

We included 14 studies, including two RCTs with a total of 1813 women, published between 2003 and 2023 with a recruitment period between 1998 and 2020. In PDS, there were no differences in progression-free survival (PFS) between HIPEC and controls [MD -5.53 months [95% CI -19.91 to 8.84 months]; I2 = 96%]. Conversely, in patients treated with NACT, pooled results showed a significant survival advantage in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the combined HIPEC plus IDS group rather than surgery alone [PFS: MD 4.68 months (95% CI 3.49 to 5.86 months, I2 = 95%); OS: MD 11.81 months (95% CI 9.34 to 14.27 months); I2 = 97%]. Concerning ROC patients, pooled MD did not show either a significant PFS difference between intervention and controls [MD 2.68 months (95% CI 433 to 9.70 months); I2 = 95%], and OS significant difference (MD 6.69 months [95% CI -9.09 to 22.47 months]; I2 = 98%). Severe post-operative complications (≥grade 3) were available in 10 studies, accounting for 1108 women. Overall, there was a slightly but significantly increased risk with the combined approach compared to controls [RR 1.26 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.55); I2 = 0%].

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of HIPEC with cytoreductive surgery prolongs OS and PFS in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after NACT with acceptable morbidity. However, additional trials are still needed to determine the effectiveness of HIPEC in primary and recurrence settings. In the era of personalized medicine, the correlation between the efficacy of HIPEC and biological and molecular findings represents a challenge for the future of ovarian cancer.

Advances in Ovarian Cancer Care and Unmet Treatment Needs for Patients With Platinum Resistance: A Narrative Review

Importance

Platinum-based chemotherapy has been the standard of care for ovarian cancer for the past 3 decades. Although most patients respond to platinum-based treatment, emergence of platinum resistance in recurrent ovarian cancer is inevitable during the disease course. Outcomes for patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer are poor, and options remain limited, highlighting a substantial unmet need for new treatment options.

Observations

This review summarizes the current and evolving treatment landscape for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer with a focus on the development of novel compounds. Biologic and targeted therapies such as bevacizumab and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors-originally approved in the platinum-resistant setting but since withdrawn-are now used in the up-front or platinum-sensitive setting, prolonging the duration of platinum sensitivity and delaying the use of nonplatinum options. The greater use of maintenance therapy and the emphasis on using platinum beyond first-line treatment has most likely been associated with a greater number of lines of platinum therapy before a patient is designated as having platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. In this contemporary setting, recent trials in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer have mostly had negative outcomes, with none having a clinically significant effect on progression-free or overall survival since the approval of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy. Nonetheless, a multitude of new therapies are under evaluation; preliminary results are encouraging. A focus on biomarker-directed treatment and patient selection may provide greater success in identifying novel therapies for treating platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

Conclusions and Relevance

Although many clinical trials in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer have had negative outcomes, these failures provide insights into how clinical trial design, biomarker-directed therapy, and patient selection could facilitate future successes in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer treatment.