Unsuccessful external validation of the MAC-score for predicting increased MIB-1 index in patients with spinal meningiomas

Long-Term Functional Outcomes Following Surgical Treatment of Spinal Schwannomas: A Population-Based Cohort Study

Spinal schwannomas are the second most common form of primary intradural spinal tumor. Despite being benign, they may cause spinal cord compression and subsequently acute or chronic neurological dysfunction. The primary treatment is surgical resection. The aim of this study was to identify pre- and postoperative predictors of favorable outcomes after surgical treatment for spinal schwannoma. All adult patients surgically treated for spinal schwannoma between 2006 and 2020 were eligible for inclusion. Medical records and imaging data were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome measures were neurological improvement according to the modified McCormick Scale (mMC) and changes in motor deficit, sensory deficit, gait disturbance, bladder dysfunction, and pain at long-term follow-up. In total, 180 patients with a median follow-up time of 4.4 years were included. Pain was the most common presenting symptom (87%). The median time between symptom presentation and surgery was 12 months, while the median time between diagnosis (first MRI) and surgery was 3 months. Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 150 (83%) patients and the nerve root could be preserved in 133 (74%) patients. A postoperative complication occurred in 10 patients (5.6%). There were significant postoperative improvements in terms of motor, sensory, gait, and bladder functions, as well as pain (p < 0.001). Of these symptoms, bladder dysfunction was the one most often improved, with complete symptom resolution in all cases. However, no other predictors of improvement could be identified. There were three cases of recurrence after GTR and nine cases of regrowth after STR. Reoperation was performed in six (3.3%) cases. GTR was associated with a significant improvement in neurological status at long-term follow-up and increased the chance of progression-free survival.

Analysis of demographics and the impact of adjuvant radiotherapy on a nationwide cohort of patients with high-grade spinal meningiomas

Background

Although typically benign, 5% of spinal meningiomas (SMs) present with higher-grade features (World Health Organization grades 2 and 3). High-grade SMs are poorly studied and the role of adjuvant radiotherapy in their management remains controversial. We hence aimed to study the demographic characteristics of this rare tumor and investigate the outcomes associated with the use of surgery with adjuvant therapy in contrast to surgery alone.

Methods

The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with SMs from 2004 to 2017. Basic statistics were used to identify differences between low- and high-grade tumors in terms of baseline characteristics. Surgery with and without adjuvant radiotherapy were compared after (1:1) propensity-score matching. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was conducted to study overall survival. All analyses were performed on R.

Results

A total of 13 184 patients diagnosed with SMs were included, of whom only 5% (n = 669) had high-grade SMs. Patients with high-grade SMs presented at a younger median age (57 years [IQR: 44-68] versus 65 years [54-75]; P < .001) and were more commonly males (33% vs 20%; P < .001). After propensity-score matching, survival analysis revealed similar overall survival outcomes in patients with high-grade SM undergoing both surgery and radiotherapy as compared to those only receiving surgery (P = .19).

Conclusions

This study reveals major demographic differences between high- and low-grade SMs. There were no benefits associated with the use of adjuvant radiotherapy. However, due to confounding, overall survival outcomes between patients receiving surgery alone and those receiving surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy are not causally interpretable.

Current Knowledge on Spinal Meningiomas Epidemiology, Tumor Characteristics and Non-Surgical Treatment Options: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis (Part 1)

BACKGROUND

Spinal meningiomas are the most common primary intradural spinal tumors. Although they are a separate entity, a large portion of the knowledge on spinal meningiomas is based on findings in intracranial meningiomas. Therefore, a comprehensive review of all the literature on spinal meningiomas was performed.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched for all studies on spinal meningiomas dating from 2000 and onward. Findings of matching studies were pooled to strengthen the current body of evidence.

RESULTS

A total of 104 studies were included. The majority of patients were female (72.83%), elderly (peak decade: seventh), and had a world health organization (WHO) grade 1 tumor (95.7%). Interestingly, the minority of pediatric patients had a male overrepresentation (62.0% vs. 27.17%) and higher-grade tumors (33.3% vs. 4.3%). Sensory and motor dysfunction and pain were the most common presenting symptoms. Despite a handful of studies reporting promising findings associated with the use of non-surgical treatment options, the literature still suffers from contradictory results and limitations of study designs.

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly females with WHO grade 1 tumors constituted the stereotypical type of patient. Compared to surgical alternatives, the evidence for the use of non-surgical treatments is still relatively weak.

Current Knowledge on Spinal Meningiomas-Surgical Treatment, Complications, and Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (Part 2)

Background: Most of the knowledge on spinal meningiomas is extrapolated from their intracranial counterparts, even though they are considered separate entities. This review aimed to systematically summarize studies covering different aspects of spinal meningiomas and their management. Methods: Databases were searched for all studies concerning spinal meningiomas dating from 2000 and onwards. When possible, a meta-analysis was performed. Results: Neurological outcomes of surgery were consistently favorable across studies, with a complication rate of 7.9% and 78.9% of the patients demonstrating good postoperative neurological function (McCormick score 1−2). The most relevant predictors of unfavorable outcomes were poor preoperative status, longer time from diagnosis to surgery, and surgery of recurrent tumors. The recurrence rate after surgery was estimated at 6%. Meta-analysis and/or survival analysis revealed that higher WHO grade (p < 0.001), higher Simpson grade (p < 0.001), ventral tumor location (p = 0.02), and male sex (p = 0.014) were all associated with higher odds of recurrence. However, the meta-analysis did not show any difference between Simpson grade 1 and grade 2 with respect to the odds of recurrence (p = 0.94). Surgery provided immediate and durable health-related quality-of-life improvement, as well as a high frequency of return to work. Conclusion: Spinal meningioma surgery is a relatively safe procedure with a low risk of tumor recurrence and high likelihood of favorable postoperative outcomes.