Predicting of axillary lymph node metastasis in invasive breast cancer using multiparametric MRI dataset based on CNN model

Predicting molecular subtypes of breast cancer based on multi-parametric MRI dataset using deep learning method

PURPOSE

To develop a multi-parametric MRI model for the prediction of molecular subtypes of breast cancer using five types of breast cancer preoperative MRI images.

METHODS

In this study, we retrospectively analyzed clinical data and five types of MRI images (FS-T1WI, T2WI, Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (T1-C), DWI, and ADC) from 325 patients with pathologically confirmed breast cancer. Using the five types of MRI images as inputs to the ResNeXt50 model respectively, five base models were constructed, and then the outputs of the five base models were fused using an ensemble learning approach to develop a multi-parametric MRI model. Breast cancer was classified into four molecular subtypes based on immunohistochemical results: luminal A, luminal B, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2-positive), and triple-negative (TN). The whole dataset was randomly divided into a training set (n = 260; 76 luminal A, 80 luminal B, 50 HER2-positive, 54 TN) and a testing set (n = 65; 20 luminal A, 20 luminal B, 12 HER2-positive, 13 TN). Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated to assess the predictive performance of the models.

RESULTS

In the testing set, for the assessment of the four molecular subtypes of breast cancer, the multi-parametric MRI model yielded an AUC of 0.859-0.912; the AUCs based on the FS-T1WI, T2WI, T1-C, DWI, and ADC models achieved respectively 0.632-0. 814, 0.641-0.788, 0.621-0.709, 0.620-0.701and 0.611-0.785.

CONCLUSION

The multi-parametric MRI model we developed outperformed the base models in predicting breast cancer molecular subtypes. Our study also showed the potential of FS-T1WI base model in predicting breast cancer molecular subtypes.

Deep learning-based breast MRI for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis that assesses the diagnostic performance of deep learning algorithms applied to breast MRI for predicting axillary lymph nodes metastases in patients of breast cancer.

METHODS

A systematic literature search in PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases for articles published from January 2004 to February 2025. Inclusion criteria were: patients with breast cancer; deep learning using MRI images was applied to predict axillary lymph nodes metastases; sufficient data were present; original research articles. Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-AI and Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging was used to assess the quality. Statistical analysis included pooling of diagnostic accuracy and investigating between-study heterogeneity. A summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) was performed. R statistical software (version 4.4.0) was used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 10 studies were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.76 (95% CI, 0.67-0.83) and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.74-0.87), respectively, with both measures having moderate between-study heterogeneity (I2 = 61% and 60%, respectively; p < 0.01). The SROC analysis yielded a weighted AUC of 0.788.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrates that deep learning algorithms applied to breast MRI offer promising diagnostic performance for predicting axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients. Incorporating deep learning into clinical practice may enhance decision-making by providing a non-invasive method to more accurately predict lymph node involvement, potentially reducing unnecessary surgeries.

DCE-MRI-based machine learning model for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer

Background

Accurate evaluation of the axillary lymph node (ALN) status is needed for determining the treatment protocol for breast cancer. This study aimed to build an artificial intelligence (AI) model to predict ALN metastasis based on pre-treatment dynamic contrast enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of breast cancer combined with radiomics algorithms.

Methods

Pre-treatment DCE-MRI dataset of 166 patients with pathologically confirmed breast cancer diagnosis from January 2017 to August 2020 was collected, and all patients were randomly divided into a training group and test group with a ratio of 7:3. Each patient underwent pre-enhancement as well as post-enhancement 1-6 MRI, and a total of 7,224 two-dimensional (2D) and 9,863 three-dimensional (3D) features were extracted, respectively. Radiomics models based on 2D, 3D, pre-enhancement, and the first post-enhancement images were established using the least absolute shrinkage selection operator (LASSO) algorithm based on machine learning, and the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the models were calculated.

Results

The mean AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the 10-fold cross-validation of the 3D radiomics-based model were 82%, 82%, 83%, and 81%, respectively. The C-index of the combined model with combining radiomics features and clinical features was 90%, the AUC was 90%, the specificity was 91%, the sensitivity was 77% and the accuracy was 84%.

Conclusions

The comprehensive prediction model using DCE-MRI image combined with clinical features can accurately predict ALN metastasis in breast cancer.

The Efficacy of MRI-Based ADC Measurements in Detecting Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis: Evaluation of a Prospective Study

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of MRI-based Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) measurements in detecting axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients. By comparing preoperative MRI findings with intraoperative sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and postoperative pathological results, we sought to explore the potential of ADC values as a non-invasive alternative to axillary interventions. Methods: A total of 104 female patients diagnosed with breast cancer between 2019 and 2021 were included in this prospective study. ADC values of axillary lymph nodes, tumors, and muscle tissues were measured using a 3T MRI system. The correlation between these measurements and pathological outcomes was analyzed. Statistical analyses, including t-tests, ANOVA, and ROC curve analysis, were employed to assess the diagnostic performance of ADC values. Results: The results indicated that, while the mean ADC values of metastatic lymph nodes were lower than those of benign nodes, the sensitivity and specificity of MRI-based ADC measurements were inferior to the expected standards. The tumor ADC value and the tumor-to-lymph node ADC ratio were found to be more reliable indicators of metastasis than the lymph node ADC value alone. The diagnostic power of the tumor ADC value was significant, with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 73%. Conclusions: MRI-based ADC measurements, particularly the tumor ADC value and the tumor-to-lymph node ADC ratio, show promise as potential non-invasive markers for axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients. However, the current results suggest that ADC measurements cannot yet replace SLNB in clinical practice.

MRI-Based Kinetic Heterogeneity Evaluation in the Accurate Access of Axillary Lymph Node Status in Breast Cancer Using a Hybrid CNN-RNN Model

BACKGROUND

Accurate evaluation of the axillary lymph node (ALN) status is needed for determining the treatment protocol for breast cancer (BC). The value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based tumor heterogeneity in assessing ALN metastasis in BC is unclear.

PURPOSE

To assess the value of deep learning (DL)-derived kinetic heterogeneity parameters based on BC dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI to infer the ALN status.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

SUBJECTS

1256/539/153/115 patients in the training cohort, internal validation cohort, and external validation cohorts I and II, respectively.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

1.5 T/3.0 T, non-contrast T1-weighted spin-echo sequence imaging (T1WI), DCE-T1WI, and diffusion-weighted imaging.

ASSESSMENT

Clinical pathological and MRI semantic features were obtained by reviewing histopathology and MRI reports. The segmentation of the tumor lesion on the first phase of T1WI DCE-MRI images was applied to other phases after registration. A DL architecture termed convolutional recurrent neural network (ConvRNN) was developed to generate the KHimage (kinetic heterogeneity of DCE-MRI image) score that indicated the ALN status in patients with BC. The model was trained and optimized on training and internal validation cohorts, tested on two external validation cohorts. We compared ConvRNN model with other 10 models and the subgroup analyses of tumor size, magnetic field strength, and molecular subtype were also evaluated.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Chi-squared, Fisher's exact, Student's t, Mann-Whitney U tests, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis were performed. P < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

The ConvRNN model achieved area under the curve (AUC) of 0.802 in the internal validation cohort and 0.785-0.806 in the external validation cohorts. The ConvRNN model could well evaluate the ALN status of the four molecular subtypes (AUC = 0.685-0.868). The patients with larger tumor sizes (>5 cm) were more susceptible to ALN metastasis with KHimage scores of 0.527-0.827.

DATA CONCLUSION

A ConvRNN model outperformed traditional models for determining the ALN status in patients with BC.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Deep Learning Prediction of Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer Patients Using Clinical Implication-Applied Preprocessed CT Images

Background: Accurate detection of axillary lymph node (ALN) metastases in breast cancer is crucial for clinical staging and treatment planning. This study aims to develop a deep learning model using clinical implication-applied preprocessed computed tomography (CT) images to enhance the prediction of ALN metastasis in breast cancer patients. Methods: A total of 1128 axial CT images of ALN (538 malignant and 590 benign lymph nodes) were collected from 523 breast cancer patients who underwent preoperative CT scans between January 2012 and July 2022 at Hallym University Medical Center. To develop an optimal deep learning model for distinguishing metastatic ALN from benign ALN, a CT image preprocessing protocol with clinical implications and two different cropping methods (fixed size crop [FSC] method and adjustable square crop [ASC] method) were employed. The images were analyzed using three different convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures (ResNet, DenseNet, and EfficientNet). Ensemble methods involving and combining the selection of the two best-performing CNN architectures from each cropping method were applied to generate the final result. Results: For the two different cropping methods, DenseNet consistently outperformed ResNet and EfficientNet. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for DenseNet, using the FSC and ASC methods, was 0.934 and 0.939, respectively. The ensemble model, which combines the performance of the DenseNet121 architecture for both cropping methods, delivered outstanding results with an AUROC of 0.968, an accuracy of 0.938, a sensitivity of 0.980, and a specificity of 0.903. Furthermore, distinct trends observed in gradient-weighted class activation mapping images with the two cropping methods suggest that our deep learning model not only evaluates the lymph node itself, but also distinguishes subtler changes in lymph node margin and adjacent soft tissue, which often elude human interpretation. Conclusions: This research demonstrates the promising performance of a deep learning model in accurately detecting malignant ALNs in breast cancer patients using CT images. The integration of clinical considerations into image processing and the utilization of ensemble methods further improved diagnostic precision.

Unveiling the best predictive models for early‑onset metastatic cancer: Insights and innovations (Review)

Cancer metastasis is the primary cause of cancer deaths. Metastasis involves the spread of cancer cells from the primary tumors to other body parts, commonly through lymphatic and vascular pathways. Key aspects include the high mutation rate and the capability of metastatic cells to form invasive tumors even without a large initial tumor mass. Particular emphasis is given to early metastasis, occurring in initial cancer stages and often leading to misdiagnosis, which adversely affects survival and prognosis. The present review highlighted the need for improved understanding and detection methods for early metastasis, which has not been effectively identified clinically. The present review demonstrated the clinicopathological and molecular characteristics of early‑onset metastatic types of cancer, noting factors such as age, race, tumor size and location as well as the histological and pathological grade as significant predictors. In conclusion, the present review underscored the importance of early detection and management of metastatic types of cancer and called for improved predictive models, including advanced techniques such as nomograms and machine learning, so as to enhance patient outcomes, acknowledging the challenges and limitations of the current research as well as the necessity for further studies.

Identification of Luminal A breast cancer by using deep learning analysis based on multi-modal images

Purpose

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a deep learning model based on multi-modal images in identifying molecular subtype of breast cancer.

Materials and methods

A total of 158 breast cancer patients (170 lesions, median age, 50.8 ± 11.0 years), including 78 Luminal A subtype and 92 non-Luminal A subtype lesions, were retrospectively analyzed and divided into a training set (n = 100), test set (n = 45), and validation set (n = 25). Mammography (MG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images were used. Five single-mode models, i.e., MG, T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion weighting imaging (DWI), axial apparent dispersion coefficient (ADC), and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), were selected. The deep learning network ResNet50 was used as the basic feature extraction and classification network to construct the molecular subtype identification model. The receiver operating characteristic curve were used to evaluate the prediction efficiency of each model.

Results

The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of a multi-modal tool for identifying Luminal A subtype were 0.711, 0.889, and 0.593, respectively, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.802 (95% CI, 0.657- 0.906); the accuracy, sensitivity, and AUC were higher than those of any single-modal model, but the specificity was slightly lower than that of DCE-MRI model. The AUC value of MG, T2WI, DWI, ADC, and DCE-MRI model was 0.593 (95%CI, 0.436-0.737), 0.700 (95%CI, 0.545-0.827), 0.564 (95%CI, 0.408-0.711), 0.679 (95%CI, 0.523-0.810), and 0.553 (95%CI, 0.398-0.702), respectively.

Conclusion

The combination of deep learning and multi-modal imaging is of great significance for diagnosing breast cancer subtypes and selecting personalized treatment plans for doctors.

Application of Machine Learning Algorithm in Predicting Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis from Breast Cancer on Preoperative Chest CT

Axillary lymph node (ALN) status is one of the most critical prognostic factors in patients with breast cancer. However, ALN evaluation with contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) has been challenging. Machine learning (ML) is known to show excellent performance in image recognition tasks. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the performance of the ML algorithm for predicting ALN metastasis by combining preoperative CECT features of both ALN and primary tumor. This was a retrospective single-institutional study of a total of 266 patients with breast cancer who underwent preoperative chest CECT. Random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and neural network (NN) algorithms were used. Statistical analysis and recursive feature elimination (RFE) were adopted as feature selection for ML. The best ML-based ALN prediction model for breast cancer was NN with RFE, which achieved an AUROC of 0.76 ± 0.11 and an accuracy of 0.74 ± 0.12. By comparing NN with RFE model performance with and without ALN features from CECT, NN with RFE model with ALN features showed better performance at all performance evaluations, which indicated the effect of ALN features. Through our study, we were able to demonstrate that the ML algorithm could effectively predict the final diagnosis of ALN metastases from CECT images of the primary tumor and ALN. This suggests that ML has the potential to differentiate between benign and malignant ALNs.

The Role of AI in Breast Cancer Lymph Node Classification: A Comprehensive Review

Breast cancer is a significant health issue affecting women worldwide, and accurately detecting lymph node metastasis is critical in determining treatment and prognosis. While traditional diagnostic methods have limitations and complications, artificial intelligence (AI) techniques such as machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) offer promising solutions for improving and supplementing diagnostic procedures. Current research has explored state-of-the-art DL models for breast cancer lymph node classification from radiological images, achieving high performances (AUC: 0.71-0.99). AI models trained on clinicopathological features also show promise in predicting metastasis status (AUC: 0.74-0.77), whereas multimodal (radiomics + clinicopathological features) models combine the best from both approaches and also achieve good results (AUC: 0.82-0.94). Once properly validated, such models could greatly improve cancer care, especially in areas with limited medical resources. This comprehensive review aims to compile knowledge about state-of-the-art AI models used for breast cancer lymph node metastasis detection, discusses proper validation techniques and potential pitfalls and limitations, and presents future directions and best practices to achieve high usability in real-world clinical settings.

Current status and quality of radiomic studies for predicting KRAS mutations in colorectal cancer patients: A systematic review and meta‑analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the methodological quality of radiomics-based studies for noninvasive, preoperative prediction of Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) mutations in patients with colorectal cancer; furthermore, we systematically evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of predicting models.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases up to 20 April 2022 for eligible studies. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) and Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) tools. A meta-analysis of studies on the prediction of KRAS status in colorectal cancer patients was performed.

RESULT

Twenty-nine studies were identified in the systematic review, including three studies on the prediction of KRAS status in colorectal cancer liver metastases. All studies had an average RQS score of 9.55 (26.5% of the total score), ranging from 3 to 17. Most studies demonstrated a low or unclear risk of bias in the domains of QUADAS-2. Nineteen studies were included in the meta-analysis, mostly imaged with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), followed by computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography-CT (PET/CT). With pooled sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC) of the training cohorts were 0.80(95% confidence interval(CI), 0.75-0.84), 0.80(95% CI, 0.74-0.85) and 0.87(95% CI, 0.84-0.90),respectively. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC for the validation cohorts (13 studies) were 0.78(95% CI, 0.71-0.84), 0.84(95% CI, 0.74-0.90), and 0.86(95% CI, 0.83-0.89), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Radiomics is a potential noninvasive technology that has a moderate preoperative diagnosis and prediction effect on KRAS mutations. However, it has not been implemented as a clinical decision-making tool. Future researchers should pay more attention to the methodological quality of the study and further externally validate the model using multicenter datasets.