The COMT Genetic Factor Regulates Chemotherapy-Related Prospective Memory Impairment in Survivors With HER2-/+ Breast Cancer

Wnt3a/GSK3β/β-catenin Signalling Modulates Doxorubicin-associated Memory Deficits in Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Chemobrain is widespread in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. However, the exact mechanism, especially the associated signalling pathway, is not currently clear. This study was to evaluate the behavioural changes in breast cancer mice after chemotherapy and to further explore the role of Wnt3a/glycogen synthase kinase (GSK3β)/β-catenin signalling in chemobrain.

METHODS

MMTV-PyMT(+) breast cancer mice were injected intraperitoneally with doxorubicin (4 mg/kg) once a week for three weeks to establish a chemobrain model. The Morris water maze (MWM) and novel object recognition (NOR) tests were performed to assess the learning and memory ability. Electron microscopy was used to observe the structural changes in the hippocampal CA1 region. The brain tissue of breast cancer mice after chemotherapy was taken out for mRNA-seq detection. Then, the expression levels and phosphorylation of key proteins in the Wnt3a/GSK3 β/β-catenin signalling pathway were evaluated through Western blotting (WB) and immunofluorescence.

RESULTS

Doxorubicin-induced spatial and short-term memory impairment was observed in breast cancer mice, and obvious neuronal damage could be seen in the hippocampal CA1 region. Immunofluorescence staining for GSK3β was increased. Wnt signalling pathway is highly enriched from mRNA-seq analysis, with GSK3β genes at important nodes. The relative protein levels of p-PI3K, p-AKT, p-GSK3 β, Wnt3a and TCF-1 were decreased significantly, while the p-β-catenin level was increased. After injection of the GSK3β inhibitor sb216763 (1 ng/0.5 µl/side), hippocampal neuronal injury was alleviated to some extent, and the changes in the expression of proteins upstream and downstream of this signalling pathway were reversed.

CONCLUSION

Wnt3a/GSK3 β/β-catenin signalling is likely involved in doxorubicin-induced memory impairment. This result provides basic evidence for the further study of chemobrain in breast cancer.

GSK3β rs3107669 polymorphism implicates chemotherapy-associated retrospective memory deficits in breast cancer survivors

Glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β) plays an important role in the development of neurodegenerative diseases. However, the underlying effect of GSK-3β polymorphism on chemobrain in cancer survivors is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between GSK-3β polymorphism and chemotherapy-associated retrospective memory deficits in breast cancer survivors. The difference in GSK-3β gene expression between breast cancer patients and healthy controls was confirmed using bioinformatics technology. All participants (197 with breast cancer and 40 healthy controls) underwent prospective and retrospective memory tests, and five single-nucleotide polymorphism loci of GSK-3β (rs3107669, rs1154597, rs334543, rs334558 and rs3755557) were genotyped from peripheral blood. Breast cancer survivors had memory impairment after chemotherapy (P<0.0001). The expression difference of the GSK-3β gene was determined through bioinformation analysis, and a genotype frequency difference of GSK-3β rs3107669 was found between the breast cancer and healthy control groups. GSK-3β rs3107669 was a genetic risk in comparison to the healthy controls (OR=0.382; 95% CI=0.186-0.786; P=0.009). Breast cancer with the GSK-3β rs3107669 (C/A+A/A) genotype was a protective factor for chemobrain (Beta=-0.306; 95% CI=-5.556~-2.145; P<0.0001) from multiple linear regression. The C/A+A/A genotype carrier performed better on the retrospective memory test than the C/C genotype (z=-4.302, P<0.0001). Breast cancer patients with chemotherapy who also carried the GSK-3β rs3107669 (C/C) genotype more easily presented cognitive deficits. The GSK-3β rs3107669 polymorphism was a feasible genetic risk factor for chemotherapy-associated retrospective memory impairments in breast cancer survivors.

Cognitive impairment after cancer treatment: mechanisms, clinical characterization, and management

Cognitive impairment is a debilitating side effect experienced by patients with cancer treated with systemically administered anticancer therapies. With around 19.3 million new cases of cancer worldwide in 2020 and the five year survival rate growing from 50% in 1970 to 67% in 2013, an urgent need exists to understand enduring side effects with severe implications for quality of life. Whereas cognitive impairment associated with chemotherapy is recognized in patients with breast cancer, researchers have started to identify cognitive impairment associated with other treatments such as immune, endocrine, and targeted therapies only recently. The underlying mechanisms are diverse and therapy specific, so further evaluation is needed to develop effective therapeutic interventions. Drug and non-drug management strategies are emerging that target mechanistic pathways or the cognitive deficits themselves, but they need to be rigorously evaluated. Clinically, consistent use of objective diagnostic tools is necessary for accurate diagnosis and clinical characterization of cognitive impairment in patients treated with anticancer therapies. This should be supplemented with clinical guidelines that could be implemented in daily practice. This review summarizes the recent advances in the mechanisms, clinical characterization, and novel management strategies of cognitive impairment associated with treatment of non-central nervous system cancers.

The correlation between neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, carcinoembryonic antigen, and carbohydrate antigen 153 levels with chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment in early-stage breast cancer patients

Background

The changes in inflammation and tumor biomarkers are associated with the anti-tumor immunological processes. Early detection and intervention are of great significance to the clinical management of cancer-related diseases. Peripheral blood biomarkers [e.g., neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and carbohydrate antigen 153 (CA153)] are obtained in real-timely, conveniently, and less invasively, and proved to availably predicted the disease states and prognosis of various cancers, including breast cancer (BC). Inflammation and poor disease management promote cognitive impairment. Chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) hazard long-term survival and quality of life (QOL) of BC patients, but its correlation with NLR, CEA, and CA153 is not clear.

Purpose

This study aimed to investigate changes in NLR, CEA, and CA153 levels before and after chemotherapy and their correlation with CRCI in patients with early-stage BC.

Materials and methods

The 187 patients with BC who were measured for NLR, CEA, and CA153 values within the first 24 hours of admission, were assigned into two groups: the before/after chemotherapy group (BCG/ACG). The ACG was assigned into two subgroups based on the cognitive assessment results: the cognitive normal/impaired group (CNG/CIG). Patients’ self-perceived cognitive impairments were evaluated using a mini-mental state examination (MMSE), prospective and retrospective memory (PM and RM) questionnaire (PRMQ), and functional assessment of cancer therapy-cognitive function version 3 (FACT-Cog, version 3, including CogPCI, CogOth, CogPCA, and CogQOL). Their QOL was also evaluated.

Results

The NLR and CA153 levels were elevated after chemotherapy (BCG vs ACG: Z = −1.996 and −1.615, P = 0.046 and 0.106, respectively), and significantly elevated in patients with CRCI (BCG vs CIG: Z = −2.444 and -2.293, P = 0.015 and 0.022; respectively). However, there was not reach significant difference in CEA levels between the four groups. In addition, there was a weak to moderate correlation between peripheral blood biomarkers (NLR, CEA, and CA153) levels and CRCI (r = −0.404, −0.205, −0.322; respectively; P < 0.001). Cognitive impairment scores (MMSE, PM, RM, and FACT-Cog) had a strong correlation with QOL in patients with early-stage BC (r = −0.786, 0.851, 0.849, and 0.938; respectively; P < 0.001).

Conclusion

NLR and CA153 m be valuable diagnostic adjuncts of CRCI, and CRCI has a strong correlation with QOL in patients with early-stage BC.

Association of markers of tumor aggressivity and cognition in women with breast cancer before adjuvant treatment: The Thinking and Living with Cancer Study

PURPOSE

Tumor features associated with aggressive cancers may affect cognition prior to systemic therapy. We evaluated associations of cognition prior to adjuvant therapy and tumor aggressivity in older breast cancer patients.

METHODS

Women diagnosed with non-metastatic breast cancer (n = 705) ages 60-98 were enrolled from August 2010-March 2020. Cognition was measured post-surgery, pre-systemic therapy using self-reported (FACT-Cog Perceived Cognitive Impairment [PCI]) and objective tests of attention, processing speed, and executive function (APE domain) and learning and memory [LM domain]. Linear regression tested associations of pre-treatment tumor features and cognition, adjusting for age, race, and study site. HER2 positivity and higher stage (II/III vs. 0/I) were a priori predictors of cognition; in secondary analyses we explored associations of other tumor features and cognitive impairment (i.e., PCI score < 54 or having 2 tests < 1.5 SD or 1 test < 2 SD from the mean APE or LM domain score).

RESULTS

HER2 positivity and the hormone receptor negative/HER2 + molecular subtype were associated with lower adjusted mean self-reported cognition scores and higher impairment rates (p values < .05). Higher stage of disease was associated with lower objective performance in APE. Other tumor features were associated with cognition in unadjusted and adjusted models, including larger tumor size and lower PCI scores (p = 0.02). Tumor features were not related to LM.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-adjuvant therapy cognition was associated with HER2 positivity and higher stage of disease and other features of aggressive tumors. Additional research is needed to confirm these results and assess potential mechanisms and clinical management strategies.