Rational Combinations of Targeted Therapy and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Head and Neck Cancers

Head and neck cancer: pathogenesis and targeted therapy

Head and neck cancer (HNC) is a highly aggressive type of tumor characterized by delayed diagnosis, recurrence, metastasis, relapse, and drug resistance. The occurrence of HNC were associated with smoking, alcohol abuse (or both), human papillomavirus infection, and complex genetic and epigenetic predisposition. Currently, surgery and radiotherapy are the standard treatments for most patients with early-stage HNC. For recurrent or metastatic (R/M) HNC, the first-line treatment is platinum-based chemotherapy combined with the antiepidermal growth factor receptor drug cetuximab, when resurgery and radiation therapy are not an option. However, curing HNC remains challenging, especially in cases with metastasis. In this review, we summarize the pathogenesis of HNC, including genetic and epigenetic changes, abnormal signaling pathways, and immune regulation mechanisms, along with all potential therapeutic strategies such as molecular targeted therapy, immunotherapy, gene therapy, epigenetic modifications, and combination therapies. Recent preclinical and clinical studies that may offer therapeutic strategies for future research on HNC are also discussed. Additionally, new targets and treatment methods, including antibody-drug conjugates, photodynamic therapy, radionuclide therapy, and mRNA vaccines, have shown promising results in clinical trials, offering new prospects for the treatment of HNC.

Less is more: Exploring neoadjuvant immunotherapy as a de-escalation strategy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treatment

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) constitutes a significant global cancer burden, given its high prevalence and associated mortality. Despite substantial progress in survival rates due to the enhanced multidisciplinary approach to treatment, these methods often lead to severe tissue damage, compromised function, and potential toxicity. Thus, there is an imperative need for novel, effective, and minimally damaging treatment modalities. Neoadjuvant treatment, an emerging therapeutic strategy, is designed to reduce tumor size and curtail distant metastasis prior to definitive intervention. Currently, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has optimized the treatment approach for a subset of HNSCC patients, yet it has not produced a noticeable enhancement in overall survival (OS). In the contemporary cancer therapeutics landscape, immunotherapy is gaining traction at an accelerated pace. Notably, neoadjuvant immunotherapy (NAIT) has shown promising radiological and pathological responses, coupled with encouraging efficacy in several clinical trials. This potentially paves the way for a myriad of possibilities in treatment de-escalation of HNSCC, which warrants further exploration. This paper reviews the existing strategies and efficacies of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), along with potential de-escalation strategies. Furthermore, the challenges encountered in the context of the de-escalation strategies of NAIT are explored. The aim is to inform future research directions that strive to improve the quality of life (QoL) for patients battling HNSCC.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor use in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: the current landscape and future perspectives

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are licensed for use in patients with unresectable, recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Multiple published and ongoing trials are assessing efficacy in the curative management of patients in the concomitant, neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant settings, as well as part of multimodality treatment in patients with metastatic disease. This review evaluates the evidence for use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in all stages of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and considers future approaches.

CDK regulators—Cell cycle progression or apoptosis—Scenarios in normal cells and cancerous cells

Serine/threonine kinases called cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) interact with cyclins and CDK inhibitors (CKIs) to control the catalytic activity. CDKs are essential controllers of RNA transcription and cell cycle advancement. The ubiquitous overactivity of the cell cycle CDKs is caused by a number of genetic and epigenetic processes in human cancer, and their suppression can result in both cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. This review focused on CDKs, describing their kinase activity, their role in phosphorylation inhibition, and CDK inhibitory proteins (CIP/KIP, INK 4, RPIC). We next compared the role of different CDKs, mainly p21, p27, p57, p16, p15, p18, and p19, in the cell cycle and apoptosis in cancer cells with respect to normal cells. The current work also draws attention to the use of CDKIs as therapeutics, overcoming the pharmacokinetic barriers of pan-CDK inhibitors, analyze new chemical classes that are effective at attacking the CDKs that control the cell cycle (cdk4/6 or cdk2). It also discusses CDKI's drawbacks and its combination therapy against cancer patients. These findings collectively demonstrate the complexity of cancer cell cycles and the need for targeted therapeutic intervention. In order to slow the progression of the disease or enhance clinical outcomes, new medicines may be discovered by researching the relationship between cell death and cell proliferation.

Pan-Cancer Analysis of the Oncogenic and Immunological Role of Solute Carrier Family 6 Member 8 (SLC6A8)

There is mounting evidence on the implication of SLC6A8 in the initiation and progression of human cancers. However, a comprehensive understanding of the role of SLC6A8 in pan-cancer remains elusive yet. Bioinformatics analysis was performed to investigate the expression and mutation profiles of SLC6A8 in cancers, and the association of SLC6A8 expression with cancer patients’ survival and immune cell infiltration. In general, SLC6A8 is significantly upregulated across multiple cancers. SLC6A8 expression was inconsistently prognostic in different types of cancer, albeit associated with favorable survival in the vast majority of cancers. The receiver operating characteristic curves showed that SLC6A8 was relatively accurate in identifying possible cancer patients. The genetic alteration of SLC6A8, including mutation, amplification and deletion, was frequently present across various types of cancer. Mechanistically, SLC6A8 might be involved in tumorigenesis through “carbon metabolism” and “HIF-1 signaling pathway.” Besides, SLC6A8 expression had significant correlation with immune checkpoints genes and tumor-infiltrating immune cell abundances. The present study offers a novel insight into the roles of SLC6A8 in the oncogenesis and development of multiple common cancers.