Safety of Rapid Daratumumab Infusion: A Retrospective, Multicenter, Real-Life Analysis on 134 Patients With Multiple Myeloma

A real-life study of daratumumab-bortezomib-dexamethasone (D-VD) in lenalidomide exposed/refractory multiple myeloma patients: a report from the Triveneto Myeloma Working Group

Treatment of lenalidomide refractory (Len-R) multiple myeloma (MM) patients still represents an unmet clinical need. In the last years, daratumumab-bortezomib-dexamethasone (D-VD) combination was extensively used in this setting, even though only a small fraction of Len-R patients was included in the pivotal trial. This real-life study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the D-VD regimen in a cohort that exclusively enrolled Len exposed or refractory MM patients. The study cohort included 57 patients affected by relapsed/refractory MM. All patients were previously exposed to Len, with 77.2% being refractory. The overall response rate (ORR) was 79.6% with 43% of cases obtaining at least a very good partial response (VGPR). The D-VD regimen showed a favorable safety profile, with low frequency of grade 3-4 adverse events, except for thrombocytopenia observed in 21.4% of patients. With a median follow-up of 13 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 17 months. No significant PFS differences were observed according to age, ISS, LDH levels, type of relapse, and high-risk FISH. Len exposed patients displayed a PFS advantage as compared to Len refractory patients (29 vs 16 months, p = 0.2876). Similarly, patients treated after Len maintenance showed a better outcome as compared to patients who had received a full-dose Len treatment (23 vs 13 months, p = 0.1728). In conclusion, our real-world data on D-VD combination showed remarkable efficacy in Len-R patients, placing this regimen as one of the standards of care to be properly taken into account in this MM setting.

Safety and blood levels of daratumumab after switching from intravenous to subcutaneous administration in patients with multiple myeloma

The intravenous administration (IV) of daratumumab sometimes causes an infusion reaction and needs a long infusion time. Recently, a subcutaneous formulation (SC) of daratumumab, which has fewer infusion reactions and shorter administration time, was approved. However, because SC has a fixed dose, overdosing is a concern for patients with low body weights. In this study, we investigated the safety and blood levels of daratumumab after switching from IV to SC in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Patients who switched from IV to SC of daratumumab between June 2021 and May 2022 at Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital were included in the study. Blood daratumumab levels were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Safety after switching from IV to SC was evaluated for six months and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. The median body weight of ten patients included in the analysis was 57.4 kg (range: 45.0-74.4). Blood daratumumab levels were significantly increased after switching to SC (p = 0.002); median through concentration at the last IV dose was 403.6 μg/mL (range: 96.3-776.3) and that at the third SC dose was 557.1 μg/mL (range: 288.3-997.2). Grade 1-2 injection site reactions were observed in six patients (60.0%) after switching to SC. A new grade 3 adverse event was observed in only one patient (neutropenia). The blood levels of daratumumab were significantly increased after switching from IV to SC in patients with MM; however, the dosage was tolerable.

Benefits of switching from intravenous to subcutaneous daratumumab: Perspectives from UK healthcare providers

Daratumumab is a CD38-directed monoclonal antibody indicated to treat multiple myeloma (MM). Daratumumab was initially administered intravenously (IV), subsequently a subcutaneous (SC) formulation was developed to increase convenience of administration. The UK was an early adopter of SC daratumumab and, as such, this report provides consensus recommendations from a group of UK MM experts, with the aim of facilitating the transition from IV to SC daratumumab for other European healthcare providers. The switch from IV to SC daratumumab has been beneficial to patients and healthcare providers, as it simplifies treatment, reduces pressure on hospitals and can improve patients' quality of life.

New Targeted Agents in Myasthenia Gravis and Future Therapeutic Strategies

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a chronic autoimmune disease for which multiple immunomodulatory therapies are available. Nevertheless, MG has a significant impact on patient quality of life. In recent years, experts' main efforts have focused on optimizing treatment strategies, since disease burden is considerably affected by their safety and tolerability profiles, especially in patients with refractory phenotypes. This article aims to offer neurologists caring for MG patients an overview of the most innovative targeted drugs specifically designed for this disease and summarizes the recent literature and more recent evidence on agents targeting B cells and plasmablasts, complement inhibitors, and neonatal fragment crystallizable receptor (FcRn) antagonists. Positive clinical trial results have been reported, and other studies are ongoing. Finally, we briefly discuss how the introduction of these novel targeted immunological therapies in a changing management paradigm would affect not only clinical outcomes, disease burden, safety, and tolerability, but also health spending in a condition that is increasingly managed based on a patient-centred model.

Toxicity management strategies for next-generation novel therapeutics in multiple myeloma

The therapeutic options available for patients with multiple myeloma have greatly expanded over the past decade and incorporating these novel agents into routine clinical practice has significantly improved outcomes. The next generation of therapeutics is available for relapsed and refractory patients either as standard of care or in clinical trial, and these drugs represent a generational paradigm shift. Patients now have access to a multitude of novel immunotherapeutics, including monoclonal antibodies, an antibody-drug conjugate, chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CAR-T), and bispecific T-cell redirecting antibodies, and novel oral therapies including selinexor (selective inhibitor of nuclear export) and venetoclax (bcl-2 inhibitor). While these drugs have the potential to be highly efficacious in certain subsets of patients when used as single agents or in combination regimens, they are each associated with unique toxicity profiles. It is imperative to understand these potential adverse events to ensure patient safety. Appropriate supportive care management is paramount to maximize drug exposure and therapeutic efficacy. The following review focuses its discussion on drugs and combination regimens that are currently FDA-approved and those that continue to be investigated in clinical trials, highlights the clinically relevant toxicity profiles for each of the different agents, and provides practical considerations for the treatment team.

Role of complement, anti-complement therapeutics, and other targeted immunotherapies in myasthenia gravis

INTRODUCTION

Several patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) do not adequately respond to available drugs or exhibit poor tolerance, necessitating the need for new therapies.

AREAS COVERED

The paper discusses the rapidly evolving target-specific immunotherapies that promise long-standing remissions in the management of MG. It is specifically focused on the role of complement, anti-complement therapeutics, and the anti-FcRn and B cell monoclonals.

EXPERT OPINION

Anti-AChR antibodies cause internalization of the receptors and activate complement leading to in situ MAC formation that damages the post-synaptic membrane of the neuromuscular junction. Inhibiting MAC formation by antibodies targeting key complements subcomponents is a reasonable therapeutic goal. Indeed, the anti-C5 monoclonal antibodies, Eculizumab, Ravulizumab, and Zilucoplan, have been successfully tested in MG with Eculizumab first and now Ravulizumab FDA-approved for refractory MG based on sustained long-term benefits. Among the biologics that inhibit FcRn, Efgartigimod caused rapid reduction of the circulating IgG in the lysosomes, and induced sustained clinical remission with good safety profile leading to FDA-approved indication. Anti-B cell agents, like Rituximab, can induce sustained long-term remissions, especially in IgG4 antibody-mediated Musk-MG, by targeting short-lived antibody-secreting plasmablasts. These biologics offer effective targeted immunotherapies with good tolerance promising to change the therapeutic algorithm in the chronic MG management.

Beyond Clinical Trials in Patients With Multiple Myeloma: A Critical Review of Real-World Results

The current strategies for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) have improved, thanks to effective drug classes and combination therapies, for both the upfront and relapsed settings. Clinical trials for newly diagnosed transplant-ineligible patients led to the approval of immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) and proteasome inhibitors (PIs) in combination with anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), to be administered during the induction phase before transplantation and during maintenance treatment, with lenalidomide recommended until relapse. In relapsed/refractory patients, the complex treatment scenario currently includes several options, such as triplets with anti-CD38 mAbs plus IMiDs or PIs, and novel targeted molecules. Comparisons among clinical trials and real-world data showed a good degree of reproducibility of some important results, particularly in terms of overall response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival. This may help clinicians towards a proper selection of the best treatment options, particularly in real-world settings. However, as compared with the management of real-world settings, clinical trials have some pitfalls in terms of outcome and especially in terms of safety and quality of life. In fact, trials include younger and presumably healthier patients, excluding those with worst clinical conditions due to MM features (e.g., renal insufficiency or bone disease, which can impair the performance status) and comorbidities (e.g., cardiac and pulmonary disease), thus resulting in a possible lack of representativeness of data about the patients enrolled. In this review, we analyze comparable and discrepant results from clinical trials vs. real-world settings published in the last 10 years, focusing on different drugs and combinations for the treatment of MM and providing an overview of treatment choices.