A Comparative Study of Multiple Deep Learning Models Based on Multi-Input Resolution for Breast Ultrasound Images

Feasibility of using AI to auto-catch responsible frames in ultrasound screening for breast cancer diagnosis

The research of AI-assisted breast diagnosis has primarily been based on static images. It is unclear whether it represents the best diagnosis image.To explore the method of capturing complementary responsible frames from breast ultrasound screening by using artificial intelligence. We used feature entropy breast network (FEBrNet) to select responsible frames from breast ultrasound screenings and compared the diagnostic performance of AI models based on FEBrNet-recommended frames, physician-selected frames, 5-frame interval-selected frames, all frames of video, as well as that of ultrasound and mammography specialists. The AUROC of AI model based on FEBrNet-recommended frames outperformed other frame set based AI models, as well as ultrasound and mammography physicians, indicating that FEBrNet can reach level of medical specialists in frame selection.FEBrNet model can extract video responsible frames for breast nodule diagnosis, whose performance is equivalent to the doctors selected responsible frames.

An AI model of sonographer's evaluation+ S-Detect + elastography + clinical information improves the preoperative identification of benign and malignant breast masses

Purpose

The purpose of the study was to build an AI model with selected preoperative clinical features to further improve the accuracy of the assessment of benign and malignant breast nodules.

Methods

Patients who underwent ultrasound, strain elastography, and S-Detect before ultrasound-guided biopsy or surgical excision were enrolled. The diagnosis model was built using a logistic regression model. The diagnostic performances of different models were evaluated and compared.

Results

A total of 179 lesions (101 benign and 78 malignant) were included. The whole dataset consisted of a training set (145 patients) and an independent test set (34 patients). The AI models constructed based on clinical features, ultrasound features, and strain elastography to predict and classify benign and malignant breast nodules had ROC AUCs of 0.87, 0.81, and 0.79 in the test set. The AUCs of the sonographer and S-Detect were 0.75 and 0.82, respectively, in the test set. The AUC of the combined AI model with the best performance was 0.89 in the test set. The combined AI model showed a better specificity of 0.92 than the other models. The sonographer's assessment showed better sensitivity (0.97 in the test set).

Conclusion

The combined AI model could improve the preoperative identification of benign and malignant breast masses and may reduce unnecessary breast biopsies.