Prognostic Significance of the Loss of Heterozygosity of KRAS in Early-Stage Lung Adenocarcinoma

Leveraging an immune cell signature to improve the survival and immunotherapy response of lung adenocarcinoma

Background: Immune cells play a critical role in the prognosis of cancer. However, the function of different immune cell types in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and the development of a prognostic signature based on immune cell types have not been comprehensively investigated. Methods: We collected and included a total of 2499 LUAD patients and performed calculations to determine the penetration level of 24 immune cells. This examination was conducted using the macro-gene-based approach provided by ImmuCellAI. We performed a meta-analysis using Lasso-Cox analysis to establish the immune cell pair score (ICPS). We conducted a survival analysis to measure differences in survival across ICPS-risk groups. Wilcox test was used to measure the difference in expression level. Spearman correlation analysis was used for the relevance assessment. Results: We collected a total of 24 immune cell types to construct cell pairs. Utilizing 17 immune cell pairs, we constructed and validated the ICPS, which plays a critical role in stratifying survival and dynamically monitoring the effectiveness of immunotherapy. Additionally, we identified several candidate drugs that target ICPS. Conclusions: The ICPS shows promise as a valuable tool for identifying suitable candidates for immunotherapy among patients. Our comprehensive assessment of immune cell interactions in LUAD contributes to a deeper understanding of infiltration patterns and functions, thereby guiding the development of more efficacious immunotherapy strategies.

Identification of a disulfidptosis-related genes signature for prognostic implication in lung adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is the most prevalent subtype of non-small cell lung cancer. Additionally, disulfidptosis, a newly discovered type of cell death, has been found to be closely associated with the onset and progression of tumors.

METHODS

The study first identified genes related to disulfidptosis through correlation analysis. These genes were then screened using univariate cox regression and LASSO regression, and a prognostic model was constructed through multivariate cox regression. A nomogram was also created to predict the prognosis of LUAD. The model was validated in three independent data sets: GSE72094, GSE31210, and GSE37745. Next, patients were grouped based on their median risk score, and differentially expressed genes between the two groups were analyzed. Enrichment analysis, immune infiltration analysis, and drug sensitivity evaluation were also conducted.

RESULTS

In this study, we examined 21 genes related to disulfidptosis and developed a gene signature that was found to be associated with a poorer prognosis in LUAD. Our model was validated using three independent datasets and showed AUC values greater than 0.5 at 1, 3, and 5 years. Enrichment analysis revealed that the disulfidptosis-related genes signature had a multifaceted impact on LUAD, particularly in relation to tumor development, proliferation, and metastasis. Patients in the high-risk group exhibited higher tumor purity and lower stromal score, ESTIMATE score, and Immune score.

CONCLUSION

This study constructed a gene signature related to disulfidptosis in lung adenocarcinoma and analyzed its impact on the disease and its association with the tumor microenvironment. The findings of this research provide valuable insights into the understanding of lung adenocarcinoma and could potentially lead to the development of new treatment strategies.

An immune indicator based on BTK and DPEP2 identifies hot and cold tumors and clinical treatment outcomes in lung adenocarcinoma

In lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), immune heterogeneity of hot and cold tumors has been recognized as one of the major factors affecting immunotherapy and other common treatments. However, there is still a lack of biomarkers that can effectively identify the immunophenotype of cold and hot tumors. First, the immune signatures were obtained based on literature mining, including macrophage/monocyte, IFN-γ response, TGF-β response, IL12 response, lymphocyte activation, and ECM/Dve/immune response. Subsequently, LUAD patients were further clustered into different immune phenotypes based on these immune signatures. Next, the key genes related to the immune phenotypes were screened by WGCNA analysis, univariate analysis, and lasso-cox analysis, and the risk signature was established via the key genes. In additional, we compared the clinicopathological characteristics, drug sensitivity, the abundance of immune infiltration, and the efficacy of immunotherapy and commonly used therapies between patients in the high- and low-risk groups in LUAD. LUAD patients were divided into immune hot phenotype and immune cold phenotype groups. The clinical presentation showed that patients with the immune hot phenotype had higher immunoactivity (including higher MHC, CYT, immune, stromal, ESTIMATE scores, higher abundance of immune cell infiltration, higher abundance of TIL, and enrichment of immune-enriched subtypes) and better survival outcomes than those with the immune cold phenotype. Subsequently, WGCNA analysis, univariate analysis, and lasso-cox analysis identified the genes highly associated with the immune phenotype: BTK and DPEP2. The risk signature, consisting of BTK and DPEP2, is highly correlated with the immune phenotype. High-risk scores were enriched in patients with immune cold phenotype and low-risk scores were enriched in patients with immune hot phenotype. Compared to the high-risk group, the low-risk group had better clinical performance, higher drug sensitivity, and a higher degree of immunoactivity, as well as better efficacy in receiving immunotherapy and common adjuvant therapy. This study developed an immune indicator consisting of BTK and DPEP2 based on the heterogeneity of hot and cold Immunophenotypes of the tumor microenvironment. This indicator has good efficacy in predicting prognosis and assessing the efficacy of immunotherapy, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. It has the potential to facilitate personalized and precise treatment of LUAD in the future.