Safety and Efficacy of Liver-Directed Radiotherapy in Combination With Lenvatinib for Hepatocelluar Carcinoma With Macroscopic Tumor Thrombosis

Clinical outcomes and safety of external beam radiotherapy with extensive intrahepatic targets for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A single institutional clinical experience

BACKGROUND

This study observed the clinical outcome of radiotherapy to extensive intrahepatic targets for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a single institution.

METHODS

From September 2009 to July 2021, patients who underwent fractionated radiotherapy to a planning target volume (PTV) of over 100 ml with biological effective dose >30 Gy 10 for advanced HCC were enrolled. Overall survival (OS) and radiation-induced liver toxicity (RILD) were evaluated. RILD was defined as an increase in Child-Pugh (CP) score ≥2 or liver function tests ≥2.5 times at 3 months after the end of radiotherapy.

RESULTS

A total of 136 patients were evaluated. Eighty-nine patients had portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT), 37 patients were in CP B stage, and the median radiation dose to PTV was 48.8 Gy 10 . The median OS was 12.3 months. The factors most affecting OS were PVTT ( P = 0.001), PTV (>500 ml, P = 0.001), incomplete coverage of the intrahepatic tumor ( P = 0.004), and CP B ( P = 0.006) in Cox regression. RILD occurred in 22.4% of the patients and was affected by PVTT ( P = 0.003), PTV ( P = 0.010), pretreatment bilirubin levels (>1.5 mg/ml, P = 0.016), and the mean normal liver dose (MNLD) (≥ EQD 2 18 Gy 3 , P = 0.021) in binary logistic regression. As the PTV was in excess of >500 ml, RILD developed in 30.2% of patients and the prognostic importance of pretreatment bilirubin levels ( P = 0.006) and the MNLD ( P = 0.014) increased.

CONCLUSIONS

As PTV is more extensive, the bilirubin level and the MNLD have to be taken into consideration for safe radiotherapy, in addition to the traditional prognostic factors.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus lenvatinib for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis: a propensity matching score analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to investigate the survival benefit of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) versus lenvatinib as first-line therapy in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

147 HCC patients with PVTT were included in this retrospective study, 70 were treated with SBRT and 77 of were treated with lenvatinib. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was employed to balance the differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) were compared between the two groups. In addition, the safety of patients in both groups was also evaluated.

RESULTS

After PSM, 38 patients were matched in each of the two groups. The median OS was 14.5 (95% CI: 10.1-18.9) and 11.1 (95% CI: 9.3-12.9) months in the SBRT and lenvatinib groups, respectively (P = 0.014). The median PFS was 6.8 (95% CI: 5.1-8.5) and 5.0 (95% CI: 3.0-7.0) months, respectively (P = 0.010). The 1-, 2-years OS rates in the two groups were 65.8% vs. 39.5% and 31.6% vs. 10.5%, respectively. The 6-, 12-months PFS rates in the two groups were 57.9% vs. 44.7% and 28.9% vs. 10.5%, respectively. In addition, the SBRT group had a better ORR than the lenvatinib group (52.6% vs. 23.7%, P = 0.009). Patients with good response to SBRT had better survival. Cox proportional hazard model showed that SBRT was an important prognostic factor for OS and PFS. The incidence of hypertension (34.2% vs. 0%) was higher in the LEN group, however, both treatment modalities were well tolerated in the two groups of patients.

CONCLUSION

In HCC patients with PVTT, SBRT had a better survival benefit than Lenvatinib treatment as first-line therapy.

Efficacy of Lenvatinib Combined with Anti-PD-1 Antibodies Plus Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus: A Retrospective, Multicenter Study

PURPOSE

The prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) is extremely poor, and systemic therapy is currently the mainstream treatment. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib combined with anti-programmed cell death-1 antibodies and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (triple therapy) in patients with HCC and PVTT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective multicenter study included patients with HCC and PVTT who received triple therapy, were aged between 18 and 75 years, classified as Child-Pugh class A or B, and had at least one measurable lesion. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rates, and disease control rates were analyzed to assess efficacy. Treatment-related adverse events were analyzed to assess safety profiles.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 11.23 months (range, 3.07 to 34.37 months), the median OS was greater than 24 months, and median PFS was 12.53 months. The 2-year OS rate was 54.9%. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 69.8% (74/106) and 84.0% (89/106), respectively; 20.8% (22/106) of the patients experienced grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events and no treatment-related deaths occurred. The conversion rate to liver resection was 31.1% (33/106), with manageable postoperative complications. The median OS was not reached in the surgery group, but was 19.08 months in the non-surgery group. The median PFS in the surgery and non-surgery groups were 20.50 and 9.00 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Triple therapy showed promising survival benefits and high response rates in patients with HCC and PVTT, with manageable adverse effects.

Tyrosine-kinase inhibitor combined with iodine-125 seed brachytherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma refractory to transarterial chemoembolization: a propensity-matched study

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) combined with iodine-125 seed brachytherapy (TKI-I) versus TKI alone for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) refractory to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).

METHODS

Data of patients with TACE-refractory HCC who received TKI (sorafenib or lenvatinib) or TKI-I from September 2018 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. A propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to diminish potential bias. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP). Tumor responses and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were also compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 132 patients were included in this study. Under PSM, 48 paired patients were selected for comparison. The median OS was 23.2 (95% CI 20.9-25.1) months in the TKI-I group versus 13.9 (95% CI 11.1-16.7) months in the TKI group (P < 0.001). The median TTP was 12.8 (95% CI 10.1-15.5) months in the TKI-I group versus 5.8 (95% CI 5.0-6.6) months in the TKI group (P < 0.001). Patients in the TKI-I group had higher objective response rate (68.8% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.001) and disease control rate (89.6% vs. 66.7%, P = 0.007) than those in the TKI group. The incidence and severity of TRAEs in the TKI-I group were comparable to those in the TKI group (any grade, 89.7% vs. 92.2%, P = 0.620; ≥grade 3, 33.8% vs. 32.8%, P = 0.902).

CONCLUSIONS

TKI-I was safe and significantly improved survival over TKI alone in HCC patients with TACE refractoriness.

Comparison of stereotactic body radiotherapy with and without lenvatinib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score analysis

PURPOSE

Lack of evidence on the benefit of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in combination with lenvatinib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Our research compared the efficacy and safety of SBRT plus lenvatinib versus SBRT alone in clinical practice for the treatment of advanced HCC.

METHODS

Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to reduce selection bias. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), intrahepatic PFS (IHPFS), and objective response rate (ORR) were compared between the two groups. Additionally, safety profiles were also evaluated in the two groups.

RESULTS

After PSM, 35 patients from each group were selected and the date was compared. Compared with the SBRT alone group, the median OS, PFS, and IHPFS were significantly prolonged in SBRT plus lenvatinib group (median OS 16.8 vs. 11.0 months, pOS = 0.043; median PFS 9.1 vs. 3.7 months, pPFS < 0.001; median IHPFS 9.5 vs. 4.2 months, pIHPFS = 0.004). The 6- and 12-month OS rates were 91.4% and 68.6% in the combined therapy group and 82.9% and 48.6% in the monotherapy group, respectively. The 6- and 12-month PFS rates were 68.6% and 34.3% in the combined therapy group and 31.4% and 8.6% in the monotherapy group, respectively. Furthermore, a higher ORR was observed in SBRT plus lenvatinib group (54.29% vs. 22.86%, p = 0.007). Subgroup analysis of patients with macroscopic vascular invasion (MVI) also had similar results. Moreover, most adverse events (AEs) were mild-to-moderate and manageable in the SBRT plus lenvatinib group.

CONCLUSION

SBRT plus lenvatinib is expected to significantly improve OS, PFS, IHPFS, and ORR for patients with advanced HCC when compared to SBRT alone, with manageable adverse effects.

Lenvatinib with or without stereotactic body radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) involving portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) are presently lacking effective treatment options. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib with or without SBRT for HCC with PVTT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective analysis included 37 patients treated with lenvatinib in combination with SBRT and 77 patients treated with lenvatinib alone from August 2018 to August 2021. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), intrahepatic PFS (IHPFS) and objective remission rate (ORR) were compared between the two groups, while adverse events (AEs) was analyzed between the two groups to assess safety profiles.

RESULTS

Median OS, PFS and IHPFS were significantly prolonged in the combination treatment group compared with the single treatment group (median OS, 19.3 vs. 11.2 months, p < 0.001; median PFS: 10.3 vs. 5.3 months, p < 0.001; median IHPFS, 10.7 vs. 5.3 months, p < 0.001). Moreover, a higher ORR (56.8% vs. 20.8%, P < 0.001) were observed in the lenvatinib combined with SBRT group. In subgroup analyses of Vp1-2 and Vp3-4 group, median OS, PFS and IHPFS were also significantly longer in the lenvatinib combined with SBRT group than those in the lenvatinib alone group. AEs in the combined therapy group were mostly manageable and the incidence was not statistically significant compared to the monotherapy group.

CONCLUSION

Lenvatinib plus SBRT had a significantly better survival benefit than lenvatinib monotherapy in the treatment of HCC patients with PVTT and was well tolerated.