Pembrolizumab monotherapy for untreated PD-L1-Positive non-small cell lung cancer in the elderly or those with poor performance status: A prospective observational study

Clinical impact of cancer cachexia on the outcome of patients with non-small cell lung cancer with PD-L1 tumor proportion scores of ≥50% receiving pembrolizumab monotherapy versus immune checkpoint inhibitor with chemotherapy

This retrospective, multicenter cohort study aimed to determine whether cancer cachexia serves as a biomarker for determining the most effective treatment for patients having non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with high programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) alone or combined with chemotherapy (ICI/chemotherapy). We included 411 patients with advanced NSCLC with a PD-L1 tumor proportion score of ≥50%. The patients were treated with pembrolizumab monotherapy or ICI/chemotherapy. Cancer cachexia was defined as a weight loss of >5% of the total body weight or a body mass index of <20 kg/m2 coupled with an additional weight loss of >2% within 6 months before starting treatment. Eighty-five (21%) patients met the cancer cachexia criteria. Overall survival (OS) was significantly shorter in patients with cachexia than in those without cachexia in both the pembrolizumab monotherapy group (17.2 vs. 35.8 months, p < 0.001) and the ICI/chemotherapy group (27.0 months vs. not reached, p = 0.044). However, after stratifying by cancer cachexia status, no significant difference in OS was observed between the pembrolizumab monotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy groups, regardless of cachexia. In conclusion, ICI/chemotherapy offers limited benefits for NSCLC patients with high PD-L1 expression and concurrent cancer cachexia. Considering the frailty associated with cachexia, ICI monotherapy may be preferred to ICI/chemotherapy for these patients. New interventions that can better address the negative prognostic impact of cachexia in patients treated using ICIs with or without chemotherapy remain warranted.

First-Line Pembrolizumab Efficacy in Octogenarians With NSCLCs Expressing ≥ 50% PD-L1 (ESCKEYP GFPC 05-2018)

BACKGROUND

Pembrolizumab alone is a first-line therapeutic option for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with ≥ 50% PD-L1 expression, but few data are available for elderly patients, specifically octogenarians.

METHODS

This retrospective, multicenter study included all consecutive patients with metastatic NSCLC PD-L1 ≥ 50% treated with first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy between May 2017 and November 2019. Information was collected from medical files with local evaluation of therapeutic response and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Among the 844 patients included, 73 (8.4%) were ≥ 80 (median: 82) years old, 74% men, 23.3% with ECOG-PS ≥ 2, 26% had ≥ 5% weight loss, PD-L1 50%-75%/≥ 75%: 45.2%/46.6%, respectively, with significantly more nonsmokers and (17.4% vs. 5.6%, P = .0002) and fewer adenocarcinomas (57.5% vs. 70.8%, P = .0217) than those < 80 years. After median follow-up of 45.7 (95% CI: 43.0-49.1) months, respective median overall survival (OS) for octogenarians versus younger patients lasted 12.0 (95% CI: 7.7-16.2) versus 23.9 (95% CI: 19.5-27.4) months (P = .0002), and median PFS for 5.0 (95% CI: 2.8-9.2) versus 8.3 (95% CI: 7.2-9.8) months (P = .039). Their respective objective response rates did not differ significantly: 42% (95% CI: 24-60) vs. 49% (95% CI: 43-54).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the results of this large multicenter population, first-line pembrolizumab efficacy against NSCLCs expressing ≥ 50% PD-L1 in octogenarians seems inferior to that obtained in younger patients. The higher percentage of nonsmokers and fewer adenocarcinomas could partially explain that finding.

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are the preferred treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without targetable oncogene alterations. However, evidence in the elderly population (aged ≥ 65 years) remains limited.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus databases for eligible publications until September 30, 2024. The primary outcome of interest was overall survival (OS). A random-effects model was used for the statistical analysis.

Findings

A total of 35 phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 9788 patients and 64 real-world studies involving 37,111 patients were included. Results from phase 3 RCTs revealed that ICIs significantly improved OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74-0.82) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.60-0.75) compared to chemotherapy. The association between ICIs and improved OS was independent of patient characteristics (race and histological type) or treatment-related factors (ICI drug type, treatment mode, and treatment line). However, significantly prolonged OS was not observed in subgroups of aged ≥ 75 years and PD-L1 < 1%. In real-world studies, the pooled median OS of ICIs were 11.8 months (95% CI: 11.2-12.4); Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (EOCG) score, histological type, PD-L1 status, with immune-related adverse events (irAEs), and treatment mode were predictive for OS; rates of irAEs and discontinuation were numerically higher for combination therapy vs. monotherapy.

Interpretation

ICIs are associated with a significant improvement in OS and PFS compared to chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. Nevertheless, some patient characteristics such as aged ≥ 75 years, ECOG score ≥ 2, and PD-L1 < 1% seem to have a negative impact on the efficacy of ICIs, while these findings require further validation in large RCTs.

Funding

None.

Survival prognostic factors in nonsmall cell lung cancer patients with simultaneous brain metastases and poor performance status at initial presentation

Purpose

Although the treatment of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has rapidly progressed recently, there is little evidence of treatment for patients with symptomatic brain metastases (BM) and poor performance status (PS). However, in symptomatic BM patients, appropriate upfront intracranial treatment can often lead to rapid improvement in PS and effective systemic therapy. Thus, this study investigated the prognostic factors for the survival of poor PS NSCLC patients with synchronous BM.

Methods

Data of patients with BM and Karnofsky PS (KPS) ≤70 at the first diagnosis of NSCLC who were treated in our hospital between January 2017 and December 2021 were reviewed. Patient survival was compared among patients stratified by type of first-line regimen of systemic treatment. Correlations between patient characteristics and survival were examined.

Results

Fifty patients receiving aggressive treatment were enrolled. The median survival times for tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), and chemotherapy alone groups were 19 (95 % confidence interval [CI], 2.8-68.5), 19 (3.0-62.0), and 13 (1.2-24.8) months, respectively. Survival in the TKI and ICI groups was significantly longer than in the chemotherapy alone group (p = 0.046, TKI vs. chemo; p = 0.022, ICI vs. chemo; p = 0.023). Both sex and type of systemic treatment correlated to survival time on univariate analysis. Chemotherapy alone for systemic treatment [p = 0.034; hazard ratio (HR), 0.44 (0.20-0.94)] remained significant for predicting overall survival in the multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

Even in patients with poor PS and BM at the initial diagnosis of NSCLC, the ICI group had a survival time comparable to that of the TKI group when combined with tailor-made intracranial treatment. There is a subgroup in the patient population that was previously considered unsuitable for ICI, whose PS improves with individualized intracranial treatment, and who may benefit from immunotherapy.

Efficacy and Safety of Docetaxel plus Ramucirumab for Patients with Pretreated Advanced or Recurrent Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Focus on Older Patients

BACKGROUND

Combination therapy with docetaxel (DTX) and ramucirumab (RAM) has been used as a second-line treatment for advanced or recurrent lung cancer. However, there is insufficient evidence regarding the safety of angiogenesis inhibitors in older patients.

OBJECTIVE

This multicenter retrospective study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of second-line treatment regimens in older patients with advanced or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 145 patients aged ≥ 70 years with advanced or recurrent NSCLC treated with second-line chemotherapy after platinum-based therapy between April 1, 2016, and March 31, 2021. Patients were subdivided into the DTX + RAM (n = 38) and single-agent (n = 107) groups.

RESULTS

The median time to treatment failure was 6.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.6-9.6) in the DTX + RAM group and 2.3 months (95% CI 1.7-3.0) in the single-agent group (p < 0.01). The median overall survival was 15.9 months (95% CI 12.3-Not Achieved) in the DTX + RAM group and 9.4 months (95% CI 6.9-15.1) in the single-agent group (p = 0.01). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events frequency was not significantly different between the two groups, except for edema. Patients in the DTX + RAM group who did not discontinue treatment owing to adverse events exhibited the most favorable prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that the DTX + RAM combination is an effective second-line therapy for older patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC, offering favorable efficacy without treatment discontinuation owing to adverse events.

Immunosenescence and immunotherapy in older NSCLC patients

Nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) predominantly affects the elderly since its incidence and mortality rates skyrocket beyond the age of 65. The landscape of NSCLC treatment has been revolutionized by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which have emerged after a long and mostly inactive period of conventional treatment protocols. However, there is limited data on the exact effects of these chemicals on older patients, whose care can be complicated by a variety of conditions. This highlights the need to understand the efficacy of emerging cancer medicines in older patients. In this study, we will review the data of ICIs from clinical trials that were relevant to older people with NSCLC and poor performance status. We will also discuss the role of immunosenescence in immunotherapy and biomarkers in predicting the efficacy of ICIs in patients with advanced NSCLC.

The landscape of immune therapy in vulnerable patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a narrative review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The clinical development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has led to substantial advances in the treatment of lung cancer. In particular, the contribution of ICIs to the long-term survival of certain patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been reported. With the accumulated experience in the use of ICIs, numerous studies have documented the efficacy and safety of ICIs in patients with diverse backgrounds, including those with problematic indications for drug therapy. In the current review, we summarize the most recent literature-based findings on ICI administration in vulnerable patients with NSCLC and provide an overview of the current status and prospects of ICIs.

METHODS

Herein, we defined vulnerable as the group of patients with NSCLC and performance status (PS) ≥2 (poor PS), advanced age (≥75 years), or cancer cachexia. We conducted a narrative review of the literature on the efficacy and safety of ICIs in vulnerable patients with advanced NSCLC.

KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS

Among the vulnerable patient group, poor PS was a strong, poor prognostic factor, even in patients undergoing ICI therapy. ICI therapy in older patients can be effective, although adverse events (AEs) should be carefully monitored. The efficacy of ICI therapy in patients with cancer cachexia is poor, with further therapeutic development warranted.

CONCLUSIONS

Although prior studies have evaluated lung cancer pharmacotherapy in various vulnerable populations, clinical studies on the application of ICIs in patients with vulnerable NSCLC are lacking in both number and quality. Further development of these therapeutic agents, with the emergence of additional evidence regarding their appropriate use in this population, is expected.

Chemoimmunotherapy Versus Pembrolizumab as a First-Line Treatment for Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer and High PD-L1 Expression: Focus on the Role of Performance Status

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy and ICI plus chemotherapy are approved first-line treatments for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) expressing high levels of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). However, appropriate treatment for patients showing high PD-L1 expression and poor performance status (PS) is not well defined.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to identify a treatment option that is better for these patients in a real-world setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 425 patients with NSCLC and high PD-L1 expression were included retrospectively. All patients received either pembrolizumab monotherapy or ICI plus chemotherapy as the first-line treatment. Patients were subdivided into good (PS score 0 or 1; n = 354) and poor PS groups (PS score 2 or 3; n = 71). Early progressive disease (PD) was defined as PD within 3 months of ICI-based therapy initiation.

RESULTS

The good PS group had significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than the poor PS group upon ICI-based therapy administration. In the poor PS group, no significant difference was observed in PFS and OS between pembrolizumab monotherapy and ICI plus chemotherapy. In the good PS group, pembrolizumab monotherapy, PD-L1 50-89%, and liver metastasis were associated with early PD, as determined using multivariate logistic regression analyses. However, in the poor PS group, the multivariate logistic regression analyses did not show an association between pembrolizumab monotherapy and early PD.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with NSCLC exhibiting poor PS and high PD-L1 expression, ICI plus chemotherapy did not confer PFS or OS benefit compared with pembrolizumab monotherapy.

Prospective Observational Study Evaluating the Prognostic Value of the G8 Screening Tool for Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Who Received Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Inhibitor plus Platinum-Etoposide Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor plus platinum-etoposide chemotherapy is used as a first-line treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), regardless of age.

OBJECTIVE

We examined the role of the Geriatric 8 (G8) screening tool for evaluating treatment outcomes in patients with ES-SCLC treated with PD-L1 inhibitor plus platinum-etoposide chemotherapy as first-line therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between September 2019 and October 2021, we prospectively evaluated patients with ES-SCLC treated with immunochemotherapy at ten institutions in Japan. The G8 score was assessed before treatment initiation.

RESULTS

We evaluated 44 patients with ES-SCLC. Patients with G8 score > 11 had longer overall survival (OS) than those with G8 score ≤ 11 (not reached versus 8.3 months; log-rank test, p = 0.005). In univariate and multivariate analyses, G8 score > 11 [hazard ratio (HR) 0.34; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15-0.75; p = 0.008 and HR 0.34; 95% CI 0.14-0.82; p = 0.02, respectively) and performance status (PS) of 2 (HR 5.42; 95% CI 2.08-14.2; p < 0.001 and HR 6.94; 95% CI 2.25-21.4; p < 0.001, respectively) were independent prognostic factors for OS. Among patients with good PS (0 or 1), the OS in patients with G8 score > 11 was significantly longer than that in patients with G8 score ≤ 11 (not reached versus 12.3 months; log-rank test, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

G8 score evaluation before treatment initiation was useful as a prognostic factor for ES-SCLC patients who received PD-L1 inhibitors and platinum-etoposide chemotherapy, even with good PS.