Development and validation of nomogram prognostic model for early-stage T1-2N0M0 small cell lung cancer: A population-based analysis

Impact of examined lymph node count on survival outcomes in patients with stage T1-2N0M0 small cell lung cancer undergoing surgery: A retrospective cohort study

To explore the relationship between the count of examined lymph nodes (ELNs) and survival outcomes in patients with stage T1-2N0M0 small cell lung cancer (SCLC) after surgical treatment. We analyzed data from patients with SCLC in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The study focused on examining the correlation between the ELN count and both cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). This relationship was investigated using restricted cubic spline curves within the framework of multivariable Cox regression models. The cutoff value for both CSS and OS was 7 ELN counts. Patients with ELN < 7 had a median CSS of 64 months, significantly lower than 123 months of patients with ELN ≥ 7 (P = .012). Multivariable Cox regression analysis indicated that ELN ≥ 7 was an independent prognostic factor for CSS (hazard ratio = 0.50, 95% confidence interval: 0.30-0.83; P = .007). Similarly, Patients with ELN < 7 had a median OS of 41 months for patients with ELN < 7, compared to 103 months for those with ELN ≥ 7 (P = .004). Multivariable Cox regression analysis confirmed that ELN ≥ 7 was an independent prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio = 0.54, 95% confidence interval: 0.36-0.81; P = .003). ELN ≥ 7 is recommended as the threshold for evaluating the quality of postoperative lymph node examination and for prognostic stratification in patients with stage T1-2N0M0 SCLC undergoing surgery.

Treatment Patterns and Survival Outcomes in Patients With Stage T1-2N0M0 Small Cell Lung Cancer Undergoing Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background

The aim of the study was to delineate the treatment modalities and survival outcomes in patients with stage T1-2N0M0 small cell lung cancer (SCLC) who underwent surgery.

Methods

SCLC patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results databases between 2000 and 2020 were investigated. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was employed to assess cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) across diverse therapeutic strategies.

Results

The study included 190 patients. Treatment modalities included surgery alone in 65 patients (34.2%), surgery + chemotherapy in 70 patients (36.8%), surgery + radiotherapy in three patients (1.6%), and surgery + chemoradiotherapy in 52 patients (27.4%). The median CSS remained undetermined for the surgery alone group, whereas it was 123 and 113 months for the surgery + chemotherapy and surgery + chemoradiotherapy groups. Median OS was 47, 84, and 50 months for these groups. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that patients receiving surgery + chemotherapy exhibited a significantly enhanced OS (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.60, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.38 - 0.94; P = 0.028) compared to those undergoing surgery alone. However, the integration of radiotherapy did not improve OS compared to surgery alone (HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.44 - 1.15; P = 0.170).

Conclusion

Adjuvant chemotherapy improved OS compared to surgery alone. However, the addition of radiotherapy did not prolong OS.

Surgery for stage IIB-IIIB small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

The NCCN guidelines do not recommend surgery for T3-4N0M0/T1-4N1-2M0 small cell lung cancer (SCLC) due to a lack of evidence.

METHODS

Data of patients with T3-4N0M0/T1-4N1-2M0 SCLC were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to determine the impact of surgery on this population. The Kaplan-Meier method, univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression, and propensity score matching (PSM) were used to compare the overall survival (OS) between the surgery and non-surgery groups. In addition, we explored whether sublobectomy, lobectomy, and pneumonectomy could provide survival benefits.

RESULTS

In total, 8572 patients with SCLC treated without surgery and 342 patients treated with surgery were included in this study. The PSM-adjusted hazard ratio (HR, 95% CI) for surgery vs. no surgery, sublobectomy vs. no surgery, lobectomy vs. no surgery, pneumonectomy vs. no surgery, and lobectomy plus adjuvant chemoradiotherapy vs. chemoradiotherapy were 0.71 (0.61-0.82) (P < 0.001), 0.91 (0.70-1.19) (P = 0.488), 0.60 (0.50-0.73) (P < 0.001), 0.57 (0.28-1.16) (P = 0.124), and 0.73 (0.56-0.96) (P = 0.023), respectively. The subgroup analysis demonstrated consistent results.

CONCLUSIONS

Lobectomy improved OS in patients with T3-4N0M0/T1-4N1-2M0 SCLC, while pneumonectomy also demonstrated a tendency to improve OS without statistical significance; however, sublobectomy showed no survival benefit.