1
|
Joseph N, Alagiyawanna L, Ruwanpura T, Gunasekera S, Ruvinda L, Madushan S, Choudhury A. Whole-body integral dose and post-radiotherapy lymphocytopaenia in solid tumours. BMJ ONCOLOGY 2025; 4:e000522. [PMID: 40046832 PMCID: PMC11880780 DOI: 10.1136/bmjonc-2024-000522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2024] [Accepted: 01/14/2025] [Indexed: 03/27/2025]
Abstract
Objective Since modern radiotherapy techniques such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) pivot on a strategy of dose redistribution, it may increase integral dose and consequently worsening of lymphocytopaenia. In this study, our objective was twofold: first to validate the correlation between integral body dose and post-treatment lymphocytopaenia in a cohort of patients treated with curative-intent radiotherapy and second to validate its prognostic impact. Methods and analysis Patients treated with curative intent radiotherapy with complete blood counts were included in the study. Data on the following variables were collected: treatment site, prescribed dose, use of concurrent chemotherapy, mean body dose, mean body volume, treatment technique and disease-free survival. Results A total of 116 patients were included for analysis. There was a significant decline in lymphocyte counts after radiotherapy (2.2×109/L vs 0.8×109/L; p<0.001). Multivariate linear regression analysis of post-treatment lymphocytopaenia revealed a significant correlation with pretreatment lymphocyte counts, integral body dose, use of IMRT and use of concurrent radiosensitising chemotherapy. Univariate survival analysis was performed in 37 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. In the Cox proportional hazards model, post-treatment lymphocyte count was statistically significant as a continuous variable (Hazard Ratio=0.998, p=0.01) and as a dichotomous variable. Conclusion The negative correlation between integral body dose and post-treatment lymphocytopaenia was validated, and post-treatment lymphocytopaenia is an adverse prognostic factor in patients with head and neck cancer treated with curative-intent radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nuradh Joseph
- Clinical Oncology, District General Hospital, Matara, Sri Lanka
| | - Lanka Alagiyawanna
- Sri Lanka Cancer Research Group, Maharagama, Sri Lanka
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Thilina Ruwanpura
- Clinical Oncology, Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| | - Sanjeeva Gunasekera
- Sri Lanka Cancer Research Group, Maharagama, Sri Lanka
- Clinical Oncology, Apeksha Hospital, Maharagama, Sri Lanka
| | | | | | - Ananya Choudhury
- Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Corrao G, Marvaso G, Mastroleo F, Biffi A, Pellegrini G, Minari S, Vincini MG, Zaffaroni M, Zerini D, Volpe S, Gaito S, Mazzola GC, Bergamaschi L, Cattani F, Petralia G, Musi G, Ceci F, De Cobelli O, Orecchia R, Alterio D, Jereczek-Fossa BA. Photon vs proton hypofractionation in prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiother Oncol 2024; 195:110264. [PMID: 38561122 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Revised: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/24/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND High-level evidence on hypofractionated proton therapy (PT) for localized and locally advanced prostate cancer (PCa) patients is currently missing. The aim of this study is to provide a systematic literature review to compare the toxicity and effectiveness of curative radiotherapy with photon therapy (XRT) or PT in PCa. METHODS PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched up to April 2022. Men with a diagnosis of PCa who underwent curative hypofractionated RT treatment (PT or XRT) were included. Risk of grade (G) ≥ 2 acute and late genitourinary (GU) OR gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity were the primary outcomes of interest. Secondary outcomes were five-year biochemical relapse-free survival (b-RFS), clinical relapse-free, distant metastasis-free, and prostate cancer-specific survival. Heterogeneity between study-specific estimates was assessed using Chi-square statistics and measured with the I2 index (heterogeneity measure across studies). RESULTS A total of 230 studies matched inclusion criteria and, due to overlapped populations, 160 were included in the present analysis. Significant lower rates of G ≥ 2 acute GI incidence (2 % vs 7 %) and improved 5-year biochemical relapse-free survival (95 % vs 91 %) were observed in the PT arm compared to XRT. PT benefits in 5-year biochemical relapse-free survival were maintained for the moderate hypofractionated arm (p-value 0.0122) and among patients in intermediate and low-risk classes (p-values < 0.0001 and 0.0368, respectively). No statistically relevant differences were found for the other considered outcomes. CONCLUSION The present study supports that PT is safe and effective for localized PCa treatment, however, more data from RCTs are needed to draw solid evidence in this setting and further effort must be made to identify the patient subgroups that could benefit the most from PT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Corrao
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Marvaso
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Federico Mastroleo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Annalisa Biffi
- National Centre of Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy; Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Giacomo Pellegrini
- National Centre of Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy; Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Samuele Minari
- National Centre of Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Giulia Vincini
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - Mattia Zaffaroni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - Dario Zerini
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Volpe
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Simona Gaito
- Proton Clinical Outcomes Unit, The Christie NHS Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK; Division of Clinical Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Luca Bergamaschi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Cattani
- Unit of Medical Physics, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Petralia
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Gennaro Musi
- Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Ceci
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Division of Nuclear Medicine and Theranostics, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio De Cobelli
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Directorate, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniela Alterio
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Spampinato S, Rancati T, Waskiewicz JM, Avuzzi B, Garibaldi E, Faiella A, Villa E, Magli A, Cante D, Girelli G, Gatti M, Noris Chiorda B, Rago L, Ferrari P, Piva C, Pavarini M, Valdagni R, Vavassori V, Munoz F, Sanguineti G, Di Muzio N, Kirchheiner K, Fiorino C, Cozzarini C. Patient-reported persistent symptoms after radiotherapy and association with quality of life for prostate cancer survivors. Acta Oncol 2023; 62:1440-1450. [PMID: 37801288 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2259597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the persistence of symptoms after radiotherapy (RT) for localised prostate cancer (PCa) and the association with quality of life (QOL). MATERIALS AND METHODS Prospective patient-reported outcome (PRO) from a multi-institutional study on PCa treated with radical RT (2010-2014) was analysed. Data was collected at baseline (BL) and follow-ups (FUPs) up to 5 years. Patients with BL and ≥3 late FUPs (≥6 months) were analysed. PRO was scored by means of the IPSS and ICIQ-SF (urinary), LENT-SOMA (gastrointestinal [GI]), and EORTC-C30 (pain, insomnia, fatigue, and QOL) questionnaires. Symptoms were defined 'persistent' if the median score over FUPs was ≥3 (urinary) or ≥2 (GI, pain, insomnia, and fatigue), and worse than BL. Different thresholds were chosen to have enough events for each symptom. QOL was linearly transformed on a continuous scale (0-100). Linear-mixed models were used to identify significant differences between groups with and without persistent symptoms including age, smoking status, previous abdominal surgery, and diabetes as confounders. Mean QOL differences between groups were evaluated longitudinally over FUPs. RESULTS The analysis included 293 patients. Persistent urinary symptoms ranged from 2% (straining) to 12% (weak stream, and nocturia). Gastrointestinal symptoms ranged from 7% (rectal pain, and incontinence) to 30% (urgency). Proportions of pain, insomnia, and fatigue were 6, 13, and 18%. Significant QOL differences of small-to-medium clinical relevance were found for urinary incontinence, frequency, urgency, and nocturia. Among GI symptoms, rectal pain and incontinence showed small-to-medium differences. Fatigue was associated with the largest differences. CONCLUSIONS The analysis showed that symptoms after RT for PCa occur with different persistence and their association with QOL varies in magnitude. A number of persistent urinary and GI symptoms showed differences in a comparable range. Urinary incontinence and frequency, rectal pain, and faecal incontinence more often had significant associations. Fatigue was also prevalent and associated with largely deteriorated QOL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia Spampinato
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Tiziana Rancati
- Data Science, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Barbara Avuzzi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Garibaldi
- Department of Radiotherapy, Ospedale Regionale Parini-AUSL Valle d'Aosta, Aosta, Italy
| | - Adriana Faiella
- Department of Radiotherapy, IRCCS Istituto Tumori 'Regina Elena', Rome, Italy
| | - Elisa Villa
- Department of Radiotherapy, Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Alessandro Magli
- Department of Radiotherapy, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria S. Maria della Misericordia, Udine, Italy
| | - Domenico Cante
- Department of Radiotherapy, ASL TO4 Ospedale di Ivrea, Ivrea, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Girelli
- Department of Radiotherapy, Ospedale degli Infermi, Biella, Italy
| | - Marco Gatti
- Department of Radiotherapy, Istituto di Candiolo - Fondazione del Piemonte per l'Oncologia IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
| | - Barbara Noris Chiorda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Luciana Rago
- Department of Radiotherapy, IRCCS CROB, Rionero in Vulture, Italy
| | - Paolo Ferrari
- Department of Health Physics, Provincial Hospital of Bolzano (SABES-ASDAA), Bolzano-Bozen, Italy; Lehrkrankenhaus der Paracelsus Medizinischen Privatuniversität
| | - Cristina Piva
- Department of Radiotherapy, ASL TO4 Ospedale di Ivrea, Ivrea, Italy
| | - Maddalena Pavarini
- Department of Medical Physics, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Riccardo Valdagni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Fernando Munoz
- Department of Radiotherapy, Ospedale Regionale Parini-AUSL Valle d'Aosta, Aosta, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Sanguineti
- Department of Radiotherapy, IRCCS Istituto Tumori 'Regina Elena', Rome, Italy
| | - Nadia Di Muzio
- Department of Radiotherapy, San Raffaele Scientific Institute and Università Vita Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Kathrin Kirchheiner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Claudio Fiorino
- Department of Medical Physics, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Cesare Cozzarini
- Department of Radiotherapy, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|