1
|
Du F, Wumener X, Zhang Y, Zhang M, Zhao J, Zhou J, Li Y, Huang B, Wu R, Xia Z, Yao Z, Sun T, Liang Y. Clinical feasibility study of early 30-minute dynamic FDG-PET scanning protocol for patients with lung lesions. EJNMMI Phys 2024; 11:23. [PMID: 38441830 PMCID: PMC10914647 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-024-00625-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to evaluate the clinical feasibility of early 30-minute dynamic 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) scanning protocol for patients with lung lesions in comparison to the standard 65-minute dynamic FDG-PET scanning as a reference. METHODS Dynamic 18F-FDG PET images of 146 patients with 181 lung lesions (including 146 lesions confirmed by histology) were analyzed in this prospective study. Dynamic images were reconstructed into 28 frames with a specific temporal division protocol for the scan data acquired 65 min post-injection. Ki images and quantitative parameters Ki based on two different acquisition durations [the first 30 min (Ki-30 min) and 65 min (Ki-65 min)] were obtained by applying the irreversible two-tissue compartment model using in-house Matlab software. The two acquisition durations were compared for Ki image quality (including visual score analysis and number of lesions detected) and Ki value (including accuracy of Ki, the value of differential diagnosis of lung lesions and prediction of PD-L1 status) by Wilcoxon's rank sum test, Spearman's rank correlation analysis, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and the DeLong test. The significant testing level (alpha) was set to 0.05. RESULTS The quality of the Ki-30 min images was not significantly different from the Ki-65 min images based on visual score analysis (P > 0.05). In terms of Ki value, among 181 lesions, Ki-65 min was statistically higher than Ki-30 min (0.027 ± 0.017 ml/g/min vs. 0.026 ± 0.018 ml/g/min, P < 0.05), while a very high correlation was obtained between Ki-65 min and Ki-30 min (r = 0.977, P < 0.05). In the differential diagnosis of lung lesions, ROC analysis was performed on 146 histologically confirmed lesions, the area under the curve (AUC) of Ki-65 min, Ki-30 min, and SUVmax was 0.816, 0.816, and 0.709, respectively. According to the Delong test, no significant differences in the diagnostic accuracies were found between Ki-65 min and Ki-30 min (P > 0.05), while the diagnostic accuracies of Ki-65 min and Ki-30 min were both significantly higher than that of SUVmax (P < 0.05). In 73 (NSCLC) lesions with definite PD-L1 expression results, the Ki-65 min, Ki-30 min, and SUVmax in PD-L1 positivity were significantly higher than that in PD-L1 negativity (P < 0.05). And no significant differences in predicting PD-L1 positivity were found among Ki-65 min, Ki-30 min, and SUVmax (AUC = 0.704, 0.695, and 0.737, respectively, P > 0.05), according to the results of ROC analysis and Delong test. CONCLUSIONS This study indicates that an early 30-minute dynamic FDG-PET acquisition appears to be sufficient to provide quantitative images with good-quality and accurate Ki values for the assessment of lung lesions and prediction of PD-L1 expression. Protocols with a shortened early 30-minute acquisition time may be considered for patients who have difficulty with prolonged acquisitions to improve the efficiency of clinical acquisitions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fen Du
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China
| | - Xieraili Wumener
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China
| | - Yarong Zhang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China
| | - Maoqun Zhang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China
| | - Jiuhui Zhao
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China
| | - Jinpeng Zhou
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China
| | - Yiluo Li
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China
| | - Bin Huang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China
| | - Rongliang Wu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China
| | - Zeheng Xia
- Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China
| | - Zhiheng Yao
- Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China
| | - Tao Sun
- Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
| | - Ying Liang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Damirov F, Stoleriu MG, Manapov F, Büsing K, Michels JD, Preissler G, Hatz RA, Hohenberger P, Roessner ED. Histology of the Primary Tumor Correlates with False Positivity of Integrated 18F-FDG-PET/CT Lymph Node Staging in Resectable Lung Cancer Patients. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13111893. [PMID: 37296745 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13111893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and false positivity rate of lymph node (LN) staging assessed by integrated 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) in patients with operable lung cancer to the tumor histology. In total, 129 consecutive patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing anatomical lung resections were included. Preoperative LN staging was evaluated in the relationship to the histology of the resected specimens (group 1: lung adenocarcinoma/LUAD; group 2: squamous cell carcinoma/SQCA). Statistical analysis was performed by the Mann-Whitney U-test, the chi2 test, and binary logistic regression analysis. To establish an easy-to-use algorithm for the identification of LN false positivity, a decision tree including clinically meaningful parameters was generated. In total, 77 (59.7%) and 52 (40.3%) patients were included in the LUAD and SQCA groups, respectively. SQCA histology, non-G1 tumors, and tumor SUVmax > 12.65 were identified as independent predictors of LN false positivity in the preoperative staging. The corresponding ORs and their 95% CIs were 3.35 [1.10-10.22], p = 0.0339; 4.60 [1.06-19.94], p = 0.0412; and 2.76 [1.01-7.55], and p = 0.0483. The preoperative identification of false-positive LNs is an important aspect of the treatment regimen for patients with operable lung cancer; thus, these preliminary findings should be further evaluated in larger patient cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fuad Damirov
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Mircea Gabriel Stoleriu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
- Institute for Lung Biology and Disease, Comprehensive Pneumology Center (CPC), Member of the German Lung Research Center (DZL), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Farkhad Manapov
- Institute for Lung Biology and Disease, Comprehensive Pneumology Center (CPC), Member of the German Lung Research Center (DZL), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 81377 Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Karen Büsing
- Clinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Julia Dorothea Michels
- Department of Pulmonology and Critical Care, Thoraxklinik Heidelberg gGmbH, University of Heidelberg, 69126 Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Lung Research Center (TLRC), Member of the German Lung Research Center (DZL), University of Heidelberg, 69126 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Gerhard Preissler
- Institute for Lung Biology and Disease, Comprehensive Pneumology Center (CPC), Member of the German Lung Research Center (DZL), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 81377 Munich, Germany
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Robert Bosch Hospital, Teaching Hospital of University Tübingen, 70376 Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Rudolf A Hatz
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
- Institute for Lung Biology and Disease, Comprehensive Pneumology Center (CPC), Member of the German Lung Research Center (DZL), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Hohenberger
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Eric D Roessner
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Center for Thoracic Diseases, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|