Robot-assisted vs. laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on comparative studies

Robot-Assisted Radical Nephroureterectomy: A Safe and Effective Option for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma, Especially for Novice Surgeons

BACKGROUND

Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is the standard treatment for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Minimally invasive techniques like robotic (RARNU) and laparoscopic (LRNU) RNU offer potential benefits over open surgery, but their comparative oncologic outcomes are debated.

METHODS

This retrospective, multicenter study analyzed 2037 Taiwanese patients undergoing RNU between 2010 and 2022. Missing data was addressed using multiple imputations. Overlap weighting was applied to balance patient characteristics between the RARNU and LRNU groups. Survival outcomes were compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression.

RESULTS

After excluding the missing data, 405 patients underwent RARNU, and 1262 underwent LRNU. After adjusting for baseline differences, both groups showed comparable rates of surgical complications, residual tumor, UTUC-related mortality, and disease recurrence. The median follow-up was similar (52.4 vs. 51.6 months, p = 0.91). Using Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis, overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and disease-free survival were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that RARNU for UTUC has comparable oncological and perioperative outcomes to pure LRNU. RARNU may be easier for surgeons to adopt, particularly those with limited laparoscopic experience.

Gold standard nephroureterectomy, chemoprophylaxis and surveillance in upper tract urothelial carcinoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to summarize the most recent evidence on surgical management, strategies to reduce tumor recurrence, and surveillance regimens in patients diagnosed with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and elected for radical treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Minimally invasive surgery is gaining momentum in the surgical management of UTUC. Chemoprophylaxis is still the gold standard to reduce intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Novel surveillance strategies have been proposed to adapt follow-up regimens to patients' characteristics.

SUMMARY

Minimally invasive surgery has been associated with comparable oncological outcomes to the open approach while improving postoperative morbidity. In these cases, bladder cuff excision (BCE) is mostly performed by an extravesical approach, that demonstrates a noninferiority compared to the intravesical one in terms of oncological outcomes. Although lymphadenectomy is recommended in patients with high-risk tumors, its benefits are still unclear. Currently, there is a lack of recent prospective trials on chemoprophylaxis to reduce intravesical recurrence post RNU, making single-dose postoperative chemotherapy instillation the standard treatment. Although novel risk stratification models were released by international urological guidelines, their validity is mainly nonevidence-based. Risk-adapted follow-up strategies incorporating cystoscopy and cross-sectional imaging accounting for individual patient factors should be implemented.

Robotic surgery of the urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract single surgeon initial experience, 66 consecutive cases

PURPOSE

Robotic surgery is increasingly utilized in the treatment of urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract (UTUC). This study investigates the advantages and burden of robot-assisted surgical treatment of the urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract in a referral urological department, along with their functional and oncological results.

METHODS

The study included 66 prospectively enrolled patients who were surgically treated by a single, robotically specialized surgeon between July 2019 and December 2023. Patients were divided into three groups. Group 1: 50 patients underwent robot-assisted radical Nephroureterectomy (RANU) with bladder cuff excision, Group 2: 11 patients underwent RANU simultaneously with robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC), and Group 3: 5 patients underwent robot-assisted segmental ureterectomy (RASU). Clinical and oncological parameters were compared. Perioperative morbidity according to Clavien-Dindo was the primary endpoint of our study. The secondary endpoint was oncologic outcomes.

RESULTS

37.8% of patients had locally advanced carcinomas. The average console time of RANU with bladder cuff excision was 69 min. The rate of positive surgical margins was n = 1/66 (2%). Lymphadenectomy (LAD) was performed on 30% of patients, with a mean of 13.7 lymph nodes removed. Of those who received LAD, 33% had lymph node metastasis. n = 6/66 (9%) patients received blood transfusion. The overall complication rate was 24%. The readmission rate was 7.5%. With a median follow-up of 26 months, the 2-year recurrence-free survival rate was 84.4%, and the 2-year overall survival rate was 94%.

CONCLUSION

Robotic surgery is a feasible option for treating UTUC that can be adapted to meet the surgical needs of each patient. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm its benefits.

Standardization of robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy via intraperitoneal approach: insights from a high-volume Japanese Center

We present the trial-and-error process of standardizing robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy (RANU) at a high-volume center in Japan. Our urology team performed 53 RANU cases using the Da Vinci Xi system, undergoing five major evolutionary stages. We performed RANU via transperitoneal approach in all cases and lymph-node dissection in selected cases. During the evolution, we adopted a lithotomy position and significantly modified port placement to facilitate lower ureter management. However, we ultimately arrived at a method that minimizes port and patient repositioning during lower ureter processing. By strategically placing ProGrasp™ forceps in the most caudal port, we effectively retracted the bladder and grasped the opened bladder wall during lower ureter manipulation. This approach also allowed us to perform pelvic, para-aortic, and renal portal lymph-node dissection without major changes in patient positioning or port placement. Nevertheless, we acknowledge that some variations in positioning and techniques may be necessary depending on specific case requirements.

Early experience and future prospects regarding use of newly developed surgical robot system, hinotori, in the field of urologic cancer surgery

In the field of urology, robotic surgery has gained rapid and wide acceptance as a standard surgical approach in the majority of major surgeries over the last decade. To date, the da Vinci surgical system has been the dominant platform in robotic surgery; however, several newly developed robotic systems have recently been introduced in routine clinical practice. Of these, hinotori, the first made-in-Japan robotic system, is characterized by various unique and attractive features different from the existing system, and the use of this system has gradually increased mainly in urologic cancer surgeries, including radical prostatectomy, partial nephrectomy, radical nephrectomy, and radical nephroureterectomy. This review initially describes detailed characteristics of hinotori, then summarizes the early experience with urologic cancer surgeries using hinotori at our institution, and finally discusses the future prospects of robotic surgery using hinotori, considering problems associated with the use of this robotic system.

Robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract tumor: initial experience with the use of novel surgical robot system, hinotori

Background

The hinotori surgical robot system is a promising robotic platform that has been recently introduced into routine clinical practice. The aim of this study was to report our initial experience of robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy (RANU) using hinotori.

Methods

This study included a total of eight patients with upper urinary tract tumor (UUTT) who underwent RANU using hinotori via the transperitoneal approach. In this series, nephrectomy was initially performed at the kidney direction stage followed by distal ureterectomy and bladder cuff excision at the bladder direction stage without repositioning of patient or port. Lymphadenectomy was performed at either stage.

Results

Median age, body mass index, and tumor diameter were 76 years, 21.7 kg/m2, and 13 mm, respectively. Of eight patients, three were diagnosed with renal pelvic tumors and five with lower ureteral tumors. They underwent lymphadenectomy targeting the renal hilum plus para-aorta and the pelvis, respectively. All procedures in this series were completed without conversion to open surgery. Median operative time, time using the robotic system, estimated blood loss, and length of hospital stay were 230 minutes, 138 minutes, 23 mL, and 8 days, respectively. No major perioperative complication occurred. Pathological examinations of the tumors revealed seven urothelial carcinomas and one papilloma, the median number of resected lymph nodes was 13, and one patient was positive for both cancer margin and lymph node metastases.

Conclusions

Despite being a small case series, this is the first study characterizing RANU using the hinotori surgical robot system. RANU was efficaciously and safely performed, resulting in the achievement of favorable perioperative findings.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of completely retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy versus traditional retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma

BACKGROUND

This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of completely retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy (CRNU) for the treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).

METHODS

A systematic review of PubMed and Web of Science databases was conducted to identify trials comparing the outcomes of CRNU and other surgical procedures. A total of 6 case-control studies were selected for analysis. The efficacy and safety of CRNU were evaluated using mean difference or hazard ratio (HR) with 95% CIs, employing continuous or dichotomous method with a random or fixed-effect model. Meta-analysis was performed using STATA 11.0 software.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis indicated that CRNU in subjects with UTUC was significantly associated with a shorter operation time (standardized mean difference, -1.36; 95% CI, -1.61 to -1.11, P < .001) and lower blood loss (standardized mean difference, -0.54; 95% CI, -0.77 to -0.31, P < .001) when compared to traditionally retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy (TRNU). No significant difference was observed in the occurrence of grade I & II complications (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.49-2.2, P = .915) and total complications (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.38-1.27, P = .238) between CRNU and TRNU.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that CRNU is an advanced surgical technique that is safe and effective for the treatment of UTUC. We recommend that CRNU be further employed for patients with UTUC. Further randomized, multicenter trials are needed to validate these results, given the limitations of this study.

Perioperative and oncologic outcomes of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and pooled analysis of comparative outcomes

BACKGROUND

The debate on whether to choose a transperitoneal (TP) or retroperitoneal (RP) approach for treating upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) with laparoscopic surgery has been drawing attention. This study aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze the existing evidence regarding oncologic and perioperative outcomes of transperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (TLNU) and retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (RLNU) in managing UTUC.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar for identifying randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that evaluated the outcomes of TLNU and RLNU for UTUC. Continuous variables were represented by weighted mean difference (WMD) and standard mean difference (SMD), while binary variables were represented by odds ratio (OR), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. A sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the robustness of the estimates.

RESULT

Six observational studies were incorporated into this meta-analysis. The overall TLNU was associated with significantly shorter operating time (WMD - 19.85; 95% CI - 38.03 to - 1.68; P = 0.03); longer recovery time of intestinal function (SMD 0.46; 95% CI 0.08 to 0.84; P = 0.02). However, the terms of estimated blood loss (WMD - 5.72; 95% CI - 19.6 to - 8.15; P = 0.42); length of stay (WMD - 0.35; 95% CI - 1.61 to 0.91; P = 0.59), visual analog pain scale (WMD - 0.38; 95% CI - 0.99 to 0.84; P = 0.22); drainage duration (WMD - 0.22; 95% CI - 0.61 to 0.17; P = 0.26); overall complication rates (OR 1.24; 95% CI 0.58 to 2.63; P = 0.58); local recurrence rate (OR 0.6; 95% CI 0.3 to 1.21; P = 0.16); distant metastasis (OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.04 to 20.77; P = 0.97); 1-year overall survival (OS) (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.1 to 2.01; P = 0.3) showed no difference between TLNU and RLUN.

CONCLUSION

TLNU provides similar surgical outcomes and oncologic results compared to RLUN; however, TLNU has a shorter procedure time and prolonged intestinal function recovery time. Due to the heterogeneity among the studies, randomized clinical trials with follow-ups in the long term are required to obtain more definite results.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ , identifier CRD42023388554.