An exploratory study on the checkout rate of circulating tumor cells and the prediction of efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy and prognosis in patients with HER-2-positive early breast cancer

Recent Advancements of Nanomedicine in Breast Cancer Surgery

Breast cancer surgery plays a pivotal role in the multidisciplinary approaches. Surgical techniques and objectives are gradually shifting from tumor complete resection towards prolonging survival, improving cosmetic outcomes, and restoring the social and psychological well-being of patients. However, surgical treatment still faces challenges such as inadequate sensitivity in sentinel lymph node localization, the need to improve intraoperative tumor boundary localization imaging, postoperative scar healing, and the risk of recurrence, necessitating other adjunct measures for improvement. To address these challenges, specificity-optimized nanomedicines have been introduced into the surgical therapeutic landscape of breast cancer. In particular, this review involves starting with an overview of breast structure and the composition of the tumor microenvironment and then introducing the guiding principle and foundation for the design of nanomedicine. Moreover, we will take the order process of breast cancer surgery diagnosis and treatment as the starting point, and adaptively propose the roles and advantages of nanomedicine in addressing the corresponding issues. Furthermore, we also involved the prospects of utilizing advanced technological approaches. Overall, this review seeks to uncover the sophisticated design and strategies of nanomedicine from a clinical standpoint, address the challenges faced in surgical treatment, and provide insights into this subject matter.

Factors influencing the diagnostic and prognostic values of circulating tumor cells in breast cancer: a meta-analysis of 8,935 patients

Background

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) could serve as a predictive biomarker in breast cancer (BC). Due to its high heterogeneity, the diagnostic and prognostic values of CTC are challenging.

Methods

We searched published studies from the databases of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and MEDLINE. The detection capability and hazard ratios (HRs) of CTCs were extracted as the clinical diagnosis and prognosis evaluation. Subgroup analyses were divided according to the detection methods, continents, treatment periods, therapeutic plans, and cancer stages.

Results

In this study, 35 publications had been retrieved with 8,935 patients enrolled. The diagnostic efficacy of CTC detection has 74% sensitivity and 98% specificity. The positive CTC detection (CTC+ ) would predict worse OS and PFS/DFS in both mid-therapy and post-therapy (HROS, 3.09; 95% CI, 2.17–4.39; HRPFS/DFS, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.72–2.47). Moreover, CTC+ indicated poor survival irrespective of the treatment phases and sampling times (HROS, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.85–3.19; HRPFS/DFS, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.66–1.99). The CTC+ was associated with poor survival regardless of the continents of patients (HROS = 2.43; 95% CI, 1.85–3.19).

Conclusion

Our study suggested that CTC+ was associated with a worse OS and PFS/DFS in the Asian population. The detection method, the threshold level of CTC+ , therapeutic approaches, and sampling times would not affect its diagnostic and prognostic values.

HER2 status of CTCs by peptide-functionalized nanoparticles as the diagnostic biomarker of breast cancer and predicting the efficacy of anti-HER2 treatment

Efficacy of anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) treatment is impacted by tissue-based evaluation bias due to tumor heterogeneity and dynamic changes of HER2 in breast cancer. Circulating tumor cell (CTC)-based HER2 phenotyping provides integral and real-time assessment, benefiting accurate HER2 diagnosis. This study developed a semi-quantitative fluorescent evaluation system of HER2 immunostaining on CTCs by peptide-functionalized magnetic nanoparticles (Pep@MNPs) and immunocytochemistry (ICC). 52 newly-diagnosed advanced breast cancer patients were enrolled for blood samples before and/or after first-line treatment, including 24 patients who were diagnosed with HER2+ tumors and treated with anti-HER2 drugs. We enumerated CTCs and assessed levels of HER2 expression on CTCs in 2.0 ml whole blood. Enumerating CTCs at baseline could distinguish cancer patients (sensitivity, 69.2%; specificity, 100%). 80.8% (42/52) of patients had at least one CTCs before therapy. Patients with <3 CTCs at baseline had significantly longer progression-free survival (medians, 19.4 vs. 9.2 months; log-rank p = 0.046) and overall survival (medians, not yet reached; log-rank p = 0.049) than those with ≥3 CTCs. Both HER2+ and HER2-low patients could be detected with HER2 overexpression on CTCs (CTC-HER2+) (52.6%, 44.4%, respectively), whereas all the HER2-negative patients had no CTC-HER2+ phenotype. Among HER2+ patients with ≥3 CTCs at baseline, objective response only appeared in pretherapeutic CTC-HER2+ cohort (60.0%), rather than in CTC-HER2- cohort (0.0%) (p = 0.034). In conclusion, we demonstrate the significance of CTC enumeration in diagnosis and prognosis of first-line advanced breast cancer, and highlight the value of CTC-HER2 status in predicting efficacy of anti-HER2 treatment.