KRAS G12 isoforms exert influence over up-front treatments: A retrospective, multicenter, Italian analysis of the impact of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors in an NSCLC real-life population

The efficacy of immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer with KRAS mutation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The KRAS mutation is highly prevalent in NSCLC and is associated with poor efficacy of immunotherapy. Nevertheless, the impact of KRAS mutation, mutation subtypes, and co-mutations on the effectiveness of immunotherapy remains uncertain. This study aimed to assess the influence of the KRAS mutation on the effectiveness of immunotherapy in NSCLC, specifically examining different subtypes of KRAS mutations and co-mutations.

METHODS

We performed an extensive search of multiple databases, covering the period from January 1, 2000, to December 5, 2023. A total of 24 articles met our inclusion criteria and were included in this study. A comparative analysis assessed the influence of different subgroups, including KRAS mutation, KRAS wild-type, KRAS G12C mutation, KRAS G12D mutation, and KRAS with co-mutations in NSCLC with immunotherapy. The study outcomes include HR, with corresponding 95% CI and P-values for OS and PFS using Review Manager 5.4 software for the meta-analysis.

RESULT

The KRAS mutation appears to have a more beneficial impact on OS (HR 0.54 [95% CI: 0.41-0.71]; P < 0.00001) and PFS (HR 0.63 [95% CI: 0.53-0.76]; P < 0.00001) in NSCLC patients receiving immunotherapy compared to those without immunotherapy. The presence of KRASG12C mutation has been found to have a positive impact on PFS (HR 0.39 [95% CI: 0.25-0.62]; P < 0.0001) in NSCLC patients who undergo immunotherapy, compared to those who did not receive immunotherapy. KRAS non-G12D mutation is considerably associated with longer OS (HR 1.52 [95% CI: 1.10-2.10]; P = 0.01). The clinical benefit in OS between patients without STK11 co-mutation and those who have KRAS mutation with STK11 is significant (HR 1.46 [95% CI: 1.10-1.93]; P = 0.008). Comparing the impact of OS patients without KEAP1/NFE2L2 mutation to those with KRAS and KEAP1/NFE2L2 co-mutations showed a significant impact (HR 1.89 [95% CI: 1.33-2.68]; P = 0.0004).

CONCLUSION

The KRAS mutation and KRAS G12C mutation confer benefits that impact OS and PFS in NSCLC patients treated with immunotherapy. However, the KRAS G12D mutation negatively impacts OS compared to the KRAS non-G12D mutation. Furthermore, KRAS co-mutations involving STK11 and KEAP1/NFE2L2 are associated with a negative impact on the efficacy of immunotherapy in NSCLC patients.

Targeting KRASG12D mutation in non-small cell lung cancer: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic potential

Lung malignant tumors are a type of cancer with high incidence and mortality rates worldwide. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for over 80% of all lung malignant tumors, and most patients are diagnosed at advanced stages, leading to poor prognosis. Over the past decades, various oncogenic driver alterations associated with lung cancer have been identified, each of which can potentially serve as a therapeutic target. Rat sarcoma (RAS) genes are the most commonly mutated oncogenes in human cancers, with Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) being the most common subtype. The role of KRAS oncogene in NSCLC is still not fully understood, and its impact on prognosis remains controversial. Despite the significant advancements in targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) that have transformed the treatment landscape of advanced NSCLC in recent years, targeting KRAS (both directly and indirectly) remains challenging and is still under intensive research. In recent years, significant progress has been made in the development of targeted drugs targeting the NSCLC KRASG12C mutant subtype. However, research progress on target drugs for the more common KRASG12D subtype has been slow, and currently, no specific drugs have been approved for clinical use, and many questions remain to be answered, such as the mechanisms of resistance in this subtype of NSCLC, how to better utilize combination strategies with multiple treatment modalities, and whether KRASG12D inhibitors offer substantial efficacy in the treatment of advanced NSCLC patients.

Unconventional strategy could be the future: From target to KRAS broad range treatment

The RAS gene family comprises genes that regulate cell growth and differentiation. KRAS, a member of this family, is often mutated in different cancers, resulting in uncontrolled cell growth and tumor development. Recent clinical trial results on KRAS inhibition in NSCLC have defined the presence of a significant proportion of patients resistant to direct G12C inhibition. The presence of co-mutations and the occurrence of secondary resistance phenomena observed in preclinical and clinical settings partly justify these poor results. In addition, all other non-G12C mutations currently remain without specific strategies. Evidence of interactions between KRAS signaling and the TME suggests potential in vitro efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. In this short paper, we have reviewed the most relevant data from recent conferences, with a focus on KRAS inhibitors resistance mechanisms and interactions with the peri-tumor immune system. Commentary.

Exploiting Tertiary Lymphoid Structures to Stimulate Antitumor Immunity and Improve Immunotherapy Efficacy

Tumor-associated tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) have been associated with favorable clinical outcomes and response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in many cancer types, including non-small cell lung cancer. Although the detailed cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying these clinical associations have not been fully elucidated, growing preclinical and clinical studies are helping to elucidate the mechanisms at the basis of TLS formation, composition, and regulation of immune responses. However, a major challenge remains how to exploit TLS to enhance naïve and treatment-mediated antitumor immune responses. Here, we discuss the current understanding of tumor-associated TLS, preclinical models that can be used to study them, and potential therapeutic interventions to boost TLS formation, with a particular focus on lung cancer research.

Understanding the feasibility of chemotherapeutic and immunotherapeutic targets against non-small cell lung cancers: an update of resistant responses and recent combinatorial therapies

Despite consistent progress in prompt diagnosis and curative therapies in the last decade, lung cancer (LC) continues to threaten mankind, accounting for nearly twice the casualties compared to prostate, breast, and other cancers. Statistics associate ~25% of 2021 cancer-related deaths with LC, more than 80% of which are explicitly caused by tobacco smoking. Prevailing as small and non-small cell pathologies, with respective occurring frequency of nearly 15% and 80-85%, non-small cell LCs (NSCLCs) are prominently distinguished into lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC), subtypes. Since the first use of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor gefitinib for NSCLC treatment in 2002, immense progress has been made for targeted therapies with the next generation of drugs spanning across the chronological generations of small molecule inhibitors. The last two years have overseen the clinical approval of more than 10 therapeutic agents as first-line NSCLC medications. However, uncertain mutational aberrations as well as systemic resistant responses, and abysmal overall survival curtail the combating efficacies. Of late, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) against various molecules including programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1) have been demonstrated as reliable LC treatment targets. Keeping these aspects in mind, this review article discusses the success of NSCLC chemo and immunotherapies with their characteristic effectiveness and future perspectives.