Case Report: A case of advanced duodenal adenocarcinoma in complete remission after chemotherapy combined with targeted therapy and radiotherapy

A Case Report of Duodenal Malignancy and Its Management With Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Gastrointestinal malignancies, most specifically duodenal malignancy, are uncommon in the population; however, they are tricky to manage because the lesions are diagnosed at a late stage and located in a complex area. This case report focuses on a patient who was diagnosed with a second (descending) part of the duodenum (D2) malignancy; the tumour was localised at the second part of the duodenum, and the management of this patient was through the Whipple procedure or pancreaticoduodenectomy. The patient complained of stinging abdomen pain. Diagnostic examination comprised of CT and biopsy proved the presence of a malignant tumour originating from the D2 area. The tumour's characteristics and the patient's general health status are determined by using Whipple's procedure. Post-operative management entails the use of IV antibiotics, analgesics, multivitamins and nasojejunal (NJ) tube feeding. The case also expounds on the consequences of a multimodal treatment strategy, meticulous planning of the surgical procedure, and adequate post-operative management of D2 malignancies. These data may shed some light on the peculiarities of duodenal cancer management with the Whipple procedure; nonetheless, early diagnosis and proper management should remain the primary goals.

Risk factors, prognostic factors, and nomograms for distant metastasis in patients with diagnosed duodenal cancer: A population-based study

BACKGROUND

Duodenal cancer is one of the most common subtypes of small intestinal cancer, and distant metastasis (DM) in this type of cancer still leads to poor prognosis. Although nomograms have recently been used in tumor areas, no studies have focused on the diagnostic and prognostic evaluation of DM in patients with primary duodenal cancer.

AIM

To develop and evaluate nomograms for predicting the risk of DM and personalized prognosis in patients with duodenal cancer.

METHODS

Data on duodenal cancer patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2019 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent risk factors for DM in patients with duodenal cancer, and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to determine independent prognostic factors in duodenal cancer patients with DM. Two novel nomograms were established, and the results were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

A total of 2603 patients with duodenal cancer were included, of whom 457 cases (17.56%) had DM at the time of diagnosis. Logistic analysis revealed independent risk factors for DM in duodenal cancer patients, including gender, grade, tumor size, T stage, and N stage (P < 0.05). Univariate and multivariate COX analyses further identified independent prognostic factors for duodenal cancer patients with DM, including age, histological type, T stage, tumor grade, tumor size, bone metastasis, chemotherapy, and surgery (P < 0.05). The accuracy of the nomograms was validated in the training set, validation set, and expanded testing set using ROC curves, calibration curves, and DCA curves. The results of Kaplan-Meier survival curves (P < 0.001) indicated that both nomograms accurately predicted the occurrence and prognosis of DM in patients with duodenal cancer.

CONCLUSION

The two nomograms are expected as effective tools for predicting DM risk in duodenal cancer patients and offering personalized prognosis predictions for those with DM, potentially enhancing clinical decision-making.

Clinicopathological Characteristics, Treatment and Prognosis in Duodenal Adenocarcinoma with Liver Metastasis: A SEER-Based Study

Background and Objectives

Duodenal adenocarcinoma (DAC) is a rare tumor that is often accompanied by liver metastasis in advanced stages. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between clinicopathological characteristics and survival in DAC patients with liver metastasis, and to explore appropriate treatment options.

Methods

482 DAC patients with liver metastasis were retrospectively identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (2011-2020). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to explore the clinicopathological factors related to survival. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to identify the independent risk factors associated with survival.

Results

The 1-year overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates for the entire cohort were 25.4% and 28.3%, and the 5-year OS and CSS rates were 2.4% and 2.9% respectively. Univariable analysis and multivariate analysis identified chemotherapy and surgery as the independent risk factors for OS and CSS. Patients who underwent chemotherapy and surgery had better CSS and OS rates, whereas radiotherapy failed to improve outcomes.

Conclusion

We identified several prognostic factors of DAC with liver metastasis. Chemotherapy and surgery can prolong the survival of DAC patients with liver metastasis, which lays the foundation for identifying the optimal treatment strategy.