1
|
Zhou Y, Lin G, Chen W, Chen Y, Shi C, Peng Z, Chen L, Cai S, Pan Y, Chen M, Lu C, Ji J, Chen S. Multiparametric MRI-based Interpretable Machine Learning Radiomics Model for Distinguishing Between Luminal and Non-luminal Tumors in Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Study. Acad Radiol 2025:S1076-6332(25)00207-7. [PMID: 40175203 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2025.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2024] [Revised: 03/06/2025] [Accepted: 03/08/2025] [Indexed: 04/04/2025]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES To construct and validate an interpretable machine learning (ML) radiomics model derived from multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images to differentiate between luminal and non-luminal breast cancer (BC) subtypes. METHODS This study enrolled 1098 BC participants from four medical centers, categorized into a training cohort (n = 580) and validation cohorts 1-3 (n = 252, 89, and 177, respectively). Multiparametric MRI-based radiomics features, including T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging, were extracted. Five ML algorithms were applied to develop various radiomics models, from which the best performing model was identified. A ML-based combined model including optimal radiomics features and clinical predictors was constructed, with performance assessed through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) method was utilized to assess model interpretability. RESULTS Tumor size and MR-reported lymph node status were chosen as significant clinical variables. Thirteen radiomics features were identified from multiparametric MRI images. The extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) radiomics model performed the best, achieving area under the curves (AUCs) of 0.941, 0.903, 0.862, and 0.894 across training and validation cohorts 1-3, respectively. The XGBoost combined model showed favorable discriminative power, with AUCs of 0.956, 0.912, 0.894, and 0.906 in training and validation cohorts 1-3, respectively. The SHAP visualization facilitated global interpretation, identifying "ADC_wavelet-HLH_glszm_ZoneEntropy" and "DCE_wavelet-HLL_gldm_DependenceVariance" as the most significant features for the model's predictions. CONCLUSION The XGBoost combined model derived from multiparametric MRI may proficiently differentiate between luminal and non-luminal BC and aid in treatment decision-making. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT An interpretable machine learning radiomics model can preoperatively predict luminal and non-luminal subtypes in breast cancer, thereby aiding therapeutic decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Zhou
- Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Imaging and Interventional Medicine, Zhejiang Engineering Research Center of Interventional Medicine Engineering and Biotechnology, Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine of Lishui City, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui 323000, China; Department of Breast Surgery, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui 323000, China
| | - Guihan Lin
- Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Imaging and Interventional Medicine, Zhejiang Engineering Research Center of Interventional Medicine Engineering and Biotechnology, Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine of Lishui City, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui 323000, China; Department of Radiology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui 323000, China
| | - Weiyue Chen
- Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Imaging and Interventional Medicine, Zhejiang Engineering Research Center of Interventional Medicine Engineering and Biotechnology, Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine of Lishui City, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui 323000, China; Department of Radiology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui 323000, China
| | - Yongjun Chen
- Department of Radiology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui 323000, China
| | - Changsheng Shi
- Department of Interventional Vascular Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui 323000, China
| | - Zhiyi Peng
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009, China
| | - Ling Chen
- Department of Radiology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui 323000, China
| | - Shibin Cai
- Department of Breast Surgery, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui 323000, China
| | - Ying Pan
- Department of Breast Surgery, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui 323000, China
| | - Minjiang Chen
- Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Imaging and Interventional Medicine, Zhejiang Engineering Research Center of Interventional Medicine Engineering and Biotechnology, Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine of Lishui City, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui 323000, China; Department of Radiology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui 323000, China
| | - Chenying Lu
- Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Imaging and Interventional Medicine, Zhejiang Engineering Research Center of Interventional Medicine Engineering and Biotechnology, Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine of Lishui City, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui 323000, China; Department of Radiology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui 323000, China
| | - Jiansong Ji
- Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Imaging and Interventional Medicine, Zhejiang Engineering Research Center of Interventional Medicine Engineering and Biotechnology, Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine of Lishui City, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui 323000, China; Department of Radiology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui 323000, China
| | - Shuzheng Chen
- Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Imaging and Interventional Medicine, Zhejiang Engineering Research Center of Interventional Medicine Engineering and Biotechnology, Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine of Lishui City, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui 323000, China; Department of Breast Surgery, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui 323000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ge L, Wu J, Jin Y, Xu D, Wang Z. Noninvasive Assessment of Tumor Histological Grade in Invasive Breast Carcinoma Based on Ultrasound Radiomics and Clinical Characteristics: A Multicenter Study. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2024; 23:15330338241257424. [PMID: 38780506 PMCID: PMC11119369 DOI: 10.1177/15330338241257424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2024] [Revised: 04/16/2024] [Accepted: 05/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Rationale and Objectives: We aimed to develop and validate prediction models for histological grade of invasive breast carcinoma (BC) based on ultrasound radiomics features and clinical characteristics. Materials and Methods: A number of 383 patients with invasive BC were retrospectively enrolled and divided into a training set (207 patients), internal validation set (90 patients), and external validation set (86 patients). Ultrasound radiomics features were extracted from all the eligible patients. The Boruta method was used to identify the most useful features. Seven classifiers were adopted to developed prediction models. The output of the classifier with best performance was labeled as the radiomics score (Rad-score) and the classifier was selected as the Rad-score model. A combined model combining clinical factors and Rad-score was developed. The performance of the models was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve. Results: Seven radiomics features were selected from 788 candidate features. The logistic regression model performing best among the 7 classifiers in the internal and external validation sets was considered as Rad-score model, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values of 0.731 and 0.738. The tumor size was screened out as the risk factor and the combined model was developed, with AUC values of 0.721 and 0.737 in the internal and external validation sets. Furthermore, the 10-fold cross-validation demonstrated that the 2 models above were reliable and stable. Conclusion: The Rad-score model and combined model were able to predict histological grade of invasive BC, which may enable tailored therapeutic strategies for patients with BC in routine clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lifang Ge
- Department of Ultrasonography, Dongyang People's Hospital, Dongyang, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jiangfeng Wu
- Department of Ultrasonography, Dongyang People's Hospital, Dongyang, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yun Jin
- Department of Ultrasonography, Dongyang People's Hospital, Dongyang, Zhejiang, China
| | - Dong Xu
- Department of Ultrasonography, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Zhengping Wang
- Department of Ultrasonography, Dongyang People's Hospital, Dongyang, Zhejiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gong X, Liu X, Xie X, Wang Y. Progress in research on ultrasound radiomics for predicting the prognosis of breast cancer. CANCER INNOVATION 2023; 2:283-289. [PMID: 38089749 PMCID: PMC10686118 DOI: 10.1002/cai2.85] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2023] [Revised: 05/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2024]
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common malignant tumor and the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women worldwide. Effective means of predicting the prognosis of breast cancer are very helpful in guiding treatment and improving patients' survival. Features extracted by radiomics reflect the genetic and molecular characteristics of a tumor and are related to its biological behavior and the patient's prognosis. Thus, radiomics provides a new approach to noninvasive assessment of breast cancer prognosis. Ultrasound is one of the commonest clinical means of examining breast cancer. In recent years, some results of research into ultrasound radiomics for diagnosing breast cancer, predicting lymph node status, treatment response, recurrence and survival times, and other aspects, have been published. In this article, we review the current research status and technical challenges of ultrasound radiomics for predicting breast cancer prognosis. We aim to provide a reference for radiomics researchers, promote the development of ultrasound radiomics, and advance its clinical application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuantong Gong
- Department of Ultrasound, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Xuefeng Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Virtual Reality Technology and Systems, School of Computer Science and Engineering, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Big Data and Brain Computing (BDBC)Beihang UniversityBeijingChina
| | - Xiaozheng Xie
- School of Computer and Communication EngineeringUniversity of Science and Technology BeijingBeijingChina
| | - Yong Wang
- Department of Ultrasound, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Xu R, You T, Liu C, Lin Q, Guo Q, Zhong G, Liu L, Ouyang Q. Ultrasound-based radiomics model for predicting molecular biomarkers in breast cancer. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1216446. [PMID: 37583930 PMCID: PMC10424446 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1216446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in women and is highly heterogeneous. BC can be classified into four molecular subtypes based on the status of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and proliferation marker protein Ki-67. However, they can only be obtained by biopsy or surgery, which is invasive. Radiomics can noninvasively predict molecular expression via extracting the image features. Nevertheless, there is a scarcity of data available regarding the prediction of molecular biomarker expression using ultrasound (US) images in BC. Objectives To investigate the prediction performance of US radiomics for the assessment of molecular profiling in BC. Methods A total of 342 patients with BC who underwent preoperative US examination between January 2013 and December 2021 were retrospectively included. They were confirmed by pathology and molecular subtype analysis of ER, PR, HER2 and Ki-67. The radiomics features were extracted and four molecular models were constructed through support vector machine (SVM). Pearson correlation coefficient heatmaps are employed to analyze the relationship between selected features and their predictive power on molecular expression. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used for the prediction performance of US radiomics in the assessment of molecular profiling. Results 359 lesions with 129 ER- and 230 ER+, 163 PR- and 196 PR+, 265 HER2- and 94 HER2+, 114 Ki-67- and 245 Ki-67+ expression were included. 1314 features were extracted from each ultrasound image. And there was a significant difference of some specific radiomics features between the molecule positive and negative groups. Multiple features demonstrated significant association with molecular biomarkers. The area under curves (AUCs) were 0.917, 0.835, 0.771, and 0.896 in the training set, while 0.868, 0.811, 0.722, and 0.706 in the validation set to predict ER, PR, HER2, and Ki-67 expression respectively. Conclusion Ultrasound-based radiomics provides a promising method for predicting molecular biomarker expression of ER, PR, HER2, and Ki-67 in BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rong Xu
- Department of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Tao You
- Department of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Chen Liu
- Department of Breast, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Qing Lin
- Department of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Quehui Guo
- Department of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Guodong Zhong
- Department of Pathology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Leilei Liu
- Department of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Qiufang Ouyang
- Department of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| |
Collapse
|