Immune-based treatment re-challenge in renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Immunotherapy Strategies After Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Exposure in Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Review

Importance

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have transformed the treatment landscape for metastatic renal cell carcinoma; however, the failure of first-line therapeutic strategies remains a considerable challenge. Currently, clinicians face various issues, such as managing cases in patients who progress during treatment or relapse after adjuvant immunotherapy.

Observations

This review evaluates different strategies for treating patients with advanced kidney cancer previously exposed to immunotherapy. Evidence from other malignant neoplasms suggests potential effectiveness for rechallenging with immune checkpoint inhibitors. The most important available data are presented, including retrospective, prospective, and randomized clinical trials, to explore the role of immunotherapy in patients with renal cell carcinoma who have experienced prior failure of immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Conclusions and Relevance

Although retrospective data suggest modest effectiveness of an immunotherapy rechallenge treatment, larger phase 3 trials failed to demonstrate substantial benefit in progression-free survival and overall survival. Currently, no randomized evidence supports the use of agents targeting conventional immune checkpoints in patients with renal cell carcinoma who have previously received immunotherapy.

Efficacy and safety of durvalumab rechallenge in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients refractory to prior anti-PD-1 therapy

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Recently, anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (anti-PD-1) and anti-PD-L1 therapies were approved for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the effectiveness of rechallenging with one immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) after failure of another remains unclear. This study explores the efficacy and safety of anti-PD-L1 rechallenge in patients who failed anti-PD-1 therapy.

METHODS

From January 2016 to December 2023, 65 advanced HCC patients previously treated with anti-PD-1 therapy were retrospectively enrolled and rechallenged with durvalumab (480 mg IV every 2 weeks).

RESULTS

Overall, 86.2% of patients received nivolumab and 13.8% pembrolizumab as prior anti-PD-1 therapy. The overall response rate (ORR) to durvalumab was 13.8%. Patients who responded to prior anti-PD-1 had a higher ORR compared to non-responders (31.3% vs. 8.7%, p = 0.04). Patients with any grade of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) from durvalumab had a higher ORR than those without irAEs (35.3% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.01). The median PFS was 5.4 months, and the median OS was 9.6 months. Responders to prior anti-PD-1 showed longer OS (33.9 vs. 8.2 months, p < 0.01) and a trend toward longer PFS (13.8 vs. 4.9 months, p = 0.07) compared to non-responders. Multivariate analysis identified prior anti-PD-1 response (HR: 0.31) as the only protective factor for death. Common irAEs were skin toxicity (13.8%) and hepatitis (7.7%); no correlation was found between irAEs from prior anti-PD-1 and durvalumab treatment.

CONCLUSION

This study provides the first, concrete evidence that durvalumab rechallenge is effective for HCC patients who are refractory to anti-PD-1 therapy, especially for those who previously responded to anti-PD-1 treatment.

Complete response to fifth-line anti-PD-1 rechallenge in fumarate hydratase-mutated papillary renal cell carcinoma

Fumarate hydratase (FH) mutated papillary renal cell carcinoma is an aggressive variant of kidney cancer that poorly responds to conventional targeted therapies and immunotherapy. Here, we present the 10-year follow-up of a heavily pre-treated patient with several lines of therapy, achieving a remarkable complete response to anti-PD-1 rechallenge. In addition, we highlight a common immune-related adverse event of anti-PD-1, eosinophilia, as a possible biomarker of response and using TCGA data analysis, provide proof-of-concept for tumor expression of the eosinophil-related gene SIGLEC8, as a promising powerful predictor of prognosis for papillary renal cell carcinoma patients.

Immunotherapeutic Innovations in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Current Strategies and Future Directions

Approximatively 80% of kidney cancers globally are clear cell kidney cancers (ccRCCs), with 80% of these malignancies featuring an inactivating mutation of the Von Hippel-Lindau gene. This genetic alteration leads to the stabilization of hypoxia inducible factors 1 and 2 alpha (HIF 1 and 2α), resulting in the over-expression of target genes such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which is crucial for angiogenesis. As a result, ccRCCs are highly vascularized and serve as models for anti-angiogenic treatments (AAT). Current AAT therapies comprise antibodies targeting VEGFs, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKi) (Sunitinib) that target neo-angiogenesis receptors, and competitive inhibitor receptors (Aflibercept) that trap VEGFA and PlGF. The over-expression of VEGF and related members such as VEGFC significantly influences angiogenesis, lymph-angiogenesis, and immune tolerance. This has resulted in the approval of various immune checkpoint inhibitors (known as anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, and anti-CTLA-4) as viable treatment options for kidney cancer. Despite these advances, ccRCC remains challenging to treat adequately. Thus, future research is imperative to better understand the biology and pathophysiology of RCC, the tumor microenvironment, and mechanisms of resistance, with the aim of developing new therapies.

Metastatic Kidney Cancer: Does the Location of the Metastases Matter? Moving towards Personalized Therapy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

The management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has been revolutionized over the past two decades with several practice-changing treatments. Treatment for RCC often requires a multimodal approach: Local treatment, such as surgery or ablation, is typically recommended for patients with localized tumors, while stage IV cancers often require both local and systemic therapy. The treatment of advanced RCC heavily relies on immunotherapy and targeted therapy, which are highly contingent upon histological subtypes. Despite years of research on biomarkers for RCC, the standard of care is to choose systemic therapy based on the risk profile according to the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre models. However, many questions still need to be answered. Should we consider metastatic sites when deciding on treatment options for metastatic RCC? How do we choose between dual immunotherapy and combinations of immunotherapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitors? This review article aims to answer these unresolved questions surrounding the concept of personalized medicine.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Rechallenge in Renal Cell Carcinoma: Current Evidence and Future Directions

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapies represent the current standard of care in the first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma. Despite a clear benefit in survival outcomes, a considerable proportion of patients experience disease progression; prospective data about second-line therapy after first-line treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors are limited to small phase II studies. As with other solid tumors (such as melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer), preliminary data about the clinical efficacy of rechallenge of immunotherapy (alone or in combination with other drugs) in renal cell carcinoma are beginning to emerge. Nevertheless, the role of rechallenge in immunotherapy in this setting of disease remains unclear and cannot be considered a standard of care; currently some randomized trials are exploring this approach in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The aim of our review is to summarize main evidence available in the literature concerning immunotherapy rechallenge in renal carcinoma, especially focusing on biological rationale of resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors, on the published data of clinical efficacy and on future perspectives.