Simultaneous CSM-TACE with CalliSpheres® and partial splenic embolization using 8spheres® for hepatocellular carcinoma with hypersplenism: Early prospective multicenter clinical outcome

Evaluating the efficacy of 8Spheres microsphere embolization combined with iodine‑125 seed implantation in advanced refractory lung cancer: A retrospective study

Patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have seen improvements in care; however, outcomes remain poor for certain individuals despite treatment with radiation, chemotherapy, targeted therapies and immunotherapy. The present study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of combining 8Spheres microsphere embolization with iodine-125 seed implantation for treating advanced refractory NSCLC. The retrospective analysis included 45 patients with advanced refractory NSCLC. Using the surv_cutpoint function in R, the optimal maximum tumor diameter threshold was determined as 53 mm, dividing patients into two groups: ≤53 mm and >53 mm. The study evaluated the association between treatment regimen, tumor diameter, and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The findings demonstrated that the experimental group achieved a significantly longer median PFS (12 vs. 10 months; P=0.006) and OS (19 vs. 12 months; P=0.032) compared with the control group. Both the treatment approach and tumor size were identified as independent factors influencing survival. The risk of death was 2.291-fold higher for patients on the control regimen than for those in the experimental group. Similarly, patients with a tumor diameter of >53 mm had a 2.723-fold higher risk of death than those with a tumor diameter of ≤53 mm. Adverse events were mild and resolved in both groups. In summary, the combination of 8Spheres microsphere embolization and iodine-125 seed implantation demonstrate promising clinical outcomes and it may be a viable treatment for advanced refractory NSCLC. Additionally, maximum tumor diameter was strongly associated with patient survival and therefore it may serve as a valuable prognostic indicator to guide treatment decisions.

Clinical benefits of partial splenic embolization for cancer patients

Partial splenic embolization (PSE) has developed as an alternative to surgical splenectomy, mainly to improve hypersplenism and esophagogastric varices in cirrhotic patients. We proposed the novel concept that splenic infarction volume, rather than the splenic infarction ratio, is essential for patients receiving PSE. A splenic infarction volume between 388 and 540 mL is suitable for a sufficient increase in platelet count and less severe PSE-related complications. When restricted to patients with massive splenomegaly >700 mL, the noninfarcted volume of the spleen plays an important role in increasing platelet counts. Based on the splenic volume concept, PSE or laparoscopic splenectomy should be selected. Partial splenic embolization is effective for cancer patients with hypersplenism. Hypersplenism can occur due to portal vein congestion by thrombosis or tumor thrombosis, and hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome after oxaliplatin-including chemotherapy other than liver cirrhosis. Therefore, PSE has been emphasized as a pretreatment intervention for invasive treatments for cancer patients and is applied synchronously with systemic chemotherapy or chemoembolization for patients with liver malignancies. It was reported that additional PSE on chemoembolization can prolong progression-free survival for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Moreover, PSE can improve liver function and fibrosis, promote liver regeneration, and activate host immunity. Partial splenic embolization can result in thrombocytosis (<200 × 109/L), but this platelet count is unlikely to promote cancer progression. Partial splenic embolization can improve hypersplenism caused by various factors related to the patient's comorbidity and cancer treatment. Our splenic volume concept helps identify appropriate treatment procedures. A proper understanding of PSE and its dissemination is strongly required.

Efficacy and Safety of Transarterial Chemoembolization and Repeated Partial Splenic Embolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Hypersplenism and Thrombocytopenia

Aim

Partial splenic embolization (PSE) combined with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been reported in treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with cirrhotic hypersplenism and thrombocytopenia. However, efficacy and safety of repeated PSE when required are unclear. This study aims to investigate post-procedural changes in peripheral blood cell and hepatic function, progression-free survival (PFS), and safety of HCC patients with hypersplenism received TACE and repeated PSE compared to those received TACE alone.

Methods

This retrospective study included 102 HCC patients with hypersplenism who received TACE (n = 73) or TACE+PSE (n = 29) from January 2014 to December 2021. Changes in peripheral blood cell and hepatic function were investigated at 1 week, 2, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. TACE procedure sessions and adverse events were recorded. PFS and prognostic factors were analyzed.

Results

Despite response to initial PSE being limited, repeated PSE increased platelet (PLT) again, which peaked at 18 months. It also continued to improve red blood cell (RBC) and hemoglobin, which showed significant differences in changes from baseline between two groups until 24 months, as well as Child-Pugh scores at 12 and 18 months. Mean TACE procedure sessions were significantly higher in TACE+PSE group than that in TACE alone group (4.55 vs 3.26, P = 0.019). TACE+PSE group had longer median PFS (19.4 vs 9.5 months, P = 0.023) than TACE alone group, where PSE was an independent protective factor (HR, 0.508; P = 0.014). Initial and repeated PSE showed no significant differences in safety.

Conclusion

Repeated PSE is effective in increasing PLT again and improving RBC, hemoglobin and liver function. It contributed to performing serial TACE procedures thereafter. TACE combined with repeated PSE has significantly longer PFS than TACE alone, where PSE was an independent protective factor. Moreover, the safety of repeated PSE was comparable to initial PSE.

The role and evolution of partial splenic embolization over three decades: A multicentric retrospective single cohort study of 90 patients from French nationwide experience

BACKGROUND

Partial splenic embolization (PSE) has been proposed to treat the consequences of hypersplenism in the context of portal hypertension, especially thrombocytopenia. However, a high morbidity/mortality rate has made this technique unpopular. We conducted a multicenter retrospective nationwide French study to reevaluate efficacy and tolerance.

METHODS

All consecutive patients who underwent PSE for hypersplenism and portal hypertension in 7 tertiary liver centers between 1998 and 2023 were included.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 91 procedures in 90 patients, with a median age of 55.5 years [range 18-83]. The main cause of portal hypertension was cirrhosis (84.6 %). The main indications for PSE were (1) an indication of medical treatment or radiological/surgical procedure in the context a severe thrombocytopenia (59.3 %), (2) a chronic hemorrhagic disorder associated with a severe thrombocytopenia (18.7 %), and (3) a chronic pain associated with a major splenomegaly (9.9 %). PSE was associated with a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in 20 cases. Median follow-up after PSE was 41.9 months [0.5-270.5]. Platelet count increased from a median of 48.0 G/L [IQR 37.0; 60.0] to 100.0 G/L [75.0; 148]. Forty-eight patients (52.7 %) had complications after PSE; 25 cases were considered severe (including 7 deaths). A Child-Pugh B-C score (p < 0.02) was significantly associated with all complications, a history of portal vein thrombosis (p < 0.01), and the absence of prophylactic antibiotherapy (p < 0.05) with severe complications.

CONCLUSION

Our results strongly confirm that PSE is very effective, for a long time, although a quarter of the patients experienced severe complications. Improved patient selection (exclusion of patients with portal vein thrombosis and decompensated cirrhosis) and systematic prophylactic antibiotherapy could reduce morbidity and early mortality in the future.