Interaction between the intestinal flora and the severity of diversion colitis after low anterior resection of rectal cancer

Independent risk factors for diversion colitis: a retrospective case-control study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate independent risk factors for diversion colitis induced by the surgical interruption of fecal flow in the non-functional colon.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study with 163 patients who underwent low anterior resections and created prophylactic ileostomies for rectal cancer between January 2014 and June 2023 at the Department of General Surgery, Air Force Medical University Tangdu Hospital. Colonoscopy results of the non-functional region of the distal colon and clinical variables were collected, including age, sex, body mass index, pathological tumor node metastasis staging, ileostomy method, diversion time, receiving radiotherapy or chemotherapy or not, suffering from preoperative inflammatory bowel disease or postoperative anastomotic leakage or not. Diagnosis of diversion colitis based on the results of the patients' colonoscopy results. Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis of diversion colitis-related risk factors were performed subsequently.

RESULTS

The morbidity of diversion colitis is 53.4% (87/163) in our study. Multivariate analysis showed that risk factors for diversion colitis included single-lumen prophylactic ileostomy (63.2 vs. 30.3%, OR 4.481, 95%CI 1.897-10.584, p<0.001), diversion time ≥90 days (79.3 vs. 40.8%, OR 4.474, 95%CI 1.849-10.826, p<0.001), inflammatory bowel disease (17.2 vs. 3.9%, OR 7.491, 95%CI 1.839-30.507, p=0.005), radiotherapy (58.6 vs. 42.1%, OR 0.515, 95%CI 0.196-1.352, p=0.178).

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that single-lumen prophylactic ileostomy, diversion time, and inflammatory bowel disease are independent risk factors for diversion colitis.

Conservative Treatment of Mesenteric and Hepatic Portal Venous Gas Caused by Gut-Derived Infection After Ileostomy: A Case Report

INTRODUCTION

Hepatic portal venous gas is an extremely rare symptom of gas accumulation in the portal venous system. This disease has an acute onset, a rapid progression, and an extremely high mortality rate. This report describes a patient with mesenteric and hepatic portal venous gas caused by intestinal microbiota disturbance-induced gut-derived infection after ileostomy. The patient recovered and was discharged after conservative treatment. Nursing management of patients with mesenteric and hepatic portal venous gas is discussed.

CLINICAL FINDINGS

A 76-year-old patient developed septic shock, paralytic intestinal obstruction, and mesenteric and hepatic portal venous gas after undergoing ileostomy.

DIAGNOSIS

Mesenteric and hepatic portal venous gas was diagnosed on the basis of abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography findings.

INTERVENTIONS

The treatment plan included early control of infection, early identification and nursing care of gut-derived infection caused by intestinal microbiota disturbance, early identification of paralytic intestinal obstruction, relief of intestinal obstruction and prevention of intestinal ischemia, and early nutritional support.

OUTCOMES

On day 18 of hospitalization, the patient was transferred to the general ward and resumed eating, producing gas, and defecating. His abdominal signs and infection indicator levels were normal. On day 27, the patient was discharged home.

CONCLUSION

This case provides an in-depth understanding of the care of patients with mesenteric and hepatic portal venous gas and emphasizes the important role of bedside nurses in evaluating and treating these patients. This report may help nurses care for similar patients.

Efferent limb stimulation prior to loop ileostomy closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Postoperative ileus (POI) remains a common phenomenon following loop ileostomy closure. Our aim was to determine whether preoperative physiological stimulation (PPS) of the efferent limb reduced POI incidence.

METHODS

A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis searching PubMed, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases was performed. The last search was carried out on 30 January 2023. All randomized studies comparing PPS versus no stimulation were included. The primary endpoint was POI incidence. Secondary endpoints included the time to first passage of flatus/stool, time to resume oral diet, need for nasogastric tube (NGT) placement postoperatively, length of stay (LOS) and other complications. Random effects models were used to calculate pooled effect size estimates. Trial sequential analyses (TSA) were also performed.

RESULTS

Three randomized studies capturing 235 patients (116 PPS, 119 no stimulation) were included. On random effects analysis, PPS was associated with a quicker time to resume oral diet (MD - 1.47 days, 95% CI - 2.75 to - 0.19, p = 0.02), shorter LOS (MD - 1.47 days, 95% CI - 2.47 to - 0.46, p = 0.004) (MD - 1.41 days, 95% CI - 2.32 to - 0.50, p = 0.002, I2 = 56%) and fewer other complications (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.18 to 1.01, p = 0.05). However, there was no difference in POI incidence (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.10 to 1.21, p = 0.10), the requirement for NGT placement (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.21 to 1.20, p = 0.12) or time to first passage of flatus/stool (MD - 0.60 days, 95% CI - 1.95 to 0.76, p = 0.39). TSA revealed imprecise estimates for all outcomes (except LOS) and further studies are warranted to meet the required information threshold.

CONCLUSIONS

PPS prior to stoma closure may reduce LOS and postoperative complications albeit without a demonstrable beneficial effect on POI. Further high-powered studies are required to confirm or refute these findings.