Effectiveness and safety of pembrolizumab for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer in real-world studies and randomized controlled trials: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Pembrolizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, has shown potential for treating advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer. This meta-analysis evaluates its efficacy and safety, alone or combined with chemotherapy, in this population.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Databases including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science were searched up to October 31, 2024. Twelve studies comprising 4,069 patients were included. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS); secondary outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), adverse events (AEs), and grade ≥ 3 AEs. Effect sizes were calculated using mean differences (MDs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy significantly improved OS (MD = 1.92 months; 95% CI: 0.94 to 2.91) and ORR (MD = 11.05%; 95% CI: 6.29 to 15.82) compared to chemotherapy alone. Pembrolizumab monotherapy did not show a significant effect on OS (MD = 0.24 months; 95% CI: -1.15 to 1.63) and was associated with a significant reduction in PFS (MD = -2.28 months; 95% CI: -2.85 to -1.71) compared to chemotherapy alone. For safety, pembrolizumab monotherapy significantly reduced the risk of AEs (OR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.57 to 0.81) and grade ≥ 3 AEs (OR = 0.39; 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.51) compared to chemotherapy. Pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy did not significantly alter the risk of AEs (OR = 1.01; 95% CI: 0.90 to 1.13) or grade ≥ 3 AEs (OR = 1.12; 95% CI: 0.99 to 1.27) compared to chemotherapy alone.

CONCLUSION

Pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy improves survival and response rates with a manageable safety profile in advanced gastric and GEJ cancers. Monotherapy shows limited efficacy, highlighting the need for combination strategies and patient selection.

Do trial benefits predict real-world gains in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

It is important to understand the relationship between drug efficacy measured in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and real-world drug effectiveness. We estimate how RCT overall survival (OS) and RCT radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) benefits predict the association between treatments and real-world OS gains for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) drugs.

METHODS

Using the National Cancer Institute list of approved cancer drugs and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Treatment Guidelines, we identified all pharmaceutical therapies for mCRPC approved between 2010 and 2019. We obtained RCT OS and rPFS hazard ratios from the pivotal trials used for Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval, and we estimated real-world OS hazard ratios using the Optum Clinformatics Extended DataMart Databases. We modeled real-world OS hazard ratios as a function of both RCT OS and RCT rPFS hazard ratios using Cox proportional hazards regressions, adjusted for year of diagnosis, age, race, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index.

RESULTS

When we did not account for nonrandom real-world selection of patients into receiving a newly approved therapy (ie, "treatment selection bias"), real-world OS gains were 15% lower than associated RCT OS and RCT rPFS benefits. However, after accounting for treatment selection bias in real-world settings, real-world OS gains were almost 28% greater than RCT OS and RCT rPFS benefits. Association between treatment and OS gains increased the longer a new therapy was on the market.

CONCLUSIONS

After adjusting for treatment selection bias, RCT OS and RCT rPFS estimates serve as useful, or even conservative, predictors of RW OS gains.

Integrating alternative therapies in overcoming chemotherapy resistance in tumors

Chemotherapy-resistant tumors present a significant challenge in oncology, often leading to treatment failures owing to mechanisms such as genetic mutations, drug efflux, altered metabolism, and adaptations within the tumor microenvironment. These factors limit the effectiveness of treatment and contribute to tumor resistance. This review highlights the role of alternative therapies aimed at overcoming resistance mechanisms. Several alternative strategies with high efficacy rate against tumor resistance are being explored, including targeted therapies (58-64%), immunotherapy (80%), hormone therapy (22-61%), and emerging approaches such as herbal therapies (90%), probiotics (34-90%), metabolic therapies (> 50%), epigenetic therapies (51-89%), microbiome-based therapies (50%), gene therapy (67-80%), photodynamic therapy/hypothermia (86-99%), and nanotechnology (50-67%). Integrating these alternative strategies with conventional treatments has the potent-al to augment the therapeutic efficacy and patient outcomes. Despite this progress, limitations in cancer therapeutics include the lack of predictive biomarkers, resistance mechanisms, and tumor heterogeneity, all of which contribute to treatment failure and relapse. To address these limitations, advancements in molecular diagnostics, as well as early detection through liquid biopsies, and the use of biomarkers to monitor resistance and guide treatment are crucial. Additionally, expanding clinical trials is essential to validate new therapies and improve patient outcomes.

Early Effects of Bronchoscopic Cryotherapy in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Immunotherapy: A Single-Center Prospective Study

Background/Objectives: Cryotherapy is used for local tissue destruction through rapid freeze-thaw cycles. It induces cancer cell necrosis followed by inflammation in the treated tumor microenvironment, and it stimulates systemic adaptive immunity. Combining cryotherapy with immunotherapy may provide a sustained immune response by preventing T cell exhaustion. Methods: Fifty-five patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer who had received no prior treatment were randomized into two groups in a 1:1 ratio: the bronchoscopic cryotherapy group or the control group. Patients received up to four cycles of pembrolizumab as monotherapy or in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs), complications, tumor size changes, overall response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) were evaluated. Results: Lung tumors, treated with cryotherapy, demonstrated continuous reduction from the baseline (22.4 cm2 vs. 14.4 cm2 vs. 10.2 cm2, p < 0.001). Similar changes were observed in pulmonary tumors in the control group (19.0 cm2 vs. 10.0 cm2, p < 0.001). The median change in pulmonary tumors between two groups was not significant (-42.9% vs. -27.7%, p = 0.175). No significant differences were observed in the ORR (28.6% vs. 23.1%, p = 0.461) or target lesion decrease (-24.0% vs. -23.4%, p = 0.296) between the groups. However, the DCR was significantly higher in the cryotherapy group (95.2% vs. 73.1%, p = 0.049). No cases of serious bleeding during cryotherapy or pneumothorax were observed. Six patients (25.0%) in the cryotherapy group and eight (26.7%) in the control group experienced irAEs. Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that combined bronchoscopic cryotherapy and immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy may reduce the rate of progressive disease in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients while maintaining a satisfactory safety profile.

Recent updates in the therapeutic uses of Pembrolizumab: a brief narrative review

INTRODUCTION

Treatment of cancer has been improved with the discovery of biological drugs that act as immune checkpoint inhibitors. In 2017, FDA designated pembrolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor employed in immunotherapy, as the first tissue-agnostic cancer treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To review pembrolizumab's use in oncology, gather and examine the latest discoveries regarding the effectiveness of pembrolizumab in cancer treatment.

METHODOLOGY

A literature review was conducted through PubMed(Medline) from January 2015 to December 2023 using "pembrolizumab", "cancer" and "treatment" as search terms.

RESULTS

Pembrolizumab demonstrated effectiveness as primary treatment for metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer, unresectable esophageal cancer, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and alternative treatment for notable triple-negative breast cancer, biliary, colorectal, endometrial, renal cell, cervical carcinoma, and high microsatellite instability or mismatch repair deficiencies tumors. Pediatric applications include treatment for refractory Hodgkin lymphoma.

CONCLUSION

Evolving research on pembrolizumab allows a deeper clinical understanding, despite challenges as variable patient responses. Pembrolizumab has emerged as a pivotal breakthrough in cancer treatment, improving patient outcomes and safety.

Clinical Outcomes and Molecular Predictors of Pembrolizumab (Keytruda) as a PD-1 Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor in Advanced and Metastatic Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This systematic review evaluates the clinical outcomes and molecular predictors of response to pembrolizumab in patients with advanced and metastatic cervical cancer. We adhered to the PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews, conducting a database search in PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. The eligibility criteria centered on clinical outcomes, including the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and immune-related biomarkers post-pembrolizumab therapy. We included both prospective and retrospective studies that detailed clinical outcomes and molecular characteristics predictive of therapeutic response. Our search yielded six studies involving 846 patients treated with pembrolizumab from 2017 to 2022. The meta-analysis of these studies showed that pembrolizumab, used as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy, extended the OS by a weighted median of 10.35 months and the PFS by 8.50 months. The treatment demonstrated a pooled objective response rate (ORR) of 22.39%, although the I2 test result of 67.49% showed a high heterogeneity among the studies. Notably, patients with high PD-L1 expression (CPS ≥ 10) experienced improved outcomes in terms of the PFS and OS. The most common complications were fatigue, diarrhea, and immune-related adverse events. Pembrolizumab significantly enhances clinical outcomes in metastatic cervical cancer, particularly among patients with high PD-L1 expression. The drug maintains a good safety profile, reinforcing its treatment potential for patients with advanced and metastatic cervical cancer. Future studies should explore long-term effects and strategies to integrate pembrolizumab optimally into current treatment regimens, aiming to maximize patient benefits and effectively manage side effects.