Dynamic changes in PSA levels predict prognostic outcomes in prostate cancer patients undergoing androgen -deprivation therapy: A multicenter retrospective analysis

Prostate-specific antigen kinetics in Asian patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer treated with apalutamide in the TITAN trial: A post hoc analysis

OBJECTIVE

In the TITAN trial of patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC), deep and rapid prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline with apalutamide plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was associated with longer overall survival (OS), radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), time to PSA progression (TTPP), and time to castration resistance (TTCR) compared with no decline (all p < 0.0001). This post hoc analysis evaluated PSA kinetics in the Asian subpopulation.

METHODS

Data were analyzed for patients enrolled in China, Japan, and Korea and treated with apalutamide (n = 111) or placebo (n = 110) plus ADT. Examined were depth of PSA response, rates of PSA decline, and associations between a deep PSA response and clinical outcomes in apalutamide-treated patients.

RESULTS

Confirmed PSA response rates were higher with apalutamide than placebo: 73.9% versus 33.6% for PSA ≤0.2 ng/mL, 90.1% versus 58.2% for PSA reduction ≥50% [PSA50], and 74.8% versus 25.5% for PSA reduction ≥90% [PSA90]. Median (Q1; Q3) time to PSA ≤0.2 ng/mL, PSA50 and PSA90 response in the apalutamide group was 1.9 (1.0; 3.7), 1.0 (1.0; 1.0), and 1.8 (1.0; 1.9) months, respectively. PSA responses with apalutamide or placebo were consistent irrespective of high- or low-volume disease. Achievement of confirmed PSA ≤0.2 ng/mL or PSA90 response with apalutamide at landmark 3 months was associated with significantly (nominal p-values) longer OS (hazard ratio: 0.23; p = 0.0009), TTPP (0.16; p = 0.0001), TTCR (0.20; p < 0.0001), and time to progression on first subsequent therapy or death (0.19; p < 0.0001) compared with no decline.

CONCLUSION

PSA kinetics have applications for early prognostic evaluation in Asian patients with mCSPC.

Novel Treatment Strategies for Low-Risk Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND

The treatment strategy for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) has changed significantly in recent years. Based on various guidelines, an upfront androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI) is the first choice, but in patients of Asian descent, including Japanese patients, there are a certain number of cases in which androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and CAB are more effective. If patients can be identified who show a marked response to ADT within 12 weeks after the initiation of ADT, which is the inclusion criterion for ARSI clinical trials targeting mCSPC, it would be valuable from an economic standpoint.

METHODS

A total of 218 patients with pure prostate adenocarcinoma and treated with ADT at the Kanazawa University Hospital between January 2000 and December 2020 were included in this study. As a risk classification for mCSPC, in addition to the LATITUDE and CHAARTED criteria, we used the castration-sensitive prostate cancer classification proposed by Kanazawa University (Canazawa), developed by the Department of Urology of Kanazawa University. The Canazawa classification was based on three factors: Gleason pattern 5, bone scan index (BSI) ≥ 1.5, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) ≥ 300 IU/L. It defined patients with one factor or less as low-risk and patients with two or three factors as high-risk. The overall survival (OS) and time to castration resistance (TTCR) were estimated retrospectively using the Kaplan-Meier method, and factors associated with TTCR were identified using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 40.4 months, the median OS period was 85.2 months, and the median TTCR period was 16.4 months. The Canazawa risk classification provided the clearest distinction between the OS and TTCR in mCSPC patients. Multivariate analysis revealed a decrease in PSA levels of <95% at 12 weeks after ADT initiation and was a predictor of short TTCR in low-risk, low-volume patients across all risk classifications.

CONCLUSION

The Canazawa classification differentiated the prognosis of mCSPC patients more clearly. A PSA reduction rate of <95% at 12 w after starting ADT in low-risk, low-volume patients of all risk classifications was significantly shorter than the TTCR. We propose a new treatment strategy, in which patients with low-risk mCSPC are treated with ADT and switched to ARSIs based on the rate of PSA reduction at 12 w.

Comparative effectiveness of multiple androgen receptor signaling inhibitor medicines with androgen deprivation therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: a study in the real world

Background

The current treatment strategy for metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer (mHSPC) is the combination of Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitors (ARSIs) medicines with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). However, there is a lack of real-world data comparing the efficacy of different ARSI pharmaceuticals. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of bicalutamide, abiraterone, enzalutamide, and apalutamide in combination with ADT for patients with mHSPC.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 82 patients diagnosed with mHSPC, including 18 patients treated with abiraterone acetate with prednisone, 21 patients with enzalutamide, 20 patients with apalutamide, and 23 patients with bicalutamide. We evaluated PSA progression-free survival (PSA-PFS), imaging progression-free survival (r PFS), castration resistance progression-free survival (CRPC-PFS), and overall survival (OS) using Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. Additionally, we explored relevant factors affecting prognosis through univariate and multivariate Cox risk-proportionality models. PSA response rates at 3, 6, and 12 months, nadir PSA levels (nPSA), and time to nadir (TTN) in different medication subgroups after treatment were documented, and we used one-way ANOVA to determine the effect of these measures on patient prognosis.

Results

In comparison with bicalutamide, both enzalutamide and apalutamide have shown significant advantages in delaying disease progression among mHSPC patients. Specifically, enzalutamide has been found to significantly prolong PSA-PFS (HR 2.244; 95% CI 1.366-3.685, p=0.001), rPFS (HR 2.539; 95% CI 1.181-5.461; p= 0.007), CRPC-PFS (HR 2.131; 95% CI 1.295-3.506; p= 0.003), and OS (HR 2.06; 95% CI 1.183-3.585; P=0.005). Similarly, apalutamide has significantly extended PSA-PFS (HR 5.071; 95% CI 1.711-15.032; P= 0.003) and CRPC-PFS (HR 6.724; 95% CI 1.976-22.878; P=0.002) among patients. On the other hand, the use of abiraterone in combination with ADT did not demonstrate a significant advantage in delaying diseases progression when compared with the other three agents in mHSPC patients. There were no significant differences in overall adverse event rates among the four pharmaceuticals in terms of safety. Additionally, the observation of PSA kinetics revealed that enzalutamide, apalutamide, and abiraterone acetate had a significant advantage in achieving deep PSA response (PSA ≤ 0.2 ng/ml) compared with bicalutamide (p=0.007 at 12 months). Enzalutamide and apalutamide exhibited preeminence efficacy, with no substantial difference observed between the two medications.

Conclusions

Abiraterone, enzalutamide, and apalutamide were found to significantly reduce and stabilize PSA levels in mHSPC patients more quickly and thoroughly than bicalutamide. Furthermore, enzalutamide and apalutamide were found to significantly prolong survival and delay disease progression in mHSPC patients compared with bicalutamide. It should be noted that abiraterone did not demonstrate a significant advantage in delaying disease compared with enzalutamide and apalutamide. After conducting drug toxicity analyses, it was determined that there were no significant differences among the four drugs.

Organoids: An Emerging Precision Medicine Model for Prostate Cancer Research

Prostate cancer (PCa) has been known as the most prevalent cancer disease and the second leading cause of cancer mortality in men almost all over the globe. There is an urgent need for establishment of PCa models that can recapitulate the progress of genomic landscapes and molecular alterations during development and progression of this disease. Notably, several organoid models have been developed for assessing the complex interaction between PCa and its surrounding microenvironment. In recent years, PCa organoids have been emerged as powerful in vitro 3D model systems that recapitulate the molecular features (such as genomic/epigenomic changes and tumor microenvironment) of PCa metastatic tumors. In addition, application of organoid technology in mechanistic studies (i.e., for understanding cellular/subcellular and molecular alterations) and translational medicine has been recognized as a promising approach for facilitating the development of potential biomarkers and novel therapeutic strategies. In this review, we summarize the application of PCa organoids in the high-throughput screening and establishment of relevant xenografts for developing novel therapeutics for metastatic, castration resistant, and neuroendocrine PCa. These organoid-based studies are expected to expand our knowledge from basic research to clinical applications for PCa diseases. Furthermore, we also highlight the optimization of PCa cultures and establishment of promising 3D organoid models for in vitro and in vivo investigations, ultimately facilitating mechanistic studies and development of novel clinical diagnosis/prognosis and therapies for PCa.